Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
At least with Bush I & everyone else I know got a few hundred bucks. Under Obama I only know a few who were getting unemployment. Most of my friends & I were 1099 workers, independent contractors or small business owners. They & I have got nothing but screwed from this administration. Not a dime for small business & most have gone out of business. There is a very large segment of the population that fall into this category who see unions & pension getting bailed out, but regular mom & pop business, 1099 workers & contractors get nothing. Nothing for the hardest working unprotected citizens who work without a safety net.
The Bush Deficit, the Clinton Surplus and TARP by Gregory Hilton | The DC World Affairs BlogTwo unfunded wars
tax cuts
medicare Part D in 2007 was only 150 billion short
where did the other 5 trillion come from?
In fact 1 war is done with. Those troops cost the same if there where at fort Bragg, just about
Do you have any idea how much a war costs and why?
Evidently not
your information is not accurate (the 5 trillion and 3 trillion)
this link provides accurate information
As far as the war goes
troops are here no matter as well as those things we use to support them
All i know is Iraq is done
in 2007 we where wide open in Iraq and was 150 billion over budget
its 1.5 trillion today
a couple million went towards hiding his birth certifacate, if that helps.
In an Oct. 27, 2009, article, WND reported that, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission, the Obama campaign had paid approximately $1.7 million to the campaign's law firm, Perkins Coie, since Obama was elected.
So that's where we started our research. We did our own tally of payments made to Perkins Coie, all of which were reported, as required by law, in quarterly disbursement reports filed to the FEC by his campaign organization, Obama for America. We found that in the last quarter of 2008 -- which is roughly the period after Obama was elected in early November -- and the first three quarters of 2009, which is when WND wrote its story, Obama for America did, in fact, pay Perkins Coie $1.7 million. If you add in the payments made in subsequent months, the fees paid to Perkins Coie between October 2008 and December 2010 rises to $2.6 million.
But what does that $2.6 million number mean? Not what Trump and others have assumed.
Specifically, the payments by Obama for America to Perkins Coie covered all sorts of legal expenses -- not just expenses related to birth certificate issues.
a couple million went towards hiding his birth certifacate, if that helps.
Is this not amazing?
not one liberal has responded
Its one thing to have the largest deficit in the history of the United States govt
Its another for no-one to know where it went
I am serious Libs
if i was yawl I would be screaming
I suppose you haven't notice the quieting of the sucking sound (job loss) that was so loud when he first took office, huh?
The hemorrhaging of American jobs accelerated at a record pace at the end of 2008, bringing the year's total job losses to 2.6 million or the highest level in more than six decades.
A sobering U.S. Labor Department jobs report Friday showed the economy lost 524,000 jobs in December and 1.9 million in the year's final four months, after the credit crisis began in September.
If money is to be printed, then it should go to the citizens first instead of government employees & big business.
Printed money should be divided equally among every US citizen with a social security number. Mail them all out a check & let them spend it. It is the absolute fastest & only fair way to stimulate the economy. When citizens spend the money then business & government can get theirs.
Its one thing to have the largest deficit in the history of the United States govt
Its another for no-one to know where it went
I am serious Libs
if i was yawl I would be screaming
Maybe the same place Iraq's WMD went? Y'all don't seem nearly as concerned about that....
Syria?
and those 500 that where found I guess went no where
Satellite Photos Support Testimony That Iraqi WMD Went to Syria
The history books on this issue shouldnt be written just yet.
June 6, 2010 - by Ryan Mauro Page 1 of 2 Next -> View as Single Page
Share |
Haaretz has revived the mystery surrounding the inability to find weapons of mass destruction stockpiles in Iraq, the most commonly cited justification for Operation Iraqi Freedom and one of the most embarrassing episodes for the United States. Satellite photos of a suspicious site in Syria are providing new support for the reporting of a Syrian journalist who briefly rocked the world with his reporting that Iraqs WMD had been sent to three sites in Syria just before the invasion commenced.
The newspaper reveals that a 200 square-kilometer area in northwestern Syria has been photographed by satellites at the request of a Western intelligence agency at least 16 times, the most recent being taken in January. The site is near Masyaf, and it has at least five installations and hidden paths leading underneath the mountains. This supports the reporting of Nizar Nayouf, an award-winning Syrian journalist who said in 2004 that his sources confirmed that Saddam Husseins WMDs were in Syria.
