Marriage Equality Cases are now in all but 3 Homophobic States

[Zombie_Pundit]

Marriage equality has always existed. Men and women have been allowed to marry each other regardless of whether they like to fudge pack or muff dive. As long as they marry the opposite gender. Always been allowed.

This is not a sound argument. The vulgar terms don't help.

Please post your reasoning.

On which part would you like me to elaborate, the obvious fallacies or the vulgarity?

 

[buckeye45_73]

This is not a sound argument. The vulgar terms don't help.

Please post your reasoning.

On which part would you like me to elaborate, the obvious fallacies or the vulgarity?

What you don't play prison boy with your friends? Why is it vulgarity when you describe the activity involved? You're such a square, loosen up.

 

[bodecea]

Marriage equality has always existed. Men and women have been allowed to marry each other regardless of whether they like to fudge pack or muff dive. As long as they marry the opposite gender. Always been allowed.

So...you support gender discrimination.

 

[Pop23]

Marriage equality has always existed. Men and women have been allowed to marry each other regardless of whether they like to fudge pack or muff dive. As long as they marry the opposite gender. Always been allowed.

So...you support gender discrimination.

Restrooms and showers are. Do you have a point?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Neither is required, since they are both garbage. That we just dump in a hole in the ground, where it belongs.

That's just your close minded, analytically-challenged opinion. Try.

Nope. Your arguments are as dead as your mind.

You still have yet to rebut intellectually.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Marriage equality has always existed. Men and women have been allowed to marry each other regardless of whether they like to fudge pack or muff dive. As long as they marry the opposite gender. Always been allowed.

So...you support gender discrimination.

What does that have to do with anything?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

That's just your close minded, analytically-challenged opinion. Try.

Nope. Your arguments are as dead as your mind.

You still have yet to rebut intellectually.

I did, many years ago, when it mattered, before people like you were relegated to the past. Your version of "equality" was found lacking. Sorry.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Having failed at the ballot box the homo lobby has managed to impose gay marriage through judicial dictatorship, the will of the people be damned.

Ignorant, hateful nonsense.

In our Constitutional Republic the issue was never to be placed on the ballot to begin with, as the people have never had the authority to determine who will or will not have his civil liberties.

The notion of subjecting Americans’ civil rights to ‘majority rule’ is repugnant to the Constitution, which is why such state measures seeking to deny gay Americans their rights are being invalidated.

 

[Seawytch]

Having failed at the ballot box the homo lobby has managed to impose gay marriage through judicial dictatorship, the will of the people be damned.

Ignorant, hateful nonsense.

In our Constitutional Republic the issue was never to be placed on the ballot to begin with, as the people have never had the authority to determine who will or will not have his civil liberties.

The notion of subjecting Americans’ civil rights to ‘majority rule’ is repugnant to the Constitution, which is why such state measures seeking to deny gay Americans their rights are being invalidated.

They're just being sore losers. Not a single case has gone "their way" so they simply must decry "judicial activism". It's just angry posturing. The dying gasps of the anti gay crowd.

 

[The Rabbi]

Having failed at the ballot box the homo lobby has managed to impose gay marriage through judicial dictatorship, the will of the people be damned.

Ignorant, hateful nonsense.

In our Constitutional Republic the issue was never to be placed on the ballot to begin with, as the people have never had the authority to determine who will or will not have his civil liberties.

The notion of subjecting Americans’ civil rights to ‘majority rule’ is repugnant to the Constitution, which is why such state measures seeking to deny gay Americans their rights are being invalidated.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The power to decide what is and is not marriage is a power of the states. It has always been seen that way. There were very limited exceptions made, i.e. interracial marriage. Otherwise it has been for states to decide what constitutes marriage.
Gays hold exactly the same rights as anyone else. It is not an issue of civil rights at all, no matter how many times the ignorant try that argument.

 

[The Rabbi]

Having failed at the ballot box the homo lobby has managed to impose gay marriage through judicial dictatorship, the will of the people be damned.

Ignorant, hateful nonsense.

In our Constitutional Republic the issue was never to be placed on the ballot to begin with, as the people have never had the authority to determine who will or will not have his civil liberties.

The notion of subjecting Americans’ civil rights to ‘majority rule’ is repugnant to the Constitution, which is why such state measures seeking to deny gay Americans their rights are being invalidated.

They're just being sore losers. Not a single case has gone "their way" so they simply must decry "judicial activism". It's just angry posturing. The dying gasps of the anti gay crowd.

"We're winning" works right up until you lose.

 

[Seawytch]

Ignorant, hateful nonsense.

In our Constitutional Republic the issue was never to be placed on the ballot to begin with, as the people have never had the authority to determine who will or will not have his civil liberties.

The notion of subjecting Americans’ civil rights to ‘majority rule’ is repugnant to the Constitution, which is why such state measures seeking to deny gay Americans their rights are being invalidated.

They're just being sore losers. Not a single case has gone "their way" so they simply must decry "judicial activism". It's just angry posturing. The dying gasps of the anti gay crowd.

"We're winning" works right up until you lose.

With a 15-0 record...I'm confident going into the finals.