Liberalism: Destroying America Through "Education"

Yeah that liberals science gave us the biggest science hoax of all time....globull warming.

We won't even go into the perverted liberal "educators" sexually molesting students. EVERYTHING a liberal touches goes to shit
Historically conservatives have opposed teaching science in the classroom, teaching about cultures around the world, teaching new languages, teaching art and music, teaching about religions that aren't Christianity, challenging students' preconceived ideas or opinions...

Canservatism is just not conducive to learning. It's a philosophy that rejects outside influence of ideas and culture. Much like the worst countries in the middle east.

Yeah we prefer they teach the important stuff, like the 3 R's.
17ac484aa3f8cd965dcae16bb7930a8bd0fceefdad8cea8dec35086fe3dd467d.jpg

Deflection only means you are deflecting. Now about the literacy rates under "liberal education"?
Color me surprised, 9 of the 10 least literate states vote overwhelmingly republican.
States Where Children are Struggling the Most to Read - 24 7 Wall St.

Don't try to use facts on conservatives. Waste of time.
 
Historically conservatives have opposed teaching science in the classroom, teaching about cultures around the world, teaching new languages, teaching art and music, teaching about religions that aren't Christianity, challenging students' preconceived ideas or opinions...

Canservatism is just not conducive to learning. It's a philosophy that rejects outside influence of ideas and culture. Much like the worst countries in the middle east.

Yeah we prefer they teach the important stuff, like the 3 R's.
17ac484aa3f8cd965dcae16bb7930a8bd0fceefdad8cea8dec35086fe3dd467d.jpg

Deflection only means you are deflecting. Now about the literacy rates under "liberal education"?
Color me surprised, 9 of the 10 least literate states vote overwhelmingly republican.
States Where Children are Struggling the Most to Read - 24 7 Wall St.

Don't try to use facts on conservatives. Waste of time.



I recognize the inefficacy of exposing imbeciles like you...but it is a guilty pleasure of mine....

So......here are several fact laden, documented and sourced posts that skewer Liberal indoctrination.

Posts # 19, 37, and 49.


Now...don't be a coward: try to find any errors in 'em.


Let me know when you give up, boyyyyyeeeeeeee!
 
it seems to work pretty well in the US; what a difference a social contract makes.

Yeah I love paying for other's shit. Like their health insurance
You would not have to if the right wasn't so socialist and not even know it; causing some on the left to become better poets, for the poetic licensing.
Sorry but you're stupider than nutty luddy, and I never thought I'd say that. Congratulations luddley!
Thank you for resorting to fallacy for your Cause, first, not second.



I’ve seen people like you before…but then I had to pay admission.
you should be more grateful, or at least complain less, since you are getting it for free, for now. :p
 
Proof it's indoctrination....


"Compounding the diminished quality of the education they received in our elementary and high schools, 18 million college student are living in an education bubble."
Savage, Op. Cit.



19. " Compare the humanists' hunger for learning with the resentment of a Columbia University undergraduate, who had been required by the school's core curriculum to study Mozart. She happens to be black, but her views are widely shared, to borrow a phrase, "across gender, sexuality, race and class."


a. "Why did I have to listen in music humanities to this Mozart?" she groused in a discussion of the curriculum reported by David Denby in "Great Books," his 1997 account of re-enrolling in Columbia's core curriculum. "My problem with the core is that it upholds the premises of white supremacy and racism. It's a racist core. Who is this Mozart, this Haydn, these superior white men? There are no women, no people of color." These are not the idiosyncratic thoughts of one disgruntled student; they represent the dominant ideology in the humanities today.


b. "Is Schuman content with a situation in which a Columbia student rails against having been asked merely to listen to Mozart because Mozart is a dead white male?

Where might that student have picked up that attitude if not from the academy and its offshoots? Whiteness studies, black studies, feminist studies, and queer studies are not a fever dream of the “neocons.” For decades now, students have been taught to search for an echo of their own “voices” in the books they read and to reject those works that they believe “exclude” them, a remarkably narrow approach to the arts...

Why not revel in the far more eloquent and surprising “voices” of Dreiser, Beerbohm, or Wells, for example, whose understanding of human passions and ability to craft sentences of stunning beauty and precision far outstrip our own?."
Nothing More Timeless Than Ignorance by Heather Mac Donald City Journal 13 January 2014


Not in the new era of Liberal dominated 'education.'
Yet, the right refuses to solve simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States with any form of moral of "goodwill toward men".




