Then why can't any of you liars demonstrate it?Sanger was a racist and a eugenicist. Fact.
Answer: Because you're making it up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Then why can't any of you liars demonstrate it?Sanger was a racist and a eugenicist. Fact.
I think you’re trolling, unless you’re finally going to say why you’re making these claimsBut failed to read it.
Reread the post. Pay particular attention to the word "lethal."I think you’re trolling, unless you’re finally going to say why you’re making these claims
Hitler considered women to be breeders.You must be proud having the same beliefs as Hitler.
I don’t see how you are any better if you support forcing a woman to bear a fetus that will be either stillborn or die soon of respiratory failure.Whereas you just want to cull the disabled, Adolf.
Maybe don’t throw stones when you live in a porcelain hovel.
An adult is not living within another’s body.If an adult is diagnosed with a terminal disease and given 2 years to live, would the pro-abortionists here support the idea of just stabbing that person to death immediately? Why or why not?
No human from day one on can live on this planet completely devoid of human support and interaction for long. No one, not even the most morally bankrupt pro-abortionist, would support the idea that a mother were to stab her one year old baby to death and tear apart the corpse. You'd best take stock.An adult is not living within another’s body.
Like Democrats.Hitler considered women to be breeders.
Just a child is.An adult is not living within another’s body.
That isn’t what the situation is. Prior to birth, the fetus is housed within another person’s body. That person has primary rights to their own body. And that doesn’t mean she would choose abortion, but tbe choice has to be hers. We are already seeing some ugly fall out from laws that restrict abortion to when a woman is in imminent danger of death.No human from day one on can live on this planet completely devoid of human support and interaction for long. No one, not even the most morally bankrupt pro-abortionist, would support the idea that a mother were to stab her one year old baby to death and tear apart the corpse. You'd best take stock.
So, a mother should be allowed to kill a one year old baby but not a two year old baby?That isn’t what the situation is. Prior to birth, the fetus is housed within another person’s body. That person has primary rights to their own body. And that doesn’t mean she would choose abortion, but tbe choice has to be hers. ...
...
In this particular situation, forcing her to carry to term a baby with a condition incompatible with life just seems cruel and shows how little value is given to her.
Maybe you should check your prescription then.I don’t see how you are any better if you support forcing a woman to bear a fetus that will be either stillborn or die soon of respiratory failure.
You dodged the issue.Having a baby as the female of the species was designed to do is "cruel," but slaughtering the most innocent and vulnerable of humans is not? Is that really how you think?
Same to you. I already know you value the woman less than what she carries. You can drop the pretense.Maybe you should check your prescription then.
Not killing the disabled makes me the same as a eugenicist who targets the disabled and dying for death?
GFY.
I’ve never heard of a one year old baby in the womb.So, a mother should be allowed to kill a one year old baby but not a two year old baby?
No, you don’t you know jack shit about anything, per usual.Same to you. I already know you value the woman less than what she carries. You can drop the pretense.
Nothing from the Ming Dynasty?