Mandate Electric Cars to save the environment.

I will always be against the government telling anyone how to live, it's why I am still in the US to begin with, they aren't suppose to be able to do this. Now we are not much different from Japan, and becoming more like China every year.
 
We should also provide tax breaks like the ones Bush gave for people to go buy HUMMERS
Tax breaks to buy Hummers?

I'm so certain you can back that assertion with a credible link.

Wait, no I'm not..... Forgot the idiot who posted that never backs up anything said.

And it's FUEL, idiot. Not "fule."

Well, old man, look who is the idiot;

BELLEVUE -- Standing next to his shiny Hummer H2, John Brightbill recounted a perk that a fellow owner noted about driving this immense sport utility vehicle.

"He said some young women wanted to drive around the block with him," said Brightbill, a real estate broker. "That hasn't happened to me yet."


Gilbert W. Arias / P-I
Real estate broker John Brightbill stands beside his Hummer H2. He is considering the tax write-off -- "I've been using it partially for business."
But some people have a more practical reason for laying down $50,000 to $60,000 to buy an H2: a federal tax deduction of nearly $38,000.

"The government is sort of subsidizing people for buying these land yachts," said Henry Pierman, a certified public accountant with Hauser & Associates in Bellevue. "It's one of those odd things that happen. I would say maybe half of the CPAs are aware of this loophole."
It's not just a Hummer, it's a tax break
 
We should also provide tax breaks like the ones Bush gave for people to go buy HUMMERS
Tax breaks to buy Hummers?

I'm so certain you can back that assertion with a credible link.

Wait, no I'm not..... Forgot the idiot who posted that never backs up anything said.

And it's FUEL, idiot. Not "fule."

Well, old man, look who is the idiot;

BELLEVUE -- Standing next to his shiny Hummer H2, John Brightbill recounted a perk that a fellow owner noted about driving this immense sport utility vehicle.

"He said some young women wanted to drive around the block with him," said Brightbill, a real estate broker. "That hasn't happened to me yet."


Gilbert W. Arias / P-I
Real estate broker John Brightbill stands beside his Hummer H2. He is considering the tax write-off -- "I've been using it partially for business."
But some people have a more practical reason for laying down $50,000 to $60,000 to buy an H2: a federal tax deduction of nearly $38,000.

"The government is sort of subsidizing people for buying these land yachts," said Henry Pierman, a certified public accountant with Hauser & Associates in Bellevue. "It's one of those odd things that happen. I would say maybe half of the CPAs are aware of this loophole."
It's not just a Hummer, it's a tax break
Clearly you're a ignorant idiot. This was covered in the thread, and the assertion that it was Booooosh who made this happen was blown away totally.

Aren't you embarrassed now?
 
Tax breaks to buy Hummers?

I'm so certain you can back that assertion with a credible link.

Wait, no I'm not..... Forgot the idiot who posted that never backs up anything said.

And it's FUEL, idiot. Not "fule."

Well, old man, look who is the idiot;

BELLEVUE -- Standing next to his shiny Hummer H2, John Brightbill recounted a perk that a fellow owner noted about driving this immense sport utility vehicle.

"He said some young women wanted to drive around the block with him," said Brightbill, a real estate broker. "That hasn't happened to me yet."


Gilbert W. Arias / P-I
Real estate broker John Brightbill stands beside his Hummer H2. He is considering the tax write-off -- "I've been using it partially for business."
But some people have a more practical reason for laying down $50,000 to $60,000 to buy an H2: a federal tax deduction of nearly $38,000.

"The government is sort of subsidizing people for buying these land yachts," said Henry Pierman, a certified public accountant with Hauser & Associates in Bellevue. "It's one of those odd things that happen. I would say maybe half of the CPAs are aware of this loophole."
It's not just a Hummer, it's a tax break
Clearly you're a ignorant idiot. This was covered in the thread, and the assertion that it was Booooosh who made this happen was blown away totally.

