jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,368
- 1,130
- Thread starter
- #61
The problem is that the cost of the drug testing will far exceed the money saved. Has to be a better way.
i am not convinced of that
i have had to have folks tested for certain contracts
and it usually runs about 80 dollars
the state certainly doesnt think so
since not all people will be tested
it may cost more for the handful of cases
where a guardian ad litem has to be appointed
however in the mean time the children
will get the benefits the people of the state want them to have
Multiply 80 dollars times the number of welfare recipients.
Now subtract the number of welfare recipients actually doing drugs.
Does the benefit outweigh the cost?
I'd google it but I have to go to bed. I'll check it out tomorrow.
not all welfare recipients will get tested
only a handful will get tested
yes later