One of the three specific sites he mentioned was an underground base underneath Al-Baida, which is one kilometer south of Masyaf. This is a perfect match. The suspicious features in the photos and the fact that a Western intelligence agency is so interested in the site support Nayoufs reporting, showing that his sources in Syria did indeed have access to specific information about secret activity that is likely WMD-related. Richard Radcliffe, one of my co-writers at WorldThreats.com, noticed that Masyaf is located on a road that goes from Hamah, where there is an airfield sufficient to handle relatively large aircraft, into Lebanon and the western side of the Bekaa Valley, another location said to house Iraqi weapons.
It seems to be commonly accepted that Iraq did not have WMDs at all. The intelligence was obviously flawed, but the book has not been closed on what actually happened. The media blasted the headline that Charles Duelfer, the head of the Iraq Survey Group tasked with finding out if Saddam had WMDs, concluded that a transfer did not occur. In reality, his report said they were unable to complete its investigation and is unable to rule out the possibility that WMD was evacuated to Syria before the war due to the poor security situation.
Although no conclusion was made, Duelfer has since said that he is convinced that no WMD went to Syria. He is a competent and credible individual, but there is evidence that key information on this possibility was not received by the Iraq Survey Group, which had many of its own problems.
On February 24, 2009, I went to see a talk Duelfer gave at the Free Library of Philadelphia to promote his book. He admitted there were some loose ends regarding the possibility that Iraqi WMD went to Syria, but dismissed them. Among these loose ends, Duelfer said, was the inability to track down the Iraqis who worked for a company connected to Uday Hussein that sources said had driven sensitive material into Syria. A Pentagon document reveals that an Iraqi dissident reported that 50 trucks crossed the border on March 10, 2003, and that his sources in Syria confirmed they carried WMD. These trucks have been talked about frequently and remain a mystery.
During the question-and-answer period and during a follow-up interview, Duelfer made several interesting statements to me that reinforced my confidence that such a transfer occurred, although we can not be sure of the extent of it.
General Georges Sada, the former second-in-command of the Iraqi Air Force, claimed in his 2006 book that he knew two Iraqi pilots that flew WMD into Syria over the summer of 2002, which came before a later shipment on the ground. I asked Duelfer if Nizar Nayouf or the two Iraqi pilots were spoken with.
I did not interview the pilots nor did I speak with the Syrian journalist you mentioned, he said. We were inundated with WMD reports and could not investigate them all. To narrow the problem, we investigated those people and places we knew would have either been involved or aware of regime WMD activities.
He then told me that the lack of testimony about such dealings is what convinced him that a lot of material went to Syria, but no WMD. He cited the testimony of Naji Sabri, the former Iraqi foreign minister, in particular.
I knew him very well, and I had been authorized to make his life a lot better, or a lot worse, he told me.
Did you get the Making Work Pay tax credit?
That cost 60 billion a year, added to the deficit.
Was that in 2007?
so thats where the 150 billion came from?
so about the other 1.4 trillion?
Maybe the same place Iraq's WMD went? Y'all don't seem nearly as concerned about that....
Syria?
and those 500 that where found I guess went no where
Satellite Photos Support Testimony That Iraqi WMD Went to Syria
The history books on this issue shouldnt be written just yet.
June 6, 2010 - by Ryan Mauro Page 1 of 2 Next -> View as Single Page
Share |
Haaretz has revived the mystery surrounding the inability to find weapons of mass destruction stockpiles in Iraq, the most commonly cited justification for Operation Iraqi Freedom and one of the most embarrassing episodes for the United States. Satellite photos of a suspicious site in Syria are providing new support for the reporting of a Syrian journalist who briefly rocked the world with his reporting that Iraqs WMD had been sent to three sites in Syria just before the invasion commenced.
The newspaper reveals that a 200 square-kilometer area in northwestern Syria has been photographed by satellites at the request of a Western intelligence agency at least 16 times, the most recent being taken in January. The site is near Masyaf, and it has at least five installations and hidden paths leading underneath the mountains. This supports the reporting of Nizar Nayouf, an award-winning Syrian journalist who said in 2004 that his sources confirmed that Saddam Husseins WMDs were in Syria.
One of the three specific sites he mentioned was an underground base underneath Al-Baida, which is one kilometer south of Masyaf. This is a perfect match. The suspicious features in the photos and the fact that a Western intelligence agency is so interested in the site support Nayoufs reporting, showing that his sources in Syria did indeed have access to specific information about secret activity that is likely WMD-related. Richard Radcliffe, one of my co-writers at WorldThreats.com, noticed that Masyaf is located on a road that goes from Hamah, where there is an airfield sufficient to handle relatively large aircraft, into Lebanon and the western side of the Bekaa Valley, another location said to house Iraqi weapons.
