Lesbian mom loses parental rights, and wife, to child's sperm donor

[AMart]

The judge made a sound ruling her and the parents are indeed the biological father and mother!

An Oklahoma woman has no parental rights over the son she raised for two years with her estranged wife, who has since started dating the former couple’s sperm donor, a judge ruled Monday.

Kris Williams and Rebekah Wilson, who were legally married in June 2019, were both initially listed on the boy’s birth certificate when Wilson gave birth to him in August 2019, according to court documents. The boy, referred to only as W.R.W.W. in the judge’s ruling, was conceived using the sperm of Harlan Vaugh, with whom Wilson entered a “Known Sperm Donor Agreement” in September 2018.


Williams and Wilson, however, split in November 2021, and Wilson moved in with Vaughn shortly afterward, court documents state. But while Williams was on the child’s birth certificate, she did not adopt him before she split with Wilson, and she has not seen him since Nov. 23, 2021.

“The reality is that the law provides a legal remedy available to Williams,” Oklahoma County District Judge Lynne McGuire wrote in her decision, referring to adoption. “She knowingly chose not to pursue it.”

McGuire’s ruling found Wilson and Vaughn, who have since had a second biological child together, to be the “legal parents” of W.R.W.W.

Williams told NBC affiliate KFOR of Oklahoma City that she was “in shock” by the judge’s ruling.

“I can tell you that that brings a lot of anger and emotion on me,” Williams said through tears Tuesday. “Why? Just why?”

In a statement to KFOR, Vaughn said that he and Wilson are “grateful for the court’s validation.”

Lesbian mom loses parental rights, and wife, to child's sperm donor

The boy’s biological mother and sperm donor, who are now dating, are the child’s “legal parents,” an Oklahoma district judge ruled.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[tyroneweaver]

if i read this right the judge gave the child to a heterosexual couple which is a good thng

 

[pknopp]

It used to be a non donating parent did NOT have to go the adoption route if they are on the birth certificate.

If you were married and your wife cheated and became pregnant the courts would still make the cheated parent pay for child support and have access to the child.

Now granted I am not aware how the courts have been ruling with the advent of DNA tests and such so............

 

[1srelluc]

if i read this right the judge gave the child to a heterosexual couple which is a good thng

Well a straight male and a bi female.

LOL.....They always did say the only difference in a straight female and a bi one is a half bottle of wine.

 

[AMart]

if i read this right the judge gave the child to a heterosexual couple which is a good thng

And the biological parents as well.

 

[Mac-7]

The judge made a sound ruling her and the parents are indeed the biological father and mother!

An Oklahoma woman has no parental rights over the son she raised for two years with her estranged wife, who has since started dating the former couple’s sperm donor, a judge ruled Monday.

Kris Williams and Rebekah Wilson, who were legally married in June 2019, were both initially listed on the boy’s birth certificate when Wilson gave birth to him in August 2019, according to court documents. The boy, referred to only as W.R.W.W. in the judge’s ruling, was conceived using the sperm of Harlan Vaugh, with whom Wilson entered a “Known Sperm Donor Agreement” in September 2018.


Williams and Wilson, however, split in November 2021, and Wilson moved in with Vaughn shortly afterward, court documents state. But while Williams was on the child’s birth certificate, she did not adopt him before she split with Wilson, and she has not seen him since Nov. 23, 2021.

“The reality is that the law provides a legal remedy available to Williams,” Oklahoma County District Judge Lynne McGuire wrote in her decision, referring to adoption. “She knowingly chose not to pursue it.”

McGuire’s ruling found Wilson and Vaughn, who have since had a second biological child together, to be the “legal parents” of W.R.W.W.

Williams told NBC affiliate KFOR of Oklahoma City that she was “in shock” by the judge’s ruling.

“I can tell you that that brings a lot of anger and emotion on me,” Williams said through tears Tuesday. “Why? Just why?”

In a statement to KFOR, Vaughn said that he and Wilson are “grateful for the court’s validation.”

Lesbian mom loses parental rights, and wife, to child's sperm donor

The boy’s biological mother and sperm donor, who are now dating, are the child’s “legal parents,” an Oklahoma district judge ruled.

www.nbcnews.com

The kid is doomed either way

All three are screwballs

 

[martybegan]

It used to be a non donating parent did NOT have to go the adoption route if they are on the birth certificate.

If you were married and your wife cheated and became pregnant the courts would still make the cheated parent pay for child support and have access to the child.

Now granted I am not aware how the courts have been ruling with the advent of DNA tests and such so............

Putting anyone other than the biological parents on the birth certificate is a lie.

I would probably advocate for a streamlined adoption process for situations like this, as the regular adoption process is very slow. Something on the order of 3-6 months to complete.

 

[White 6]

The judge made a sound ruling her and the parents are indeed the biological father and mother!

An Oklahoma woman has no parental rights over the son she raised for two years with her estranged wife, who has since started dating the former couple’s sperm donor, a judge ruled Monday.

