Marriage Has Never Been Just Between A Man And A Woman

gay marriage is just step one towards the total destruction of marriage. If gay marriage becomes legal then there is no legal defence that can be brought to deny bigamy, polygamy, mother/daughter, father/son, brother/sister, et al.

the legal argument will be that those people are being denied their civil rights to marry and live with who they want. Gay marriage laws will be brought up as the precedent. It is a slippery slope. many of you refuse to acknowledge that reality, but it is there nonetheless.

Since we are a nation of laws, this will be decided on legal precedence, and all forms of marriage will become legal--------and the lawyers will be celebrating all the litigation to come when there is a divorce in a polygamous marriage, or an inheritence fight between two married brothers and their married sisters.

Its where you on the left are taking us---------------wake the fuck up.
 
gay marriage is just step one towards the total destruction of marriage. If gay marriage becomes legal then there is no legal defence that can be brought to deny bigamy, polygamy, mother/daughter, father/son, brother/sister, et al.

In 17 states and the District of Columbia it is legal. Destroyed yet? Gays have been legally marrying in Massachusetts for a decade. Anyone marrying family members, animals or multiple people there? How long does it take?


the legal argument will be that those people are being denied their civil rights to marry and live with who they want. Gay marriage laws will be brought up as the precedent. It is a slippery slope. many of you refuse to acknowledge that reality, but it is there nonetheless.

No, the precedent is here:

Loving v Virginia (1967)
Zablocki v Wisconsin (1978)
Turner v Safley (1987)

And since those cases didn't bring about dogs and cats living together, why do you assume that because non familial consenting adult same sex couples are now marrying that we must slippery slope to such an inevitable end? Countries with marriage equality have not seen a significant rise in challenges to their bans on polygamy. I should also point out that countries that have legalized polygamy don't have marriage equality for gays.


Since we are a nation of laws, this will be decided on legal precedence, and all forms of marriage will become legal--------and the lawyers will be celebrating all the litigation to come when there is a divorce in a polygamous marriage, or an inheritence fight between two married brothers and their married sisters.

Its where you on the left are taking us---------------wake the fuck up.

The legal precedent was decided in 1967, 78 and 87. No Fish, siblings will not be able to legally marry. Polygamy...well, it's a true long shot looking at it from an oddsmaker perspective. I certainly wouldn't put any money on it when you look at the actual data...and there is centuries of data on polygamy. It was popular among the 1% back in the olden days.

It still is popular in some parts of the country...why haven't they slippery sloped to gay marriage?

The Big Question: What's the history of polygamy, and how serious a problem is it in Africa?

How common is it?

In 1998 the University of Wisconsin surveyed more than a thousand societies. Of these just 186 were monogamous. Some 453 had occasional polygyny and in 588 more it was quite common. Just four featured polyandry. Some anthropologists believe that polygamy has been the norm through human history. In 2003, New Scientist magazine suggested that, until 10,000 years ago, most children had been sired by comparatively few men. Variations in DNA, it said, showed that the distribution of X chromosomes suggested that a few men seem to have had greater input into the gene pool than the rest. By contrast most women seemed to get to pass on their genes. Humans, like their primate forefathers, it said, were at least "mildly polygynous".

Polygamy is very common in the animist and Muslim communities of West Africa. In Senegal, for example, nearly 47 per cent of marriages are said to feature multiple women. It is relatively high still in many Arab nations; among the Bedouin population of Israel it stands at about 30 per cent. According to The Salt Lake Tribune as many as 10,000 Mormon fundamentalists in 2005 lived in polygamous families.

imgw_polygamy-map-2.jpg


6a00d8341c630a53ef0167666634a0970b-pi
 
gay marriage is just step one towards the total destruction of marriage. If gay marriage becomes legal then there is no legal defence that can be brought to deny bigamy, polygamy, mother/daughter, father/son, brother/sister, et al.

That's absurd.

btw, what is your argument against a brother and sister getting married?

Let's hear it.
 
