Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I'd agreee Farrakhtan is a Right-Winger.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.

......there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...


It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.




Let's prove it together:
. There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Fake news.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

 

[deanrd]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

Desperate Progs Gonna Post Deperate Misinformation.

Are you suggesting that atheists are conservative?

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

And yet he is on the left with your political politicians.

So your claim is now Jackson, Sharpton, Obama and Waters are now right-wing Conservatives because Ol'Louis is a friend of theirs...

Well he’s black. Republicans hate black people. They hate gays most of all and then comes blacks. And then you have a Hispanics, Muslims, and a whole list of people they hate. But they hate gays first and blacks second.

And that is why I am not a Republican. I don’t hate gays or blacks, but I do hate ignorant OP’s, eh Dentard.

 

[JGalt]

 

[Crepitus]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.

......there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...


It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.




Let's prove it together:
. There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Fake news.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

God damn you people are stupid.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

Atheist might limit the amount of traditional values AKA Conservate values one might have, but not necessarily.

I've met a bunch of Atheist White Supremacists & Racialists, they tend to be pro-White, anti-Black, anti-Abortion, anti-Jewish, anti-Muslim, pro-Authoritarianism, anti-Drug-dealer, and so forth.

So, they're still Right-Wingers.

I myself am an Agnostic, and certainly am a Right-Winger.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Well, at least it isn't another Hitler thread.

I bet you could find some good points about Hitler...you know, just to be even-handed.

"Hitler was a great painter!!!!

Two coats in an afternoon!!!!"

And now the American Nazi party is a wing of the GOP. Odd that!

I don tink so, Lucy.....



Ku Klux Klan Grand Dragon Will Quigg Endorses Hillary Clinton for President

He says he's retracting his endorsement of Donald Trump.



By Rachel Dicker, Associate Editor, Social Media March 14, 2016, at 5:27 p.m.

More



Ku Klux Klan Grand Dragon Will Quigg Endorses Hillary Clinton for President

More

HILLARY CLINTON CAN ADD a new name to her list of endorsements – a prominent Ku Klux Klan member who says he likes her because of her "hidden agenda."
Will Quigg, a grand dragon of the Ku Klux Klan's California chapter, told the Telegraph Monday that he would be switching his support from Donald Trump to Clinton.


https://www.usnews.com/news/article...-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president

The grand Dragon switching his support from Trump? Want to bet he switched it back?

And.....let's remember that the latest Democrat iteration of the Democrat creation, the KKK, is Antifa....

Nationwide, there are still an estimated 3,000 Klan members and unaffiliated people who "identify with Klan ideology," according to the ADL. Membership, though, remains spread across dozens of groups. The largest Klans reportedly don't have more than 50 to 100 active members, and most have fewer than 25.”
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...is-still-based-in-22-states-in-the-us-in-2017


“However, social media does give some indication of how many people are involved in the Antifa movement, but those numbers don't indicate a massive following. The New York City Antifa Twitter account has a little under 18,000 followers, and the account for Philadelphia only has about 6,000. The group's previously low profile has quickly dissolved — search interest in Antifa has exploded in the last 72 hours, according to Google Trends.”
After Charlottesville, Interest In The Antifa Movement Is Spiking





“Communist agitators took to Twitter this week to brainstorm strategies for a violent armed insurrection against their perceived enemies.

“Dr. Bones," the co-host of the far-left podcast The Guillotine, started the conversation going with his 5,000-plus Twitter followers. Bones (@Ole_Bonsey on Twitter) asked: “Hey quick little question for military minded lefties: should leftists train/organize in a 'insurgent' focus where they blend into a civilian population for potential attacks or a more 'militia' structure focused on holding/maintaining turf?”

Antifa Calls for 'Slaughter' of Border Patrol Dogs

Bones went on to suggest that fellow travelers organize "hidden cells" and focus on ambushes and assassinations to bleed "right-leaning forces" dry. He said the during the day comrades should pretend to be into "helping everybody" and never talk about their "nighttime activities."

Communists Planning Armed Insurrection on Twitter


Wow, you Leftists have been busy.

 

[The Purge]

Putin is a communist. Trump works for Putin. That’s just the way it is. So why would you say vote Democrat? It makes no sense.

TALK ABOUT A COMMIE TRAITOR BASTARD!

 

[JoeMoma]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

Farrakhan is one of yours. Live with it!

What our great teacher " The OP " forget is Louis is a wannabe Muslim but what Louis really is is a charlatan...

Like trump

Trump is a wannabe Muslim? Who would have thunk!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.

......there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...


It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.




Let's prove it together:
. There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Fake news.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

God damn you people are stupid.

....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


Why couldn't you name any?


Seems your post just became a boomerang, huh?

 

[BookShaka]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

Oh my fucking God you are too stupid for words. I’m not saying this to be mean. It’s the simple truth and 98% of the members here agree I’m sure, even the dumber ones.

“All religious extremists are right-wing.” LMFAO!!!! I guess you just discount all the Muslims blowing people up all over the world.

“An atheist would be considered liberal, not conservative” only in your warped mind. Using stereotypes as part of claiming truth is NOT something intelligent people do.

