Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Link to the Democrats statement urging making it illegal to question C02...
Well Dex, you are still the same fucked up liar as always;Link to the Democrats statement urging making it illegal to question C02...
FALSE: California to Jail Climate Change Skeptics
Climate change denial should be a crime
Climate change activists want punishment for skeptics
"WHY does one Earth polar circle have 9 times the ice of the other?"
Because there is a continent of land under it. What a stupid question.
Link to the Democrats statement urging making it illegal to question C02...
FALSE: California to Jail Climate Change Skeptics
Climate change denial should be a crime
Climate change activists want punishment for skeptics
can you link to what you are referencing? this is all i can find when i google:LOL!!!
The Dems say they want to make it illegal to question whether CO2 is the main variable that "controls" Earth temperature and related climate effects.
How many Dems here want to make it illegal to ask things like
WHY does one Earth polar circle have 9 times the ice of the other?
I mean, really, doesn't "liberal" mean.... you allow questions of left wing frauds???
CLIMATE CHANGE DENIAL SHOULD BE A CRIME
Democrats in CA introduce a bill to criminalize questioning of Algore's FRAUD.
The bill fails.
Dems here deny any Dem supported the bill.
Good grief!!!!!!!!!
Good God, you daft little ass, we just saw an example where it was both. California came out of the drought with major rain storms. Then this summer, another drought with record temperatures. Now the Santa Anna winds, and we have huge firestorms there now.CLIMATE CHANGE DENIAL SHOULD BE A CRIME
We got one right here... although he hides behind "climate change" and doesn't use "Global Warming (because of CO2)" which gives him "wiggle room" to claim he wasn't talking about CO2....
Apparently floods never happened before Algore started lying....
and the NYT thinks the Syrian crisis is because of DROUGHT "caused by" the same "warming..."
Here is a question for Old Rocks.
If planet Earth was indeed warming, would it be WETTER or DRIER???
Hint - it isn't both...
Good God, you daft little ass, we just saw an example where it was both. California came out of the drought with major rain storms. Then this summer, another drought with record temperatures. Now the Santa Anna winds, and we have huge firestorms there now.CLIMATE CHANGE DENIAL SHOULD BE A CRIME
We got one right here... although he hides behind "climate change" and doesn't use "Global Warming (because of CO2)" which gives him "wiggle room" to claim he wasn't talking about CO2....
Apparently floods never happened before Algore started lying....
and the NYT thinks the Syrian crisis is because of DROUGHT "caused by" the same "warming..."
Here is a question for Old Rocks.
If planet Earth was indeed warming, would it be WETTER or DRIER???
Hint - it isn't both...
CLIMATE CHANGE DENIAL SHOULD BE A CRIME
In the wake of Harvey, it’s time to treat science denial as gross negligence—and hold those who do the denying accountable.
n August 2016, months after Houston had been hit by the second of two back-to-back “hundred year floods,” Mike Talbott, then the head of Houston’s flood control district, told The Texas Tribune and ProPublica that he still had no plans to study climate change or its potential impacts on the county — Harris, the third-largest in the nation — that he was charged with protecting. Talbott criticized scientists for being “anti-development,” and not only ignored but denigrated studies — even those conducted by his own department, one of which he called “absurd” — that suggested development was worsening flooding, or that urged him to leave prairies intact to absorb floodwaters. When the Tribune told Talbott that a host of scientific experts had said the contrary, his reply was blunt.
“You need to find some better experts,” he said. When asked for names, the Tribune reported, Talbott would only say, “starting here, with me.”
Almost exactly one year later, Harvey made landfall.
According to the Texas penal code, “A person acts with criminal negligence, or is criminally negligent… when he ought to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist or the result will occur. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that the failure to perceive it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise....”
Climate change denial should be a crime
From what was in the rest of the article, Talbott should be charged with criminal negligence.