MA Court writes law giving unmarried lesbian full parental rights!!!

[RoshawnMarkwees]

No it does not mean objectively that "any roommate in a house can legally claim parenthood."

If Rosh were an attorney and offered that as a motion, he would be sanctioned, fined, and suspended.

Trolls use the funny button in lieu of analysis.
You're a troll.

 

[guno]

Legislators write laws not courts, but that hallowed principle was abandoned in america long ago. Liberals know they can't get their laws passed so they insist judges write laws and call it an "interpretation".

Massachusetts' highest court grants full parental rights to unmarried gay woman

oct 4 2016 BOSTON - The Mass. court that paved the way for same-sex marriage in the United States ruled Tuesday that an unmarried gay woman whose former girlfriend gave birth to two children through artificial insemination has the same parental rights as their biological mother.

The Supreme Judicial Court, of Massachusetts, issued its decision Tuesday in a complicated case about the parental rights of a once-partnered, but unmarried, gay couple.

Julie Gallagher gave birth to the children, and her former partner, Karen Partanen, has helped raise them. They are now 4 and 8.

After the couple split in 2013, Partanen wanted to be declared a full legal parent.

A family court judge dismissed Partanen's request, finding that she didn't meet the requirements under state law because she and Gallagher were not married when the children were born, and Partanen is not a biological parent.

In overturning that ruling, the SJC found that a gay person may establish themselves as a child's presumptive parent under state law, even without a biological relationship with the child.

looks like your christer world is falling apart

 

[TheOldSchool]

Okay so you are so dumb that you actually believe what you posted is accurate. Got it.

You still haven't responded.

To what? Why would a random roommate that played no role in the creation of a child and did not raise it get parental rights?

Ask the judge. What is the judge's criteria?

Wow so you either you lied or you're an idiot, and now we find out you didn't even read the article and don't know anything about this case? Good grief man are you even trying?

I asked the question rhetorically.
You should not be allowed to vote.

And you have nothing. Shocker.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

You still haven't responded.

To what? Why would a random roommate that played no role in the creation of a child and did not raise it get parental rights?

Ask the judge. What is the judge's criteria?

Wow so you either you lied or you're an idiot, and now we find out you didn't even read the article and don't know anything about this case? Good grief man are you even trying?

I asked the question rhetorically.
You should not be allowed to vote.

And you have nothing. Shocker.

How would you know? You've still made no pointed response.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No it does not mean objectively that "any roommate in a house can legally claim parenthood."

If Rosh were an attorney and offered that as a motion, he would be sanctioned, fined, and suspended.

Trolls use the funny button in lieu of analysis. You're a troll.

I answered your nonsense clearly and objectively.

You would have got your ass kicked out of court.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Sounds good to me

Really? This means any roommate in a house can legally claim parenthood.
Democrats should not be allowed to vote.

You are right. This creates a whole new raft of relationship issues. Literally anyone can claim to be filling the role of parent and claim rights.

This law won't last very long. It's too chaotic.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

No it does not mean objectively that "any roommate in a house can legally claim parenthood."

If Rosh were an attorney and offered that as a motion, he would be sanctioned, fined, and suspended.

Trolls use the funny button in lieu of analysis. You're a troll.

I answered your nonsense clearly and objectively.

You would have got your ass kicked out of court.

You didn't answer anything. You're just a troll. Democrats depend on weak-minded people like you.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Thank goodness conservatives don't run this country. According to them this decision would mean that anybody could declare themselves the parent of anyone or anything. Crazy stuff.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Thank goodness conservatives don't run this country. According to them this decision would mean that anybody could declare themselves the parent of anyone or anything. Crazy stuff.

Geez, you're stupid. WTF do you think this judge just did? What do you think legal homo marriage did?
Democrats must love you.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Thank goodness conservatives don't run this country. According to them this decision would mean that anybody could declare themselves the parent of anyone or anything. Crazy stuff.