It seems to be commonly accepted that Iraq did not have WMDs at all. The intelligence was obviously flawed, but the book has not been closed on what actually happened. The media blasted the headline that Charles Duelfer, the head of the Iraq Survey Group tasked with finding out if Saddam had WMDs, concluded that a transfer did not occur. In reality, his report said they were unable to complete its investigation and is unable to rule out the possibility that WMD was evacuated to Syria before the war due to the poor security situation.
Although no conclusion was made, Duelfer has since said that he is convinced that no WMD went to Syria. He is a competent and credible individual, but there is evidence that key information on this possibility was not received by the Iraq Survey Group, which had many of its own problems.
On February 24, 2009, I went to see a talk Duelfer gave at the Free Library of Philadelphia to promote his book. He admitted there were some loose ends regarding the possibility that Iraqi WMD went to Syria, but dismissed them. Among these loose ends, Duelfer said, was the inability to track down the Iraqis who worked for a company connected to Uday Hussein that sources said had driven sensitive material into Syria. A Pentagon document reveals that an Iraqi dissident reported that 50 trucks crossed the border on March 10, 2003, and that his sources in Syria confirmed they carried WMD. These trucks have been talked about frequently and remain a mystery.
During the question-and-answer period and during a follow-up interview, Duelfer made several interesting statements to me that reinforced my confidence that such a transfer occurred, although we can not be sure of the extent of it.
General Georges Sada, the former second-in-command of the Iraqi Air Force, claimed in his 2006 book that he knew two Iraqi pilots that flew WMD into Syria over the summer of 2002, which came before a later shipment on the ground. I asked Duelfer if Nizar Nayouf or the two Iraqi pilots were spoken with.
I did not interview the pilots nor did I speak with the Syrian journalist you mentioned, he said. We were inundated with WMD reports and could not investigate them all. To narrow the problem, we investigated those people and places we knew would have either been involved or aware of regime WMD activities.
He then told me that the lack of testimony about such dealings is what convinced him that a lot of material went to Syria, but no WMD. He cited the testimony of Naji Sabri, the former Iraqi foreign minister, in particular.
I knew him very well, and I had been authorized to make his life a lot better, or a lot worse, he told me.
Psst -- Nobody's going to revisit that horseshit again, pal. You can cling to it until your blankie shrinks to nothing, but the fact remains THERE WERE NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, which even George W. Bush himself admits to.
If money is to be printed, then it should go to the citizens first instead of government employees & big business.
Printed money should be divided equally among every US citizen with a social security number. Mail them all out a check & let them spend it. It is the absolute fastest & only fair way to stimulate the economy. When citizens spend the money then business & government can get theirs.
Aren't you a "conservative" on everything else? You're beginning to sound like one of those welfare queens spitting out babies every year in order to live off gubmit dole that most cons believe all libs/dems do.
Obama ($3 trillion)
Tax credits
Public Works projects
Teacher, Police and Firefighter salaries
Loans to Banks and Automakers
Bush ($5 trillion)
Two unfunded wars
$2 trillion in tax cuts
Medicare Part D
Maybe the same place Iraq's WMD went? Y'all don't seem nearly as concerned about that....
Syria?
and those 500 that where found I guess went no where
Satellite Photos Support Testimony That Iraqi WMD Went to Syria
The history books on this issue shouldnt be written just yet.
June 6, 2010 - by Ryan Mauro Page 1 of 2 Next -> View as Single Page
Share |
Haaretz has revived the mystery surrounding the inability to find weapons of mass destruction stockpiles in Iraq, the most commonly cited justification for Operation Iraqi Freedom and one of the most embarrassing episodes for the United States. Satellite photos of a suspicious site in Syria are providing new support for the reporting of a Syrian journalist who briefly rocked the world with his reporting that Iraqs WMD had been sent to three sites in Syria just before the invasion commenced.
The newspaper reveals that a 200 square-kilometer area in northwestern Syria has been photographed by satellites at the request of a Western intelligence agency at least 16 times, the most recent being taken in January. The site is near Masyaf, and it has at least five installations and hidden paths leading underneath the mountains. This supports the reporting of Nizar Nayouf, an award-winning Syrian journalist who said in 2004 that his sources confirmed that Saddam Husseins WMDs were in Syria.
