Looks Like The Cat's Out Of The Bag....

upload_2019-3-27_18-57-22.png

Rising Seas Are Flooding Virginia’s Naval Base, and There’s No Plan to Fix It

upload_2019-3-27_18-58-22.png


Rising oceans threaten to submerge 128 military bases: report

and

National Defense in Jeopardy: Rising Seas Put These Military Bases at Risk of Destruction
 
And the brows and the shore power leads and redesign the camels and rerun power and steam and phone lines..

I guess the Navy was confused. They should have asked you Mike. Silly sailors.

How many trillions do we need to spend on windmills so we don't need to change the bases?
 
If only we had less CO2, the ocean wouldn't rise.



A quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

Studies have shown that increased concentrations of carbon dioxide increase photosynthesis, spurring plant growth. While rising carbon dioxide concentrations in the air can be beneficial for plants, it is also the chief culprit of climate change.Apr 26, 2016


CO2 is making Earth greener—for now – Climate Change: Vital ...




CO2 is making Earth greener—for now – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
 
Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere - Wikipedia
A 2017 article states that increased CO2 levels have a negative impact on the nutritional quality of various human food crops, by increasing the levels of carbohydrates, such as glucose, while decreasing the levels of important nutrients such as protein, iron, and zinc. Crops experiencing a decrease in protein include rice, wheat, barley and potatoes.[1]

Reference
1) Archer, D. (2005). "Fate of fossil fuel CO2 in geologic time". J. Geophys. Res. 110. Bibcode:2005JGRC..11009S05A. doi:10.1029/2004JC002625.
 
Remember this, from the first Republican President?

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.


Looks like the Global Warming Scam has run its course.


"New Gallup Poll: Americans do not even mention global warming as a problem – 36 ‘problems’ cited, but not climate

According to the latest Gallup poll, NOBODY thinks global warming is our most important problem, contrary to what NRCM, Audubon and CLF sock puppets tell us."
New Gallup Poll: Americans do not even mention global warming as a problem – 36 ‘problems’ cited, but not climate



Oh, noooozzzzz!!!!

Now we're gonna have to find a whole new bunch of human piñatas!!!

_sq_
Tell that to the people in Nebraska and Iowa.
 
Remember this, from the first Republican President?

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.


Looks like the Global Warming Scam has run its course.


"New Gallup Poll: Americans do not even mention global warming as a problem – 36 ‘problems’ cited, but not climate

According to the latest Gallup poll, NOBODY thinks global warming is our most important problem, contrary to what NRCM, Audubon and CLF sock puppets tell us."
New Gallup Poll: Americans do not even mention global warming as a problem – 36 ‘problems’ cited, but not climate



Oh, noooozzzzz!!!!

Now we're gonna have to find a whole new bunch of human piñatas!!!

_sq_
Tell that to the people in Nebraska and Iowa.

There were no floods before we used fossil fuels, eh?
 
And the brows and the shore power leads and redesign the camels and rerun power and steam and phone lines..

I guess the Navy was confused. They should have asked you Mike. Silly sailors.


"Why would Al Gore buy a 9 million dollar house by the ocean if he thinks that the oceans are going to rise by 10 feet?"
https://www.quora.com/Why-would-Al-...-that-the-oceans-are-going-to-rise-by-10-feet
Why would some one like you like continually about this? Montecito, California, lies at 180 ft above sea level.

Montecito, California - Wikipedia
 
If only we had less CO2, the ocean wouldn't rise.



A quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

Studies have shown that increased concentrations of carbon dioxide increase photosynthesis, spurring plant growth. While rising carbon dioxide concentrations in the air can be beneficial for plants, it is also the chief culprit of climate change.Apr 26, 2016


CO2 is making Earth greener—for now – Climate Change: Vital ...




CO2 is making Earth greener—for now – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
I am so sure that the farmers in Nebraska and Iowa are so happy to see how much greener their crops will be this year. I am also so sure that they are so thankful that the floods took care of all that grain and soybeans that they could not sell this year because of the Trump tariffs.
 
Remember this, from the first Republican President?

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.


Looks like the Global Warming Scam has run its course.