I always wondered what sort of post one could provide by of tossing out the Scrabble tiles and pretending that the unaltered order make sense.

Thanks for answering that query.

Thanks for letting me know, you don't really have a clue or a Cause as to the social dilemma involved.




Perhaps you have a better memory than I.....has there ever been a less articulate poster than you?
I can't recall any.

Watching you work through a new concept would make one think of prescribing Ritalin to a glacier.
One reason for "bloated" local bureaucracies is simple "job creation" through socialism instead of capitalism. Solving simple poverty could solve several social dilemmas, including this one.
 
A strong argument can be made that the end of real education came via the presidency of Democrat Jimmy Carter.



8. “In 1972, the massive union [The National Education Association (NEA)] formed a political action committee…released ‘Needed: A Cabinet Department of Education’ in 1975, but its most significant step was to endorse a presidential candidate- Jimmy Carter- for the first time in the history of the organization.
D.T. Stallngs, “A Brief History of the Department of Education: 1979-2002,” p. 3.


When formed, its budget was $13.1 billion (in 2007 dollars) and it employed 450 people. IN 2010, the estimated budget is $107 billion, and there are 4,800 employees.
http://crunchycon.nationalreview.co...-department-education-not-radical/mona-charen


“In November 1995, when the federal government shut down over a budget crisis, 89.4 percent of the department’s employees were deemed ‘nonessential’ and sent home.”
Beck and Balfe, “Broke,” p.304




9. Progressive Education aims to “level the playing field.”
Translation: “lower the standards.” Everyone’s work goes up on the walls because it’s not fair to judge a child’s work as there are no wrong answers, only life experiences.

‘Lost in all the chanting for change is the core commitment to impart actual knowledge. For progressives in the Age of Obama, setting high academic standards is secondary to the self-improvement of the "whole child" and "service" to the cause of social justice.’ The Three R s in the Age of Obama Rappin Revolution and Radicalism - Michelle Malkin - Page 2


What have the Liberals/Progressives/Democrats done to this nation in service to their thirst for power????


It goes back much further than Jimmy Carter.
Progressive education - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

In the late 60's, TUNE IN, TURN ON, DROP OUT added DROP BACK IN AND INFILTRATE.

I know, I entered the College of Education a lefty, thinking human nature could be changed.

I left a little to the right of Hermann Goering, after watching the lefties create the entitled class.

I once thought we could teach empowerment, and saw the whole system become geared to nanny-statism, free breakfast and lunch, day care for single mothers, and the creation of a sense of dependency in the poorer classes.
 
A strong argument can be made that the end of real education came via the presidency of Democrat Jimmy Carter.



8. “In 1972, the massive union [The National Education Association (NEA)] formed a political action committee…released ‘Needed: A Cabinet Department of Education’ in 1975, but its most significant step was to endorse a presidential candidate- Jimmy Carter- for the first time in the history of the organization.
D.T. Stallngs, “A Brief History of the Department of Education: 1979-2002,” p. 3.


When formed, its budget was $13.1 billion (in 2007 dollars) and it employed 450 people. IN 2010, the estimated budget is $107 billion, and there are 4,800 employees.
http://crunchycon.nationalreview.co...-department-education-not-radical/mona-charen


“In November 1995, when the federal government shut down over a budget crisis, 89.4 percent of the department’s employees were deemed ‘nonessential’ and sent home.”
Beck and Balfe, “Broke,” p.304




9. Progressive Education aims to “level the playing field.”
Translation: “lower the standards.” Everyone’s work goes up on the walls because it’s not fair to judge a child’s work as there are no wrong answers, only life experiences.

‘Lost in all the chanting for change is the core commitment to impart actual knowledge. For progressives in the Age of Obama, setting high academic standards is secondary to the self-improvement of the "whole child" and "service" to the cause of social justice.’ The Three R s in the Age of Obama Rappin Revolution and Radicalism - Michelle Malkin - Page 2


What have the Liberals/Progressives/Democrats done to this nation in service to their thirst for power????


It goes back much further than Jimmy Carter.
Progressive education - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

In the late 60's, TUNE IN, TURN ON, DROP OUT added DROP BACK IN AND INFILTRATE.

