Liberals, So What Is YOUR Plan to Deal with These Two Central Facts About Muslim Immigrants?

[Siete]

RW dolts are laughable ... there's over 80,000 refugees from Iraq in America and they don't even know they're here, and NEVER will know they're here... if they hadn't READ about Syrian refugees they wouldn't know a damn thing about them either.

How many Iraqi's blew up Americans .... how many Syrians blew up Americans ???

candy ass RW's .... go hide, cry, and quiver.

>>" How Iraqi's blew up Americans .... how many Syrians blew up Americans ???"<<

How many does it take?

So sorry, that we think we have legitimate reasons to worry about terrorism upon this nation. So sorry, we look further down the road than just a few months. Terrorists are extremely patient in plotting... or haven't you learned that yet?

This kind of concerns me ---> http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/visa-program-struggles-track-missing-foreign-students/story?id=25208740

Lost in America: Visa Program Struggles to Track Missing Foreign Students

By Brian Ross and Matthew Mosk ·Sep 2, 2014, 8:02 AM ET

The Department of Homeland Security has lost track of more than 6,000 foreign nationals who entered the United States on student visas, overstayed their welcome, and essentially vanished -- exploiting a security gap that was supposed to be fixed after the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks.

"My greatest concern is that they could be doing anything," said Peter Edge, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement official who oversees investigations into visa violators. "Some of them could be here to do us harm."

Homeland Security officials disclosed the breadth of the student visa problem in response to ABC News questions submitted as part of an investigation into persistent complaints about the nation’s entry program for students.

ABC News found that immigration officials have struggled to keep track of the rapidly increasing numbers of foreign students coming to the U.S. -- now in excess of one million each year. The immigration agency’s own figures show that 58,000 students overstayed their visas in the past year. Of those, 6,000 were referred to agents for follow-up because they were determined to be of heightened concern.

“They just disappear,” said Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla. “They get the visas and they disappear.”

Coburn said since the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks, 26 student visa holders have been arrested in the U.S. on terror-related charges.

Tightening up the student visa program was one of the major recommendations made by the 9/11 Commission, after it was determined that the hijacker who flew Flight 77 into the Pentagon, Hani Hanjour, had entered the U.S. on a student visa but never showed up for school.

Edge said ICE agents are trying to locate every one of the 6,000 missing students, but acknowledged that “we really have a lot more work to do” to tighten up the student visa program.

Despite repeated concerns raised by Congress, federal immigration officials have also continued to grant schools certification to accept overseas applicants even if the schools lack accreditation, state certification, or any obvious measure of academic rigor.

There are now more than 9,000 schools on the government approved list. The list includes such top flight American colleges as Harvard and Yale, but it also includes 86 beauty schools, 36 massage schools and nine schools that teach horseshoeing. Foreign students can enter the U.S. on a visa to study acupuncture, hair braiding, or join academies that focus on tennis and golf.

Once the student arrives in the U.S., it is up to the schools to keep track of the visa-holder’s whereabouts -- and report to the government if they repeatedly miss class.

That is a serious concern, Coburn said, because a number of for-profit schools appear to have been operating with a primary goal of selling visas, not educating students.

“We know we have a lot of non-accredited universities that are using this system to bring people in, collect money, and not educate them at all,” said Coburn, who is part of a bi-partisan group of senators that has been trying to tighten controls on student visas. “To me, it’s a mess.”

One school on the approved list, MicroPower Career Institute, licensed by the state of New York, continues to have four campuses on the approved list, even though five of the school’s top officials -- including its president -- were indicted on charges of visa fraud in May. According to the indictment, 80 percent of the foreign students enrolled MicroPower had delinquent attendance, putting them out of compliance with their visas. But the school did not report them, the indictment says. All five school officials have pleaded not guilty in the case.

ABC News visited MicroPower’s small fifth floor campus in a Manhattan office suite, but the school declined to make anyone available to comment.

Edge, who is Executive Associate Director at for ICE Homeland Security Investigations, said his agency had no choice but to continue to allow MicroPower to facilitate student visas.

“I can only say that this is the United States of America and everyone has due process,” Edge said.

The MicroPower case is one of several that touch on broader questions long raised about the student visa program.