Kris Williams and Rebekah Wilson, who were legally married in June 2019, were both initially listed on the boy’s birth certificate when Wilson gave birth to him in August 2019, according to court documents. The boy, referred to only as W.R.W.W. in the judge’s ruling, was conceived using the sperm of Harlan Vaugh, with whom Wilson entered a “Known Sperm Donor Agreement” in September 2018.


Williams and Wilson, however, split in November 2021, and Wilson moved in with Vaughn shortly afterward, court documents state. But while Williams was on the child’s birth certificate, she did not adopt him before she split with Wilson, and she has not seen him since Nov. 23, 2021.

“The reality is that the law provides a legal remedy available to Williams,” Oklahoma County District Judge Lynne McGuire wrote in her decision, referring to adoption. “She knowingly chose not to pursue it.”

McGuire’s ruling found Wilson and Vaughn, who have since had a second biological child together, to be the “legal parents” of W.R.W.W.

Williams told NBC affiliate KFOR of Oklahoma City that she was “in shock” by the judge’s ruling.

“I can tell you that that brings a lot of anger and emotion on me,” Williams said through tears Tuesday. “Why? Just why?”

In a statement to KFOR, Vaughn said that he and Wilson are “grateful for the court’s validation.”

Lesbian mom loses parental rights, and wife, to child's sperm donor

The boy’s biological mother and sperm donor, who are now dating, are the child’s “legal parents,” an Oklahoma district judge ruled.

www.nbcnews.com

As I understand it, preference always goes more towards the biologic birth mother. Nothing surprising here.

 

[martybegan]

Well a straight male and a bi female.

LOL.....They always did say the only difference in a straight female and a bi one is a half bottle of wine.

What's the other joke? All women are bi, either bi-polar or bi-sexual and the key is finding out which one it is.

 

[martybegan]

As I understand it, preference always goes more towards the biologic birth mother. Nothing surprising here.

This situation is also unique where the biological mother ended up with the biological father.

 

[pknopp]

Putting anyone other than the biological parents on the birth certificate is a lie.

If your spouse cheated on you and you were unaware, how is that a lie?

Many married couples have used donated sperm. It's a lie for the couple who go this route to put both the man's and woman's name on the B.C.?

If you are married for say 12 years after the birth of the child and your wife takes off, you are no longer the dad because you didn't adopt?

 

[martybegan]

If your spouse cheated on you and you were unaware, how is that a lie?

Many married couples have used donated sperm. It's a lie for the couple who go this route to put both the man's and woman's name on the B.C.?

If you are married for say 12 years after the birth of the child and your wife takes off, you are no longer the dad because you didn't adopt?

The BC should include biological parents only, as it is a source document that explains the source of the person's DNA, which can have medical implications.

For same sex couples some easier adoption or joint custody process can be created without messing with the purpose of a birth certificate.

 

[pknopp]

The BC should include biological parents only, as it is a source document that explains the source of the person's DNA, which can have medical implications.

I really doubt sperm donors have any desire to be on any B.C.

For same sex couples some easier adoption or joint custody process can be created without messing with the purpose of a birth certificate.

As noted in other threads, seperate but equal is not going to stand.

 

[AMart]

If your spouse cheated on you and you were unaware, how is that a lie?

Many married couples have used donated sperm. It's a lie for the couple who go this route to put both the man's and woman's name on the B.C.?

If you are married for say 12 years after the birth of the child and your wife takes off, you are no longer the dad because you didn't adopt?

Depends on the laws present in that state duh.

 

[martybegan]

I really doubt sperm donors have any desire to be on any B.C.




As noted in other threads, seperate but equal is not going to stand.

There should be some record of who it is, even if redacted. and even if not identified that is no reason to add someone who has no biological connection to the person in question.

This isn't equal. Two women simply cannot have a child naturally, same as two men.

Your problem is you delude yourself into thinking these are equal.

 

[pknopp]

Depends on the laws present in that state duh.

And I noted that I am not up on current laws. Duh.

 

[pknopp]

There should be some record of who it is, even if redacted. and even if not identified that is no reason to add someone who has no biological connection to the person in question.

I noted why it happens.

This isn't equal. Two women simply cannot have a child naturally, same as two men.

Your problem is you delude yourself into thinking these are equal.

I'm simply noting what will happen according to the law.

 

[martybegan]

I noted why it happens.



I'm simply noting what will happen according to the law.

That assumes the situation merits the term "equal", which it does not.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

The BC should include biological parents only, as it is a source document that explains the source of the person's DNA, which can have medical implications.

For same sex couples some easier adoption or joint custody process can be created without messing with the purpose of a birth certificate.

Decades of grooming has made this type of reason and common sense impenetrable to the leftist skull.

 

[pknopp]

That assumes the situation merits the term "equal", which it does not.

In both cases you have a married couple who can not conceive on their own.