Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

[deanrd]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

And yet he is on the left with your political politicians.

So your claim is now Jackson, Sharpton, Obama and Waters are now right-wing Conservatives because Ol'Louis is a friend of theirs...

 

[JoeMoma]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

Farrakhan is one of yours. Live with it!

 

[Mac1958]

Well, at least it isn't another Hitler thread.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

Farrakhan is one of yours. Live with it!

What our great teacher " The OP " forget is Louis is a wannabe Muslim but what Louis really is is a charlatan...

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

So he would vote for Reagan, Bush, Bush II, and Trump?

Put down the crack pipe kid.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

Do your nurses let you walk the grounds unchaperoned?

 

[deanrd]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

And yet he is on the left with your political politicians.

So your claim is now Jackson, Sharpton, Obama and Waters are now right-wing Conservatives because Ol'Louis is a friend of theirs...

Well he’s black. Republicans hate black people. They hate gays most of all and then comes blacks. And then you have a Hispanics, Muslims, and a whole list of people they hate. But they hate gays first and blacks second.

 

[night_son]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

The train you ride main lines to the end of the line in a dark reeking fog of history enshrouded mountain of human skulls and long bones. Do not be so quick to embrace the title of moron, wuss or wimp's wimp. Atheist led nations have slain, massacred more of their own citizens than any other religious faith led civilization in history, fact.

From where, Dean hails your nuance of bitter ignorance of history? I very personally know many liberals, in fact I am engaged to one whose very large immigrant family is a combination of Catholicism, Hinduism and Judaism. See, fool, when you try to paint or generalize wide swaths of tens of millions of your fellow Americans into corners of identity groups, only you come out looking like a total idiot, blind to reality and truth. Don't be that guy.

Atheism is a religion, dupe.

 

[deanrd]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

So he would vote for Reagan, Bush, Bush II, and Trump?

Put down the crack pipe kid.

Only Republicans want to vote for people that hurt the country.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

And yet he is on the left with your political politicians.

So your claim is now Jackson, Sharpton, Obama and Waters are now right-wing Conservatives because Ol'Louis is a friend of theirs...

Well he’s black. Republicans hate black people. They hate gays most of all and then comes blacks. And then you have a Hispanics, Muslims, and a whole list of people they hate. But they hate gays first and blacks second.

Keep trolling

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

So he would vote for Reagan, Bush, Bush II, and Trump?

Put down the crack pipe kid.

Only Republicans want to vote for people that hurt the country.

Answer my question?

 

[deanrd]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

The train you ride main lines to the end of the line in a dark reeking fog of history enshrouded mountain of human skulls and long bones. Do not be so quick to embrace the title of moron, wuss or wimp's wimp. Atheist led nations have slain, massacred more of their own citizens than any other religious faith led civilization in history, fact.

From where, Dean hails your nuance of bitter ignorance of history? I very personally know many liberals, in fact I am engaged to one whose very large immigrant family is a combination of Catholicism, Hinduism and Judaism. See, fool, when you try to paint or generalize wide swaths of tens of millions of your fellow Americans into corners of identity groups, only you come out looking like a total idiot, blind to reality and truth. Don't be that guy.

Atheism is a religion, dupe.

Oh Pah leese. Atheists have been a very tiny minority. Just the dark ages alone tells you a lot about the power of religion. Then you look at the Middle East. Atheist nations are a very recent occurrence. When you look at the totality of history.

Come on now. Get those facts straight. This is what happens when you believe education as a bad thing. You get Republicans who don’t know anything.

They just make up history the way they make up evolution the way they make up science the way they make up facts.

 

[Correll]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

And yet he is on the left with your political politicians.

So your claim is now Jackson, Sharpton, Obama and Waters are now right-wing Conservatives because Ol'Louis is a friend of theirs...

Well he’s black. Republicans hate black people. They hate gays most of all and then comes blacks. And then you have a Hispanics, Muslims, and a whole list of people they hate. But they hate gays first and blacks second.

And just like that you give up defending your op.


Wow. That was pathetically weak of you, and your "argument", such as it WAS.


You can shove your vile race baiting up your ass.

 

[Correll]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

So he would vote for Reagan, Bush, Bush II, and Trump?

Put down the crack pipe kid.

Only Republicans want to vote for people that hurt the country.

Answer my question?

He can't, Generally, he can't answer questions, and certainly specifically more than ever with this especially stupid claim.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

Left wing....just like FDR, Obama, Hitler, and you.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

once again dean demonstrates that liberalism is mental disorder

 

[night_son]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

The train you ride main lines to the end of the line in a dark reeking fog of history enshrouded mountain of human skulls and long bones. Do not be so quick to embrace the title of moron, wuss or wimp's wimp. Atheist led nations have slain, massacred more of their own citizens than any other religious faith led civilization in history, fact.

From where, Dean hails your nuance of bitter ignorance of history? I very personally know many liberals, in fact I am engaged to one whose very large immigrant family is a combination of Catholicism, Hinduism and Judaism. See, fool, when you try to paint or generalize wide swaths of tens of millions of your fellow Americans into corners of identity groups, only you come out looking like a total idiot, blind to reality and truth. Don't be that guy.

Atheism is a religion, dupe.

Oh Pah leese. Atheists have been a very tiny minority. Just the dark ages alone tells you a lot about the power of religion. Then you look at the Middle East. Atheist nations are a very recent occurrence. When you look at the totality of history.

Come on now. Get those facts straight. This is what happens when you believe education as a bad thing. You get Republicans who don’t know anything.

They just make up history the way they make up evolution the way they make up science the way they make up facts.

See how a not minority of Atheists slaughtered hundreds of thousands of fellow Christian countrymen during the French Revolution, tens of millions during the Bolshevik Revolution, tens of millions under Stalin, and then remove your foot from your mouth.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Well, at least it isn't another Hitler thread.

I bet you could find some good points about Hitler...you know, just to be even-handed.

"Hitler was a great painter!!!!

Two coats in an afternoon!!!!"

 

[Mac1958]

Well, at least it isn't another Hitler thread.

I bet you could find some good points about Hitler...you know, just to be even-handed.
"Hitler was a great painter!!!!
Two coats in an afternoon!!!!"

My goodness.

Get me out of your head.

Yikes.
.