Thomas Kean 9/11 Commission Co-Chair said the government has yet to address the security gaps the program has created. He said was stunned the federal government continues to lose track of so many foreign nationals who had entered the country with student visas. He noted that, even before the 9/11 terror attacks, federal officials had been aware of the gaps in the student visa program. The man who drove the van containing explosives into the World Trade Center garage in 1993 was also a student visa holder who was a no-show at school.

“It's been pointed out over and over and over again and the fact that nothing has been done about it yet... it's a very dangerous thing for all of us,” Kean said. “The fact that there's been no action on this is very bothersome.”

Janice Kephart, who was counsel to the 9/11 Commission and co-author of a separate report looking at how the hijackers entered the U.S., said the credibility of schools certified by ICE is another significant concern.

“When schools are not legitimate that enables terrorists to come here under a fraudulent basis and disappear into the fabric of society without anybody knowing that they are here for illegitimate reason,” Kephart said, “because the system itself will say they're here legitimately when in fact they're not.”

ICE has taken steps to address the issue, especially in the aftermath of a damning report by the Government Accountability Office in 2012, which found the agency had failed to adequately police for visa fraud. ICE officials told ABC News, for instance, that it has undertaken a new program to deploy field representatives around the country to personally inspect schools that had been approved to accept foreign students. So far, 15 field representatives have been hired, with a plan to ultimately employ 60 around the country, according to spokesperson Carissa Cutrell.

The agency has also launched a program -- so far installed at one airport, but planned for others -- that will immediately alert a customs inspector if a student is attempting to re-enter the country after their status has been flagged by a school official.

“We’re continually making improvements,” Cutrell said.

Edge said part of the blame for the continued trouble with the student visa program stems from a Congress that has been unwilling to impose tighter limits on schools -- many of which profit from tuition paid by foreign students.

Coburn, as well as Sens. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Chuck Schumer, D-NY, were among those pushing for limiting ICE certification to accredited schools in 2012. But that effort stalled in the House of Representatives.

Rachel Banks, the director of public policy for NAFSA, the association of international educators, said her group has been working to promote opportunities for foreign study in the U.S. She said the group understands the need to monitor the arrival and departure of foreign nationals, but it should not come at the expense of legitimate applicants seeking to study in America.

“Students should not be scapegoated,” Banks said. “Foreign students are an asset and not a threat.”

The effort to expand options for foreign study appear to be prevailing. According to figures gathered by congressional investigators, the number of foreign nationals obtaining visas to study in the U.S. has grown from 662,966 in 2003 to more than 1.2 million in 2012.

Edge said his agency has accepted that those numbers represent a continued challenge for the Department of Homeland Security.

“Our work has only begun,” he said. “We have a lot more work to do in this space.”

ABC News' Stephanie Lopez, Lissette Rodriguez and Alex Hosenball contributed to this report.

take a breath...


LMFAO !

 

[turzovka]

RW dolts are laughable ... there's over 80,000 refugees from Iraq in America and they don't even know they're here, and NEVER will know they're here... if they hadn't READ about Syrian refugees they wouldn't know a damn thing about them either.

How many Iraqi's blew up Americans .... how many Syrians blew up Americans ???

candy ass RW's .... go hide, cry, and quiver.

>>" How many Iraqi's blew up Americans .... how many Syrians blew up Americans ???"<<

How many does it take?

So sorry, that we think we have legitimate reasons to worry about terrorism upon this nation. So sorry, we look further down the road than just a few months. Terrorists are extremely patient in plotting... or haven't you learned that yet?

This kind of concerns me ---> http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/visa-program-struggles-track-missing-foreign-students/story?id=25208740

Lost in America: Visa Program Struggles to Track Missing Foreign Students

By Brian Ross and Matthew Mosk ·Sep 2, 2014, 8:02 AM ET

The Department of Homeland Security has lost track of more than 6,000 foreign nationals who entered the United States on student visas, overstayed their welcome, and essentially vanished -- exploiting a security gap that was supposed to be fixed after the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks.

"My greatest concern is that they could be doing anything," said Peter Edge, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement official who oversees investigations into visa violators. "Some of them could be here to do us harm."

Homeland Security officials disclosed the breadth of the student visa problem in response to ABC News questions submitted as part of an investigation into persistent complaints about the nation’s entry program for students.

ABC News found that immigration officials have struggled to keep track of the rapidly increasing numbers of foreign students coming to the U.S. -- now in excess of one million each year. The immigration agency’s own figures show that 58,000 students overstayed their visas in the past year. Of those, 6,000 were referred to agents for follow-up because they were determined to be of heightened concern.

