Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"I'm always correct, and the threads are always well documented, linked and supported."Her point is that she doesn't understand what a fallacy is, and why her threads fail as a consequence of those fallacies.
The OP's threads fail as a result of one of three fallacies – and often a combination thereof:
Straw man fallacy: “liberals believe/advocate thus and such” - when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.
Hasty generalization/composition fallacy: “all liberals.”
False comparison fallacy: “liberals are 'Nazis,' liberals are 'communists,' liberals are 'fascists.'"
I'm always correct, and the threads are always well documented, linked and supported.
And that's what gets you you dunces, isn't it.
And there will be more!
What spankings? You either reply solely with ad hominem, or you dance like crazy to deflect from responding to the many spears piercing your "arguments" or BOTH! You're a plagiaristic, fabricating flunky to the Big Lie neoconservative fascists to put it in actual terms. You simply emulate a caricature of the pseudo-intellectuals of the far, far right you pretend and wish to be, just so someone will notice and give you some attention, you narcissistic twit! Hey, everybody's gotta be sum'tin, huh Chica!
Have a nice day, Chica!
You must think folks are stupid and can't recognize and place the hostility in your every post.
I kinda like the result: I think I'll keep doing it.
You're projecting again, Chica! And hey, you're the one who posted to me initially, remember little one?
No...you followed me to this thread.
My rectitude sets you off, huh?
Great!
Let's do this again!What spankings? You either reply solely with ad hominem, or you dance like crazy to deflect from responding to the many spears piercing your "arguments" or BOTH! You're a plagiaristic, fabricating flunky to the Big Lie neoconservative fascists to put it in actual terms. You simply emulate a caricature of the pseudo-intellectuals of the far, far right you pretend and wish to be, just so someone will notice and give you some attention, you narcissistic twit! Hey, everybody's gotta be sum'tin, huh Chica!
Have a nice day, Chica!
You must think folks are stupid and can't recognize and place the hostility in your every post.
I kinda like the result: I think I'll keep doing it.
You're projecting again, Chica! And hey, you're the one who posted to me initially, remember little one?
No...you followed me to this thread.
My rectitude sets you off, huh?
Great!
Let's do this again!
Chica, you just lied through your teeth! I peruse many threads, so disavow yourself of your self centered notion that I landed on this thread gunning for ya, you narcissistic twit. The world DOES NOT revolve about you.
My first post on this thread was #35 to Pete7469. Then YOU piggybacked my post to him with your usual screed! So your claim addressing me that, "...you followed me to this thread." Is FALSE...a LIE. Your alleged rectitude is nothing more false bravado and bullshit hype! You mirror precisely what you allege to detest! What hypocrisy!!!!
Did I mention that you are a liar...yeah, I did! What will be your excuse to pardon yourself from that example of your perfidy this time, Chica!
Now, don't you worry, Old Timer.....I'll be right here to get under you skin, and teach you right from wrong.
You can't stay away....but neither can you win.
You must think folks are stupid and can't recognize and place the hostility in your every post.
I kinda like the result: I think I'll keep doing it.
You're projecting again, Chica! And hey, you're the one who posted to me initially, remember little one?
No...you followed me to this thread.
My rectitude sets you off, huh?
Great!
Let's do this again!You must think folks are stupid and can't recognize and place the hostility in your every post.
I kinda like the result: I think I'll keep doing it.
You're projecting again, Chica! And hey, you're the one who posted to me initially, remember little one?
No...you followed me to this thread.
My rectitude sets you off, huh?
Great!
Let's do this again!
Chica, you just lied through your teeth! I peruse many threads, so disavow yourself of your self centered notion that I landed on this thread gunning for ya, you narcissistic twit. The world DOES NOT revolve about you.
My first post on this thread was #35 to Pete7469. Then YOU piggybacked my post to him with your usual screed! So your claim addressing me that, "...you followed me to this thread." Is FALSE...a LIE. Your alleged rectitude is nothing more false bravado and bullshit hype! You mirror precisely what you allege to detest! What hypocrisy!!!!
Did I mention that you are a liar...yeah, I did! What will be your excuse to pardon yourself from that example of your perfidy this time, Chica!
