Log of Liberal Lies

[The Rabbi]

Talk about anything other than Obama's record. That is the left's code for this election cycle.

or we could tell lies about the teatards in the house not intentionally sabotaging our recovery.

or the wingers in the senate not filibustering everything.

but if enough rightwingnuts say it, it must be true, right?

'deliberately sabotaging our recovery'? Are you serious?

You'd have to have a recovery to sabotage first.
This is Obama's latest excuse: everything was going fine and then the midterm happened and the House blocked all the legislation that would have turned this country into Singapore economically.
Jillian is incapable of more than repeating lines from the Obama campaign, and when challenged on them is unable to support her position and falls back to neg repping and insults.

 

[Katzndogz]

Democrats think that if they can convert every criticism of obama into racism they will be able to shut all criticism down. It won't work. obama has been so bad, that even democrats are starting to blink.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Talk about anything other than Obama's record. That is the left's code for this election cycle.

How can you possibly be on this board every day and then turn around and claim that liberals won't talk about Obama's record?

From where I'm sitting I see the attacks on Romney from the left. I see attacks on Obama from the right, But I don't see the left talking about Obama's record.
I guess you could call it an observation.

So what you meant to say was, Talk about anything other than Obama's or Romney's records,

those are the codes for the left and right, respectively.

 

[NYcarbineer]

What have the Republicans in the House been willing to compromise on, for the sake of getting something done on a bi-partisan basis,

for the sake of jobs and the economy?

 

[jillian]

Talk about anything other than Obama's record. That is the left's code for this election cycle.

or we could tell lies about the teatards in the house not intentionally sabotaging our recovery.

or the wingers in the senate not filibustering everything.

but if enough rightwingnuts say it, it must be true, right?

How many republican bills have been shelved by Reid in the Senate, Jillian?
I see a politics for what it is...devisive these days.

you mean the ones that cut taxes more for the wealthy?

or the ones that create a system of "vouchers" for health insurance for old people?

those bills?

or the ones that attack my constitutional right to control my own body?

those bills?

or "personhood" laws?

those?

or anti-gay, anti-female bills?

those?

unfortunately, rightwing ideas about compromise mean that everyone else do what you want.

not gonna happen.

and you all voted against your OWN plans...

but thanks for illustrating my point.

 

[P@triot]

No Dem lies, just Pubcrappe. STOOOPID shytte! Beck never says anything that ISN'T a lie. Ditto Breitbar Inc....

The important thing is their POLICY- not what kind of car they drive STUPID GOSSIP. MORON DUPES LOL Change the channel.

First of all, Glenn Beck isn't a representative of the people creating laws, so who gives a shit if he is lying? Typical idiot liberal, instead of condemning the lies of your representatives, you try to redirect the issue to Glenn Beck.

Secondly, actions speak louder than words. How can you falsely accuse accuse the GOP of policies that will cause everyone to drive a foreign car when YOUR the idiot buying foreign cars and putting American's out of work?!? Exactly. Now try to redirect the issue again by blaming idiot liberal policy on Glenn Beck.

 

[peach174]

What have the Republicans in the House been willing to compromise on, for the sake of getting something done on a bi-partisan basis,

for the sake of jobs and the economy?

I think that would be the one where Repubs wanted 6 trillion cut in 10 years.
They compromised with Dem's for 1.2 trillion in 10 years, Then we got a credit rating downsized because of it.

 

[asaratis]

What have the Republicans in the House been willing to compromise on, for the sake of getting something done on a bi-partisan basis,

for the sake of jobs and the economy?

Read all the Republican authored bills that remain in Reid's committees awaiting discussion on the Senate floor. Then talk to me about obstruction of beneficial legislation and misrepresentation of the American people.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

 

[P@triot]

"In the latest transparent attempt by the Obama Administration and the Democratic Party to make the 2012 election a referendum on supposed racism and not Obama's dismal performance, House Democrats received training this week on how to portray neutral free-market rhetoric as racially charged."

Well, when your arguments fail, your ideas fail, and your policies fail, I guess you have to stoop to despicable acts like lying about everyone else and falsely accusing them of "racism". Sorry Dems, that tactic failed miserably in the November 2010 elections when you got your asses kicked, and it's going to fail even worse now. You've "cried wolf" too many times...