“They just disappear,” said Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla. “They get the visas and they disappear.”

Coburn said since the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks, 26 student visa holders have been arrested in the U.S. on terror-related charges.

Tightening up the student visa program was one of the major recommendations made by the 9/11 Commission, after it was determined that the hijacker who flew Flight 77 into the Pentagon, Hani Hanjour, had entered the U.S. on a student visa but never showed up for school.

Edge said ICE agents are trying to locate every one of the 6,000 missing students, but acknowledged that “we really have a lot more work to do” to tighten up the student visa program.

take a breath...


LMFAO !

Pardon me.

I thought I was talking to a human being with at least a partial brain.

 

[LeftofLeft]

In reading the various liberals threads and replies on the issue bringing in more Syrian refugees, over and over again I see that they avoid dealing with the two most important facts relating to this issue: (1) the fact that every single jihadist terrorist attack has been conducted by people who were either raised Muslims or who became Muslims before they turned to terrorism, and (2) the fact that recent history has proven that the more Muslim immigrants that a Western or pro-Western country allows in, the greater that country's chances become of suffering terrorist attacks.

So, liberals, what is your plan to address these central, undeniable facts? If you're going to allow in thousands of additional Syrian refugees, do you have any plan to track their activities, given the fact that Muslim immigrants have repeatedly proven to be ripe recruiting material for jihadism, both here and overseas? Given the recent attempts by Muslims to enter our country illegally via our Southern border, do you have any plan to increase border security, since it's a safe, reasonable bet that for every five would-be infiltrators whom we have stopped, at least one has not been caught?

What do you say to the fact that polls are consistently showing that a majority of Americans oppose bringing in more Syrian refugees? Are most Americans simply "racists," "hysterically fearful," "xenophobic," etc, etc.? What do you say to average Americans who make the entirely logical, reasonable deduction that allowing in additional Syrian refugees is manifestly unwise and risky, since recent history has proven beyond all doubt that the more Muslim immigrants a Western/pro-Western country allows in, the greater its chances become of suffering terrorist attacks? Give me a logical, non-race-card explanation for why this is not a perfectly rational conclusion?

Where are the two facts?

Here's a FACT: The Left's only plan to mitigate the risk of terrorism from among the Syrian Refugees is to simply call anyone racist or intolerant. When a terrorist slips through among the ranks of Syrian refugees and beheads an American, who's fault will it be?

 

[bravoactual]

There is ABSOLUTELY no way to screen the " refugee / terrorists ".

All information about them would have to come from the Syrian government and that is run by the same Muslims that tell the terrorists to kill the infidels.

The information to screen the " refugees " would come from the very people who hate our guts.

I'm sure they would tell us the truth about the " refugees " </snark >.

Just so you know....NONE OF THE TERRORISTS IN PARIS WERE SYRIAN!!!

 

[Arizona Willie]

There is ABSOLUTELY no way to screen the " refugee / terrorists ".

All information about them would have to come from the Syrian government and that is run by the same Muslims that tell the terrorists to kill the infidels.

The information to screen the " refugees " would come from the very people who hate our guts.

I'm sure they would tell us the truth about the " refugees " </snark >.

Just so you know....NONE OF THE TERRORISTS IN PARIS WERE SYRIAN!!!

============
That could be but it makes little difference as to their actual nationality. They are all muslims / terrorists and the government of the country they came from is usually ran by the Imams who hold government offices as well as being " religious leaders ".

Syria / Iran / Iraq / Afghanistan / Packistan they are all basically the same fucked up mess since we took out Saddam. Their governments / religious leaders all hate us and would NOT tell us the truth about the backgrounds and history of the " refugees " --- especially when they have sent them to be terrorists.

 

[francoHFW]

In reading the various liberals threads and replies on the issue bringing in more Syrian refugees, over and over again I see that they avoid dealing with the two most important facts relating to this issue: (1) the fact that every single jihadist terrorist attack has been conducted by people who were either raised Muslims or who became Muslims before they turned to terrorism, and (2) the fact that recent history has proven that the more Muslim immigrants that a Western or pro-Western country allows in, the greater that country's chances become of suffering terrorist attacks.