I’ve come to the conclusion you’re not a troll and therefore I must pity you.

 

[BookShaka]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

And yet he is on the left with your political politicians.

So your claim is now Jackson, Sharpton, Obama and Waters are now right-wing Conservatives because Ol'Louis is a friend of theirs...

Only deanrd can make a post this asinine. He takes idiocy to the extreme of the extreme.

 

[BookShaka]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

And yet he is on the left with your political politicians.

So your claim is now Jackson, Sharpton, Obama and Waters are now right-wing Conservatives because Ol'Louis is a friend of theirs...

Well he’s black. Republicans hate black people. They hate gays most of all and then comes blacks. And then you have a Hispanics, Muslims, and a whole list of people they hate. But they hate gays first and blacks second.

Keep trolling

He’s not trolling.

 

[JoeMoma]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

And yet he is on the left with your political politicians.

So your claim is now Jackson, Sharpton, Obama and Waters are now right-wing Conservatives because Ol'Louis is a friend of theirs...

Only deanrd can make a post this asinine. He takes idiocy to the extreme of the extreme.

I don't know about Waters, but Jackson and Sharpton are Reverands. Obama professes to be a Christian, even though he has an affinity towards Muslims. Guess they are right wing!

 

[BookShaka]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.

It’s not a question of joining. Religious extremists are right wing. They all are. Their conservative.

And yet he is on the left with your political politicians.

So your claim is now Jackson, Sharpton, Obama and Waters are now right-wing Conservatives because Ol'Louis is a friend of theirs...

Well he’s black. Republicans hate black people. They hate gays most of all and then comes blacks. And then you have a Hispanics, Muslims, and a whole list of people they hate. But they hate gays first and blacks second.

All of your posts belong in a Crayola font.

Truth is truth. Even if it’s written into a tablet like what Moses was given. Commandments that Republicans these days spit on.

Continue the broadbrush Harold ...
View attachment 227097
You draw a pretty scary monster.

If you support a racist like trump and you support racist policies like republican policies then yes U2 are a racist.

Case and point right here... this is the extent of your thinking.

 

[BookShaka]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.

......there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...


It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.




Let's prove it together:
. There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Fake news.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

But there are. C’mon don’t sink to this level where you just ignore the world around you. There are people who believe white should be the majority race and their beliefs fit the definition of white supremacy. Sorry but you sound just as ludicrous as dean with this post.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.

......there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...


It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.




Let's prove it together:
. There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Fake news.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

But there are. C’mon don’t sink to this level where you just ignore the world around you. There are people who believe white should be the majority race and their beliefs fit the definition of white supremacy. Sorry but you sound just as ludicrous as dean with this post.

I publish truth with the diligence of a UN translator.




Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

Or.....name 'em and quote 'em.




Bet you can't.

 

[BookShaka]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.

......there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...


It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.




Let's prove it together:
. There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Fake news.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

But there are. C’mon don’t sink to this level where you just ignore the world around you. There are people who believe white should be the majority race and their beliefs fit the definition of white supremacy. Sorry but you sound just as ludicrous as dean with this post.

I publish truth with the diligence of a UN translator.




Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

Or.....name 'em and quote 'em.




Bet you can't.

So the Nazis weren’t white supremacists? In order to be a white supremacist you must be American and a leader?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Louis Farrakhan is a right-wing religious extremist. An atheist would be considered liberal.

Somehow Republicans on the US message board have this idea that if it’s not Christian it must be a liberal. But all religious extremists are right wing.

An atheist would be considered liberal. Not conservative.

Is that clear now?

The rwnj white supremacists won't let him join for obvious reasons.

......there is no such thing as a 'white supremacist'...


It is one of those terms, like 'boogey man' that is used to fuel other immature minds.




Let's prove it together:
. There are no white supremacists. The term is a created 'term of art' to camouflage the real villains, the Democrats.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.

"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST


I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.
The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Fake news.

Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

But there are. C’mon don’t sink to this level where you just ignore the world around you. There are people who believe white should be the majority race and their beliefs fit the definition of white supremacy. Sorry but you sound just as ludicrous as dean with this post.

I publish truth with the diligence of a UN translator.




Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

Or.....name 'em and quote 'em.




Bet you can't.

So the Nazis weren’t white supremacists? In order to be a white supremacist you must be American and a leader?

Please don't change the subject.

You were given a simple challenge....Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

Or.....name 'em and quote 'em.

You couldn't because there are no such folks who are reputable.




Why would you bring up Nazis....?

Do you know that the Nazis actually modeled their program on the Democrat Party?

“At Nuremberg, the Nazis sought to preserve Nordic racial purity by outlawing racial intermarriage with Jews in much the same manner that Democratic anti-miscegenation laws outlawed racial intermarriage with blacks.”
Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats


“…Hitler learned from progressive sterilization laws that had been enacted in America through the influence of activists like Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. “I have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would in all probability be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.”

Hitler’s views—which closely parallel Sanger’s—provided the basis for the Nazi sterilization laws of 1933 which began by targeting “imbeciles” and the mentally retarded, and later expanded to cover Jews, gypsies, and other social undesirables.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats


From the LATimes:

“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American [Democrat] jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes