Liberal radio host shows how intolerant the left can be

[Cecilie1200]

Sad thing is that this behavior isn't rare among liberals. The nastiness coming from the left is common when people aren't abiding by their liberal views. This lunatic would scream at the sight of a gun carried legally, he would call 911 and falsely claim that shots were fired and he would hope that police would shoot the gun owner when they arrived. And if someone died because of this, I bet he wouldn't feel bad at all.

Far-left radio talk-show host Mike Malloy has a plan for the next time he sees a law-abiding open-carry gun owner in public: Start screaming “Guns, guns, hit the deck!” Call 911 and say “Shots fired.” What he hopes happens next is even more appalling.

Liberal Radio Host Redefines Insanity With What He Plans to Do When He Sees an Open Carry Gun Owner

Hah!

Love it!!!!

You find blithering stupidity lovable? Well, at least you won't lack for dates.

 

[asaratis]

hey its one of these threads that prove absolutely nothing

It offers a bit of evidence that Mike Malloy is an idiot...similar to most all liberal media hosts. Liberals can't maintain a large audience because nobody (even another liberal) believes what they say.

Liberalism is a mental disorder!

Uh huh.

So how's it feel, living in a country founded by a "mental disorder"?

How's it feel to be not able to comprehend the difference between "is" and "was"?

Liberalism in the 18th century favored less oppressive government and more personal freedoms. Liberalism was good.

Liberalism in the 21st century pushes oppressive government and more control of the masses. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

You need tutoring in reading comprehension.

 

[itfitzme]

Only a leftist would be dumb enough to not realize that making false calls to 911 is a crime. As for the rest, he's obviously accustomed to making a fool of himself in public, so it won't be much of a change.

I would definitely call 911. I do not know this gun-wielding person's intentions.

I'm pretty sure your inability to read minds is not viewed as a legitimate cause for a 911 call in any state in the Union.

But by all means, feel free to make the call. Just be certain you have bail money when you do.

You are quite wrong there? He need only be afraid and concern for his personal safety and he can reasonably call 911.

 

[Howey]

Sad thing is that this behavior isn't rare among liberals. The nastiness coming from the left is common when people aren't abiding by their liberal views. This lunatic would scream at the sight of a gun carried legally, he would call 911 and falsely claim that shots were fired and he would hope that police would shoot the gun owner when they arrived. And if someone died because of this, I bet he wouldn't feel bad at all.


Liberal Radio Host Redefines Insanity With What He Plans to Do When He Sees an Open Carry Gun Owner

Hah!

Love it!!!!

You find blithering stupidity lovable? Well, at least you won't lack for dates.

I'm not interested in you honey. I like men and am happily married to one.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I would definitely call 911. I do not know this gun-wielding person's intentions.

I'm pretty sure your inability to read minds is not viewed as a legitimate cause for a 911 call in any state in the Union.

But by all means, feel free to make the call. Just be certain you have bail money when you do.

You are quite wrong there? He need only be afraid and concern for his personal safety and he can reasonably call 911.

Sorry, but the law does not view "I find all gun owners scary" as a reasonable concern for personal safety.

 

[Pogo]

It offers a bit of evidence that Mike Malloy is an idiot...similar to most all liberal media hosts. Liberals can't maintain a large audience because nobody (even another liberal) believes what they say.

Liberalism is a mental disorder!

Uh huh.

So how's it feel, living in a country founded by a "mental disorder"?

How's it feel to be not able to comprehend the difference between "is" and "was"?

Liberalism in the 18th century favored less oppressive government and more personal freedoms. Liberalism was good.

Liberalism in the 21st century pushes oppressive government and more control of the masses. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

You need tutoring in reading comprehension.

So you don't understand what the word means, and then want to blame others.
Thanks for clearing that up. Hey, it's the price of dittoism and outsourcing your philosophy to a porno store clerk with a radio mic.

You're not alone -- the distinction flew over the OP's head as well. When the thread title conflated "Liberals" and "leftists" within the same sentence I asked for clarification. Still waiting on that. But you go with what's convenient for your level of understanding. The Peter Principle and all that. You go right ahead and pretend Liberalism, alone among political philosophies, suddenly did an about-face, because you're in too deep a hole to view it any other way now.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Hah!

Love it!!!!

You find blithering stupidity lovable? Well, at least you won't lack for dates.

I'm not interested in you honey. I like men and am happily married to one.

And I can assure you that the women of the world would give thanks for this fact . . . if they bothered to notice you existed at all.

Self-flattery is for those who will never receive any other kind.

 

[itfitzme]

I'm pretty sure your inability to read minds is not viewed as a legitimate cause for a 911 call in any state in the Union.

But by all means, feel free to make the call. Just be certain you have bail money when you do.

You are quite wrong there? He need only be afraid and concern for his personal safety and he can reasonably call 911.

Sorry, but the law does not view "I find all gun owners scary" as a reasonable concern for personal safety.

Sorry, but you don't know what you ar talking about. People call 911 all the time because they feel afraid. And the police arrive and do nothingbecause there isn't a crime.

Oh, and apparently in Florida you can murder someone and not be imprisoned, simply because you feel afraid for your safety.