So, liberals, what is your plan to address these central, undeniable facts? If you're going to allow in thousands of additional Syrian refugees, do you have any plan to track their activities, given the fact that Muslim immigrants have repeatedly proven to be ripe recruiting material for jihadism, both here and overseas? Given the recent attempts by Muslims to enter our country illegally via our Southern border, do you have any plan to increase border security, since it's a safe, reasonable bet that for every five would-be infiltrators whom we have stopped, at least one has not been caught?

What do you say to the fact that polls are consistently showing that a majority of Americans oppose bringing in more Syrian refugees? Are most Americans simply "racists," "hysterically fearful," "xenophobic," etc, etc.? What do you say to average Americans who make the entirely logical, reasonable deduction that allowing in additional Syrian refugees is manifestly unwise and risky, since recent history has proven beyond all doubt that the more Muslim immigrants a Western/pro-Western country allows in, the greater its chances become of suffering terrorist attacks? Give me a logical, non-race-card explanation for why this is not a perfectly rational conclusion?

Where are the two facts?

So you don't know that ALL of the jihadist terrorist attacks have been done by people who were raised Muslims or who became Muslims before engaging in terrorism? You don't know this? You dispute this?

And you don't know that we have seen over and over again in recent history that Muslim immigrants have proven to be ripe recruiting material for jihadism? You don't know this? Heard of the Tsarnaev brothers? Heard of Nidal Hasan? Heard of the Little Rock and Chattanooga shooters? Heard of the Paris attackers who were Muslim immigrants? Have you seen the federally documented list that Senator Sessions just released of mostly Muslim immigrants who turned to jihad just this year? Heard of any of this?

What planet do you live you on?

Jihadists are Muslims? Duh lol. The Paris attackers were born and raised in Europe DUH. So how misinformed, hateful and brainwashed is the attacker at Planned Parenthood, Charleston etc etc? Guns and brainwashed functional morons of ALL kinds are everywhere. Great job, our way or the highway shytteheads and thieves.

 

[mikegriffith1]

So it seems that the liberal plan for dealing with these crucial facts is to deny them.

Why has the pro-Western nation of Japan had no jihadistic terrorist attacks? Because Japan is virtually closed to Muslim immigration and has a tiny Muslim population.

Who carried out the jihadist terrorist attacks in France in the last seven months? First- and second-generation Muslim immigrants who had turned to jihad, along with jihadists from overseas, including the mastermind, who entered the the country by posing as a Syrian refugees.

Who are the jihadists on the list released by Senator Sessions? I know most of them are Muslims, and I'd bet good money that those who were not already Muslims converted to Islam before getting involved with jihadist activities.

And what of the numerous polls done among Muslims that have consistently found that a surprising number of "average Muslims" sympathize with jihadism/Muslim extremism? Obviously, this explains why Muslim immigrants have proven to be so disproportionately liable to get recruited for jihad (disproportionately in relation to every other demographic group--no other group even comes close).

Articles: Why Muslim Migrants Always = Terrorism
EXTRACT:

In an attempt to salvage a failing multicultural model and strategy for importing left-leaning voters, we hear that the Muslim migrants must be “vetted” better. A simple practical problem with this notion is that Syria’s and other Middle Eastern countries’ databases are woefully inadequate, making accurate information on many migrants impossible to obtain. This confronts us with a simple matter of probability: if 1 million migrants enter a nation over time and just 1/10th of 1 percent are terrorists, that’s 1000 dangerous jihadists. Is this acceptable? Note that my estimate may be conservative.

Yet there’s also a fundamental problem with vetting that goes unmentioned: even with complete information, it only tells you about the past.

It cannot tell you about the future.​

In other words, even if those one million migrants have “clean records,” how many will become terrorists in the future? Again, 1/10th of 1 percent is 1000.​

 

[imawhosure]

So it seems that the liberal plan for dealing with these crucial facts is to deny them.

Why has the pro-Western nation of Japan had no jihadistic terrorist attacks? Because Japan is virtually closed to Muslim immigration and has a tiny Muslim population.

Who carried out the jihadist terrorist attacks in France in the last seven months? First- and second-generation Muslim immigrants who had turned to jihad, along with jihadists from overseas, including the mastermind, who entered the the country by posing as a Syrian refugees.

Who are the jihadists on the list released by Senator Sessions? I know most of them are Muslims, and I'd bet good money that those who were not already Muslims converted to Islam before getting involved with jihadist activities.