One of the three specific sites he mentioned was an underground base underneath Al-Baida, which is one kilometer south of Masyaf. This is a perfect match. The suspicious features in the photos and the fact that a Western intelligence agency is so interested in the site support Nayoufs reporting, showing that his sources in Syria did indeed have access to specific information about secret activity that is likely WMD-related. Richard Radcliffe, one of my co-writers at WorldThreats.com, noticed that Masyaf is located on a road that goes from Hamah, where there is an airfield sufficient to handle relatively large aircraft, into Lebanon and the western side of the Bekaa Valley, another location said to house Iraqi weapons.
It seems to be commonly accepted that Iraq did not have WMDs at all. The intelligence was obviously flawed, but the book has not been closed on what actually happened. The media blasted the headline that Charles Duelfer, the head of the Iraq Survey Group tasked with finding out if Saddam had WMDs, concluded that a transfer did not occur. In reality, his report said they were unable to complete its investigation and is unable to rule out the possibility that WMD was evacuated to Syria before the war due to the poor security situation.
Although no conclusion was made, Duelfer has since said that he is convinced that no WMD went to Syria. He is a competent and credible individual, but there is evidence that key information on this possibility was not received by the Iraq Survey Group, which had many of its own problems.
On February 24, 2009, I went to see a talk Duelfer gave at the Free Library of Philadelphia to promote his book. He admitted there were some loose ends regarding the possibility that Iraqi WMD went to Syria, but dismissed them. Among these loose ends, Duelfer said, was the inability to track down the Iraqis who worked for a company connected to Uday Hussein that sources said had driven sensitive material into Syria. A Pentagon document reveals that an Iraqi dissident reported that 50 trucks crossed the border on March 10, 2003, and that his sources in Syria confirmed they carried WMD. These trucks have been talked about frequently and remain a mystery.
During the question-and-answer period and during a follow-up interview, Duelfer made several interesting statements to me that reinforced my confidence that such a transfer occurred, although we can not be sure of the extent of it.
General Georges Sada, the former second-in-command of the Iraqi Air Force, claimed in his 2006 book that he knew two Iraqi pilots that flew WMD into Syria over the summer of 2002, which came before a later shipment on the ground. I asked Duelfer if Nizar Nayouf or the two Iraqi pilots were spoken with.
I did not interview the pilots nor did I speak with the Syrian journalist you mentioned, he said. We were inundated with WMD reports and could not investigate them all. To narrow the problem, we investigated those people and places we knew would have either been involved or aware of regime WMD activities.
He then told me that the lack of testimony about such dealings is what convinced him that a lot of material went to Syria, but no WMD. He cited the testimony of Naji Sabri, the former Iraqi foreign minister, in particular.
I knew him very well, and I had been authorized to make his life a lot better, or a lot worse, he told me.
Psst -- Nobody's going to revisit that horseshit again, pal. You can cling to it until your blankie shrinks to nothing, but the fact remains THERE WERE NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, which even George W. Bush himself admits to.
Obama ($3 trillion)
Tax credits
Public Works projects
Teacher, Police and Firefighter salaries
Loans to Banks and Automakers
Bush ($5 trillion)
Two unfunded wars
$2 trillion in tax cuts
Medicare Part D
BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!The Bush Deficit, the Clinton Surplus and TARP by Gregory Hilton | The DC World Affairs BlogTwo unfunded wars
tax cuts
medicare Part D in 2007 was only 150 billion short
where did the other 5 trillion come from?
In fact 1 war is done with. Those troops cost the same if there where at fort Bragg, just about
Do you have any idea how much a war costs and why?
Evidently not
your information is not accurate (the 5 trillion and 3 trillion)
this link provides accurate information
As far as the war goes
troops are here no matter as well as those things we use to support them
All i know is Iraq is done
in 2007 we where wide open in Iraq and was 150 billion over budget
its 1.5 trillion today
Again, to CON$ intergovernmental DEBT is not DEBT, just as off budget DEFICIT SPENDING is not DEFICIT SPENDING.Obama ($3 trillion)
Tax credits
Public Works projects
Teacher, Police and Firefighter salaries
Loans to Banks and Automakers
Bush ($5 trillion)
Two unfunded wars
$2 trillion in tax cuts
Medicare Part D
I did a bit of research. Obama in his first two years increased Debt Held By The Public more than Bush did during his entire eight years.
Over 8 years, Bush increased Federal Debt by $4.9T, $2T of that was Intragovernmental Holdings (i.e. borrowing from the SS Trust Fund). Bush increased Debt Held By The Public by $2.9T.