House Dems Receive Training On Portraying Conservatives As Racist

how are those WMD's going?

and the one about this president outspending the repub presidents?

or the one about reagan not raising taxes?

or the one about corporations being people.

shall i go on, winger?

and why is garbage like this thread in politics and not in 'flame;?

oh right...

never mind.

Um, Jillian - do you realize that you are embarassing yourself with how misinformed you are right now? Please allow me to enlighten you for just a moment about WMD's in Iraq:

1.) Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons against the Kurds in the north during the 1980's. So to claim he never had WMD's is simply crazy beyond words.

2.) A quick excerpt from the book "Seal Target: Geronimo" by Chuck Pfarrer: "It is a chilling fact that thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq. *These weapons have been used by Al Qaeda against coalition and NATO forces on dozens of occasions. *This has been confirmed by countless sources, most recently in the released WikiLeaks cables.

So why haven't the American people been told of the stock-piled caches of chemical WMD's uncovered in Iraq or of the chemical weapon attacks by Al Qaeda?

The Republicans won’t touch this because it would reveal the incompetence of the Bush administration in failing to neutralize the danger of Iraqi WMD (instead of preventing Weapons of Mass Destruction from falling into the hands of terrorists, the 2003 invasion of Iraq has accelerated the acquisition, manufacture, and use of chemical weapons by Al Qaeda). The Democrats won’t touch it because it would show President Bush was right to invade Iraq in the first place. It is an axis of embarrassment. *And the*press won't touch it because they had already convinced themselves, and most of the American public, that Saddam Hussein didn’t have any WMD's. *The media turned a blind eye to continued reports of chemical weapon attacks because its own credibility was threatened. Several major outlets were deeply invested with the story line of an “unjustifiable war". *Not many people can bear to admit they were wrong, especially in print, and especially if they have been very wrong for a very long time."

3.) A quick Google search of "Iraq WMD's" will reveal endless major media outlets acknowledging story after story of WMD's in Iraq. Here are just a couple, including extremely liberal biased news outlet NY Post and the radical left-wing propaganda machine, MSNBC:

Iraq did have chemical WMD, WikiLeaks documents reveal - NYPOST.com

Sarin-loaded bomb explodes in Iraq - World news - Mideast/N. Africa - Conflict in Iraq - msnbc.com

Sarin, Mustard Gas Discovered Separately in Iraq | Fox News

See Jillian, you're not even slightly informed. You don't WANT to be informed. You just want to blindly pledge allegiance to the radical Commuinist left. And that's your choice. But when you comment on things you know nothing about, you lose credibility (not to mention respect) and nobody takes you seriously. Why don't you actually turn off the propagana from the left and actually learn the TRUTH? Is it that you're too afraid you'll realize you are rooting for the wrong team?

 

[P@triot]

Yet another MASSIVE lie from Marxist Dictator Obama:

Here is what President Obama had to say:

“Because of these new standards for cars, and trucks they’re going to go further and use less fuel every year, and that means pretty soon you’ll be able to fill up your car every two weeks instead of every week, and over time that saves you or a typical family, about $8,000 a year.”

But the actual statistics points out that the average family spends around $3,000 a year. If their average spending is $3,000 - I’m not sure how they would save $8,000. Are the Democrats going to pay us $5,000 to fill our tanks?

 

[midcan5]

Why does the right find it so hard to accept racism? Surely they live in the real world of lots of people, and surely they know bigots, racists, and other hateful sort of people? They are everywhere. Look at the racist comments on this site, or check out the tea party signs, or go to the local white mostly bar, and talk to the patrons. Wingnuts live in a bubble which it is hard to comprehend. The good thing about our news media is it doesn't give the rabid loony racist the bullhorn. But denying it exists is kinda stupid and ostrich like.

How Racist Are We? Ask Google - NYTimes.com

Does race matter? It sure as hell matters.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/07/opinion/blow-the-gops-black-people-platform.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-f...fucking-bigots-doing-here-29.html#post3363885

 

[The Rabbi]

Racism on the right among white people pales in comparison to racism on the left among black people.

 

[Meister]

or we could tell lies about the teatards in the house not intentionally sabotaging our recovery.

or the wingers in the senate not filibustering everything.

but if enough rightwingnuts say it, it must be true, right?