And what of the numerous polls done among Muslims that have consistently found that a surprising number of "average Muslims" sympathize with jihadism/Muslim extremism? Obviously, this explains why Muslim immigrants have proven to be so disproportionately liable to get recruited for jihad (disproportionately in relation to every other demographic group--no other group even comes close).

Articles: Why Muslim Migrants Always = Terrorism
EXTRACT:

In an attempt to salvage a failing multicultural model and strategy for importing left-leaning voters, we hear that the Muslim migrants must be “vetted” better. A simple practical problem with this notion is that Syria’s and other Middle Eastern countries’ databases are woefully inadequate, making accurate information on many migrants impossible to obtain. This confronts us with a simple matter of probability: if 1 million migrants enter a nation over time and just 1/10th of 1 percent are terrorists, that’s 1000 dangerous jihadists. Is this acceptable? Note that my estimate may be conservative.

Yet there’s also a fundamental problem with vetting that goes unmentioned: even with complete information, it only tells you about the past.

It cannot tell you about the future.​

In other words, even if those one million migrants have “clean records,” how many will become terrorists in the future? Again, 1/10th of 1 percent is 1000.​

Mike, like all conservatives we are in utter disbelief of how the lefties are trying to spin this. That being said, remember that over 65% of the people in America support our point of view. If everyones time tables are true, these people will be stuck waiting to get in until AFTER the next Presidential election.

Now, if the Democrats want to stand against 2/3rds of Americans and their opinions because like all lefties, they know better; far be it from me to argue with their brilliance. I will just point out each and every chance I get to voters, that the Democrats are DISSING the voters point of view, and care less what they think. They are going to IMPOSE their will upon Americans, and aren't we happy we have a constitutionalist like Ted Cruz running to stop them-)

If they actually want to piss off much of the silent majority who hasn't been involved in years, I say, "let them go ahead, and watch what happens!"

 

[rightwinger]

(1) the fact that every single jihadist terrorist attack has been conducted by people who were either raised Muslims or who became Muslims before they turned to terrorism

The FACT that every Christian murder was committed by a Christian

Want to get rid of Christian murders.....DONT allow Christians in the country

 

[mikegriffith1]

Let's see if we can boil this down: Can anyone name a jihadist terrorist attack that has not been carried out by someone who was either raised a Muslim or who became a Muslim before engaging in jihad?

 

[Moonglow]

Let's see if we can boil this down: Can anyone name a jihadist terrorist attack that has not been carried out by someone who was either raised a Muslim or who became a Muslim before engaging in jihad?

What other religion uses the word jihad?

 

[Disir]

Why has the pro-Western nation of Japan had no jihadistic terrorist attacks? Because Japan is virtually closed to Muslim immigration and has a tiny Muslim population.

Or............it could be something different.


I. Introduction
The current Constitution of Japan was promulgated on November 3, 1946, and came into effect on May 3, 1947. One of the Constitution’s distinctive features is its embrace of pacifism. Article 9 of the Constitution, which renounces war, is considered unique. Japan is allowed Jieitai, the Self Defense Forces (SDF): the Air SDF, the Maritime SDF, and the Ground SDF. They cannot be called land, sea and air forces (gun) because article 9 prohibits Japan from maintaining military forces. However the SDF were named, many have believed the SDF is military and the existence of the SDF is, in essence, unconstitutional.[1] Of course, the government has interpreted the Constitution in a manner in which the SDF would not be unconstitutional.

The government has developed a somewhat unique interpretation of article 9 and its related rules in order to legalize the existence of the SDF, and has also put limitations on the SDF in the spirit of article 9. As the government’s interpretation of article 9 has developed further, many think the interpretation has begun to deviate too much from article 9’s language. The government interpretation has emerged at a time that the United States has demanded more cooperation from Japan in maintaining Japan’s military security.

The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which has been the ruling party for most of the era after the Second World War, has discussed amending the Constitution, especially article 9, but resistance has been strong. It once looked impossible to amend article 9 because the majority of Japanese people would not support the amendment. However, global political and security issues impacting Japan have changed, as have the viewpoints of the Japanese people. Recently, there are realistic opportunities to amend article 9.

Back to Top

II. Pacifist Constitution and Self Defense
The Constitution of Japan is known as the pacifist Constitution. Both its Preamble and article 9 express principles of pacifism. The Preamble of the Constitution proclaims:

We, the Japanese people, … resolved that never again shall we be visited with the horrors of war through the action of government….