Over the first two years of his Presidency, Obama increased total debt by $3.5T. Only $300B of that was Intragovernmental. He increased Debt Held By The Public by $3.2T - more than over Bush's entire two terms, and over 1/3 of the entire cumulative historical balance.
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/mspd/2011/opds012011.pdf
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/mspd/2009/opds012009.pdf
ftp://ftp.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opds012001.pdf
Its one thing to have the largest deficit in the history of the United States govt
Its another for no-one to know where it went
I am serious Libs
if i was yawl I would be screaming
Maybe the same place Iraq's WMD went? Y'all don't seem nearly as concerned about that....
The Bush Deficit, the Clinton Surplus and TARP by Gregory Hilton | The DC World Affairs BlogTwo unfunded wars
tax cuts
medicare Part D in 2007 was only 150 billion short
where did the other 5 trillion come from?
In fact 1 war is done with. Those troops cost the same if there where at fort Bragg, just about
Do you have any idea how much a war costs and why?
Evidently not
your information is not accurate (the 5 trillion and 3 trillion)
this link provides accurate information
As far as the war goes
troops are here no matter as well as those things we use to support them
All i know is Iraq is done
in 2007 we where wide open in Iraq and was 150 billion over budget
its 1.5 trillion today
Syria?
and those 500 that where found I guess went no where
Satellite Photos Support Testimony That Iraqi WMD Went to Syria
The history books on this issue shouldnt be written just yet.
June 6, 2010 - by Ryan Mauro Page 1 of 2 Next -> View as Single Page
Share |
Haaretz has revived the mystery surrounding the inability to find weapons of mass destruction stockpiles in Iraq, the most commonly cited justification for Operation Iraqi Freedom and one of the most embarrassing episodes for the United States. Satellite photos of a suspicious site in Syria are providing new support for the reporting of a Syrian journalist who briefly rocked the world with his reporting that Iraqs WMD had been sent to three sites in Syria just before the invasion commenced.
The newspaper reveals that a 200 square-kilometer area in northwestern Syria has been photographed by satellites at the request of a Western intelligence agency at least 16 times, the most recent being taken in January. The site is near Masyaf, and it has at least five installations and hidden paths leading underneath the mountains. This supports the reporting of Nizar Nayouf, an award-winning Syrian journalist who said in 2004 that his sources confirmed that Saddam Husseins WMDs were in Syria.
One of the three specific sites he mentioned was an underground base underneath Al-Baida, which is one kilometer south of Masyaf. This is a perfect match. The suspicious features in the photos and the fact that a Western intelligence agency is so interested in the site support Nayoufs reporting, showing that his sources in Syria did indeed have access to specific information about secret activity that is likely WMD-related. Richard Radcliffe, one of my co-writers at WorldThreats.com, noticed that Masyaf is located on a road that goes from Hamah, where there is an airfield sufficient to handle relatively large aircraft, into Lebanon and the western side of the Bekaa Valley, another location said to house Iraqi weapons.
It seems to be commonly accepted that Iraq did not have WMDs at all. The intelligence was obviously flawed, but the book has not been closed on what actually happened. The media blasted the headline that Charles Duelfer, the head of the Iraq Survey Group tasked with finding out if Saddam had WMDs, concluded that a transfer did not occur. In reality, his report said they were unable to complete its investigation and is unable to rule out the possibility that WMD was evacuated to Syria before the war due to the poor security situation.
Although no conclusion was made, Duelfer has since said that he is convinced that no WMD went to Syria. He is a competent and credible individual, but there is evidence that key information on this possibility was not received by the Iraq Survey Group, which had many of its own problems.
On February 24, 2009, I went to see a talk Duelfer gave at the Free Library of Philadelphia to promote his book. He admitted there were some loose ends regarding the possibility that Iraqi WMD went to Syria, but dismissed them. Among these loose ends, Duelfer said, was the inability to track down the Iraqis who worked for a company connected to Uday Hussein that sources said had driven sensitive material into Syria. A Pentagon document reveals that an Iraqi dissident reported that 50 trucks crossed the border on March 10, 2003, and that his sources in Syria confirmed they carried WMD. These trucks have been talked about frequently and remain a mystery.
During the question-and-answer period and during a follow-up interview, Duelfer made several interesting statements to me that reinforced my confidence that such a transfer occurred, although we can not be sure of the extent of it.
General Georges Sada, the former second-in-command of the Iraqi Air Force, claimed in his 2006 book that he knew two Iraqi pilots that flew WMD into Syria over the summer of 2002, which came before a later shipment on the ground. I asked Duelfer if Nizar Nayouf or the two Iraqi pilots were spoken with.