Geez, you're stupid. WTF do you think this judge just did? What do you think legal homo marriage did?
Democrats must love you.

Again thank goodness you loons don't run the country. Imagine if your insane belief was how the judge's ruling was actually interpreted.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No it does not mean objectively that "any roommate in a house can legally claim parenthood."

If Rosh were an attorney and offered that as a motion, he would be sanctioned, fined, and suspended.

Trolls use the funny button in lieu of analysis. You're a troll.

I answered your nonsense clearly and objectively.

You would have got your ass kicked out of court.

You didn't answer anything. You're just a troll. Democrats depend on weak-minded people like you.

You made a silly assertion without any evidence, then you get mad because we laugh at your nonsense.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Thank goodness conservatives don't run this country. According to them this decision would mean that anybody could declare themselves the parent of anyone or anything. Crazy stuff.

Geez, you're stupid. WTF do you think this judge just did? What do you think legal homo marriage did?
Democrats must love you.

This lesbian couple was never married! They were nothing more than roommates with benefits! That's why you are right.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

No it does not mean objectively that "any roommate in a house can legally claim parenthood."

If Rosh were an attorney and offered that as a motion, he would be sanctioned, fined, and suspended.

Trolls use the funny button in lieu of analysis. You're a troll.

I answered your nonsense clearly and objectively.

You would have got your ass kicked out of court.

You didn't answer anything. You're just a troll. Democrats depend on weak-minded people like you.

You made a silly assertion without any evidence, then you get mad because we laugh at your nonsense.

How can I know what you consider silly since you have yet to respond?

 

[AmericanFirst1]

Sounds good to me

Not following the constitution sounds good to you? Typical commie scum libtard.

 

[bodecea]

Okay so you are so dumb that you actually believe what you posted is accurate. Got it.

You still haven't responded.

To what? Why would a random roommate that played no role in the creation of a child and did not raise it get parental rights?

Ask the judge. What is the judge's criteria?

Wow so you either you lied or you're an idiot, and now we find out you didn't even read the article and don't know anything about this case? Good grief man are you even trying?

I asked the question rhetorically.
You should not be allowed to vote.

Now that's a typical Alt-Right response.....take away peoples' right to vote because they don't agree with you.

 

[TNHarley]

Sounds good to me

Did you even try to think about this?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Sounds good to me

Did you even try to think about this?

Yes. Did you?

 

[bodecea]

Legislators write laws not courts, but that hallowed principle was abandoned in america long ago. Liberals know they can't get their laws passed so they insist judges write laws and call it an "interpretation".

Massachusetts' highest court grants full parental rights to unmarried gay woman

oct 4 2016 BOSTON - The Mass. court that paved the way for same-sex marriage in the United States ruled Tuesday that an unmarried gay woman whose former girlfriend gave birth to two children through artificial insemination has the same parental rights as their biological mother.

The Supreme Judicial Court, of Massachusetts, issued its decision Tuesday in a complicated case about the parental rights of a once-partnered, but unmarried, gay couple.

Julie Gallagher gave birth to the children, and her former partner, Karen Partanen, has helped raise them. They are now 4 and 8.

After the couple split in 2013, Partanen wanted to be declared a full legal parent.

A family court judge dismissed Partanen's request, finding that she didn't meet the requirements under state law because she and Gallagher were not married when the children were born, and Partanen is not a biological parent.

In overturning that ruling, the SJC found that a gay person may establish themselves as a child's presumptive parent under state law, even without a biological relationship with the child.

So....you don't believe an unmarried couple, if the male member wants parential rights they should be granted them?

 

[TNHarley]

Sounds good to me

Did you even try to think about this?

Yes. Did you?

Any gay person that helped raise a child can get parenting rights? That's some bullshit and you know it.
Maybe he went over that, idk. But just form the OP, that is called a pandoras box.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Guys great news! It turns out Roshawn was right! I've just begun the process of becoming his legal parent! Soon he'll have to answer "you are" when I ask him who his daddy is!