"New Gallup Poll: Americans do not even mention global warming as a problem – 36 ‘problems’ cited, but not climate

According to the latest Gallup poll, NOBODY thinks global warming is our most important problem, contrary to what NRCM, Audubon and CLF sock puppets tell us."
New Gallup Poll: Americans do not even mention global warming as a problem – 36 ‘problems’ cited, but not climate



Oh, noooozzzzz!!!!

Now we're gonna have to find a whole new bunch of human piñatas!!!

_sq_
Tell that to the people in Nebraska and Iowa.

There were no floods before we used fossil fuels, eh?
We are seeing an increase in both the number of floods, and the amount of water in those floods worldwide. So that kind of comment is just a deflection to avoid reality.
 
Remember this, from the first Republican President?

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.


Looks like the Global Warming Scam has run its course.


"New Gallup Poll: Americans do not even mention global warming as a problem – 36 ‘problems’ cited, but not climate

According to the latest Gallup poll, NOBODY thinks global warming is our most important problem, contrary to what NRCM, Audubon and CLF sock puppets tell us."
New Gallup Poll: Americans do not even mention global warming as a problem – 36 ‘problems’ cited, but not climate



Oh, noooozzzzz!!!!

Now we're gonna have to find a whole new bunch of human piñatas!!!

_sq_
Tell that to the people in Nebraska and Iowa.

There were no floods before we used fossil fuels, eh?
We are seeing an increase in both the number of floods, and the amount of water in those floods worldwide. So that kind of comment is just a deflection to avoid reality.

We are seeing an increase in both the number of floods, and the amount of water in those floods worldwide.

What's the proper number of floods and the proper amount of water?
How do you know?
 
A quick quiz for you Ms Chic. What do all naval bases possess?

Piers. Fixed structures to which large ships may be moored. As sea level rises, moored ships rise with respect to the piers. Problem.





According to you silly people the piers are supposed to already be under water. Hansen, one of your heros famously said that by, oh a few years ago now, the West Side Highway would be under water.

Last time I checked it is still the same.
 
Remember this, from the first Republican President?

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.


Looks like the Global Warming Scam has run its course.


"New Gallup Poll: Americans do not even mention global warming as a problem – 36 ‘problems’ cited, but not climate

According to the latest Gallup poll, NOBODY thinks global warming is our most important problem, contrary to what NRCM, Audubon and CLF sock puppets tell us."
New Gallup Poll: Americans do not even mention global warming as a problem – 36 ‘problems’ cited, but not climate



Oh, noooozzzzz!!!!

Now we're gonna have to find a whole new bunch of human piñatas!!!

_sq_
Tell that to the people in Nebraska and Iowa.

There were no floods before we used fossil fuels, eh?
We are seeing an increase in both the number of floods, and the amount of water in those floods worldwide. So that kind of comment is just a deflection to avoid reality.





Bullshit. There has been no flood to equal the Great Flood of 1862 when the Central Valley of California was turned into a lake. Facts say you're a baldfaced liar.

Here's the dumb downed version from wiki as that seems the limit of your intellect.

The Great Flood of 1862 was the largest flood in the recorded history of Oregon, Nevada, and California, occurring from December 1861 to January 1862, caused by an ARkStorm. It was preceded by weeks of continuous rains and snows in the very high elevations that began in Oregon in November 1861 and continued into January 1862. This was followed by a record amount of rain from January 9–12, and contributed to a flood that extended from the Columbia River southward in western Oregon, and through California to San Diego, and extended as far inland as Idaho in the Washington Territory, Nevada and Utahin the Utah Territory, and Arizona in the western New Mexico Territory. The ARkStorm dumped an equivalent of 10 feet of rainfall in California, in the form of rain and snow, over a period of 43 days.[1][2] Immense snowfalls in the mountains of the far western United States caused more flooding in Idaho, Arizona, New Mexico, and Sonora, Mexico the following spring and summer as the snow melted.

The event was capped by a warm intense storm that melted the high snow load. The resulting snow-melt flooded valleys, inundated or swept away towns, mills, dams, flumes, houses, fences, and domestic animals, and ruined fields. It has been described as the worst disaster ever to strike California.[3]

Great Flood of 1862 - Wikipedia
 
And the brows and the shore power leads and redesign the camels and rerun power and steam and phone lines..

I guess the Navy was confused. They should have asked you Mike. Silly sailors.

