barryqwalsh
Gold Member
- Sep 30, 2014
- 3,397
- 250
- 140
Manus closure must not weaken border protection
The Turnbull government’s decision, after talks with Papua New Guinea, to close the Manus Island immigration detention centre is a sign Australia’s tough border protection regime, including offshore processing, has worked. The move was anticipated following a PNG Supreme Court ruling in April that the centre was illegal. As Immigration Minister Peter Dutton said last week, one of the benefits of stopping the boats is that Australia now can do without the capacity it provided. As a result of the pending closure, and the leaking of thousands of files alleging serious abuse and self-harm among asylum-seekers on Nauru, the Greens and refugee activists claim offshore processing has had its day.
Abandoning the option, however, would risk a return to the failures of the Rudd-Gillard era in which 50,000 asylum-seekers arrived by boat and 1200 drowned after Labor scrapped the Howard government’s Pacific Solution. Violence and disruption since German Chancellor Angela Merkel opened the doors to one million refugees last year underline the risks of weakening border protection in the current international environment. Australia — and thousands of the world’s neediest refugees — are far better off if our government sticks to a generous, orderly refugee processing system through official channels.
Refugee advocates want detainees in offshore centres resettled in Australia and West Australian Premier Colin Barnett says his state would accept some. However well-intentioned, such an outcome would be a virtual green light to people-smugglers to resume their deadly trade. A decision to allow current detainees into Australia would be used by people-smugglers to convince potential passengers they would reach Australia sooner or later. For the same reason, settling refugees in New Zealand would also be a mistake because of the free movement of citizens allowed informally under the Trans-Tasman Travel Arrangement.
Under the agreement between Labor and PNG, asylum-seekers processed on Manus Island and found to be refugees are free to settle in PNG. They can be resettled in a third country, but not Australia. Until the Turnbull government reaches an agreement with a suitable third country, the refugees’ choice between PNG or going home must remain in place. The government could also consider consolidating offshore processing by looking at transferring detainees to Nauru.
READ MORE
Quiz time
JAMES MORROW
Central bankers rethink inflation
DAVID UREN
MORE STORIES
MOST POPULAR IN OPINION
- The Australian
- 12:00AM August 22, 2016
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on email
- Share more...
The Turnbull government’s decision, after talks with Papua New Guinea, to close the Manus Island immigration detention centre is a sign Australia’s tough border protection regime, including offshore processing, has worked. The move was anticipated following a PNG Supreme Court ruling in April that the centre was illegal. As Immigration Minister Peter Dutton said last week, one of the benefits of stopping the boats is that Australia now can do without the capacity it provided. As a result of the pending closure, and the leaking of thousands of files alleging serious abuse and self-harm among asylum-seekers on Nauru, the Greens and refugee activists claim offshore processing has had its day.
Abandoning the option, however, would risk a return to the failures of the Rudd-Gillard era in which 50,000 asylum-seekers arrived by boat and 1200 drowned after Labor scrapped the Howard government’s Pacific Solution. Violence and disruption since German Chancellor Angela Merkel opened the doors to one million refugees last year underline the risks of weakening border protection in the current international environment. Australia — and thousands of the world’s neediest refugees — are far better off if our government sticks to a generous, orderly refugee processing system through official channels.
Refugee advocates want detainees in offshore centres resettled in Australia and West Australian Premier Colin Barnett says his state would accept some. However well-intentioned, such an outcome would be a virtual green light to people-smugglers to resume their deadly trade. A decision to allow current detainees into Australia would be used by people-smugglers to convince potential passengers they would reach Australia sooner or later. For the same reason, settling refugees in New Zealand would also be a mistake because of the free movement of citizens allowed informally under the Trans-Tasman Travel Arrangement.
Under the agreement between Labor and PNG, asylum-seekers processed on Manus Island and found to be refugees are free to settle in PNG. They can be resettled in a third country, but not Australia. Until the Turnbull government reaches an agreement with a suitable third country, the refugees’ choice between PNG or going home must remain in place. The government could also consider consolidating offshore processing by looking at transferring detainees to Nauru.
READ MORE
Quiz time
JAMES MORROW
Central bankers rethink inflation
DAVID UREN
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on email
- Share more...
MORE STORIES
Borders must stay strong
US hapless as Putin marches in
Games of triumph and disaster
Debt burden’s next generation
Program is transforming lives
MOST POPULAR IN OPINION
Be more transparent, Mr Soros
Kill 18C to help combat racism
Mudslingers distort Nauru’s image
Freedom is indivisible
- A NOTE ABOUT RELEVANT ADVERTISING: We collect information about the content (including ads) you use across this site and use it to make both advertising and content more relevant to you on our network and other sites. This is also known as Online Behavioural Advertising. You can find out more about our policy and your choices, including how to opt-out here
- Desktop Site
- Help
- Terms of Use
- Privacy
- Subscription Terms
- Support
- Copyright The Australian. All times AEST (GMT +10:00)