How many republican bills have been shelved by Reid in the Senate, Jillian?
I see a politics for what it is...devisive these days.

you mean the ones that cut taxes more for the wealthy?

or the ones that create a system of "vouchers" for health insurance for old people?

those bills?

or the ones that attack my constitutional right to control my own body?

those bills?

or "personhood" laws?

those?

or anti-gay, anti-female bills?

those?

unfortunately, rightwing ideas about compromise mean that everyone else do what you want.

not gonna happen.

and you all voted against your OWN plans...

but thanks for illustrating my point.

That is a seriously flawed statement on your behalf, Jillian. I can at least see this as a two sided coin...you not so much. But thanks for illustrating MY point.

I'm still waiting for a friggin' budget from our president....seriously.

 

[The T]

How many republican bills have been shelved by Reid in the Senate, Jillian?
I see a politics for what it is...devisive these days.

you mean the ones that cut taxes more for the wealthy?

or the ones that create a system of "vouchers" for health insurance for old people?

those bills?

or the ones that attack my constitutional right to control my own body?

those bills?

or "personhood" laws?

those?

or anti-gay, anti-female bills?

those?

unfortunately, rightwing ideas about compromise mean that everyone else do what you want.

not gonna happen.

and you all voted against your OWN plans...

but thanks for illustrating my point.

That is a seriously flawed statement on your behalf, Jillian. I can at least see this as a two sided coin...you not so much. But thanks for illustrating MY point.

I'm still waiting for a friggin' budget from our president....seriously.

A REAL budget...like the ones fronted by the House that Dingy Harry Reid shelved.

 

[Meister]

How can you possibly be on this board every day and then turn around and claim that liberals won't talk about Obama's record?

From where I'm sitting I see the attacks on Romney from the left. I see attacks on Obama from the right, But I don't see the left talking about Obama's record.
I guess you could call it an observation.

So what you meant to say was, Talk about anything other than Obama's or Romney's records,

those are the codes for the left and right, respectively.

Seems Obama has been the only president of the two so far, right?

 

[NYcarbineer]

From where I'm sitting I see the attacks on Romney from the left. I see attacks on Obama from the right, But I don't see the left talking about Obama's record.
I guess you could call it an observation.

So what you meant to say was, Talk about anything other than Obama's or Romney's records,

those are the codes for the left and right, respectively.

Seems Obama has been the only president of the two so far, right?

I'm still marveling at your claim that you've never seen any liberals on this forum talking about

the stimulus, the healthcare bill, the killing of Bin Laden, gays in the military, the 2010 tax bill, the end to combat troops in Iraq, the drone strike killings of dozens of terrorists, for starters...

Not one liberal here is willing to discuss any of those issues?

How many threads would you need to be referred to before you'd admit you're an idiot?

 

[NYcarbineer]

"In the latest transparent attempt by the Obama Administration and the Democratic Party to make the 2012 election a referendum on supposed racism and not Obama's dismal performance, House Democrats received training this week on how to portray neutral free-market rhetoric as racially charged."

Well, when your arguments fail, your ideas fail, and your policies fail, I guess you have to stoop to despicable acts like lying about everyone else and falsely accusing them of "racism". Sorry Dems, that tactic failed miserably in the November 2010 elections when you got your asses kicked, and it's going to fail even worse now. You've "cried wolf" too many times...

House Dems Receive Training On Portraying Conservatives As Racist

how are those WMD's going?

and the one about this president outspending the repub presidents?

or the one about reagan not raising taxes?

or the one about corporations being people.

shall i go on, winger?

and why is garbage like this thread in politics and not in 'flame;?

oh right...

never mind.

Um, Jillian - do you realize that you are embarassing yourself with how misinformed you are right now? Please allow me to enlighten you for just a moment about WMD's in Iraq:

1.) Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons against the Kurds in the north during the 1980's. So to claim he never had WMD's is simply crazy beyond words.

2.) A quick excerpt from the book "Seal Target: Geronimo" by Chuck Pfarrer: "It is a chilling fact that thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq. *These weapons have been used by Al Qaeda against coalition and NATO forces on dozens of occasions. *This has been confirmed by countless sources, most recently in the released WikiLeaks cables.

So why haven't the American people been told of the stock-piled caches of chemical WMD's uncovered in Iraq or of the chemical weapon attacks by Al Qaeda?