Aren't you embarrassed now?
he SHOULD be
but i doubt he will admit it
 
The cool thing about what you are proposing is if you had 4 electric motors at each wheel you could transfer upto 100% to the wheel with traction.
Wheelmotors is what locomotives use. However, not practical in the scaled down version. At first blush it does sound right, and my design originally incorporated them. But I quickly realized that it was really more for show than go, just vanity. Just for showing off. When I need 4WD I can get it mechanically. You don't need all four wheels driving at highway speeds anyway, two of them would just be idling most of the time, so why bother? Locomotives however, DO need all 16 wheels powered at all times.

Mine uses a single motor with limited slip differential. It just quite simply replaces the original engine and tranny in the drive train. It's also, AC instead of DC. Far more efficient, you have far better control, need much fewer batteries, everything's smaller from the wires to the controller to the stator. Higher voltage means much fewer amps to do the same work. Fewer amps also means alot less heat. You get alot more bang for the buck.

It's all controlled by a PLC. (Programmable Logic Controller) Everything on the vehicle. Everything for controls is digital +-5 volt, from the footfeed commutator to the turn signals to the headlamp switches. Everything. No matter what control is used, it's +-5 volt and goes as an input to the PLC. No 12 volt anywhere but on the output side of the PLC and PoU. (Point of Use)

The PLC is also constantly monitoring speed, (Yes we have cruise control) AC motor performance, the DC bus, the 12 volt system, the hydrogen generator, and even monitors and controls the diesel genset! It also even knows if you have buckled your seat belts or not, and reminds you! Tells you if a door is ajar, all that rot. Controls the climate in the cabin! Everything cars have today, every little bell and whistle, this PLC the size of a brick, controls. And it's programmed from your laptop!

The motor is controlled by a variable frequency drive. It utilizes the onboard DC bus I'll be maintaining with the batteries and the genset, and converts the current into a digitally simulated 3 phase AC waveform. This allows complete control of all parameters in the motor -- from frequency, amperage, magnetism, everything. Can actually magnetically LOCK and hold the rotor completely if need be. This allows me to use commercially available AC motors, and not have to have a custom one made! Important point here, this also makes this easily built and sold as a refit kit for existing vehicles of any size and type! THAT's recycling!

By the way, you only need to start the diesel for longer trips. The PLC program decides if we need the diesel, and when. And starts and stops it as necessary, and even controls its RPM. Most little in-town stuff won't require it, since you can plug in when you get home. But for longer trips, you're looking at extremely good fuel mileage at highway speeds. It'll be upwards of 200 MPG if not better. Which is just the opposite of what you get with a hybrid -- they're actually worse on the highway than they are in city driving.

Also, this has Hydrogen injection to supplement the diesel. I have had this on one of my diesel pick-ups for a couple of years. With this diesel-electric powerplant, there's ample power to make lots of hydrogen. In a diesel, hydrogen is very beneficial both for performance, mileage, and also for reducing wear. The only way Hydrogen is viable to make -- where you get back almost (but not quite) what you put into it to make it -- is as a supplement to your diesel fuel. (We cannot change the laws of thermodynamics, for starters.) But, since I have the capability of generating 5kva at all times anyway, it would be nonsensical not to make hydrogen during the process, to supplement the diesel.

Everything on this is in my computer, in my SolidWorks design program. A wonderful piece of software, allows me to design, build and even test everything in the virtual world. You mentioned BMW and VW earlier? They use SolidWorks or a similar design program as well.

The EV race car you gave us the video of earlier? I went to the guy's website and studied his specs. He's easily got $300,000 in that car. It has a 30 mile range at normal driving, then it needs plugged in. It's designed as a novelty drag racer, basically a rich man's toy -- he makes no pretense at all of it being in any way practical to own for just driving around, and he cannot take it on trips of any distance without trailering it and hauling it with his..... Diesel Dually pick-up.