I know, I entered the College of Education a lefty, thinking human nature could be changed.

I left a little to the right of Hermann Goering, after watching the lefties create the entitled class.

I once thought we could teach empowerment, and saw the whole system become geared to nanny-statism, free breakfast and lunch, day care for single mothers, and the creation of a sense of dependency in the poorer classes.
don't tell me; you are on the right, have a degree, but still appeal to ignorance.
 
Yeah I love paying for other's shit. Like their health insurance
You would not have to if the right wasn't so socialist and not even know it; causing some on the left to become better poets, for the poetic licensing.
Sorry but you're stupider than nutty luddy, and I never thought I'd say that. Congratulations luddley!
Thank you for resorting to fallacy for your Cause, first, not second.



I’ve seen people like you before…but then I had to pay admission.
you should be more grateful, or at least complain less, since you are getting it for free, for now. :p



Well....at least we agree on its value.
 
Proof it's indoctrination....


"Compounding the diminished quality of the education they received in our elementary and high schools, 18 million college student are living in an education bubble."
Savage, Op. Cit.



19. " Compare the humanists' hunger for learning with the resentment of a Columbia University undergraduate, who had been required by the school's core curriculum to study Mozart. She happens to be black, but her views are widely shared, to borrow a phrase, "across gender, sexuality, race and class."


a. "Why did I have to listen in music humanities to this Mozart?" she groused in a discussion of the curriculum reported by David Denby in "Great Books," his 1997 account of re-enrolling in Columbia's core curriculum. "My problem with the core is that it upholds the premises of white supremacy and racism. It's a racist core. Who is this Mozart, this Haydn, these superior white men? There are no women, no people of color." These are not the idiosyncratic thoughts of one disgruntled student; they represent the dominant ideology in the humanities today.


b. "Is Schuman content with a situation in which a Columbia student rails against having been asked merely to listen to Mozart because Mozart is a dead white male?

Where might that student have picked up that attitude if not from the academy and its offshoots? Whiteness studies, black studies, feminist studies, and queer studies are not a fever dream of the “neocons.” For decades now, students have been taught to search for an echo of their own “voices” in the books they read and to reject those works that they believe “exclude” them, a remarkably narrow approach to the arts...

Why not revel in the far more eloquent and surprising “voices” of Dreiser, Beerbohm, or Wells, for example, whose understanding of human passions and ability to craft sentences of stunning beauty and precision far outstrip our own?."
Nothing More Timeless Than Ignorance by Heather Mac Donald City Journal 13 January 2014


Not in the new era of Liberal dominated 'education.'
Yet, the right refuses to solve simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States with any form of moral of "goodwill toward men".




I always wondered what sort of post one could provide by of tossing out the Scrabble tiles and pretending that the unaltered order make sense.

Thanks for answering that query.

Thanks for letting me know, you don't really have a clue or a Cause as to the social dilemma involved.




Perhaps you have a better memory than I.....has there ever been a less articulate poster than you?
I can't recall any.

Watching you work through a new concept would make one think of prescribing Ritalin to a glacier.
One reason for "bloated" local bureaucracies is simple "job creation" through socialism instead of capitalism. Solving simple poverty could solve several social dilemmas, including this one.



There are so very many errors in what passes for 'thinking' in your case that one hardly knows where to begin.

Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which uses genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma....?

6. Which represents totalitarian governance?



And, of course, they all are do.
 
You would not have to if the right wasn't so socialist and not even know it; causing some on the left to become better poets, for the poetic licensing.
Sorry but you're stupider than nutty luddy, and I never thought I'd say that. Congratulations luddley!
Thank you for resorting to fallacy for your Cause, first, not second.



I’ve seen people like you before…but then I had to pay admission.
you should be more grateful, or at least complain less, since you are getting it for free, for now. :p



Well....at least we agree on its value.

Then don't complain. I usually just purchase a good time from a nice girl named Ginger who insists only bad girls lie to me and let me miss my turn for free, especially when I don't have enough money; whenever you chics play your games instead of getting really really serious about getting me to put out a really really serious relationship.
 
Yet, the right refuses to solve simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States with any form of moral of "goodwill toward men".




I always wondered what sort of post one could provide by of tossing out the Scrabble tiles and pretending that the unaltered order make sense.

Thanks for answering that query.