Now, don't you worry, Old Timer.....I'll be right here to get under you skin, and teach you right from wrong.
You can't stay away....but neither can you win.
Well at least this time you had the good sense not to claim your innocence with yet another lie!
I love watching the way you react every time you get caught up displaying the reflections of your true self and then deluding yourself as if you had won a sweepstakes.
1. Ever hear this quip? "93.6 % of statistics are made up on the spot."
Not only is it the aim of Liberals to silence any views to which they object, but they have no compunction about producing phony facts and statistics that support their ideological goals.
The bogus rape statistics in support of the "rape culture" meme have pretty much been refuted...but how about the "domestic abuse" stats?
“Disturbingly, intimate partner homicide is the leading cause of death for African American women ages 15 to 45.” Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.,speech at domestic violence awareness month event, Oct. 19, 2009
Guess what? Just like Obama's "1-in-5 college women raped" claim.....it's another 'Liberal fact' that's entirely made up!
"....this fact was proven wrong, and yet at least two of Holder’s speeches referring to this “fact” remained uncorrected on DOJ’s Web sites, year after year..... Eric Holder’s statement deserves a ‘four Pinocchio’ rating (a ‘whopper’) for ‘undermining our democracy’ with false information [as per Mark J. Perry, an economics professor at the University of Michigan-Flint and a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute].
... Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data show that, for the year 2008 (the year before Holder’s speeches), cancer, heart disease, unintentional injury and HIV/AIDS all topped homicide.
.... this all started with a 1998 study by the Justice Department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics, titled “Violence Against Intimates,” that examined the data concerning crimes committed by current and former spouses, boyfriends and girlfriends. The most recent data in the study were collected in 1996.
The study does not say that intimate-partner homicide is the leading cause of death among African American women; in fact, it makes a key point that the rate of such murders had dropped dramatically." Holder’s 2009 claim that intimate-partner homicide is the leading cause of death for African American women
Bottom line: 'Liberal facts' such as this are designed to perpetuate the myth that everyone is a victim, needing big government to protect them.
2. "...Holder's patently false assertion has remained on the Justice Department website for more than a year. How is that possible? It is possible because false claims about male domestic violence are ubiquitous and immune to refutation.
During the era of the infamous Super Bowl Hoax, it was widely believed that on Super Bowl Sundays, violence against women increases 40%. Journalists began to refer to the game as the "abuse bowl" and quoted [Liberal] experts who explained how male viewers, intoxicated and pumped up with testosterone, could "explode like mad linemen." During the 1993 Super Bowl, NBC ran a public service announcement warning men they would go to jail for attacking their wives.
... one lone journalist,Washington Post reporter Ken Ringle, checked the facts. As it turned out, there was no source...
["93.6 % of statistics are made up on the spot."]
.... the story has proved too politically convenient to kill off altogether." Domestic violence myths help no one - USATODAY.com
The lying and dishonesty isn't surprising.....
......how many accept the propaganda, is.
1. Ever hear this quip? "93.6 % of statistics are made up on the spot."
Not only is it the aim of Liberals to silence any views to which they object, but they have no compunction about producing phony facts and statistics that support their ideological goals.
The bogus rape statistics in support of the "rape culture" meme have pretty much been refuted...but how about the "domestic abuse" stats?
“Disturbingly, intimate partner homicide is the leading cause of death for African American women ages 15 to 45.” Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.,speech at domestic violence awareness month event, Oct. 19, 2009
Guess what? Just like Obama's "1-in-5 college women raped" claim.....it's another 'Liberal fact' that's entirely made up!
"....this fact was proven wrong, and yet at least two of Holder’s speeches referring to this “fact” remained uncorrected on DOJ’s Web sites, year after year..... Eric Holder’s statement deserves a ‘four Pinocchio’ rating (a ‘whopper’) for ‘undermining our democracy’ with false information [as per Mark J. Perry, an economics professor at the University of Michigan-Flint and a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute].
... Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data show that, for the year 2008 (the year before Holder’s speeches), cancer, heart disease, unintentional injury and HIV/AIDS all topped homicide.
.... this all started with a 1998 study by the Justice Department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics, titled “Violence Against Intimates,” that examined the data concerning crimes committed by current and former spouses, boyfriends and girlfriends. The most recent data in the study were collected in 1996.
