Except for Cannon. Right?How about a real judge that upholds the law? We seem to be fresh out of those.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except for Cannon. Right?How about a real judge that upholds the law? We seem to be fresh out of those.
Prosecutors have a legal theory it has little to do with actual law. An activist judge may convict but it will be overturned on appeal. You got a lot of nothing and big time election interference.Prosecutors have enough evidence to charge a former President. Something not done lightly. In fact you'd have to be an extreme criminal to be a former president and get charged. It's never been done before. And if Trump were innocent, this will help him in November 2024. But you know he's not going to be exhonorated at all these trials. Prosecutors have tons of evidence. Which of the 4 cases is the strongest? IDK. They are all pretty strong.
You can't make up 4 indictments and 100's of counts. We would all see right through it that it's just politics. This is not just politics. This is a criminal who wants to be POTUS again.
I always compared Trump to a mafia boss. But I never imagined he'd actually get charged with RICO. This is fucking great.
Sorry, not a witch hunt. You'd have to be a drooling fool to think that.
Now you could be like my brother and nephew and say you don't care if he's a criminal. You're so sick of WOKE you just don't care. Plus you might convince yourself "they are all criminals". But watch. That's no defense in a court of law.
Trump won't be able to say what about Hunter at his trial. Or what about BLM at his insurrection trial. Nope. Those arguments won't fly there. But you feel free to continue using those kinds of tactics.
If everything does not go your way you whine. Why?Except for Cannon. Right?
You are the whiny ass titty baby on this site. You declared all judges were crooked, not me.If everything does not go your way you whine. Why?
You are so full of shit I can smell you through my keyboard.Leftists are still blubbering about supposedly "classified documents" that Trump took with him when he left the White House. They claim to support Law and Order, but the truth is they don't even know the law.Leftists are excited. They’ve got him now because Mark Meadows, Trump’s former chief of staff, doesn’t recall Trump declassifying the documents later seized at Mar-a-Lago. In fact, that’s a big “who cares?”. Trump didn’t need to follow bureaucratic requirements to declassify anything. As one with plenary power over national security under the Constitution, merely by taking them with him, he declassified them.ABC News' story :
Trump is correct. He declassified the documents by taking the documents. That’s all he needed to do.Let me explain.National security questions belong solely to the president. That’s not me saying that; that’s the Supreme Court saying that:
The majority are corrupt. If you cannot figure the gross disdain they show for the rule of law you are an idiot that defends criminals. Glad that is settled.You are the whiny ass titty baby on this site. You declared all judges were crooked, not me.
Why are you so wrong with every post?
Seek help.
Um...retard?Leftists are still blubbering about supposedly "classified documents" that Trump took with him when he left the White House. They claim to support Law and Order, but the truth is they don't even know the law.Leftists are excited. They’ve got him now because Mark Meadows, Trump’s former chief of staff, doesn’t recall Trump declassifying the documents later seized at Mar-a-Lago. In fact, that’s a big “who cares?”. Trump didn’t need to follow bureaucratic requirements to declassify anything. As one with plenary power over national security under the Constitution, merely by taking them with him, he declassified them.ABC News' story :
Trump is correct. He declassified the documents by taking the documents. That’s all he needed to do.Let me explain.National security questions belong solely to the president. That’s not me saying that; that’s the Supreme Court saying that:
Their stuff got lost in the shuffle. Careless, sloppy, call it what you will. Neither Biden nor Pence suffer from the personality disorder Trump is afflicted with.
Another fantasy post you can't prove. I could retort that It's only the FedSociety trump appointed judges that are crooked. Is that true? Possibly. And more likely. But you will throw a tantrum about that. So I will throw your gross disdain back atcha!The majority are corrupt. If you cannot figure the gross disdain they show for the rule of law you are an idiot that defends criminals. Glad that is settled.
Your senile messiah is who is going down, fuckstick. Trump will be president in about 18 months and most of the Biden family will be indicted the minute Trump gets into office.Your idol is going down, fucking moron. Best that you accept it.
You are talking directly from your ass.Bullshit
If you were really involved in classified information you would know better.
The DOCUMENT is not classified as much as the INFORMATION in that document is classified
A President removing a document from a SCIF does not declassify it
Everyone who has a copy of that document must be notified that document is now declassified b
Every person who has a document with that information must be notified that information is now unclassified.
A President who thinks he should declassify information just because he is too lazy to protect it is a sorry excuse for someone in charge of our nations security
I can prove it with no evidentiary hearings concerning the obvious fraud in 2020.Another fantasy post you can't prove. I could retort that It's only the FedSociety trump appointed judges that are crooked. Is that true? Possibly. And more likely. But you will throw a tantrum about that. So I will throw your gross disdain back atcha!
Yes...it does.A President removing a document from a SCIF does not declassify it
Doesn’t disproveYes...it does.
Read for yourself.
Although all classified documents can be viewed in a SCIF, it is not required that documents in the least restrictive classification categories be viewed in those facilities. The facilities are used typically for materials categorized as “top secret/sensitive compartmented information.”
Can classified documents be removed from secure facilities? Sometimes. - Poynter
Appearing on 'Fox News Sunday,' a GOP congressman oversimplifies a claim on classified documents amid the Biden investigation.www.poynter.org
In five years of service I NEVER ONCE of a Top Secret or TS/SCI document EVER leaving a SCIF.
Ever.
Why not?I declassified them with my mind will not cut it in court.
Didn't know he needed a justificationGood question
What was Trumps justification for declassifying ?
I didn’t want to be bothered with securing them is not a good answer