Not cutting it down, it just is what it is. It's exactly what he wanted to build. I want to build a 200 MPG Hummer, and it's a much taller, much more challenging -- and much more universally beneficial, order.

By the way, I chose a Hummer for the symbolism. It's the poster boy of excess and waste, almost universally. The shock value of converting it to the most practical, most luxurious, and definitely easily the highest mileage vehicle around is what I'm going for.

I am waiting for a junked one to pop up, which isn't totaled. That I can buy pretty cheap. I'm not getting any gubmint grants or funding to do this, so I have to be miserly. When the right Hummer pops up, this all starts in the real world. Gonna cost me around $122,000, give or take 5 or 6, to build this prototype.

Now I hope you understand why I so strenuously object to the OP of this thread. We don't need any freaking mandates or subsidies from the gubmint to make shit work. It only stymies true progress in most cases. And also causes alot of waste, because people who get grants don't worry too much about being miserly.

If I got a gubmint grant for this, I would fast-track it and not worry too much about getting a junked Hummer on the cheap. I would go out and buy a used one and pay twice as much or more. I wouldn't have the incentive to really design this thing, it would be mostly trial and error. I would probably hire help as well -- all of this driving the cost up to probably triple or more what I am projecting.

See?



LOVE IT MAN!!! ABSOLUTELY LOVE IT!! My mechanic has prob a 90 something Suburban and he gets like 30 mpg just by doing little tweeks here and there. I think he said it was carberated and I think he took some emmisions controls off of it but said it will pass ANY test. He is a really cool guy so I know he's not feeding me any BS. Just not his style.

Like I said your idea sounds cool as hell and I REALLY hope it works out the way you want.
 
You mentioned that you heard about the BMW/VW diesel cars but didn't say much more. The one thing that is kind of weird about them is they have to have I don't know the precise addative "uriea" something like that but would only need to be filled like every 30,000 miles. They sound pretty nice to me but as a guy who OBVIOUSLY knows a lot more about it than I what do you think?
 
The cool thing about what you are proposing is if you had 4 electric motors at each wheel you could transfer upto 100% to the wheel with traction.
Wheelmotors is what locomotives use. However, not practical in the scaled down version. At first blush it does sound right, and my design originally incorporated them. But I quickly realized that it was really more for show than go, just vanity. Just for showing off. When I need 4WD I can get it mechanically. You don't need all four wheels driving at highway speeds anyway, two of them would just be idling most of the time, so why bother? Locomotives however, DO need all 16 wheels powered at all times.

Mine uses a single motor with limited slip differential. It just quite simply replaces the original engine and tranny in the drive train. It's also, AC instead of DC. Far more efficient, you have far better control, need much fewer batteries, everything's smaller from the wires to the controller to the stator. Higher voltage means much fewer amps to do the same work. Fewer amps also means alot less heat. You get alot more bang for the buck.

It's all controlled by a PLC. (Programmable Logic Controller) Everything on the vehicle. Everything for controls is digital +-5 volt, from the footfeed commutator to the turn signals to the headlamp switches. Everything. No matter what control is used, it's +-5 volt and goes as an input to the PLC. No 12 volt anywhere but on the output side of the PLC and PoU. (Point of Use)

The PLC is also constantly monitoring speed, (Yes we have cruise control) AC motor performance, the DC bus, the 12 volt system, the hydrogen generator, and even monitors and controls the diesel genset! It also even knows if you have buckled your seat belts or not, and reminds you! Tells you if a door is ajar, all that rot. Controls the climate in the cabin! Everything cars have today, every little bell and whistle, this PLC the size of a brick, controls. And it's programmed from your laptop!