The study does not say that intimate-partner homicide is the leading cause of death among African American women; in fact, it makes a key point that the rate of such murders had dropped dramatically." Holder’s 2009 claim that intimate-partner homicide is the leading cause of death for African American women
Bottom line: 'Liberal facts' such as this are designed to perpetuate the myth that everyone is a victim, needing big government to protect them.
2. "...Holder's patently false assertion has remained on the Justice Department website for more than a year. How is that possible? It is possible because false claims about male domestic violence are ubiquitous and immune to refutation.
During the era of the infamous Super Bowl Hoax, it was widely believed that on Super Bowl Sundays, violence against women increases 40%. Journalists began to refer to the game as the "abuse bowl" and quoted [Liberal] experts who explained how male viewers, intoxicated and pumped up with testosterone, could "explode like mad linemen." During the 1993 Super Bowl, NBC ran a public service announcement warning men they would go to jail for attacking their wives.
... one lone journalist,Washington Post reporter Ken Ringle, checked the facts. As it turned out, there was no source...
["93.6 % of statistics are made up on the spot."]
.... the story has proved too politically convenient to kill off altogether." Domestic violence myths help no one - USATODAY.com
The lying and dishonesty isn't surprising.....
......how many accept the propaganda, is.
Wow - you go through this long convoluted explanation to make a case that two reporters couldn't find the source of stats quoted by two other reporters.
Brilliant.
So you'e a woman (I guess) who is pro-rape and PRO violence against women...???
You fucking dumb twit.
The same sort of self-serving totalitarian government myth pops up elsewhere:
4. "Worst of all, misinformation about violence against women suggests a false moral equivalence between societies where women are protected by law and those where they are not.
American and British societies are not perfect, but we have long ago decided that violence against women is barbaric.
By contrast, the Islamic Republic of Iran — where it is legal to bury an adulterous woman up to her neck and stone her — was last year granted a seat on the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad defended the decision by noting Iranian women are far better off than women in the West. "What is left of women's dignity in the West?" he asked.
He then came up with a statistic to drive home his point: "In Europe almost 70% of housewives are beaten by their husbands."
That was a self-serving lie. Western women, with few exceptions, are safe and free. Iranian women are neither. Officials like Attorney General Holder, the deputy constable of Gwent, and the activists and journalists who promoted the Super Bowl and World Cup hoaxes, unwittingly contribute to such twisted deceptions.
Victims of intimate violence are best served by the truth." Domestic violence myths help no one - USATODAY.com
The same sort of lies from Obama, Holder and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad ....and for the very same reasons!
And Iran's biggest backer?
Barack Hussein Obama...peace be on him.
Interesting connections, huh?
An excellent candidate for today's meltdown post of the day.
The New Right is apparently pro-domestic violence now.
Creepy.
Speaking of violence.....
.....did you know that every single presidential assassin in the history of this nation has been a Liberal- or has not been associated with a political outlook?
None....not a single one were right-wingers.
That's an actual fact, not a "Liberal fact."
Really? John Wilkes Booth was a liberal? What liberal positions did he hold?
Garfield's assassin:
Guiteau's interest turned to politics. He wrote a speech in support of Ulysses S. Grant called "Grant vs. Hancock", which he revised to "Garfield vs. Hancock" after Garfield won the Republican nomination in the 1880 presidential campaign. Ultimately, he changed little more than the title. The speech was delivered at most twice (and copies were passed out to members of the Republican National Committee at their summer 1880 meeting in New York), but Guiteau believed himself to be largely responsible for Garfield's victory. He insisted he should be awarded an ambassadorship for his vital assistance, first asking for Vienna, then deciding that he would rather be posted in Paris.
McKinley?
His assassin, Leon Czolgosz, was an anarchist, as in, the most opposition to big central government you can get. Who in America today opposes big central government? Eh?
The Kennedy assassination. Kennedy was the 2nd most liberal president we've ever had, up until Obama.
So why did Oswald shoot him?
Now....take notes so you don't embarrass yourself again:
Lincoln was assassinated byJohn Wilkes Booth, “…an angry Copperhead, a.k.a., ‘peace democrat,’ (when that meant pro-slavery, of course.)John Wilkes Booth - Liberapedia
- Historic review: every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.
