SobieskiSavedEurope
Gold Member
- Banned
- #41
I'd agreee Farrakhtan is a Right-Winger.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
Are you suggesting that atheists are conservative?Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
Desperate Progs Gonna Post Deperate Misinformation.
Well he’s black. Republicans hate black people. They hate gays most of all and then comes blacks. And then you have a Hispanics, Muslims, and a whole list of people they hate. But they hate gays first and blacks second.Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
And yet he is on the left with your political politicians.
So your claim is now Jackson, Sharpton, Obama and Waters are now right-wing Conservatives because Ol'Louis is a friend of theirs...
God damn you people are stupid.The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
......there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.
Let's prove it together:
. There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.
Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.
"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST
I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Clearly this is totally bogus.
Fake news.
Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"
There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
The grand Dragon switching his support from Trump? Want to bet he switched it back?And now the American Nazi party is a wing of the GOP. Odd that!Well, at least it isn't another Hitler thread.
I bet you could find some good points about Hitler...you know, just to be even-handed.
"Hitler was a great painter!!!!
Two coats in an afternoon!!!!"
I don tink so, Lucy.....
Ku Klux Klan Grand Dragon Will Quigg Endorses Hillary Clinton for President
He says he's retracting his endorsement of Donald Trump.
By Rachel Dicker, Associate Editor, Social Media March 14, 2016, at 5:27 p.m.
More
Ku Klux Klan Grand Dragon Will Quigg Endorses Hillary Clinton for President
More
HILLARY CLINTON CAN ADD a new name to her list of endorsements – a prominent Ku Klux Klan member who says he likes her because of her "hidden agenda."
Will Quigg, a grand dragon of the Ku Klux Klan's California chapter, told the Telegraph Monday that he would be switching his support from Donald Trump to Clinton.
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president
Putin is a communist. Trump works for Putin. That’s just the way it is. So why would you say vote Democrat? It makes no sense.
Trump is a wannabe Muslim? Who would have thunk!Like trumpFarrakhan is one of yours. Live with it!Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
What our great teacher " The OP " forget is Louis is a wannabe Muslim but what Louis really is is a charlatan...
God damn you people are stupid.The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
......there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.
Let's prove it together:
. There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.
Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.
"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST
I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Clearly this is totally bogus.
Fake news.
Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"
There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."
Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
And yet he is on the left with your political politicians.
So your claim is now Jackson, Sharpton, Obama and Waters are now right-wing Conservatives because Ol'Louis is a friend of theirs...
Well he’s black. Republicans hate black people. They hate gays most of all and then comes blacks. And then you have a Hispanics, Muslims, and a whole list of people they hate. But they hate gays first and blacks second.Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
And yet he is on the left with your political politicians.
So your claim is now Jackson, Sharpton, Obama and Waters are now right-wing Conservatives because Ol'Louis is a friend of theirs...
Keep trolling
I don't know about Waters, but Jackson and Sharpton are Reverands. Obama professes to be a Christian, even though he has an affinity towards Muslims. Guess they are right wing!Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
And yet he is on the left with your political politicians.
So your claim is now Jackson, Sharpton, Obama and Waters are now right-wing Conservatives because Ol'Louis is a friend of theirs...
Only deanrd can make a post this asinine. He takes idiocy to the extreme of the extreme.
It’s not a question of joining. Religious extremists are right wing. They all are. Their conservative.The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
If you support a racist like trump and you support racist policies like republican policies then yes U2 are a racist.Continue the broadbrush Harold ...Truth is truth. Even if it’s written into a tablet like what Moses was given. Commandments that Republicans these days spit on.All of your posts belong in a Crayola font.Well he’s black. Republicans hate black people. They hate gays most of all and then comes blacks. And then you have a Hispanics, Muslims, and a whole list of people they hate. But they hate gays first and blacks second.And yet he is on the left with your political politicians.
So your claim is now Jackson, Sharpton, Obama and Waters are now right-wing Conservatives because Ol'Louis is a friend of theirs...
View attachment 227097
You draw a pretty scary monster.
The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
......there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.
Let's prove it together:
. There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.
Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.
"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST
I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Clearly this is totally bogus.
Fake news.
Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"
There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."
The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
......there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.
Let's prove it together:
. There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.
Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.
"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST
I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Clearly this is totally bogus.
Fake news.
Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"
There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."
But there are. C’mon don’t sink to this level where you just ignore the world around you. There are people who believe white should be the majority race and their beliefs fit the definition of white supremacy. Sorry but you sound just as ludicrous as dean with this post.
The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
......there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.
Let's prove it together:
. There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.
Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.
"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST
I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Clearly this is totally bogus.
Fake news.
Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"
There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."
But there are. C’mon don’t sink to this level where you just ignore the world around you. There are people who believe white should be the majority race and their beliefs fit the definition of white supremacy. Sorry but you sound just as ludicrous as dean with this post.
I publish truth with the diligence of a UN translator.
Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"
There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."
Or.....name 'em and quote 'em.
Bet you can't.
The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.
Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.
An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.
Is that clear now?
......there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...
It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.
Let's prove it together:
. There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.
Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.
"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST
I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Clearly this is totally bogus.
Fake news.
Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"
There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."
But there are. C’mon don’t sink to this level where you just ignore the world around you. There are people who believe white should be the majority race and their beliefs fit the definition of white supremacy. Sorry but you sound just as ludicrous as dean with this post.
I publish truth with the diligence of a UN translator.
Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"
There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."
Or.....name 'em and quote 'em.
Bet you can't.
So the Nazis weren’t white supremacists? In order to be a white supremacist you must be American and a leader?