If I lived in Florida, I'd simply carry a gun and if you showed up brandishing a weapon, I'd shoot you in the head and then say I was afraid for my safety because you were brandishing a weapon. I had reasonable concern for my safety. The important thing, it appears, is to be sure that you die. Then it's my woird against..,well not yours, you're dead.

You haven't been paying much attention to the news, have ya...

 

[Pogo]

You are quite wrong there? He need only be afraid and concern for his personal safety and he can reasonably call 911.

Sorry, but the law does not view "I find all gun owners scary" as a reasonable concern for personal safety.

Sorry, but you don't know what you ar talking about. People call 911 all the time because they feel afraid. And the police arrive and do nothingbecause there isn't a crime.

Oh, and apparently in Florida you can murder someone and not be imprisoned, simply because you feel afraid for your safety.

If I lived in Florida, I'd simply carry a gun and if you showed up brandishing a weapon, I'd shoot you in the head and then say I was afraid for my safety because you were brandishing a weapon. I had reasonabke concern for my safety.

This guy in Montana is claiming that, and his victim wasn't even armed. Hell, he wasn't even visible.

How is one guy able to blow an unarmed invisible kid away with a shotgun because he's "concerned for his safety", and that's OK, yet this Mike Malloy can't call out a person who IS both armed and visible?

Somebody reconcile that shit for me.

 

[mamooth]

He need only be afraid and concern for his personal safety and he can reasonably call 911.

If it's a stand-your-ground state, he can simply draw his own weapon and blast away the other gun-carrier. The law will back him up, so long as he says he felt threatened.

Now, if the gun-carrier is black, there's no need to call. A dozen other citizens will have already called, and the police will instantly open fire. That's why blacks don't open carry; they know it's suicide-by-cop (unless you're a tea partier being shielded by whites). How police react to open carry is one of the most glaring examples of white privilege you'll ever see. The 2 Las Vegas shooters, white people, wheeled a grocery cart full of guns across town and nobody batted an eye.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Liberal radio host shows how intolerant the left can be

No, it shows only the ignorance of the OP as to what a hasty generalization fallacy is, and the thread fails accordingly.

A single individual is not representative of the whole.

In fact, history indicates that liberals are overwhelmingly tolerant, with regard to same-sex couples’ right to access marriage law, the right of women to privacy, and the right of African-Americans to vote – since before Brown liberals have fought for the rights and civil liberties of all Americans.

 

[Harry Dresden]

The far left is intolerant to anyone who is not far left.

This is no secret, just look at the far left posters on this board.

the far right is the same way if you dont agree with them......both are plagues on America.....

 

[Harry Dresden]

and you are not being nasty with your synopsis of many on the left, right?

I don't even know who this man is and the 50 plus years of my time on Earth as a Liberal from head to toe, I have never known, nor met, anyone like him....

he said FAR Left Care.....they and their Cousins on the Far Right live in their own worlds....if things are not going their way i would not doubt that they would do what they feel is needed to sway things their way....no matter how underhanded it is...

 

[Harry Dresden]

Sad thing is that this behavior isn't rare among liberals. The nastiness coming from the left is common when people aren't abiding by their liberal views. This lunatic would scream at the sight of a gun carried legally, he would call 911 and falsely claim that shots were fired and he would hope that police would shoot the gun owner when they arrived. And if someone died because of this, I bet he wouldn't feel bad at all.

Far-left radio talk-show host Mike Malloy has a plan for the next time he sees a law-abiding open-carry gun owner in public: Start screaming “Guns, guns, hit the deck!” Call 911 and say “Shots fired.” What he hopes happens next is even more appalling.

Liberal Radio Host Redefines Insanity With What He Plans to Do When He Sees an Open Carry Gun Owner

Hah!

Love it!!!!

most anti-gun people do......

 

[Cecilie1200]

You are quite wrong there? He need only be afraid and concern for his personal safety and he can reasonably call 911.

Sorry, but the law does not view "I find all gun owners scary" as a reasonable concern for personal safety.

Sorry, but you don't know what you ar talking about. People call 911 all the time because they feel afraid. And the police arrive and do nothingbecause there isn't a crime.

Wrong. If they determine that the call was made without sufficient cause, they can and do charge the person who made the call. Since we are discussing calling 911 merely because someone is spotted carrying a gun in public - which is legal - it is not a legitimate reason to call 911 simply because you consider gun owners and carriers to be dangerous by definition.

Your ignorance of the law does not mean the law doesn't exist.

FBI ? The Crime of ?Swatting?: Fake 9-1-1 Calls Have Real Consequences

Oh, and apparently in Florida you can murder someone and not be imprisoned, simply because you feel afraid for your safety.

::yawn:: Your personal political interpretation of legal trials in contradiction to the evidence presented is irrelevant to the topic, and renders you irrelevant to the discussion.

Oh, did you have more to say after this? Congratulations. The entire rest of your post has been disregarded because your fucknuttery reached critical mass in three sentences. Gotta be a record of some sort.

Dismissed.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Liberal radio host shows how intolerant the left can be

No, it shows only the ignorance of the OP as to what a hasty generalization fallacy is, and the thread fails accordingly.

