Well Trump's popularity hasn't waned any snowflake, and the massive spike that Brietbart enjoyed has not decreased once ounce. If they were surviving before at a lower level, surely they must be flourishing now at a much higher level.
Which defeats your entire desperate false narrative that they are "only surviving" because of the "deep pockets of owners". Are there any other really stupid lies would you like to attempt?
BS. Their sales are flat and they have dropped 41 points in their worldwide rankings. The onslaught continues with great effect.
Idiots who made that graph in your OP couldn't even get it right side up... And the "data" isn't specified. You're talking about number of advertisers, but the explanation for the data is some kind of nebulous "world ranking"..
Just more proof that math and reason are keeping the left contained all by themselves. WTF is that graph anyways?
LOL
I love how you're bashing the graph and calling the automatic algorithm that created it "idiots," then ask "wtf is that graph anyway?"
Hilarious. Here's a suggestion, don't run your mouth about stuff you're absolutely clueless about. You'll only embarrass yourself.
That graph "made by idiots" comes from Alexa, dumbass. One of the oldest internet traffic/SEO tools out there. By the way, it didn't "reverse" anything.
Good Evening DUMBASS !!!! That chart appears on Alexis here -- Breitbart.com Traffic, Demographics and Competitors - Alexa
And contrary to the sheer crap you were licking off the floor about what it PROVES --- what it ACTUALLY shows is the BreitBart TRAFFIC is WAY up since election night. WAY beyond where it was during the campaign.. The site ranks 262 or something close in the WORLD....
So sorry ass know nothing bitches like yourself might think it LOOKS pretty and no one with 11th grade math skillls from YOUR side would ever question it -- but you dumbasses constantly prove you don't have a CLUE about defending yourselves on facts, data or math.. So you should be more careful with the ad-homs.
Maybe it wasn't "made by idiots" -- but it was totally MISINTERPRETED by morons.
Congratulations! You finally learned how to read the graph! Are they idiots now, dumbshit? LOL
And no shit traffic is up -- fuckwit -- that's why I said nothing was reversed -- because traffic is up for them. Jesus fucking Christ. I never said it wasn't. This whole thing has caused a spike in traffic for them as it's made headlines across the web, but it's likely a temporary spike.
However, they are looking at rebranding since the Milo debacle and the mass exodus of advertisers. Even if they've got a temporary spike in traffic, they're still getting hurt every time advertisers pull their ads.
Sorry.. I guess I skip most of your posts.. I was referring to OP's totally bogus characterization of that data which was ----
In the run up to the election Breitbart was doing quite well but from the graph from Alexa, you can see they have flattened out
Apparently confused by UP vs DOWN or what a ranking is... .
I was confused why the OP would SHOW the astronomical increase in page hits post election while he's blabbering about showing how much Brietbart is hurting.. Let's do some math. If Breitbart doubles their page hits and loses 1/2 of it's advertisers --- what is the result?