- John Wilkes Booth was opposed to President Lincoln’s Republican war policies. His letter to is family explained he was furious with Lincoln for having brought war to the South! THE MURDERER OF MR. LINCOLN.; Extraordinary Letter of John Wilkes Booth Proof that He Meditated His Crime Months Ago His Excuses for the Contemplated Act His Participation in the Execution of John Brown. Commissioners of Public Charities and Correction. Fires. The Seventh Ward Fire Note from Chief Engineer Decker.
John Wilkes Booth
- Charles J. Guiteau, who shot President James Garfield, was part of a utopian commune, the Oneida Community, where free love was practiced. Ackerman, “Dark Horse: The Surprise Election and Political Murder of President James A. Garfield,” p.135
- Leon Czolgosz, who killed President McKinley, was a socialist and anarchist, whose act was instigated by a speech he heard by socialist Emma Goldman. American Experience | Emma Goldman | Transcript | PBS
- John Schrank, who shot and wounded Teddy Roosevelt in 1912, seemed to have no affiliation other than opposition to a third term. Theodore Roosevelt shot in Milwaukee - Oct 14, 1912 - HISTORY.com
- Giuseppe Zangara, who came close to killing President Roosevelt in 1933, (he killed Mayor Cermak) hated the rich and sought to “make even with the capitalists.” Outside of shooting elected officials, he would have made an ideal pick for Obama’ws cabinet. http://digital.library.miami.edu/gov/FDRAssn.html
- Lee Harvey Oswald, who shot JFK, had been a communist ever since he read a communist pamphlet about the Rosenbergs. As soon as he was arrested, he called John Abt, lawyer for the American Communist Party.
- Sirhan Sirhan, who killed Robert Kennedy, was a Palestinian who hated Kennedy’s support of Israel.
- Arthur Bremer shot George Wallace in 1972, due to Wallace’s support for segregation. http://basicfamouspeople.com//index.php?aid=7134 Upon his release, Bremer showed no remorse: “ ‘shooting segregationist dinosaurs’ is not like shooting people because ‘they are extinct by act of God.’ This mention of God was the only blemish on Bremer’s otherwise impeccable liberal credentials.” Coulter, “Guilty,” p. 260.
- Lynette ‘Squeaky’ Fromme, tried to shoot President Ford because she was incensed about the plight of the California redwoods. http://minx.cc/?blog=86&post=209933
- Sara Jane Moore also tried to kill President Ford because “the government had declared war on the left.” ABC7 News - KGO Bay Area and San Francisco News
- John Hinckley shot President Reagan to impress a girl. The jury found him “not guilty by reason of insanity.” “”…which is as good a definition of liberalism as I’ve heard.” Coulter, “Guilty.” P. 260.
When you have incorporated the above be sure to let me know when you're ready for a discussion of assassination of nonpresidential political figures.
You left out the Jewish Zionist terrorist group that sent letter bombs to Harry Truman:
"In the summer of 1947, pending the independence of Israel, the Zionist Stern Gang was believed to have sent a number of letter bombs addressed to the president and high-ranking staff at the White House. The Secret Service had been alerted by British intelligence after similar letters had been sent to high-ranking British officials and the Gang claimed credit. The mail room of the White House intercepted the letters and the Secret Service defused them. At the time, the incident was not publicized.'
Lehi (group) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm sure some of your very very very close Jewish friends can elaborate on those incidents for you.
"I'm correct about everything- always"You are correct to say that misleading figures are used to portray the male/female pay gap.
I'm correct about everything- always.....and in this tread, about the lies and myths that pass for 'Liberal facts.'
No, you are not. I am.
Another wannabe.
Anyone who claims this is dishonest by default.
lol, I know. Delusions of grandeur. How boring.
And, a reminder of this, the grand-daddy of all the Liberal "facts"....."
7." For years, advocates for colleges to do more to prevent and punish sexual assault on campus have cited a 2007 federal statistic that one in five female students experience sexual assault in college. President Obama and members of Congress have used the statistic, as have many others." New survey finds 1 in 5 college women have experienced sexual assault | InsideHigherEd
" It is possible because false claims about male domestic violence are ubiquitous and immune to refutation." Domestic violence myths help no one - USATODAY.com
Could the Liberal liars be after women's votes...and not care how they get 'em?
