- Thread starter
- #201
Why do you ignore the fact that the companies themselves gave him credit?So I guess the moral of the story is that Trump supporters will give him credit for positive things but no blame for negative outcomes while Obama gets only the blame and none of the credit.
Pretty much the case?
It's too bad our resident umpire isn't here to make his famous "bullshit call"....gee; wonder why?????
Steeeeeee... Rike 1.So I guess the moral of the story is that Trump supporters will give him credit for positive things but no blame for negative outcomes while Obama gets only the blame and none of the credit.
Pretty much the case?
It's too bad our resident umpire isn't here to make his famous "bullshit call"....gee; wonder why?????
We can have this conversation when he becomes President.
The point is that he’s getting credit when he’s not President…
If you’re going to get the credit, you deserve the blame as well.
A “vote of confidence” is great. Its also pretty worthless without follow through. And it will probably mean that the end product will be higher priced than it would have otherwise. Oh well, “wages are too high” according to Mr. Trump. But in and of itself…I’ll agree. I’m pretty sure that if the economy were not improving, such a “vote” would not have been made. Or Maybe it’s because when Obama bailed out GM, the person in the same position, the CEO of Ford said that if there was no bail out, it would have threatened Ford.
I seem to recall you guys giving Mr. Obama zero credit for that. Or the $5.9B that Ford took from the same Federal Government to re-vamp their plaints (that they still haven’t paid back).
“wages are too high”...Please don't quote out of context.
What context was that said in?