Thanks for letting me know, you don't really have a clue or a Cause as to the social dilemma involved.




Perhaps you have a better memory than I.....has there ever been a less articulate poster than you?
I can't recall any.

Watching you work through a new concept would make one think of prescribing Ritalin to a glacier.
One reason for "bloated" local bureaucracies is simple "job creation" through socialism instead of capitalism. Solving simple poverty could solve several social dilemmas, including this one.



There are so very many errors in what passes for 'thinking' in your case that one hardly knows where to begin.

Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which uses genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
And, of course, they all are do.
This is a nation founded upon Liberalism. If you don't like then go back to Korea. You are neither needed nor wanted here, it's not a nation for your kind.
 
PC graduated from Columbia University by cutting and pasting the work of others

Need we say more about American education?
 
Yet, the right refuses to solve simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States with any form of moral of "goodwill toward men".




I always wondered what sort of post one could provide by of tossing out the Scrabble tiles and pretending that the unaltered order make sense.

Thanks for answering that query.

Thanks for letting me know, you don't really have a clue or a Cause as to the social dilemma involved.




Perhaps you have a better memory than I.....has there ever been a less articulate poster than you?
I can't recall any.

Watching you work through a new concept would make one think of prescribing Ritalin to a glacier.
One reason for "bloated" local bureaucracies is simple "job creation" through socialism instead of capitalism. Solving simple poverty could solve several social dilemmas, including this one.



There are so very many errors in what passes for 'thinking' in your case that one hardly knows where to begin.

Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which uses genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma....?

6. Which represents totalitarian governance?

And, of course, they all are do.

Dudette, socialism must start with a social Contract.
 
Sorry but you're stupider than nutty luddy, and I never thought I'd say that. Congratulations luddley!
Thank you for resorting to fallacy for your Cause, first, not second.



I’ve seen people like you before…but then I had to pay admission.
you should be more grateful, or at least complain less, since you are getting it for free, for now. :p



Well....at least we agree on its value.

Then don't complain. I usually just purchase a good time from a nice girl named Ginger who insists only bad girls lie to me and let me miss my turn for free, especially when I don't have enough money; whenever you chics play your games instead of getting really really serious about getting me to put out a really really serious relationship.


You know you have as much experience with girls as you do with logic or education: zero.
You couldn't attract a woman if you were a chocolate-covered millionaire handing out free shoes.
 
PC graduated from Columbia University by cutting and pasting the work of others

Need we say more about American education?


You forgot to include that I always give credit to sources.

You, on the other hand, practice Liberal plagiarism, mouthing whatever you hear or read on MSNBC, NYTimes, the DNC, etc.

AND....Columbia has the best fight song in the nation!

 
I always wondered what sort of post one could provide by of tossing out the Scrabble tiles and pretending that the unaltered order make sense.

Thanks for answering that query.

Thanks for letting me know, you don't really have a clue or a Cause as to the social dilemma involved.




Perhaps you have a better memory than I.....has there ever been a less articulate poster than you?
I can't recall any.

Watching you work through a new concept would make one think of prescribing Ritalin to a glacier.
One reason for "bloated" local bureaucracies is simple "job creation" through socialism instead of capitalism. Solving simple poverty could solve several social dilemmas, including this one.



There are so very many errors in what passes for 'thinking' in your case that one hardly knows where to begin.

Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which uses genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma....?

6. Which represents totalitarian governance?

And, of course, they all are do.

Dudette, socialism must start with a social Contract.


More education coming right up, you dope.

The social contract of Rousseau gave rise to every totalitarian regime of modern times.....over 100 million slaughtered.

    1. In ‘The Social Contract’ Rousseau advocated death for anyone who did not uphold the common values of the community: the totalitarian view of reshaping of humanity, echoed in communism, Nazism, progressivism. Robespierre: “the necessity of bringing about a complete regeneration and, if I may express myself so, of creating a new people.” Himmefarb, , “The Roads to Modernity,” p. 167-68.
In your face, boyyyyeeeeeee!!!
 
PC graduated from Columbia University by cutting and pasting the work of others

Need we say more about American education?
I pity her profs who had to wade through her plagiarized *cough* "work". Did she say she was at Columbia? for what, pray tell? :eusa_eh:


I realize that you don't plagiarize.
You're so stupid you never even post anything.
 

Forum List

Back
Top