Could be.
a. " At first glance, one might conclude that the risk of rape victimization for college women is not high; “only” about 1 in 36 college women (2.8 percent) experience a completed rape or attempted rape in an academic year. ... The figures measure victimization for slightly more than half a year (6.91 months). Projecting results beyond this reference period is problematic for a number of reasons, such as assuming that the risk of victimization is the same during summer months and remains stable over a person’s time in college. However, if the 2.8 percent victimization figure is calculated for a 1-year period, the data suggest that nearly 5 percent (4.9 percent) of college women are victimized in any given calendar year. Over the course of a college career—which now lasts an average of 5 years—the percentage of completed or attempted rape victimization among women in higher educational institutions might climb to between one-fifth and one-quarter." https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/182369.pdf
Did you note terms like 'projecting,' and 'problematic,' and 'suggest,' and 'might'? Liberals eat this stuff up.
And, this just in!
b. "A new report on sexual assault released today by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officially puts to bed the bogus statistic that one in five women on college campuses are victims of sexual assault. In fact, non-students are 25 percent more likely to be victims of sexual assault than students, according to the data. And the real number of assault victims isseveral orders of magnitude lower than one-in-five.
The full study,which was published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a division within DOJ, found that rather than one in five female college students becoming victims of sexual assault, the actual rate is 6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent(instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5). For non-students, the rate of sexual assault is 7.6 per 1,000 people."
New DOJ Data On Sexual Assaults Students Are Less Likely To Be Raped
"....6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent(instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5)."
Get that??? --> 0.03 in five!!!!
OK....who's gonna tell Obama?
Or the rest of the hand-wringing Liberals?
What is your point?
You must learn to have a point. Friendly advice.
Let's count this post, your pretense that you didn't understand the PROOF that I've provided of the title, as one of the reasons you are known as the NYLiar.
You can pretend that I didn't prove you told a lie in the OP, but that won't change reality.
And, a reminder of this, the grand-daddy of all the Liberal "facts"....."
7." For years, advocates for colleges to do more to prevent and punish sexual assault on campus have cited a 2007 federal statistic that one in five female students experience sexual assault in college. President Obama and members of Congress have used the statistic, as have many others." New survey finds 1 in 5 college women have experienced sexual assault | InsideHigherEd
" It is possible because false claims about male domestic violence are ubiquitous and immune to refutation." Domestic violence myths help no one - USATODAY.com
Could the Liberal liars be after women's votes...and not care how they get 'em?
Could be.
a. " At first glance, one might conclude that the risk of rape victimization for college women is not high; “only” about 1 in 36 college women (2.8 percent) experience a completed rape or attempted rape in an academic year. ... The figures measure victimization for slightly more than half a year (6.91 months). Projecting results beyond this reference period is problematic for a number of reasons, such as assuming that the risk of victimization is the same during summer months and remains stable over a person’s time in college. However, if the 2.8 percent victimization figure is calculated for a 1-year period, the data suggest that nearly 5 percent (4.9 percent) of college women are victimized in any given calendar year. Over the course of a college career—which now lasts an average of 5 years—the percentage of completed or attempted rape victimization among women in higher educational institutions might climb to between one-fifth and one-quarter." https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/182369.pdf
Did you note terms like 'projecting,' and 'problematic,' and 'suggest,' and 'might'? Liberals eat this stuff up.
And, this just in!
b. "A new report on sexual assault released today by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officially puts to bed the bogus statistic that one in five women on college campuses are victims of sexual assault. In fact, non-students are 25 percent more likely to be victims of sexual assault than students, according to the data. And the real number of assault victims isseveral orders of magnitude lower than one-in-five.
The full study,which was published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a division within DOJ, found that rather than one in five female college students becoming victims of sexual assault, the actual rate is 6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent(instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5). For non-students, the rate of sexual assault is 7.6 per 1,000 people."
New DOJ Data On Sexual Assaults Students Are Less Likely To Be Raped
"....6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent(instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5)."
