Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Historical films should make reasonable attempts to look accurate.is this the third or fourth RW thread on a black Cleopatra?
As everyone knows, Cleopatra looked like Liz Taylor
Romans at the time spoke with British Accents
Jesus was blonde with blue eyes and also spoke with a British Accent
Why didn’t Romans sound Italian and Jesus sound Jewish?
'lol that's a good one.
We have always had a westernized depiction of Biblical times.Historical films should make reasonable attempts to look accurate.
This was given abandon in pretty much every period movie in the 60s.
We know what Cleopatra looked like because there are drawings and busts.
She was not attractive. She looked like a dude actually. But she most obviously was not black.
Doesn't even remotely look black.
And to your post - two wrongs don't make a right.
She was born in Egypt, too bad they didn't have pictures back then. I willing to bet she wasn't a blue eyed, blond headed white woman.She was Greek.
Greek people are white.
Historical films should make reasonable attempts to look accurate.
This was given abandon in pretty much every period movie in the 60s.
We know what Cleopatra looked like because there are drawings and busts.
She was not attractive. She looked like a dude actually. But she most obviously was not black.
Doesn't even remotely look black.
And to your post - two wrongs don't make a right.
You pay almost no attention to what people write, only what you want to say.Did you whine about Jesus being played by this guy....
You pay almost no attention to what people write, only what you want to say.
Especially, you like to make responses to people for things they didn't say... but you make the response anyway.
It was also an amazing movie that critics hated, and the reason they hated it was because it was Mel Gibson.Yes, you can make historically accurate Biblical movies.
Mel Gibson did it with The Passion of the Christ. All dialogue was in Aramaic. It was a box office dud
It was also an amazing movie that critics hated, and the reason they hated it was because it was Mel Gibson.
If the exact same movie would have been made by, say Oliver North, it would have won 6 Academy awards.
Rotten Tomatoes gave it 49% which is an OBVIOUS bias.
Two wrongs don't make a right.I couldn’t watch it, it was tedious
I prefer Biblical movies with white guys and British accents
You pay almost no attention to what people write, only what you want to say.
Especially, you like to make responses to people for things they didn't say... but you make the response anyway.
The movie was dark. And it was closer to reality. Pope Joh Paul 2 at the time made a comment..."It is, as was".Yes, you can make historically accurate Biblical movies.
Mel Gibson did it with The Passion of the Christ. All dialogue was in Aramaic. It was a box office dud
You wouldI will take that as a no.
again, we have paintings of them, and she was Greek weren't to many black Greeks back then as well as no Egyptian blacks as well.She was born in Egypt, too bad they didn't have pictures back then. I willing to bet she wasn't a blue eyed, blond headed white woman.
Based on what? Your opinion.again, we have paintings of them, and she was Greek weren't to many black Greeks back then as well as no Egyptian blacks as well.
Who is he? Ben Shapiro's Dad? Are you saying he could never portray a 1st Century Jew in the Levant? Here is Muhammed's 33rd Grandson Shaykh Muhammad Abul Huda al-YaqoubiDid you whine about Jesus being played by this guy....
B
based on facts of history dumb ass.Based on what? Your opinion.
Yes, you can make historically accurate Biblical movies.
Mel Gibson did it with The Passion of the Christ. All dialogue was in Aramaic. It was a box office dud
The gross ignorance astounds me.
