Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #41
dear idiots,
you cant pretend you dont stand for certain things.
you cant pretend you dont stand for certain things.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The austrian school of economics is Not veiwed very well by the rest of the economics field.
Our founding fathers had no other choice. The nation was bankrupt after the Revolution and impediments to transportation and communications between the states made a strong centralized government an impossibility.
Areas outside the populated urban areas did experience anarchy as the weak federal and state governments were unable to maintain control over desolate areas
A strong centralized government was never the intent, the federal government was only intended to do the things a state couldn't do on it's own, like common defense, a postal system and preventing states form taking economic advantage of each other. The federal government is still allowing anarchy to prevail in isolated areas, a prime example is the desert southwest with drug and human smuggling.
bla bla bla.
your a progrmaed fool
This explains your ignorance regarding libertarians. They do NOT want an absence of government. They want LESS government intervention in their lives. I suppose if government were limited to the minimum required to provide the services envisioned by our founding fathers, we would have a working libertarian government.
A strong centralized government was never the intent, the federal government was only intended to do the things a state couldn't do on it's own, like common defense, a postal system and preventing states form taking economic advantage of each other. The federal government is still allowing anarchy to prevail in isolated areas, a prime example is the desert southwest with drug and human smuggling.
bla bla bla.
your a progrmaed fool
Yep, you'd be surprised what you can learn actually reading the words of the founders instead of depending on others to tell you what they said. But that's ok, I think your better suited for your fantasy liberal utopia, no matter how badly it works.
bla bla bla.
your a progrmaed fool
Yep, you'd be surprised what you can learn actually reading the words of the founders instead of depending on others to tell you what they said. But that's ok, I think your better suited for your fantasy liberal utopia, no matter how badly it works.
when in history has libertarian philosophy been proven to work in real life?
Go get an example in history
Well, TM hates the 1% and banks, but loves federal govt. bailouts for them and thinks stimulus works. So listening to her views on economics is a lot like listening to the toilet flush.
Yep, you'd be surprised what you can learn actually reading the words of the founders instead of depending on others to tell you what they said. But that's ok, I think your better suited for your fantasy liberal utopia, no matter how badly it works.
when in history has libertarian philosophy been proven to work in real life?
Go get an example in history
United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
when in history has libertarian philosophy been proven to work in real life?
Go get an example in history
United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nope that is not an example of libertarian philosophy in practice
No. That's LIBERAL philosophy. It has failed repeatedly. Yet you dumb fucks hang on to it like Jesus passed it down.libertarian philosophy is historically failed philosophy
Nope that is not an example of libertarian philosophy in practice
Not since 1787, but it was.
Nope that is not an example of libertarian philosophy in practice
Not since 1787, but it was.
We have never been Libertarian....never will be
This explains your ignorance regarding libertarians. They do NOT want an absence of government. They want LESS government intervention in their lives. I suppose if government were limited to the minimum required to provide the services envisioned by our founding fathers, we would have a working libertarian government.
It is a strawman argument to say that libertarians want zero government. Liberals are good at strawman! Keep up the good work!