Get that??? --> 0.03 in five!!!!
OK....who's gonna tell Obama?
Or the rest of the hand-wringing Liberals?
What is your point?
You must learn to have a point. Friendly advice.
Let's count this post, your pretense that you didn't understand the PROOF that I've provided of the title, as one of the reasons you are known as the NYLiar.
You can pretend that I didn't prove you told a lie in the OP, but that won't change reality.
You proved no such thing...but you are the NYLiar.
"I'm correct about everything- always"I'm correct about everything- always.....and in this tread, about the lies and myths that pass for 'Liberal facts.'
No, you are not. I am.
Another wannabe.
Anyone who claims this is dishonest by default.
lol, I know. Delusions of grandeur. How boring.
Leave off the word 'delusions' and you'd have a perfectly correct post.
And, a reminder of this, the grand-daddy of all the Liberal "facts"....."
7." For years, advocates for colleges to do more to prevent and punish sexual assault on campus have cited a 2007 federal statistic that one in five female students experience sexual assault in college. President Obama and members of Congress have used the statistic, as have many others." New survey finds 1 in 5 college women have experienced sexual assault | InsideHigherEd
" It is possible because false claims about male domestic violence are ubiquitous and immune to refutation." Domestic violence myths help no one - USATODAY.com
Could the Liberal liars be after women's votes...and not care how they get 'em?
Could be.
a. " At first glance, one might conclude that the risk of rape victimization for college women is not high; “only” about 1 in 36 college women (2.8 percent) experience a completed rape or attempted rape in an academic year. ... The figures measure victimization for slightly more than half a year (6.91 months). Projecting results beyond this reference period is problematic for a number of reasons, such as assuming that the risk of victimization is the same during summer months and remains stable over a person’s time in college. However, if the 2.8 percent victimization figure is calculated for a 1-year period, the data suggest that nearly 5 percent (4.9 percent) of college women are victimized in any given calendar year. Over the course of a college career—which now lasts an average of 5 years—the percentage of completed or attempted rape victimization among women in higher educational institutions might climb to between one-fifth and one-quarter." https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/182369.pdf
Did you note terms like 'projecting,' and 'problematic,' and 'suggest,' and 'might'? Liberals eat this stuff up.
And, this just in!
b. "A new report on sexual assault released today by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officially puts to bed the bogus statistic that one in five women on college campuses are victims of sexual assault. In fact, non-students are 25 percent more likely to be victims of sexual assault than students, according to the data. And the real number of assault victims isseveral orders of magnitude lower than one-in-five.
The full study,which was published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a division within DOJ, found that rather than one in five female college students becoming victims of sexual assault, the actual rate is 6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent(instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5). For non-students, the rate of sexual assault is 7.6 per 1,000 people."
New DOJ Data On Sexual Assaults Students Are Less Likely To Be Raped
"....6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent(instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5)."
Get that??? --> 0.03 in five!!!!
OK....who's gonna tell Obama?
Or the rest of the hand-wringing Liberals?
What is your point?
You must learn to have a point. Friendly advice.
Let's count this post, your pretense that you didn't understand the PROOF that I've provided of the title, as one of the reasons you are known as the NYLiar.
You can pretend that I didn't prove you told a lie in the OP, but that won't change reality.
You proved no such thing...but you are the NYLiar.
The best part of proving you wrong is hearing you cry about it.
What's 5 + 6?And, a reminder of this, the grand-daddy of all the Liberal "facts"....."
7." For years, advocates for colleges to do more to prevent and punish sexual assault on campus have cited a 2007 federal statistic that one in five female students experience sexual assault in college. President Obama and members of Congress have used the statistic, as have many others." New survey finds 1 in 5 college women have experienced sexual assault | InsideHigherEd
" It is possible because false claims about male domestic violence are ubiquitous and immune to refutation." Domestic violence myths help no one - USATODAY.com
Could the Liberal liars be after women's votes...and not care how they get 'em?
