Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not sure what case is but the fact it is at the Supreme Court means it has been appealed many times and therefore must have merit if they are hearing it. Let's see if the MSM covers this.
You MAGAs are funny.I know, that happens to you quite easily.
Ya'll didn't notice?
At the end of the video he wasn't talking about a file, he wasn't talking about a hearing, he wasn't talking about a conference. He said "live from the steps of the Supreme Court".
Meaning he'll be standing outside the building talking to the press (those that will show up) on the steps, not having ANYTHING done with (a) a legal filing, or (b) with the Justices.
LOLz
WW
He was. In front of the building.That is what he did last time he claimed he was going to be "in front of SCOTUS"
I don't know. Do you have a count for me. Thanks.How many times is he going to claim to go to SOCUTS and never do before you will stop believing him?
Was him saying he was going to be in front of them on a day they were not even in session not clue you in that you are being played for a fool?
No one means anything.You literally mean nothing.
Only to the insane. Ask Fox News about that argument...That is why I point out the fraud of 2020 and the stolen election. It was obvious.
Not sure what case is but the fact it is at the Supreme Court means it has been appealed many times and therefore must have merit if they are hearing it. Let's see if the MSM covers this.
Not sure what case is but the fact it is at the Supreme Court means it has been appealed many times and therefore must have merit if they are hearing it. Let's see if the MSM covers this.
You are going to lose when criminals are running things.No one means anything.
Only to the insane. Ask Fox News about that argument...
It would not have got to the SCOTUS if it had no merit. Wait until Friday dickhead and we will both find out.LOL, It will be "explosive", all right... it will be explosively thrown out of court.
Even the SC is not foolish enough to hear Kari Lake's case.
Lindell needs our collective thanks for keeping us entertained.
No NYT or WP? No AP? Of course not.MSM did cover it. It would help if you learned to use Google. Good luck.
No NYT or WP? No AP? Of course not.
Yeah, like I said…learn to use Google.
Sure, we can wait till Friday to laugh at your disappointment…but then where is the fun?It would not have got to the SCOTUS if it had no merit. Wait until Friday dickhead and we will both find out.
I do not go near Google. They are hate filled bastards. Is that why you like them?
Yeah, we know. Reason why you are and will remain a retard.I do not go near Google. They are hate filled bastards. Is that why you like them?
"We"? Take the turd out of your pocket.Yeah, we know. Reason why you are a retard.
Tell us more about stuff you don’t know and don’t care to find out."We"? Take the turd out of your pocket.
He has nothing the court is remotely interested in.It would not have got to the SCOTUS if it had no merit. Wait until Friday dickhead and we will both find out.
How do you know? I believe that election was stolen. Anything he can do to expose the fraud, more than it is already is, is a good thing.He has nothing the court is remotely interested in.
He needs to shut the hell up. He pushed a total lie and fabricated (very amateurish to networking geeks) what he called evidence of hacking.
Lindell is bad news- he knew what he had was nothing from very early on, and he just kept doubling down. Serious.
Seriously man, trust me. Yes, the election was stolen, but chasing an impossible narrative does not get you where you need to be.How do you know? I believe that election was stolen. Anything he can do to expose the fraud is a good thing.
