Looks like Obama was correct about Benghazi

So much for the Republican campaign against Hillary

A Deadly Mix in Benghazi - The New York Times

Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault.

So it was the video? So security wasn't inadequate after all? you're a joke:cuckoo:

Probably. Bengazi was a dumb move for an ambassador. And no...
 
oh I'm sorry, did you have something intelligent to add to the discussion....clearly not....you can piss off now....

Well, if THAT'S the criteria, what the hell are you doing here?!

Discussing the item in question in an intelligent manner. A fact that escapes your grasp. Run along now child....

You'll never get that from the likes of Poop. She never puts forth anything in the way of argument.
 
So much for the Republican campaign against Hillary

A Deadly Mix in Benghazi - The New York Times

Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault.

What does it really matter?

It matters only to the partisan right, desperate to ‘get rid’ of Obama.
 
So much for the Republican campaign against Hillary

A Deadly Mix in Benghazi - The New York Times

Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault.

What does it really matter?

It matters only to the partisan right, desperate to ‘get rid’ of Obama.

Obviously those comments went right over the head of the far left Obama drones.
 
. Fifteen months after Mr. Stevens’s death, the question of responsibility remains a searing issue in Washington, framed by two contradictory story lines.
One has it that the video, which was posted on YouTube, inspired spontaneous street protests that got out of hand. This version, based on early intelligence reports, was initially offered publicly by Susan E. Rice, who is now Mr. Obama’s national security adviser.
The other, favored by Republicans, holds that Mr. Stevens died in a carefully planned assault by Al Qaeda to mark the anniversary of its strike on the United States 11 years before. Republicans have accused the Obama administration of covering up evidence of Al Qaeda’s role to avoid undermining the president’s claim that the group has been decimated, in part because of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.
The investigation by The Times shows that the reality in Benghazi was different, and murkier, than either of those story lines suggests. Benghazi was not infiltrated by Al Qaeda, but nonetheless contained grave local threats to American interests. The attack does not appear to have been meticulously planned, but neither was it spontaneous or without warning signs.

So did Susan Rice quit talking out her fat ass about videos ?
 
Alright let me see if I have this straight in the Presidential debate hosted by Candy Crowley President Obama stated that in his September 12th speech in the Rose garden the day after the attack he said he called Benghazi a terrorist attack yet the following Sunday Susan Rice went on all the morning talk shows and said it was the result of outrage over video. Now the New York Times is basically saying it was neither so we have the President claiming it was one thing Rice another and the Times saying it's none of the above that about it?
 
Last edited:
Ansar al-Sharia has also been suspected in the violent attacks in the Mount Chaambi area near the Algerian border, including the killing of eight soldiers last month.

Laradeyh blamed the Salafist movement for liaising with Al-Qaeda's North African affiliate and announced the group as a terrorist group.

Ansar al-Sharia is considered one of the most radical groups that emerged after the secular autocrat Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali was toppled in 2011.

The Ansar leader Saifallah Benahssine, also known as Abu Iyadh, is a former al-Qaeda fighter in Afghanistan sought by police for allegedly inciting an attack on the US embassy in Tunis in September 2012.

Ansar al-Sharia blamed for Tunisia killings - Africa - Al Jazeera English


??????


WTF does any of this mean?

You are really starting to scare me. Do you live alone ? If so, how ????

:dig::dig::dig:
 
Never underestimate the ability of a conservative to remain willfully ignorant.

Unfortunately, you've become pretty sloppy as of late.

Did you want to ascribe that to a particular post or was this to be a general "drool" on your part ?
 
It was an eccentric militia, probably reacting to earlier embassy protests in the ME, that were obeying calls from the ME's favorite fundy TV personality, to attack US EMBASSIES.

BY DEFINITION IT WAS A TERROR ATTACK, AS OBAMA SAID THE NEXT DAY. SORRY YOUR IGNORANT BRAINS ARE FULL of RW bs- that's why Fox/Rush/Beck etc etc zombies get more ignorant the more they listen. DUMBASS hater dupes...
 
It was an eccentric militia, probably reacting to earlier embassy protests in the ME, that were obeying calls from the ME's favorite fundy TV personality, to attack US EMBASSIES.

BY DEFINITION IT WAS A TERROR ATTACK, AS OBAMA SAID THE NEXT DAY. SORRY YOUR IGNORANT BRAINS ARE FULL of RW bs- that's why Fox/Rush/Beck etc etc zombies get more ignorant the more they listen. DUMBASS hater dupes...

So our Affirmative Action Failure Susan Rice was flapping her buttcheeks when she said it was all due to videos...five times the following Sunday.
 
The Iraq war was a terrorist attack. Remember the false pretenses that led to the invasion? The Bush administration lied to the UN and the American people to invade a country that was not involved with 9/11. There weren't any WMD to pose an "imminent threat".

Keep it in perspective, Republicans. Your war was illegal from the start and has cost the American people trillions of dollars and thousands of lives, and cost the Iraqi people so much more.

Remember that, Republicans. Remember your lies that resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths.
 
It was an eccentric militia, probably reacting to earlier embassy protests in the ME, that were obeying calls from the ME's favorite fundy TV personality, to attack US EMBASSIES.

BY DEFINITION IT WAS A TERROR ATTACK, AS OBAMA SAID THE NEXT DAY. SORRY YOUR IGNORANT BRAINS ARE FULL of RW bs- that's why Fox/Rush/Beck etc etc zombies get more ignorant the more they listen. DUMBASS hater dupes...

So our Affirmative Action Failure Susan Rice was flapping her buttcheeks when she said it was all due to videos...five times the following Sunday.
Can you READ...
 
so the gist of the times article is it was neither a well planned terrorist attack or a spontaneous protest gone bad or in other words they really don't know anything for sure and are just guessing and speculating. Depending on one's perspective this either vindication for the obama administration or the times trying to help repair hillary's image in case she runs in 2016.

bingo!!!
 
Obama owns and runs the NYT, everyone knows that, and of course all those Muslims in Libya would agree with him, they like him hes a Muslim, duh.

Get out of here and take your fail post with you.

He was a Muslim, eh?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

He's on your side idiot, is your sarcasm detector broke?
 
The Iraq war was a terrorist attack. Remember the false pretenses that led to the invasion? The Bush administration lied to the UN and the American people to invade a country that was not involved with 9/11. There weren't any WMD to pose an "imminent threat".

Keep it in perspective, Republicans. Your war was illegal from the start and has cost the American people trillions of dollars and thousands of lives, and cost the Iraqi people so much more.

Remember that, Republicans. Remember your lies that resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths.

Republicans have cover for that. It's the Democrats fault for going along with that debacle.
 
Same thing I've been saying all along. A CRAZY LIBYAN MILITIA REACTING TO ALL THE OTHER ATTACKS/PROTESTS EARLIER THAT DAY, IN RESPONSE TO THE ME'S FAVORITE FUNDIE TV PERSONALITY YELLING ABOUT THAT STUPID RW VIDEO....
 
To Republicans, every Muslim is a member of al Qaeda, except the America hating Saudi Prince that along with Rupert Murdoch, owns Fox News.
Remember when John McCain was saying that Iran and al Qaeda were working together and he had to be corrected on camera? After the Iraq fiasco, the Arab world hates this country. Every GOP policy for the last 20 years has been a terrible disaster for this country. From Trickle Down to Tax Cuts for the rich, to let him die, to you are with us or with the terrorists. They offer nothing but division and dumb. But if America keeps voting these people into office, we deserve what they give us.
 

Forum List

Back
Top