EriktheRed
Eh...
Of course they do. Is anyone surprised?
Sounds a lot like Al Gore claiming that Bush stole the election in 2000
You sure he said that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Of course they do. Is anyone surprised?
Sounds a lot like Al Gore claiming that Bush stole the election in 2000
Have they ever proven any voter fraud from the 2008 election?
Republicans are delusional. They didn't fuck up....someone stole the last two elections from them
Have they ever proven any voter fraud from the 2008 election?
Republicans are delusional. They didn't fuck up....someone stole the last two elections from them
Its awfully suspicious when an organization like ACORN has been indicted for voter fraud in many states.
No...this election wasn't stolen. It was just the first time that our ever growing population of ethnically diverse citizens were motivated, by bribe or otherwise, to vote. Once...twice...sometimes more. It was worth every pack of smokes...autographed by Obama of course...or every free lunch...or cruise they were offered.
Of course they do. Is anyone surprised?
Sounds a lot like Al Gore claiming that Bush stole the election in 2000
Of course they do. Is anyone surprised?
Sounds a lot like Al Gore claiming that Bush stole the election in 2000
That's a hell of a lot more plausible than this story.
Sounds a lot like Al Gore claiming that Bush stole the election in 2000
That's a hell of a lot more plausible than this story.
yeah because after all, Bush's brother happened to be the governor of florida.
Sounds a lot like Al Gore claiming that Bush stole the election in 2000
That's a hell of a lot more plausible than this story.
yeah because after all, Bush's brother happened to be the governor of florida.
Gore lost all credibility when he wanted only the counties recounted that he thought he should have won. and how many dirty tricks did Gore's team play?That's a hell of a lot more plausible than this story.
yeah because after all, Bush's brother happened to be the governor of florida.
I didn't say I believe it. I'm just saying it's more plausible that this story.
The quick summary of my perspective of Florida 2000:
1. Bush received a majority of the votes cast.
2. The Court's decision in Bush v Gore represents the absolute worst form of political activism, effectively rewriting the law to create a favored outcome for a specific candidate, but then saying that the special rules are a one-time deal and no one should think they'll get the same treatment in the future.
3. Gore would have received the majority of the votes cast if not for the use of techniques like caging.
yeah because after all, Bush's brother happened to be the governor of florida.
I didn't say I believe it. I'm just saying it's more plausible that this story.
The quick summary of my perspective of Florida 2000:
1. Bush received a majority of the votes cast.
2. The Court's decision in Bush v Gore represents the absolute worst form of political activism, effectively rewriting the law to create a favored outcome for a specific candidate, but then saying that the special rules are a one-time deal and no one should think they'll get the same treatment in the future.
3. Gore would have received the majority of the votes cast if not for the use of techniques like caging.
Gore lost all credibility when he wanted only the counties recounted that he thought he should have won. and how many dirty tricks did Gore's team play?
I didn't say I believe it. I'm just saying it's more plausible that this story.
The quick summary of my perspective of Florida 2000:
1. Bush received a majority of the votes cast.
2. The Court's decision in Bush v Gore represents the absolute worst form of political activism, effectively rewriting the law to create a favored outcome for a specific candidate, but then saying that the special rules are a one-time deal and no one should think they'll get the same treatment in the future.
3. Gore would have received the majority of the votes cast if not for the use of techniques like caging.
Gore lost all credibility when he wanted only the counties recounted that he thought he should have won. and how many dirty tricks did Gore's team play?
Gore's team didn't play any dirty tricks. And selective recounts are allowed under Florida law.
Gore lost all credibility when he wanted only the counties recounted that he thought he should have won. and how many dirty tricks did Gore's team play?
Gore's team didn't play any dirty tricks. And selective recounts are allowed under Florida law.
There are dirty tricks played in every election. Even by that guy on the 50 cent piece. A full recount was done afterwords and Bush still won.
Gore's team didn't play any dirty tricks. And selective recounts are allowed under Florida law.
There are dirty tricks played in every election. Even by that guy on the 50 cent piece. A full recount was done afterwords and Bush still won.
Which is why I said Bush received a majority of the votes cast. That doesn't change the fact that the Supreme Court's decision was a miscarriage of justice.
There are dirty tricks played in every election. Even by that guy on the 50 cent piece. A full recount was done afterwords and Bush still won.
Which is why I said Bush received a majority of the votes cast. That doesn't change the fact that the Supreme Court's decision was a miscarriage of justice.
what should have been done? keep recounting, maybe getting a different result every time?