The motor is controlled by a variable frequency drive. It utilizes the onboard DC bus I'll be maintaining with the batteries and the genset, and converts the current into a digitally simulated 3 phase AC waveform. This allows complete control of all parameters in the motor -- from frequency, amperage, magnetism, everything. Can actually magnetically LOCK and hold the rotor completely if need be. This allows me to use commercially available AC motors, and not have to have a custom one made! Important point here, this also makes this easily built and sold as a refit kit for existing vehicles of any size and type! THAT's recycling!

By the way, you only need to start the diesel for longer trips. The PLC program decides if we need the diesel, and when. And starts and stops it as necessary, and even controls its RPM. Most little in-town stuff won't require it, since you can plug in when you get home. But for longer trips, you're looking at extremely good fuel mileage at highway speeds. It'll be upwards of 200 MPG if not better. Which is just the opposite of what you get with a hybrid -- they're actually worse on the highway than they are in city driving.

Also, this has Hydrogen injection to supplement the diesel. I have had this on one of my diesel pick-ups for a couple of years. With this diesel-electric powerplant, there's ample power to make lots of hydrogen. In a diesel, hydrogen is very beneficial both for performance, mileage, and also for reducing wear. The only way Hydrogen is viable to make -- where you get back almost (but not quite) what you put into it to make it -- is as a supplement to your diesel fuel. (We cannot change the laws of thermodynamics, for starters.) But, since I have the capability of generating 5kva at all times anyway, it would be nonsensical not to make hydrogen during the process, to supplement the diesel.

Everything on this is in my computer, in my SolidWorks design program. A wonderful piece of software, allows me to design, build and even test everything in the virtual world. You mentioned BMW and VW earlier? They use SolidWorks or a similar design program as well.

The EV race car you gave us the video of earlier? I went to the guy's website and studied his specs. He's easily got $300,000 in that car. It has a 30 mile range at normal driving, then it needs plugged in. It's designed as a novelty drag racer, basically a rich man's toy -- he makes no pretense at all of it being in any way practical to own for just driving around, and he cannot take it on trips of any distance without trailering it and hauling it with his..... Diesel Dually pick-up.

Not cutting it down, it just is what it is. It's exactly what he wanted to build. I want to build a 200 MPG Hummer, and it's a much taller, much more challenging -- and much more universally beneficial, order.

By the way, I chose a Hummer for the symbolism. It's the poster boy of excess and waste, almost universally. The shock value of converting it to the most practical, most luxurious, and definitely easily the highest mileage vehicle around is what I'm going for.

I am waiting for a junked one to pop up, which isn't totaled. That I can buy pretty cheap. I'm not getting any gubmint grants or funding to do this, so I have to be miserly. When the right Hummer pops up, this all starts in the real world. Gonna cost me around $122,000, give or take 5 or 6, to build this prototype.

Now I hope you understand why I so strenuously object to the OP of this thread. We don't need any freaking mandates or subsidies from the gubmint to make shit work. It only stymies true progress in most cases. And also causes alot of waste, because people who get grants don't worry too much about being miserly.

If I got a gubmint grant for this, I would fast-track it and not worry too much about getting a junked Hummer on the cheap. I would go out and buy a used one and pay twice as much or more. I wouldn't have the incentive to really design this thing, it would be mostly trial and error. I would probably hire help as well -- all of this driving the cost up to probably triple or more what I am projecting.

See?



LOVE IT MAN!!! ABSOLUTELY LOVE IT!! My mechanic has prob a 90 something Suburban and he gets like 30 mpg just by doing little tweeks here and there. I think he said it was carberated and I think he took some emmisions controls off of it but said it will pass ANY test. He is a really cool guy so I know he's not feeding me any BS. Just not his style.

Like I said your idea sounds cool as hell and I REALLY hope it works out the way you want.
but remember, we NEEDED those things on cars to "save the environment"
 
Well it's pretty clear that I LOVE the idea of plug ins but I DEFINATELY DON'T like the idea of mandating anything but I beleive it has so much potential that we should have tax credits and even some gov't funding for research. Hell even the Pharmas get funding through research at Universities.
 
