Loretta Lynch Refuses to Say Whether It’s Illegal to Lie Under Oath

Vigilante

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2014
51,327
18,072
2,290
Waiting on the Cowardly Dante!!
Mediaite ^ | 12 Jul 2016 | Alex Griswold
During her testimony before the House Judiciary Committee Tuesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch at one point declined to say whether it was legal or illegal to lie under oath. Republican Congressman Jason Chaffetz quizzed Lynch on the legality of a series of acts that former Secretary of State and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has been accused of doing. But each time, Lynch stonewalled and refused to weigh in on whether the given act was legal or illegal. “Is it legal or illegal to store, house or retain classified information in a non-secure location?” asked Chaffetz. “I would refer you...

th
 
At this point humoring desperate republicans is pointless. Lynch should have just held up the middle finger until they dismissed her.

Fuck you. I say that because you don't mind that the AG is a political hack, which means you are a political hack.
 
At this point humoring desperate republicans is pointless. Lynch should have just held up the middle finger until they dismissed her.

Fuck you. I say that because you don't mind that the AG is a political hack, which means you are a political hack.
I bet you loved John Ashcroft. Cry me a river asshole.
 
Mediaite ^ | 12 Jul 2016 | Alex Griswold
During her testimony before the House Judiciary Committee Tuesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch at one point declined to say whether it was legal or illegal to lie under oath. Republican Congressman Jason Chaffetz quizzed Lynch on the legality of a series of acts that former Secretary of State and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has been accused of doing. But each time, Lynch stonewalled and refused to weigh in on whether the given act was legal or illegal. “Is it legal or illegal to store, house or retain classified information in a non-secure location?” asked Chaffetz. “I would refer you...

th

Another legacy/precedent from the Obama Administration....An Attorney General cannot answer a straight forward question: “Is it legal or illegal to store, house or retain classified information in a non-secure location?”

Every opposing party member of Congress ought to be explicitly setting up remote, NON SECURE servers and write the Attorney General that they are doing so. Make her tell you how you are wrong for doing so.
 
At this point humoring desperate republicans is pointless. Lynch should have just held up the middle finger until they dismissed her.

Fuck you. I say that because you don't mind that the AG is a political hack, which means you are a political hack.
I bet you loved John Ashcroft. Cry me a river asshole.

It's always the same with your kind (ie hacks), they always deflect.
Okay how about this - I'm happy that Lynch will not cooperate with republican bullshit. The birth certificate, Jade Helm, ebola, Benghazi, death panels, the administration all being members of the Muslim Brotherhood... all of your made up bullshit has been humored for 8 years. Rather than responding, it's about damn time for you all to get the finger.

Next time, don't cry wolf constantly.
 
i hope all of this BS brings all of the swing states to a boiling point where Trump wins 40 States, the beast wins 10, then Hillary can move back to Kenya
 
At this point humoring desperate republicans is pointless. Lynch should have just held up the middle finger until they dismissed her.

Well, we have seen what Contempt of Congress means to the Oboma administration

Eric Holder contempt vote: Holder held in contempt of Congress ...
www.politico.com/story/2012/.../holder-held-in-contempt-of-congress-07798...
Politico
Jun 28, 2012 - The House has voted to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress over his failure to turn over documents related to the Fast ...

And when an Obuma Judge has to decide the case....

Judge declines to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt ...
www.politico.com/...the.../judge-declines-to-hold-holder-in-contempt-196650
Politico
Oct 6, 2014 - A federal judge has declined a House committee's bid to have Attorney General Eric Holder held in contempt of court — and perhaps even ...

Trumps right again....THE SYSTEM IS RIGGED!
 
Lying under oath is not necessarily illegal.

Now tell US how that is trustworthy and ethical? What is the Law of the Land? ACA? Enviro-friendly lightbulbs? Crossing the border undocumented? the right wood for Gibson Guitars? You people are in no position to define adherence to a law.....your pendulum keeps hitting you in the back of your ass.
 
i hope all of this BS brings all of the swing states to a boiling point where Trump wins 40 States, the beast wins 10, then Hillary can move back to Kenya
And take all the raggity ass Liberials Democrats communist socialist and last but not least 0bumer.
 

Forum List

Back
Top