Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, I doubt that; however, a more interesting observation would be: The J6 Hearings had a social impact and likely an unquantifiable impact on why the Mid-Term elections turned out the way they did. Meaning, MAGA-world was seen to be tainted by J6 in the eyes of Independents, RINO's, and right-leaning Democrats."This thread has more views than the hearings."
and I doubt thatOh, I doubt that;
That is interesting...do you really believe the GOP won back the house because of the that?however, a more interesting observation would be: The J6 Hearings had a social impact and likely an unquantifiable impact on why the Mid-Term elections turned out the way they did.
and so those voters sent the bad guys packing?Meaning, MAGA-world was seen to be tainted by J6 in the eyes of Independents, RINO's, and right-leaning Democrats.
I believe that was the only reason the made for TV spectacular was put together.Mid-Term elections turned out the way they did. Meaning, MAGA-world was seen to be tainted by J6 in the eyes of Independents, RINO's, and right-leaning Democrats.
J6 showed what a sewer MAGA is.I believe that was the only reason the made for TV spectacular was put together.
You'll have to do better than that....many before you have tossed out that BS.....Am I supposed to get mad?J6 showed what a sewer MAGA is.
Haha, yeah, you have just posted about the multiple timesYou have been crowing the criminal referrals as a fact, not myself.
They had less than expected gains in the house and lost a seat in the senate. I noticed you forgot to mention that last part.That is interesting...do you really believe the GOP won back the house because of the that?
trump's trouble is just beginning.You'll have to do better than that....many before you have tossed out that BS.....Am I supposed to get mad?
From a lopsided perspective.
Only time will tell.trump's trouble is just beginning.
--------------------------------------------------------"I believe that was the only reason the made for TV spectacular was put together."
Yeah, right.--------------------------------------------------------
I would demur on that 'belief'. Meaning, I don't think it is a correct or accurate one.
Now, to be sure the Democrats...the Party and many candidates....DID benefit by the growing perception that Don Trump and the MAGAMob were a serious threat to American democracy and our institutions.
Yupper, that served the Dems well in the mid-terms.
However, I do not subscribe to the belief that that that was the driving force behind these hearings. Rather, the hearings were about determining responsibility and holding those responsible to account.
And as we saw that was and remains a challenge. There occurred much deflection, denial, obfuscation, and it appears outright criminality in attempting to hide the truth (I'm referencing efforts to 'buy off' potential witnesses by Trump allies).
So getting to as much of the truth as possible was a challenge. Plus, key players ---despite the claims that "the other side never had a chance to tell their side".....well, key players who could have, and probably quite ably 'tell their side'.... refused the invitation, and then refused the subpoena.
All of which, likely led America to believe...."Well, those suckers really do have something to hide."
So, while the Dems benefitted by the Hearings, so did America. We got a slice of the whole truth....not all, by any means....and we saw how the opposing side denied, deflected, dismissed, and refused to defend themselves under oath. Which makes us sincerely believe there really was a there there in this conspiracy to deny the Constitutional requirement of a peaceful transfer of power.
IMHO
Oops, you confused yourself again. That happens in trials, not congressional heraings.Where was the cross of witnesses?
It's NOT a trial dude.Where was the cross of witnesses?
Oops, you're wrong again.Oops, you confused yourself again. That happens in trials, not congressional heraings.
What was that waste of time? That's not cross examination. What is this useless trolling?Oops, you're wrong again.
Questioning Witnesses (Clause 2(j)(2) of Rule XI) - As a general rule, each committee member is technically entitled to five minutes of questioning for each witnesses. However, in practice this five minutes is usually applied per each panel of witnesses. Furthermore, the Chair and ranking minority member may designate specific members or staff for extended questioning of up to 30 minutes per side.
HANDOUT -- HOUSE RULES WHICH GOVERN THE COMMITTEE HEARING PROCESS
so taking back the house was or wasn't due to the hearings?They had less than expected gains in the house and lost a seat in the senate.
Why do you assume I forgot?I noticed you forgot to mention that last part.
So the smaller than expected and historically predicted gains were or were not due to the hearing?so taking back the house was or wasn't due to the hearings?
It was a joke. I assume you didn't forget, but rather left it out in order not to undermine your own stretched narrative.Why do you assume I forgot?
"were not"...see how easy it is to answer that question with the truth then is to answer when trying to hide a lie with another question...no one cared or cares about those hearings, and for the handful that watch them I can assure you their votes were not changed one iota, including chi-co's and yoursSo the smaller than expected and historically predicted gains were or were not due to the hearing?
Joke? or lie?It was a joke. I assume you didn't forget,
Well he does believe it, does that change the narrative now?but rather left it out in order not to undermine your own stretched narrative.
Of course you did, it free's you up from having to answer the first partI noticed you forgot to mention that last part.
Haha, sure they weren't."were not"...
