Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So you didn't think about it, is what you're saying...Any gay person that helped raise a child can get parenting rights? That's some bullshit and you know it.Yes. Did you?Did you even try to think about this?Sounds good to me
Maybe he went over that, idk. But just form the OP, that is called a pandoras box.
Stop being an idiotSo you didn't think about it, is what you're saying...Any gay person that helped raise a child can get parenting rights? That's some bullshit and you know it.Yes. Did you?Did you even try to think about this?Sounds good to me
Maybe he went over that, idk. But just form the OP, that is called a pandoras box.
The woman was part of the decision to conceive the children, raised them, and shares equal custody wih her former partner. Stop being a drama queen. You sound like one of these alt-right Dump retards.Stop being an idiotSo you didn't think about it, is what you're saying...Any gay person that helped raise a child can get parenting rights? That's some bullshit and you know it.Yes. Did you?Did you even try to think about this?Sounds good to me
Maybe he went over that, idk. But just form the OP, that is called a pandoras box.
In overturning that ruling, the SJC found that a gay person may establish themselves as a child's presumptive parent under state law, even without a biological relationship with the child.
PANDORAS BOX and possibly institutionalized discrimination if it only applies to gays.
No. Now get out of the fetal position and get on with your life.Obviously, if I help raise my friends kid because they work all the time, I can take them to court for parental rights?
It's not about disagreement. It's about the lack of intellect and reason skewing judgment. Just like you just demonstrated.Now that's a typical Alt-Right response.....take away peoples' right to vote because they don't agree with you.I asked the question rhetorically.Wow so you either you lied or you're an idiot, and now we find out you didn't even read the article and don't know anything about this case? Good grief man are you even trying?Ask the judge. What is the judge's criteria?To what? Why would a random roommate that played no role in the creation of a child and did not raise it get parental rights?You still haven't responded.
You should not be allowed to vote.
If he is the biological father his rights should not be denied. You're so brainwashed you believe rights are granted by the state.So....you don't believe an unmarried couple, if the male member wants parential rights they should be granted them?Legislators write laws not courts, but that hallowed principle was abandoned in america long ago. Liberals know they can't get their laws passed so they insist judges write laws and call it an "interpretation".
Massachusetts' highest court grants full parental rights to unmarried gay woman
oct 4 2016 BOSTON - The Mass. court that paved the way for same-sex marriage in the United States ruled Tuesday that an unmarried gay woman whose former girlfriend gave birth to two children through artificial insemination has the same parental rights as their biological mother.
The Supreme Judicial Court, of Massachusetts, issued its decision Tuesday in a complicated case about the parental rights of a once-partnered, but unmarried, gay couple.
Julie Gallagher gave birth to the children, and her former partner, Karen Partanen, has helped raise them. They are now 4 and 8.
After the couple split in 2013, Partanen wanted to be declared a full legal parent.
A family court judge dismissed Partanen's request, finding that she didn't meet the requirements under state law because she and Gallagher were not married when the children were born, and Partanen is not a biological parent.
In overturning that ruling, the SJC found that a gay person may establish themselves as a child's presumptive parent under state law, even without a biological relationship with the child.
Im not talking about the particular case. I think the woman deserves it.The woman was part of the decision to conceive the children, raised them, and shares equal custody wih her former partner. Stop being a drama queen. You sound like one of these alt-right Dump retards.Stop being an idiotSo you didn't think about it, is what you're saying...Any gay person that helped raise a child can get parenting rights? That's some bullshit and you know it.Yes. Did you?Did you even try to think about this?
Maybe he went over that, idk. But just form the OP, that is called a pandoras box.
In overturning that ruling, the SJC found that a gay person may establish themselves as a child's presumptive parent under state law, even without a biological relationship with the child.
PANDORAS BOX and possibly institutionalized discrimination if it only applies to gays.
Why not? That's what the fucking thing said. Do you have info im not seeing?No. Now get out of the fetal position and get on with your life.Obviously, if I help raise my friends kid because they work all the time, I can take them to court for parental rights?
No I'm just not making up absurd scenariosWhy not? That's what the fucking thing said. Do you have info im not seeing?No. Now get out of the fetal position and get on with your life.Obviously, if I help raise my friends kid because they work all the time, I can take them to court for parental rights?
You take it at face value and stop there. It's ignorant and a tad sheepishNo I'm just not making up absurd scenariosWhy not? That's what the fucking thing said. Do you have info im not seeing?No. Now get out of the fetal position and get on with your life.Obviously, if I help raise my friends kid because they work all the time, I can take them to court for parental rights?
Now I'm suspecting you're just drunkand apparently you are ok with institutional discrimination. Funny
They have shared custody for years. Why don't righties ever read anything and just react react react?Since the kids are who is most impacted by this matter, why not ask them who they want to be with?
God bless you and them always!!!
Holly
P.S. Three cheers for those who thumb their nose at the adults who are selfish.
Goddamn bro, did you even read the OP?Now I'm suspecting you're just drunkand apparently you are ok with institutional discrimination. Funny
No court will do that. The court won't even listen until a kid is 14, and that's only a maybe.Since the kids are who is most impacted by this matter, why not ask them who they want to be with?
God bless you and them always!!!
Holly
P.S. Three cheers for those who thumb their nose at the adults who are selfish.
But they are not together anymore now and if one decides to move, then what happens with the kids?They have shared custody for years. Why don't righties ever read anything and just react react react?Since the kids are who is most impacted by this matter, why not ask them who they want to be with?
God bless you and them always!!!
Holly
P.S. Three cheers for those who thumb their nose at the adults who are selfish.
Yes you?Goddamn bro, did you even read the OP?Now I'm suspecting you're just drunkand apparently you are ok with institutional discrimination. Funny
What happens? I don't know. Whatever happens with the countless other kids in America whose parents share dual custody I suppose.But they are not together anymore now and if one decides to move, then what happens with the kids?They have shared custody for years. Why don't righties ever read anything and just react react react?Since the kids are who is most impacted by this matter, why not ask them who they want to be with?
God bless you and them always!!!
Holly
P.S. Three cheers for those who thumb their nose at the adults who are selfish.
God bless you and them always!!!
Holly