We … desire peace for all time … and we have determined to preserve our security and existence, trusting in the justice and faith of the peace-loving peoples of the world.[2]

Japan: Article 9 of the Constitution | Law Library of Congress

Of course now it's all jacked up.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

(1) the fact that every single jihadist terrorist attack has been conducted by people who were either raised Muslims or who became Muslims before they turned to terrorism,

Wow. Every single terrorist attack committed by Muslims is committed by Muslims. You may be on to something there....

and (2) the fact that recent history has proven that the more Muslim immigrants that a Western or pro-Western country allows in, the greater that country's chances become of suffering terrorist attacks.

Who is "recent history" and where can I see him or her prove this?

 

[Carla_Danger]

Well, I am sure all of these libs who want the Syrian refugees here so we can take care of them who are dog lovers have Dobermans, and pitbulls as pets, yes! Especially if they have kids, yes? No, why not? You mean to tell me because these animals have a higher probability of biting, and severely injuring someone, (by the way, in case you didn't know, that is called profiling animals. It is also discriminating against certain dog breeds to protect our families) you don't want them? You bunch of RACIST, anti animal Democrats.

Afraid of Dobermans and pitbulls are you, lolol. What you gonna run from next, (right Siete) a Chinese Chu?

WTF?

 

[auditor0007]

RW dolts are laughable ... there's over 80,000 refugees from Iraq in America and they don't even know they're here, and NEVER will know they're here... if they hadn't READ about Syrian refugees they wouldn't know a damn thing about them either.

How many Iraqi's blew up Americans .... how many Syrians blew up Americans ???

candy ass RW's .... go hide, cry, and quiver.

I can appreciate a bit of concern coming from Americans when it comes to letting in Syrian refugees, but it's funny that these same people have little concern about Americans with guns shooting up our schools, movie theaters, and Planned Parenthood clinics, or the 11,000 plus homicides per year committed with guns, or the more than 32,000 deaths each year from firearms, including murders, suicides and accidental deaths.

 

[billyerock1991]

In reading the various liberals threads and replies on the issue bringing in more Syrian refugees, over and over again I see that they avoid dealing with the two most important facts relating to this issue: (1) the fact that every single jihadist terrorist attack has been conducted by people who were either raised Muslims or who became Muslims before they turned to terrorism, and (2) the fact that recent history has proven that the more Muslim immigrants that a Western or pro-Western country allows in, the greater that country's chances become of suffering terrorist attacks.

So, liberals, what is your plan to address these central, undeniable facts? If you're going to allow in thousands of additional Syrian refugees, do you have any plan to track their activities, given the fact that Muslim immigrants have repeatedly proven to be ripe recruiting material for jihadism, both here and overseas? Given the recent attempts by Muslims to enter our country illegally via our Southern border, do you have any plan to increase border security, since it's a safe, reasonable bet that for every five would-be infiltrators whom we have stopped, at least one has not been caught?

What do you say to the fact that polls are consistently showing that a majority of Americans oppose bringing in more Syrian refugees? Are most Americans simply "racists," "hysterically fearful," "xenophobic," etc, etc.? What do you say to average Americans who make the entirely logical, reasonable deduction that allowing in additional Syrian refugees is manifestly unwise and risky, since recent history has proven beyond all doubt that the more Muslim immigrants a Western/pro-Western country allows in, the greater its chances become of suffering terrorist attacks? Give me a logical, non-race-card explanation for why this is not a perfectly rational conclusion?

let me explain something to you neanderthal repub-lie-tards ... federal law says we can't stop them ... why is it idiots like this one who makes accusations to us liberals about thing, we as liberals, haven't any say in these matters .... even if we all opposed this we couldn't stop it .... you see your republicans passed a federal saying we can't stop them from coming here ... that they have a right to come here because of the threat to their existence ... why is it when the constitution says we have to follow the law, when its something you repub-lie-tards don't seem to like, you start the accusations, assumptions against us liberals for following the constitution ... why is that skippy

 

[2aguy]

there plan is: let them all in, expect that we the people pay for them to get settled and then help them all apply for welfare because there isn't ANY JOBS for us Citizens as it is. and keep their fingers crossed that we don't let in too many terrorist who ends up killing thousands. I mean weren't you born in this country just to work and take away from your family so you can PAY to bring 100's of thousand foreigners who will be pushing themselves and cultures on us instead of assimilating.