Pedophilia was an accepted practice in many civilizations. Doesn't make it right.

Why is it that some of you insist on comparing pedophilia to homosexuality? They are completely different things. One is without doubt a crime while the other is not a crime at all.
Crime against nature

How do you know what's natural and what isn't or why it should or shouldn't be called a crime?

Is heterosexual oral sex a crime against nature? Is heterosexual anal sex a crime against nature? Is taking pills to prevent pregnancy a crime against nature? Is the taking of vows of celibacy a crime against nature?
 
Why is it that some of you insist on comparing pedophilia to homosexuality? They are completely different things. One is without doubt a crime while the other is not a crime at all.
Crime against nature

How do you know what's natural and what isn't or why it should or shouldn't be called a crime?

Is heterosexual oral sex a crime against nature? Is heterosexual anal sex a crime against nature? Is taking pills to prevent pregnancy a crime against nature? Is the taking of vows of celibacy a crime against nature?
Some crimes are worse then others, homosexuality one of the bigger ones
 
Crime against nature

How do you know what's natural and what isn't or why it should or shouldn't be called a crime?

Is heterosexual oral sex a crime against nature? Is heterosexual anal sex a crime against nature? Is taking pills to prevent pregnancy a crime against nature? Is the taking of vows of celibacy a crime against nature?
Some crimes are worse then others, homosexuality one of the bigger ones

The vile nasty lies spewed by some rw's is far far worse than any of the so-called crimes they're against.

You really are a sick bunch.
 
Crime against nature

How do you know what's natural and what isn't or why it should or shouldn't be called a crime?

Is heterosexual oral sex a crime against nature? Is heterosexual anal sex a crime against nature? Is taking pills to prevent pregnancy a crime against nature? Is the taking of vows of celibacy a crime against nature?
Some crimes are worse then others, homosexuality one of the bigger ones

lol, is that a yes or a no?

Which then is the worse crime? A man and a women who have anal and oral and vaginal sex,

or 2 women who have oral sex?
 
How do you know what's natural and what isn't or why it should or shouldn't be called a crime?

Is heterosexual oral sex a crime against nature? Is heterosexual anal sex a crime against nature? Is taking pills to prevent pregnancy a crime against nature? Is the taking of vows of celibacy a crime against nature?
Some crimes are worse then others, homosexuality one of the bigger ones

lol, is that a yes or a no?

Which then is the worse crime? A man and a women who have anal and oral and vaginal sex,

or 2 women who have oral sex?
The homosexuality
 

BS.

If a gay male goes to a gym and showers with a room full of males, the gender he finds the most sexually appealing, other men, he will not be arrested

If a heterosexual male goes to a gym and showers with a room full of naked females, the gender he is the most sexually attracted to, he WILL be arrested.

When will Heterosexual stand up and assert they are being oppressed!

This whole debate is just silly. Separate but equal is OK only if it oppresses heterosexuals.
 
in the Genesis account, we note that the newly created Eve was Adam — his very flesh and bone, and for that reason, the Bible says, Adam called her woman, and, for that reason a man is to leave mother and father and be united to his wife to become one flesh (v24).

For what reason is man to marry a wife? Because woman was originally a constituent part of man, she must return to become one with him again, so that the full expression and design of God's image in human beings can be revealed.

Here we have another parallel between the Old Testament type and the New Testament fulfillment. Eve was to reunite with her source and become one with him—just as we are with Christ, as He prayed in John 17. Sexuality, therefore, is a prefigurement of the intimate relationship that God desires to have with man. In fact, the marital union and covenant, in all its dimensions, is meant to gloriously reveal the very image of God in ways that we can only begin to understand.
 
Why is it that some of you insist on comparing pedophilia to homosexuality? They are completely different things.

They are perfectly comparable. Both are sexual proclivities that can't result in procreation.

You need to learn a little something about consent...before you get yourself into trouble.

That's a completely separate issue. This is about the nature of he compulsion, not the law.
 

Forum List

Back
Top