Could be.
a. " At first glance, one might conclude that the risk of rape victimization for college women is not high; “only” about 1 in 36 college women (2.8 percent) experience a completed rape or attempted rape in an academic year. ... The figures measure victimization for slightly more than half a year (6.91 months). Projecting results beyond this reference period is problematic for a number of reasons, such as assuming that the risk of victimization is the same during summer months and remains stable over a person’s time in college. However, if the 2.8 percent victimization figure is calculated for a 1-year period, the data suggest that nearly 5 percent (4.9 percent) of college women are victimized in any given calendar year. Over the course of a college career—which now lasts an average of 5 years—the percentage of completed or attempted rape victimization among women in higher educational institutions might climb to between one-fifth and one-quarter." https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/182369.pdf
Did you note terms like 'projecting,' and 'problematic,' and 'suggest,' and 'might'? Liberals eat this stuff up.
And, this just in!
b. "A new report on sexual assault released today by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officially puts to bed the bogus statistic that one in five women on college campuses are victims of sexual assault. In fact, non-students are 25 percent more likely to be victims of sexual assault than students, according to the data. And the real number of assault victims isseveral orders of magnitude lower than one-in-five.
The full study,which was published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a division within DOJ, found that rather than one in five female college students becoming victims of sexual assault, the actual rate is 6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent(instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5). For non-students, the rate of sexual assault is 7.6 per 1,000 people."
New DOJ Data On Sexual Assaults Students Are Less Likely To Be Raped
"....6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent(instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5)."
Get that??? --> 0.03 in five!!!!
OK....who's gonna tell Obama?
Or the rest of the hand-wringing Liberals?
What is your point?
You must learn to have a point. Friendly advice.
Let's count this post, your pretense that you didn't understand the PROOF that I've provided of the title, as one of the reasons you are known as the NYLiar.
You can pretend that I didn't prove you told a lie in the OP, but that won't change reality.
You proved no such thing...but you are the NYLiar.
Happens every time you post....What is your point?
You must learn to have a point. Friendly advice.
Let's count this post, your pretense that you didn't understand the PROOF that I've provided of the title, as one of the reasons you are known as the NYLiar.
You can pretend that I didn't prove you told a lie in the OP, but that won't change reality.
You proved no such thing...but you are the NYLiar.
The best part of proving you wrong is hearing you cry about it.
Hmm....I guess we'll have to wait to see if that ever happens.
Happens every time you post....Let's count this post, your pretense that you didn't understand the PROOF that I've provided of the title, as one of the reasons you are known as the NYLiar.
You can pretend that I didn't prove you told a lie in the OP, but that won't change reality.
You proved no such thing...but you are the NYLiar.
The best part of proving you wrong is hearing you cry about it.
Hmm....I guess we'll have to wait to see if that ever happens.
What never happens is your missing a meal.
You're projecting again, Chica! And hey, you're the one who posted to me initially, remember little one?
No...you followed me to this thread.
My rectitude sets you off, huh?
Great!
Let's do this again!You're projecting again, Chica! And hey, you're the one who posted to me initially, remember little one?
No...you followed me to this thread.
My rectitude sets you off, huh?
Great!
Let's do this again!
Chica, you just lied through your teeth! I peruse many threads, so disavow yourself of your self centered notion that I landed on this thread gunning for ya, you narcissistic twit. The world DOES NOT revolve about you.
My first post on this thread was #35 to Pete7469. Then YOU piggybacked my post to him with your usual screed! So your claim addressing me that, "...you followed me to this thread." Is FALSE...a LIE. Your alleged rectitude is nothing more false bravado and bullshit hype! You mirror precisely what you allege to detest! What hypocrisy!!!!
Did I mention that you are a liar...yeah, I did! What will be your excuse to pardon yourself from that example of your perfidy this time, Chica!
Now, don't you worry, Old Timer.....I'll be right here to get under you skin, and teach you right from wrong.
You can't stay away....but neither can you win.
Well at least this time you had the good sense not to claim your innocence with yet another lie!
I love watching the way you react every time you get caught up displaying the reflections of your true self and then deluding yourself as if you had won a sweepstakes.
I never lie....but it seems I have a gift of getting under your skin.
Bad news: it's only gonna get worse.
Take those blood pressure pills.
So you must be talking about people like Political Chica with her girl crush on Ann Coulter as examples of "low information" voters AND their "celebrities and other pathetic sources"!