I did not interview the pilots nor did I speak with the Syrian journalist you mentioned, he said. We were inundated with WMD reports and could not investigate them all. To narrow the problem, we investigated those people and places we knew would have either been involved or aware of regime WMD activities.
He then told me that the lack of testimony about such dealings is what convinced him that a lot of material went to Syria, but no WMD. He cited the testimony of Naji Sabri, the former Iraqi foreign minister, in particular.
I knew him very well, and I had been authorized to make his life a lot better, or a lot worse, he told me.
Psst -- Nobody's going to revisit that horseshit again, pal. You can cling to it until your blankie shrinks to nothing, but the fact remains THERE WERE NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, which even George W. Bush himself admits to.
Thats not what he admitted to mam
By the way how do you feel about these remarks?
all of them prior o March 2003
Lets start with the UN
lix: weapons and anthrax still unaccounted for
3:40PM GMT 27 Jan 2003
Iraq has not yet come to genuinely accept disarmament, according to Hans Blix, the United Nations's chief weapons inspector.
Iraq has co-operated with his team on providing access but it needed to go further, Mr Blix told the UN Security Council.
He said: "It would appear from our experience so far that Iraq has decided in principle to provide co-operation on process, notably access.
"A similar decision is indispensable to provide co-operation on substance in order to bring the disarmament task to completion, through the peaceful process of inspection, and to bring the monitoring task on a firm course."
Touching on the question of how much time inspectors need, he said he shared "the sense of urgency" to achieve disarmament within "a reasonable period of time".
The UN Security Council was meeting to hear Mr Blix's first report following the return of weapons inspectors to Iraq last November.
Of the declaration of weapons made by Iraq under UN resolution 1441, he said: "Regrettably, the 12,000-page declaration does not seem to contain any new material."
Mr Blix said the declaration had failed to account for 6,500 chemical warfare bombs, adding that 12 empty chemical warheads recently found in a bunker south of Baghdad "could be the tip of the iceberg".
Iraq had also failed to prove it had destroyed all of its anthrax, Mr Blix said. There were "strong indications" that it had produced more than it had admitted.
He recalled that Iraq had declared that it produced 8,500 litres of anthrax and unilaterally destroyed the stock in the summer of 1991. But there was "no convincing evidence of destruction," he said.
He added that Iraq had not fully accounted for stocks of precursor chemicals used to make VX nerve gas. Baghdad had also lied about how close it had come to weaponising the gas in the late 1980s.
Mr Blix added that Iraq has refused to co-operate with a request from UN weapons inspectors regarding flights of U-2 spy planes for aerial imagery and surveillance.
Mr Blix, who is charged with overseeing the elimination of Iraq's chemical and biological weapons and long-range missiles, was accompanied by Mohamed ElBaradei, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Mr ElBaradei said that his inspectors had found no evidence that Iraq had revived its weapons programme after it was destroyed following the Gulf War.
But he said that inspectors needed more time to provide "credible assurance" that Iraq has no nuclear weapons programme.
He also urged Iraq to provide more information about the pre-1991 weapons programme.
John Negroponte, the United States ambassador to the UN, said that nothing Mr Blix and Mr ElBaradei had said indicated that Iraq had disarmed. He said: "Iraq is back to business as usual."
how about some dems
One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
Again, to CON$ intergovernmental DEBT is not DEBT, just as off budget DEFICIT SPENDING is not DEFICIT SPENDING.Obama ($3 trillion)
Tax credits
Public Works projects
Teacher, Police and Firefighter salaries
Loans to Banks and Automakers
Bush ($5 trillion)
Two unfunded wars
$2 trillion in tax cuts
Medicare Part D
I did a bit of research. Obama in his first two years increased Debt Held By The Public more than Bush did during his entire eight years.
Over 8 years, Bush increased Federal Debt by $4.9T, $2T of that was Intragovernmental Holdings (i.e. borrowing from the SS Trust Fund). Bush increased Debt Held By The Public by $2.9T.
Over the first two years of his Presidency, Obama increased total debt by $3.5T. Only $300B of that was Intragovernmental. He increased Debt Held By The Public by $3.2T - more than over Bush's entire two terms, and over 1/3 of the entire cumulative historical balance.
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/mspd/2011/opds012011.pdf
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/mspd/2009/opds012009.pdf
ftp://ftp.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opds012001.pdf