A single individual is not representative of the whole.

In fact, history indicates that liberals are overwhelmingly tolerant, with regard to same-sex couples’ right to access marriage law, the right of women to privacy, and the right of African-Americans to vote – since before Brown liberals have fought for the rights and civil liberties of all Americans.

....this coming from an asshole who thanks people like Dean who ALWAYS throws that tent over all Republicans with every fucking post and thread the guy throws up....you are a fucking Joke Jones....

 

[Pogo]

Liberal radio host shows how intolerant the left can be

No, it shows only the ignorance of the OP as to what a hasty generalization fallacy is, and the thread fails accordingly.

A single individual is not representative of the whole.

In fact, history indicates that liberals are overwhelmingly tolerant, with regard to same-sex couples’ right to access marriage law, the right of women to privacy, and the right of African-Americans to vote – since before Brown liberals have fought for the rights and civil liberties of all Americans.

....this coming from an asshole who thanks people like Dean who ALWAYS throws that tent over all Republicans with every fucking post and thread the guy throws up....you are a fucking Joke Jones....

Wtf Harry --- he's right, it's a blatant biased sample/sweeping generalization fallacy, with a strawman stirring the drink. How is it NOT that? Where is RDean in any of this anyway?

Judging people by who they thank now? Really? Hell I thank and/or rep anybody when they get it right.

 

[itfitzme]

Sorry, but the law does not view "I find all gun owners scary" as a reasonable concern for personal safety.

Sorry, but you don't know what you ar talking about. People call 911 all the time because they feel afraid. And the police arrive and do nothingbecause there isn't a crime.

Wrong. If they determine that the call was made without sufficient cause, they can and do charge the person who made the call. Since we are discussing calling 911 merely because someone is spotted carrying a gun in public - which is legal - it is not a legitimate reason to call 911 simply because you consider gun owners and carriers to be dangerous by definition.

Your ignorance of the law does not mean the law doesn't exist.

FBI ? The Crime of ?Swatting?: Fake 9-1-1 Calls Have Real Consequences

Oh, and apparently in Florida you can murder someone and not be imprisoned, simply because you feel afraid for your safety.

::yawn:: Your personal political interpretation of legal trials in contradiction to the evidence presented is irrelevant to the topic, and renders you irrelevant to the discussion.

Oh, did you have more to say after this? Congratulations. The entire rest of your post has been disregarded because your fucknuttery reached critical mass in three sentences. Gotta be a record of some sort.

Dismissed.

Your ignorance of reality is clearly the result of years of practice. Still, heing ignorant in the face of reality doesn't change the fact that people do feel concerned for thei safety and call 911. Your insistance on categorizing a call to 911 as reason to arrest them yet find no problem with someone shooting and killing an unarmed individual because they felt threatened. And this just highlights your ignorance and lack of rational, objective thought. As actions go, shoting someone is orders of magnitude more offensive than calling 911.

Regardless, the facts remain that people do call 911 all the time when they feel threatenedmand they don't get arrested. And clearly, in Florida and other stand your ground state, people kill unarmed individuals because they felt threatened and are aquitted.

This is all pretty obvious. It's also obvious that your problem is that you want brandishing a gun in public to be right and calling 911 when someone is brandishing one to be wrong.

But hey, you've gotten good at ignoring the obvious. And if denial doesn't work, you always have getting angry to fall back on.

I'll even go a bit further in my analysis. What you want is to threaten people by brandishing a firearm in public and for them to have no recourse. And that is the fundamental characteristic of an abuse personality?

 

[Harry Dresden]

No, it shows only the ignorance of the OP as to what a hasty generalization fallacy is, and the thread fails accordingly.

A single individual is not representative of the whole.

In fact, history indicates that liberals are overwhelmingly tolerant, with regard to same-sex couples’ right to access marriage law, the right of women to privacy, and the right of African-Americans to vote – since before Brown liberals have fought for the rights and civil liberties of all Americans.

....this coming from an asshole who thanks people like Dean who ALWAYS throws that tent over all Republicans with every fucking post and thread the guy throws up....you are a fucking Joke Jones....

Wtf Harry --- he's right, it's a blatant biased sample/sweeping generalization fallacy, with a strawman stirring the drink. How is it NOT that? Where is RDean in any of this anyway?

Judging people by who they thank now? Really? Hell I thank and/or rep anybody when they get it right.

Pogo this guy talks about partisan far righties and he is a fucking partisan lefty.....he says...
A single individual is not representative of the whole.....and yet Dean will use one individual in the republican party as an example of all republicans and Jones will thank him.....its a tad hypercritical......and i will say something....

 

[Howey]

Far-left radio talk-show host Mike Malloy has a plan for the next time he sees a law-abiding open-carry gun owner in public: Start screaming “Guns, guns, hit the deck!”

So you're against free speech.


Got it.

This is like yelling fire in a theater .. It is against the law .. Let him do it .. They can tell by the gun if it had been fired recently and the person who will get arrested is the stupid moron who yelled shots fired

Except there really isn't a fire but there really is a loon carrying a gun.