Well it's pretty clear that I LOVE the idea of plug ins but I DEFINATELY DON'T like the idea of mandating anything but I beleive it has so much potential that we should have tax credits and even some gov't funding for research. Hell even the Pharmas get funding through research at Universities.

Tax credits are just dressed up mandates in most cases, I'm against those as much. If you like the vehicle then good for you, buy it, enjoy it, etc. just don't con or force people into buying it as well. ;)
 
Oh I don't think a tax credit is a con or forcing people to buy something they don't want. The fact is they are and will be very expesive until they become more mainstream. I would just like to be able to get a nice plug in sedan for say 30K.......Not that I'm in the market for a 30K car.....Hell I'm not in the market for a $30 car right now but.......CROSS MY FINGERS I hope I won't need to buy a car before I graduate.
 
Oh I don't think a tax credit is a con or forcing people to buy something they don't want. The fact is they are and will be very expesive until they become more mainstream. I would just like to be able to get a nice plug in sedan for say 30K.......Not that I'm in the market for a 30K car.....Hell I'm not in the market for a $30 car right now but.......CROSS MY FINGERS I hope I won't need to buy a car before I graduate.

Tax credits take money from the government, which they have to regain by increasing taxes on other things, therefore forcing people who do not benefit from this to pay for it indirectly. Ultimately taking choice away. As I said, I am against all tax credits though write offs for donating to charities I am for. I won't drive, I prefer to walk everywhere I can (when my knees don't hurt too much) and bus everywhere else, so I would be paying for these tax credits even though I hate all cars. ;) My dream would be to make horse travel popular again.
 
So tell me MM how efficient are IC engines? Why do they produce SO MUCH unwanted heat that has to be vented out through radiators?
Coming back to this for a second: You seem to equate heat with ineffeciency. Nothing could be further from the truth.

You WANT heat in a IC engine. If it runs too cool is it grossly inefficient. This is why they have thermostats, to keep the coolant from removing ALL the heat. Find this out for yourself, remove the thermostat and replace the hose without it. Your fuel mileage and performance will tank, and if you keep driving like that eventually all the coolant will boil out and your shit will seize up. But the engine will be cooler internally, TOO cool, until this happens.

Because it's all about the efficient use of heat -- using the BTUs the combustion process generates to maximum effect. Cleaner burns, less pollution equals more efficiency.

Electric motors get hot as hell too. The only way to cool them is airflow over them. This is why you see fins and fans on larger motors. The heat's gotta go somewhere. You are going to generate heat by doing work, no matter what it is or how you're doing it. It's a fact of thermodynamics.
 
My mechanic has prob a 90 something Suburban and he gets like 30 mpg just by doing little tweeks here and there. I think he said it was carberated and I think he took some emmisions controls off of it but said it will pass ANY test. He is a really cool guy so I know he's not feeding me any BS. Just not his style.
I seriously doubt the validity of his claim. How is he measuring the mileage? By a scientific method, such as testing on a dynamometer? Or just a seat of the pants guesstimate?

When I want to measure mileage, I connect a digital flow meter to the fuel line and calibrate it. Then I operate the vehicle at a set speed on a dynomometer. This gives me a totalizing figure for the time frame of the test, expressed in GPH. (Gallons per hour) From this you take the time, and miles driven, and you get a damn accurate mileage number that's not guesstimated and isn't dependent on wind resistance, road conditions, etc. Removing many variables from the equation.

Now,

The purpose of most emissions controls is to re-burn the exhaust gases, to get a more complete burn of all fuel elements before expelling them. This is called the AIR system. It helps your mileage and reduces CO2 emissions. But if it's not working right, yeah it will actually have the opposite effect. This is the reason for emissions testing.

There is no way he is actually passing emissions with a carbureted IC engine without emissions controls. I think he is blowing smoke, literally, up your ass.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top