You forgot the most important part.....let them in....so they vote for hilary in the next election...that is why they are pushing so hard.......

 

[billyerock1991]

RW dolts are laughable ... there's over 80,000 refugees from Iraq in America and they don't even know they're here, and NEVER will know they're here... if they hadn't READ about Syrian refugees they wouldn't know a damn thing about them either.

How many Iraqi's blew up Americans .... how many Syrians blew up Americans ???

candy ass RW's .... go hide, cry, and quiver.

I can appreciate a bit of concern coming from Americans when it comes to letting in Syrian refugees, but it's funny that these same people have little concern about Americans with guns shooting up our schools, movie theaters, and Planned Parenthood clinics, or the 11,000 plus homicides per year committed with guns, or the more than 32,000 deaths each year from firearms, including murders, suicides and accidental deaths.

I can't wait when the government is forced to release all the videos, pictures, of all those poor innocent children who were mowed down by theses guns that killed these children ... I can see it now the NRA doing the old duck and cover ploy ... hear these republicans saying those 7 to 9 year olds should have been packing... yeah, thats a good idea ... you didn't pick me to play dodge ball ... then all of a sudden we have a whole team of dodge ball players killed.. he was packing and then NRA telling us oh well shit happens

 

[2aguy]

RW dolts are laughable ... there's over 80,000 refugees from Iraq in America and they don't even know they're here, and NEVER will know they're here... if they hadn't READ about Syrian refugees they wouldn't know a damn thing about them either.

How many Iraqi's blew up Americans .... how many Syrians blew up Americans ???

candy ass RW's .... go hide, cry, and quiver.

I can appreciate a bit of concern coming from Americans when it comes to letting in Syrian refugees, but it's funny that these same people have little concern about Americans with guns shooting up our schools, movie theaters, and Planned Parenthood clinics, or the 11,000 plus homicides per year committed with guns, or the more than 32,000 deaths each year from firearms, including murders, suicides and accidental deaths.

Twit....we have laws that put people in jail who use guns to break the law....but the democrats keep letting them out...just ask obama, who has reduced the number of gun crimes he has prosectued since he got into office and the other prosecutors and judges who give light sentences to gun criminals, who spend little to no time in jail........

and again...twit......there were 8,124 gun murders in the 2014...and 505 accidental gun deaths in 2013, the last year for stats from the CDC...the rest were self inflicted gun shot wounds or suicides......those do not count..why? Because Japan, South Korea and China have absolute gun control, and their suicide rate is 2x our rate...also....there were 19,000 suicides in the United States that were done without guns.....

So guns are not the issue...

Also, the 8,124 gun murders were majority criminals murdering other criminals in the commission of criminal acts in very small areas of our democrat controlled inner cities....the longer the democrats have controlled a city,the less they care about gun violence, since their gun murder rates are the highest......

And 2nd Amendment supporters push for gun safety education in schools, to keep kids safe from guns.....you guys fight it...

We support strict sentences for gun crimes...your guys let the gun criminals out.....

you guys create gun free zones...and mass shooters go there and murder people who can't defend themselves....

Those deaths are on you genius....

 

[2aguy]

RW dolts are laughable ... there's over 80,000 refugees from Iraq in America and they don't even know they're here, and NEVER will know they're here... if they hadn't READ about Syrian refugees they wouldn't know a damn thing about them either.

How many Iraqi's blew up Americans .... how many Syrians blew up Americans ???

candy ass RW's .... go hide, cry, and quiver.

I can appreciate a bit of concern coming from Americans when it comes to letting in Syrian refugees, but it's funny that these same people have little concern about Americans with guns shooting up our schools, movie theaters, and Planned Parenthood clinics, or the 11,000 plus homicides per year committed with guns, or the more than 32,000 deaths each year from firearms, including murders, suicides and accidental deaths.

I can't wait when the government is forced to release all the videos, pictures, of all those poor innocent children who were mowed down by theses guns that killed these children ... I can see it now the NRA doing the old duck and cover ploy ... hear these republicans saying those 7 to 9 year olds should have been packing... yeah, thats a good idea ... you didn't pick me to play dodge ball ... then all of a sudden we have a whole team of dodge ball players killed.. he was packing and then NRA telling us oh well shit happens

Do you actually know how many kids are killed each year? Obviously not...if you did you would be more concerned about putting your kids in that car in your driveway....