Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Speaking of party man hack dingleberries with memory issues:
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
-- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
-- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
-- Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
-- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
In fact, they did. Again, you fail to understand that the President cannot invade any country without the approval of the Congress.did they invade and occupy the country?
Each and every single member of Congress was saying the same thing as the President because all the intel said it was the case.
And even though you'll never admit it, no matter how true it is, the only thing that was NOT found in Iraq was the stockpiles of WMD. The facilities, programs and research was all there. That never gets reported however because that would then put a good light on the good work that was done in Iraq in eliminating one componet in the war against Islamic global extremism.
Umm Reagan and Grenada?
lol...usc just embarrassed himself....tried to start a thread about so called republican lies only to be shown that his beloved dems said the same things
lol...usc just embarrassed himself....tried to start a thread about so called republican lies only to be shown that his beloved dems said the same things
lol...usc just embarrassed himself....tried to start a thread about so called republican lies only to be shown that his beloved dems said the same things
1) Every leader in multiple countries agreed on the same intel... you want us to list all the same statements from other leaders and DEMs within our own government also??
2) The war (I suggest actually reading EVERYTHING in the resolution) was not just about WoMD.. though a lot of media focus was on precisely that
3) There were things found, but not to the extent that would satisfy the naysayers
Please tell me you are not going to start a "yellow cake" argument?
The mere possession of it, plus older piles of chem weapons and delivery systems were in direct violation... let alone the violations when Saddam delayed the inspections...
Again.. the sonofabitch should have been taken out when we were over there the first time...
Are you serious?You agree that this has been a bipartisan train wreck, yet it's still somehow BOOOOOOOSH!'s fault in the end.I agree with you 100%. However, wasn't the LEADER of our fair country supposed to be smart enough to rise above scare tactics and not drive us into invading a sovereign nation that posed NO immediate threat to us? He had SCUD missiles for crying out loud.....what the hell did we have to fear from them?
A-fucking-mazing.
How many dems in congress voted for the war authorization vs how many Republicans?
And more lies we forget " You are either with us or for the terrorists" GWB
Freedom fries....
Unamerican...
1) Every leader in multiple countries agreed on the same intel... you want us to list all the same statements from other leaders and DEMs within our own government also??
2) The war (I suggest actually reading EVERYTHING in the resolution) was not just about WoMD.. though a lot of media focus was on precisely that
3) There were things found, but not to the extent that would satisfy the naysayers
Please tell me you are not going to start a "yellow cake" argument?
The mere possession of it, plus older piles of chem weapons and delivery systems were in direct violation... let alone the violations when Saddam delayed the inspections...
Again.. the sonofabitch should have been taken out when we were over there the first time...
Please tell me you are not going to start a "yellow cake" argument?
The mere possession of it, plus older piles of chem weapons and delivery systems were in direct violation... let alone the violations when Saddam delayed the inspections...
Again.. the sonofabitch should have been taken out when we were over there the first time...
the rest of the iraqi WMD's was shipped by hovercrafts to syria on april 1st 2003.
Here's a few more lies too. Remember any of these big fat lies?
(1) I will post every bill I am about to sign into law on the internet for at least 72 hours so the American public can have full disclosure and transparency.
(2) No more business as usual.
(3) I will close Gitmo down before August.
(4) The Cambridge Police Department acted irresponsibily.
The list goes on and on.
The Bush Administration doesn't have the market cornered on telling lies.
And this pathetic list has cost the lives of how many American service men and women?
Bush apologists my ass.
Iraq has been a bipartisan disaster (one I've been against since the unilateral imposition of the so-called "no fly zones" in the '90s), and the only people shifting the blame for it are little brain dead phony fucks like you.
Are you serious?You agree that this has been a bipartisan train wreck, yet it's still somehow BOOOOOOOSH!'s fault in the end.
A-fucking-mazing.
How many dems in congress voted for the war authorization vs how many Republicans?
And more lies we forget " You are either with us or for the terrorists" GWB
Freedom fries....
Unamerican...
It was DEMOCRATS who demanded that a whole new debate and vote be held in the Senate (#10 has some direct quotes from those sessions), in advance of the 2002 elections, so they could be on record as saying "MEETOOMEETOO!" for an Iraq land invasion.
And you now have the nerve to accuse others of having memory issues?
Here's a few more lies too. Remember any of these big fat lies?
(1) I will post every bill I am about to sign into law on the internet for at least 72 hours so the American public can have full disclosure and transparency.
(2) No more business as usual.
(3) I will close Gitmo down before August.
(4) The Cambridge Police Department acted irresponsibily.
The list goes on and on.
The Bush Administration doesn't have the market cornered on telling lies.
And this pathetic list has cost the lives of how many American service men and women?
HIS list?
Funny...I seem to recall it was an international agreement that WMD existed based on a collection of international intelligence.
Please tell me you are not going to start a "yellow cake" argument?
The mere possession of it, plus older piles of chem weapons and delivery systems were in direct violation... let alone the violations when Saddam delayed the inspections...
Again.. the sonofabitch should have been taken out when we were over there the first time...
the rest of the iraqi WMD's was shipped by hovercrafts to syria on april 1st 2003.
Fuck you asshole...You're one of those who know I've been against the Iraq invasion from the outset.Most Democrats voted against the Iraq war.
I find it sadly hilarious how many I-was-always-anti-Iraq war conservatives have come out of the woodwork in recent times.
