Liberal radio host shows how intolerant the left can be

hey its one of these threads that prove absolutely nothing
It offers a bit of evidence that Mike Malloy is an idiot...similar to most all liberal media hosts. Liberals can't maintain a large audience because nobody (even another liberal) believes what they say.

Liberalism is a mental disorder!

Uh huh.

So how's it feel, living in a country founded by a "mental disorder"?

:popcorn:
This county wasn't founded by liberals. Certainly not by anyone with today's liberal ideology.
 
It offers a bit of evidence that Mike Malloy is an idiot...similar to most all liberal media hosts. Liberals can't maintain a large audience because nobody (even another liberal) believes what they say.

Liberalism is a mental disorder!

Uh huh.

So how's it feel, living in a country founded by a "mental disorder"?

:popcorn:
This county wasn't founded by liberals. Certainly not by anyone with today's liberal ideology.

Not sure what country you're in but this one certainly was.

>> Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas such as free and fair elections, civil rights, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free trade, and private property.[2][3][4][5][6]

Liberalism first became a distinct political movement during the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among philosophers and economists in the Western world. Liberalism rejected the notions, common at the time, of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, and the Divine Right of Kings. The 17th century philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct philosophical tradition. Locke argued that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property[7] and according to the social contract, governments must not violate these rights. Liberals opposed traditional conservatism and sought to replace absolutism in government with representative democracy and the rule of law. The revolutionaries of the Glorious Revolution, American Revolution, segments of the French Revolution, and other liberal revolutionaries from that time used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of what they saw as tyrannical rule. << (wiki)​
 
He need only be afraid and concern for his personal safety and he can reasonably call 911.

If it's a stand-your-ground state, he can simply draw his own weapon and blast away the other gun-carrier. The law will back him up, so long as he says he felt threatened.

Now, if the gun-carrier is black, there's no need to call. A dozen other citizens will have already called, and the police will instantly open fire. That's why blacks don't open carry; they know it's suicide-by-cop (unless you're a tea partier being shielded by whites). How police react to open carry is one of the most glaring examples of white privilege you'll ever see. The 2 Las Vegas shooters, white people, wheeled a grocery cart full of guns across town and nobody batted an eye.

Have you noticed who is shooting who in places like Chicago?
 
Uh huh.

So how's it feel, living in a country founded by a "mental disorder"?

:popcorn:
This county wasn't founded by liberals. Certainly not by anyone with today's liberal ideology.

Not sure what country you're in but this one certainly was.

>> Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas such as free and fair elections, civil rights, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free trade, and private property.[2][3][4][5][6]

Liberalism first became a distinct political movement during the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among philosophers and economists in the Western world. Liberalism rejected the notions, common at the time, of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, and the Divine Right of Kings. The 17th century philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct philosophical tradition. Locke argued that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property[7] and according to the social contract, governments must not violate these rights. Liberals opposed traditional conservatism and sought to replace absolutism in government with representative democracy and the rule of law. The revolutionaries of the Glorious Revolution, American Revolution, segments of the French Revolution, and other liberal revolutionaries from that time used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of what they saw as tyrannical rule. << (wiki)​
today's liberals are nothing like the Founders. In fact, they don't want them mentioned in our schools.
 
This county wasn't founded by liberals. Certainly not by anyone with today's liberal ideology.

Not sure what country you're in but this one certainly was.

>> Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas such as free and fair elections, civil rights, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free trade, and private property.[2][3][4][5][6]

Liberalism first became a distinct political movement during the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among philosophers and economists in the Western world. Liberalism rejected the notions, common at the time, of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, and the Divine Right of Kings. The 17th century philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct philosophical tradition. Locke argued that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property[7] and according to the social contract, governments must not violate these rights. Liberals opposed traditional conservatism and sought to replace absolutism in government with representative democracy and the rule of law. The revolutionaries of the Glorious Revolution, American Revolution, segments of the French Revolution, and other liberal revolutionaries from that time used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of what they saw as tyrannical rule. << (wiki)​
today's liberals are nothing like the Founders. In fact, they don't want them mentioned in our schools.

rofl.gif

:link:

Is that really the best you have?

Well I kinda saw this coming after the old two-dimentia political spectrum just now :rolleyes:
 
So I guess this Christian radio host shows how depraved, perverted, and immoral Christian conservatives are:

Christian radio host in Michigan busted in child sex probe, feds say

A host for a Christian radio station in Michigan was busted for paying to have sex with minors, federal investigators said.

John Balyo, 35, was collared on child sex charges after investigators with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement linked him to a human trafficking case, authorities said.

Balyo — the morning host on WCSG Radio, based in Grand Rapids — allegedly paid an accused john, 41-year-old Ronald Lee Moser, to arrange sexual encounters with his victims.

Moser was arrested in early June, after officers with the federal agency’s Homeland Security Investigations unit raided his home — where they found him living with a 12-year-old boy and a stash of child pornography, authorities said.


Christian radio host in Michigan busted in child sex probe, feds say* - NY Daily News

Now I don't know about you people, but that sure is more than enough proof for me that Christian conservatism is a cesspool of sexual depravity.

Fair enough?
 
How do you know that guy driving down the street isnt planning on jumping the curb and running you down?
^^^ Retard analogy.

Hardly...that person would be far more likely to succeed in killing you,making them far more dangerous. You wouldnt even see it coming.

Your analogy only works if you say "attack vehicle driving down the street".

Cars are the norm.
Armed yokels in public are not the norm.
 
Only a leftist would be dumb enough to not realize that making false calls to 911 is a crime. As for the rest, he's obviously accustomed to making a fool of himself in public, so it won't be much of a change.

I would definitely call 911. I do not know this gun-wielding person's intentions.

You are a poster child for punishing misuse of the 911 system with a caning. Say...fifty strokes, to the face!

Why are you saying I would be misusing the 911 system?

I see someone other than law enforcement walking around carrying a gun and I'm supposed to default to assuming he's harmless?

Not a chance.
 
The scary thing about this is you know at least one idiot listener will actually do this and get in trouble, but never blame the host.
 

Forum List

Back
Top