The Republicans won’t touch this because it would reveal the incompetence of the Bush administration in failing to neutralize the danger of Iraqi WMD (instead of preventing Weapons of Mass Destruction from falling into the hands of terrorists, the 2003 invasion of Iraq has accelerated the acquisition, manufacture, and use of chemical weapons by Al Qaeda). The Democrats won’t touch it because it would show President Bush was right to invade Iraq in the first place. It is an axis of embarrassment. *And the*press won't touch it because they had already convinced themselves, and most of the American public, that Saddam Hussein didn’t have any WMD's. *The media turned a blind eye to continued reports of chemical weapon attacks because its own credibility was threatened. Several major outlets were deeply invested with the story line of an “unjustifiable war". *Not many people can bear to admit they were wrong, especially in print, and especially if they have been very wrong for a very long time."

3.) A quick Google search of "Iraq WMD's" will reveal endless major media outlets acknowledging story after story of WMD's in Iraq. Here are just a couple, including extremely liberal biased news outlet NY Post and the radical left-wing propaganda machine, MSNBC:

Iraq did have chemical WMD, WikiLeaks documents reveal - NYPOST.com

Sarin-loaded bomb explodes in Iraq - World news - Mideast/N. Africa - Conflict in Iraq - msnbc.com

Sarin, Mustard Gas Discovered Separately in Iraq | Fox News

See Jillian, you're not even slightly informed. You don't WANT to be informed. You just want to blindly pledge allegiance to the radical Commuinist left. And that's your choice. But when you comment on things you know nothing about, you lose credibility (not to mention respect) and nobody takes you seriously. Why don't you actually turn off the propagana from the left and actually learn the TRUTH? Is it that you're too afraid you'll realize you are rooting for the wrong team?

There were no WMD's. Even Bush admitted it. When Bush admitted it, which is a declaration against interests (a legal term, btw)

that was all the confirmation anyone needed.

 

[NYcarbineer]

From where I'm sitting I see the attacks on Romney from the left. I see attacks on Obama from the right, But I don't see the left talking about Obama's record.
I guess you could call it an observation.

So what you meant to say was, Talk about anything other than Obama's or Romney's records,

those are the codes for the left and right, respectively.

Seems Obama has been the only president of the two so far, right?

So the reason that the right here won't talk about Romney's record, as you claim,

is because Romney's record isn't relevant?

lol. Dig that hole deeper.

 

[francoHFW]

Since Reagan GAVE those chemical weapons to his pal Saddam, that's STUPID. Of course we're talking about the "mushroom clouds" Condi was worried about, that horrible yellow cake that nobody really gives a damn about...

Do those black "racists" think whites are inferior and discriminate against them? Then that's another moronic theory for the dupes right up there with Hitler was a socialist, or just blatant lies like Obama had a supermajority for two years, or an out of power since 1994 Barney Frank caused the meltdown. Ignorant arrogant idiocy for dupes only.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Why does the right find it so hard to accept racism? Surely they live in the real world of lots of people, and surely they know bigots, racists, and other hateful sort of people? They are everywhere. Look at the racist comments on this site, or check out the tea party signs, or go to the local white mostly bar, and talk to the patrons. Wingnuts live in a bubble which it is hard to comprehend. The good thing about our news media is it doesn't give the rabid loony racist the bullhorn. But denying it exists is kinda stupid and ostrich like.

How Racist Are We? Ask Google - NYTimes.com

Does race matter? It sure as hell matters.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/07/opinion/blow-the-gops-black-people-platform.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-f...fucking-bigots-doing-here-29.html#post3363885

Well if your definition of racism is using the N word, then wow we have a problem. Mine is a little more old school. Like attacking people, refusing to work with or serve people of another race.

Now I think it still exists, but I think it's more black on white than the old fashioned white on black racsim.. And that's because of the people who "help" on racial matters like JAcks on and Sharpton, who always attack whitey. And yeah I do use th N word EVERYTIME I see Jackson and his crap.

I work with tons of black people and have never had an incident. I dont know of any racist people and I'm a republican, and I know lots of republicans. Mabye cuz my dad is a medicinal chemistry professor and I've met people from everywhere and always had a good time with his grad and post doc students.
But from tv I've seen more racism at an occupy rally than at a tea part and it's not even that close.