Make Following Illegal

[KissMy]

Lets do what the stupid people want & make following illegal. That way I can position myself in front of someone to justify self defense & deadly force. Then I could kill at will & walk every time.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Make Following Illegal

That would certainly make getting in and out of a ballpark interesting.

 

[Seawytch]

It is...it's called stalking.

 

[deltex1]

Obabble will make an exception for ballparks....and campaign events...and golf courses...

 

[Smilebong]

It is...it's called stalking.

GZ was not stalking.

 

[Cookie]

It would never happen. The big O guy wants us to keep an eye on each other. They're pushing "see something, say something". They want givernment employees to report each other for suspicious behavior such as using the copy machine too much or having a disagreement with your spouse.

 

[healthmyths]

Lets do what the stupid people want & make following illegal. That way I can position myself in front of someone to justify self defense & deadly force. Then I could kill at will & walk every time.

That is the Florida law already!
Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine
776.013 Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.—
(1) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if:
(a) The person against whom the defensive force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person’s will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and
(b) The person who uses defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.
(2) The presumption set forth in subsection (1) does not apply if:
(a) The person against whom the defensive force is used has the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence, or vehicle, such as an owner, lessee, or titleholder, and there is not an injunction for protection from domestic violence or a written pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person; or
(b) The person or persons sought to be removed is a child or grandchild, or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of, the person against whom the defensive force is used; or
(c) The person who uses defensive force is engaged in an unlawful activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further an unlawful activity; or
(d) The person against whom the defensive force is used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who enters or attempts to enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person entering or attempting to enter was a law enforcement officer.
(3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be
has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.

 

[KissMy]

It is...it's called stalking.

Key words "with the intent" to commit a crime.

18 USC § 2261A - Stalking

Whoever—
(1) travels in interstate or foreign commerce or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or enters or leaves Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to, or causes substantial emotional distress to that person, a member of the immediate family (as defined in section 115) of that person, or the spouse or intimate partner of that person; or
(2) with the intent—
(A) to kill, injure, harass, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person in another State or tribal jurisdiction or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States; or
(B) to place a person in another State or tribal jurisdiction, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to—
(i) that person;
(ii) a member of the immediate family (as defined in section 115 [1] of that person; or (iii) a spouse or intimate partner of that person;
uses the mail, any interactive computer service, or any facility of interstate or foreign commerce to engage in a course of conduct that causes substantial emotional distress to that person or places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to, any of the persons described in clauses (i) through (iii) of subparagraph (B);

 

[dilloduck]

I can hear the whiney voices now. Stop following me. Hell my little brother used to whine like that when he was two years old.

 

[dilloduck]

Make Following Illegal

That would certainly make getting in and out of a ballpark interesting.

and traffic jams.

 

[Norman]

The government of course should be able to follow you where ever it wants from cradle to grave.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Lets do what the stupid people want & make following illegal. That way I can position myself in front of someone to justify self defense & deadly force. Then I could kill at will & walk every time.

I had a guy follow me for an hour on the highway the other day.

He might have been "angrily" following me for all I know.

I should have beat him up I guess.

 

[Katzndogz]

Stalking is a repeated activity. If Zimmerman followed Martin on more than one occasion, it would be stalking. Liberals really want to make up their own laws, they just can't. It is what it is.

 

[Skull Pilot]

The simple fact is that the kid struck first.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

It is...it's called stalking.

You truly are a moron.