How many trillions do we need to spend on windmills so we don't need to change the bases?

You seem like a sensible guy. Would you recommend that when faced by a problem like this, we do nothing to mitigate the CAUSE of the sea level rise?
 
And the brows and the shore power leads and redesign the camels and rerun power and steam and phone lines..

I guess the Navy was confused. They should have asked you Mike. Silly sailors.

How many trillions do we need to spend on windmills so we don't need to change the bases?

You seem like a sensible guy. Would you recommend that when faced by a problem like this, we do nothing to mitigate the CAUSE of the sea level rise?

Instead of throwing tax dollars at windmills, solar panels and electric cars, throw it at something useful.
Like nuclear.

If you really want to cut US emissions, boot 15 million illegal aliens.
They'll release less CO2 back in their home country than they will here.
 
If only we had less CO2, the ocean wouldn't rise.



A quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

Studies have shown that increased concentrations of carbon dioxide increase photosynthesis, spurring plant growth. While rising carbon dioxide concentrations in the air can be beneficial for plants, it is also the chief culprit of climate change.Apr 26, 2016


CO2 is making Earth greener—for now – Climate Change: Vital ...




CO2 is making Earth greener—for now – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
I am so sure that the farmers in Nebraska and Iowa are so happy to see how much greener their crops will be this year. I am also so sure that they are so thankful that the floods took care of all that grain and soybeans that they could not sell this year because of the Trump tariffs.

Sucks for sure.....but that's what happens after unusually heavy snows in the winter!
 
And the brows and the shore power leads and redesign the camels and rerun power and steam and phone lines..

I guess the Navy was confused. They should have asked you Mike. Silly sailors.

This is English? I think not.

Nobody redesigns camels except God.
 
There is endless nonsense on the internet for unscientific dimwits like you to cling to while you say with a straight face that the scientists are wrong. I've danced this dance before and it's a waste of time. You've already made up your mind, so I'll just laugh at you instead.

Shuck and jive....dodge and weave....tuck tail and run...it is always the same with you guys. Here I am, asking not for absolute proof that we are causing cliamte change...not even an overwhelming body of evidence that we are causing climate change...I am asking for a single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability and you can't produce it...all of climate science can't produce it.

That being the case, what exactly do you think has all these scientists convinced.

And laughing, when you are being made a laughing stock presents some interesting psychology...you can't provide a single shred of actual evidence to support your position and when called on it, you laugh. ......interesting.

No, no I get it now. There's no evidence; you're right. It's all a big conspiracy. Scientists all over the world are lying to the public so they can help spread globalism and socialism. How did I not see it before? Thank you Dingus. My life is forever changed.

And still not a single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.

Here, let me show you what it looks like to provide evidence that supports your position....

Here is a gold standard temperature reconstruction derived from the GISP2 ice cores taken from above the Arctic Circle. Even climate science acknowledges that ice cores are the gold standard for temperature reconstruction. Note the present temperature relative to the past 10,000 years.

Lappi_Greenland_ice_core_10000yrs.jpg


Here is another gold standard temperature reconstruction derived from the Vostok ice cores taken from Antarctica.

vostok-last-12000-years-web.gif


Again, note the present temperature relative to the past 10,000 years. Close examination of the two graphs shows very similar temperature spikes over the past 10K years. Now, if you can think of a rational, scientifically valid reason why gold standard ice cores taken from opposite poles indicate that most of the past 10,000 years was warmer than the present but the globe in between was not, I would like to hear it.

Then there is this...dozens of studies showing the past was warmer than the present.


Project: Mapping the Medieval Warm Period | Die kalte Sonne


fig-1-screenshot-of-mwp-project.jpg


So I have supported my position with gold standard temperature reconstructions and dozens of peer reviewed, published papers which show that the past was warmer than the present...and I have just barely scratched the surface. What do you have? answer: nothing at all but impotent bluster.

Thank you for enlightening me, Dingus. We need to let the scientists know. Where should we start?

They already know, since it was the SCIENTISTS who made the Ice core charts and the MWP chart in the first place.

You must have been a pet rock in a previous incarnation, your head is still full of it today.

Try something new for a change, THINK and READ it out before you post.
 

Forum List

Back
Top