- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,824
- 350
It's not that people wouldn't understand what is in the emails, the left just doesn't want them to understand what Hillary is actually planning.
People can't form an opinion when they're not given the facts. Most of the liberal media aren't touching the leaked emails. If it were Trump, they'd not only go into depth with their coverage, they'd press him for answers. No one is even bringing the emails up to Hillary. They refuse to put her on the spot by asking any tough questions. They dismiss the whole, ugly scandal and pretend that it's just too hard for voters to understand.
It's pretty easy to grasp. Read the emails and you'll know that Hillary is lying to the American people. She admitted that it's necessary to tell people one thing and then do another behind closed doors. She knows there would be no support for her radical plans so she has a public opinion and a private one. The two are exact opposites. She is good at telling people what they want to hear and then carrying on with her agenda in secret.
The agenda is radical. She wants open borders and a global government. She wants that central global government to control everything- energy, food, healthcare and information.
Freedoms will be severely limited and all media will become propaganda machines. Many already are.
For the time being, she'll expand Obama's policies. She intends to bring in thousands of Muslim refugees and the press has all but blacked out the reports from other countries that show how they are making life hell in other countries.
She intends to attack our current sources of energy even though we don't yet have a replacement.
She will likely introduce single payer as the only fix for the disaster known as Obamacare.
She will raise taxes on middle class. Between her open borders and fake global warming solutions, we are in for a massive and detrimental redistribution of wealth. She will raise death taxes to ridiculous rates, ensuring that grieving family members will certainly lose the family business, homes and savings.
So, the liberal media feels justifed in not telling the truth about Hillary because people just won't get it. And they go along with her to make her agenda a reality. Makes a lot of sense, right? It does if they approve of her agenda and seek to help her fool the country.
"Appearing on Wednesday’s NBC Today, Bloomberg Politics editor Mark Halperin tried to dismiss the importance of Clinton campaign e-mails released by Wikileaks as being too “inside baseball” and “complicated” for voters to grasp. He then argued the issue would only matter if journalists actually pressed the Democratic nominee on the topic.
Following a report from correspondent Kristen Welker on Hillary Clinton “facing more tough questions about hacked e-mails,” co-host Matt Lauer asked Halperin: “Mark, scale of one to ten, one being a non-event, ten being a campaign-shaking event, where do these Wikileaks documents fall for Hillary Clinton?” Halperin replied: “Three today with the potential to go to eight as reporters dig in to some of this stuff and more come.”"
"Halperin still insisted that the story wouldn’t go anywhere – unless journalists actually did their job and questioned Clinton: “Unless we see her react to this stuff, unless reporters can get to her and question her about it and she's forced to respond, it just doesn't get in front of any type of voters the way this Trump stuff is right now.”"
Halperin: Leaked Clinton Campaign E-Mails Too ‘Complicated’ for Voters to Care About
People can't form an opinion when they're not given the facts. Most of the liberal media aren't touching the leaked emails. If it were Trump, they'd not only go into depth with their coverage, they'd press him for answers. No one is even bringing the emails up to Hillary. They refuse to put her on the spot by asking any tough questions. They dismiss the whole, ugly scandal and pretend that it's just too hard for voters to understand.
It's pretty easy to grasp. Read the emails and you'll know that Hillary is lying to the American people. She admitted that it's necessary to tell people one thing and then do another behind closed doors. She knows there would be no support for her radical plans so she has a public opinion and a private one. The two are exact opposites. She is good at telling people what they want to hear and then carrying on with her agenda in secret.
The agenda is radical. She wants open borders and a global government. She wants that central global government to control everything- energy, food, healthcare and information.
Freedoms will be severely limited and all media will become propaganda machines. Many already are.
For the time being, she'll expand Obama's policies. She intends to bring in thousands of Muslim refugees and the press has all but blacked out the reports from other countries that show how they are making life hell in other countries.
She intends to attack our current sources of energy even though we don't yet have a replacement.
She will likely introduce single payer as the only fix for the disaster known as Obamacare.
She will raise taxes on middle class. Between her open borders and fake global warming solutions, we are in for a massive and detrimental redistribution of wealth. She will raise death taxes to ridiculous rates, ensuring that grieving family members will certainly lose the family business, homes and savings.
So, the liberal media feels justifed in not telling the truth about Hillary because people just won't get it. And they go along with her to make her agenda a reality. Makes a lot of sense, right? It does if they approve of her agenda and seek to help her fool the country.
"Appearing on Wednesday’s NBC Today, Bloomberg Politics editor Mark Halperin tried to dismiss the importance of Clinton campaign e-mails released by Wikileaks as being too “inside baseball” and “complicated” for voters to grasp. He then argued the issue would only matter if journalists actually pressed the Democratic nominee on the topic.
Following a report from correspondent Kristen Welker on Hillary Clinton “facing more tough questions about hacked e-mails,” co-host Matt Lauer asked Halperin: “Mark, scale of one to ten, one being a non-event, ten being a campaign-shaking event, where do these Wikileaks documents fall for Hillary Clinton?” Halperin replied: “Three today with the potential to go to eight as reporters dig in to some of this stuff and more come.”"
"Halperin still insisted that the story wouldn’t go anywhere – unless journalists actually did their job and questioned Clinton: “Unless we see her react to this stuff, unless reporters can get to her and question her about it and she's forced to respond, it just doesn't get in front of any type of voters the way this Trump stuff is right now.”"
Halperin: Leaked Clinton Campaign E-Mails Too ‘Complicated’ for Voters to Care About
Last edited:
