Liberal Effort To Kill Breitbart Working, 1250 Advertisers Gone

[P@triot]

1. Liberals do not want to "kill" any organization. They want to reject hate speech. advertisers apparently agree.

But Brietbart doesn't do "hate speech". They simply report the news, simpleton. Please share one example from Brietbart where they advocate for "killing n*ggers" or something similar. That would be hate speech, snowflake. Just because you don't like the news, doesn't make reporting of it "hate speech".

1,250 major advertisers disagree and have left Breitbart because of their hate speech.

While 4,400 others have joined and are laughing at you right now....

 

[Juan de Fuca]

2. Breitbart is still in business because the owners are deep pockets, they should tire of spending their own money sometime soon.

Robert Mercer and his daughter Rebekah Google it.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

3. The spike in increase was due to Donald Trump's popularity in the run up to the election. They have ceased growing and are merely maintaining a status quo by huge injection of the investors money.

Well Trump's popularity hasn't waned any snowflake, and the massive spike that Brietbart enjoyed has not decreased once ounce. If they were surviving before at a lower level, surely they must be flourishing now at a much higher level.

Which defeats your entire desperate false narrative that they are "only surviving" because of the "deep pockets of owners". Are there any other really stupid lies would you like to attempt?

BS. Their sales are flat and they have dropped 41 points in their worldwide rankings. The onslaught continues with great effect.

 

[SYTFE]

1. Liberals do not want to "kill" any organization. They want to reject hate speech. advertisers apparently agree.

But Brietbart doesn't do "hate speech". They simply report the news, simpleton. Please share one example from Brietbart where they advocate for "killing n*ggers" or something similar. That would be hate speech, snowflake. Just because you don't like the news, doesn't make reporting of it "hate speech".

1,250 major advertisers disagree and have left Breitbart because of their hate speech.

While 4,400 others have joined and are laughing at you right now....

Got a link, coward?

 

[Juan de Fuca]

1. Liberals do not want to "kill" any organization. They want to reject hate speech. advertisers apparently agree.

But Brietbart doesn't do "hate speech". They simply report the news, simpleton. Please share one example from Brietbart where they advocate for "killing n*ggers" or something similar. That would be hate speech, snowflake. Just because you don't like the news, doesn't make reporting of it "hate speech".

1,250 major advertisers disagree and have left Breitbart because of their hate speech.

While 4,400 others have joined and are laughing at you right now....

Who? Ivanka Trump brands LOL

 

[Juan de Fuca]

1. Liberals do not want to "kill" any organization. They want to reject hate speech. advertisers apparently agree.

But Brietbart doesn't do "hate speech". They simply report the news, simpleton. Please share one example from Brietbart where they advocate for "killing n*ggers" or something similar. That would be hate speech, snowflake. Just because you don't like the news, doesn't make reporting of it "hate speech".

1,250 major advertisers disagree and have left Breitbart because of their hate speech.

While 4,400 others have joined and are laughing at you right now....

Got a link, coward?

Look it up are you afraid you might learn something?

 

[SYTFE]

1. Liberals do not want to "kill" any organization. They want to reject hate speech. advertisers apparently agree.

But Brietbart doesn't do "hate speech". They simply report the news, simpleton. Please share one example from Brietbart where they advocate for "killing n*ggers" or something similar. That would be hate speech, snowflake. Just because you don't like the news, doesn't make reporting of it "hate speech".

1,250 major advertisers disagree and have left Breitbart because of their hate speech.

While 4,400 others have joined and are laughing at you right now....

Got a link, coward?

Look it up are you afraid you might learn something?

Huh? I'm asking Hatriot to provide evidence that 4,400 companies "joined" in advertising on Breitbart.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

But Brietbart doesn't do "hate speech". They simply report the news, simpleton. Please share one example from Brietbart where they advocate for "killing n*ggers" or something similar. That would be hate speech, snowflake. Just because you don't like the news, doesn't make reporting of it "hate speech".

1,250 major advertisers disagree and have left Breitbart because of their hate speech.

While 4,400 others have joined and are laughing at you right now....

Got a link, coward?

Look it up are you afraid you might learn something?

Huh? I'm asking Hatriot to provide evidence that 4,400 companies "joined" in advertising on Breitbart.

Sorry, I'm trying to do several things at once

 

[miketx]

Although neonazi sympathizer sites like Breibart are in vogue these days with the alt right, they deserve to be eradicated off the map.

Yet you scream like a stuck swine when Trump won't let the lying msm in a conference.

This dumb bitch knows nothing about history and despot regimes.
Probably never read the Constitution either like Trump.
Start at the first amendment and get back to us.

Why would anyone want to "get back" to one of you pathetic liars?

 

[Rambunctious]

Liberal Effort To Kill Breitbart Working, 1250 Advertisers Gone

 

[martybegan]

Maybe they can start up air America again...

The market for guzzling down propaganda isn't big enough among liberals like it is for conservatives and their talk radio.

No, they get their thought-directions from wine and cheese parties where they sniff their own farts and get marching orders from the Collective.

 

[Rambunctious]

No, they get their thought-directions from wine and cheese parties where they sniff their own farts and get marching orders from the Collective.

I'll take a cold beer a pizza and those little bake in the oven tacos.....

 

[flacaltenn]

3. The spike in increase was due to Donald Trump's popularity in the run up to the election. They have ceased growing and are merely maintaining a status quo by huge injection of the investors money.

Well Trump's popularity hasn't waned any snowflake, and the massive spike that Brietbart enjoyed has not decreased once ounce. If they were surviving before at a lower level, surely they must be flourishing now at a much higher level.

Which defeats your entire desperate false narrative that they are "only surviving" because of the "deep pockets of owners". Are there any other really stupid lies would you like to attempt?

BS. Their sales are flat and they have dropped 41 points in their worldwide rankings. The onslaught continues with great effect.

Idiots who made that graph in your OP couldn't even get it right side up... And the "data" isn't specified. You're talking about number of advertisers, but the explanation for the data is some kind of nebulous "world ranking"..

Just more proof that math and reason are keeping the left contained all by themselves. WTF is that graph anyways?

 

[SYTFE]

3. The spike in increase was due to Donald Trump's popularity in the run up to the election. They have ceased growing and are merely maintaining a status quo by huge injection of the investors money.

Well Trump's popularity hasn't waned any snowflake, and the massive spike that Brietbart enjoyed has not decreased once ounce. If they were surviving before at a lower level, surely they must be flourishing now at a much higher level.

Which defeats your entire desperate false narrative that they are "only surviving" because of the "deep pockets of owners". Are there any other really stupid lies would you like to attempt?

BS. Their sales are flat and they have dropped 41 points in their worldwide rankings. The onslaught continues with great effect.

Idiots who made that graph in your OP couldn't even get it right side up... And the "data" isn't specified. You're talking about number of advertisers, but the explanation for the data is some kind of nebulous "world ranking"..

Just more proof that math and reason are keeping the left contained all by themselves. WTF is that graph anyways?

LOL

I love how you're bashing the graph and calling the automatic algorithm that created it "idiots," then ask "wtf is that graph anyway?"

Hilarious. Here's a suggestion, don't run your mouth about stuff you're absolutely clueless about. You'll only embarrass yourself.

That graph "made by idiots" comes from Alexa, dumbass. One of the oldest internet traffic/SEO tools out there. By the way, it didn't "reverse" anything.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

3. The spike in increase was due to Donald Trump's popularity in the run up to the election. They have ceased growing and are merely maintaining a status quo by huge injection of the investors money.

Well Trump's popularity hasn't waned any snowflake, and the massive spike that Brietbart enjoyed has not decreased once ounce. If they were surviving before at a lower level, surely they must be flourishing now at a much higher level.

Which defeats your entire desperate false narrative that they are "only surviving" because of the "deep pockets of owners". Are there any other really stupid lies would you like to attempt?

BS. Their sales are flat and they have dropped 41 points in their worldwide rankings. The onslaught continues with great effect.

Idiots who made that graph in your OP couldn't even get it right side up... And the "data" isn't specified. You're talking about number of advertisers, but the explanation for the data is some kind of nebulous "world ranking"..

Just more proof that math and reason are keeping the left contained all by themselves. WTF is that graph anyways?

The "idiots" who made that graph were the folks at "Alexa" the Internet ranking service who ranks everyone on the Internet including the U.S. Messageboard. If you want specific data you need to subscribe and I won't, as I have enough useless email coming to me daily. Since they run a company that Internet business depends on and since they have been in business ranking since the early days of the Internet, they are a trusted source. You and your opinion without fact are not. I know how righties get their back hair up when they they think that the world isn't knocking down their doors, but facts are facts and you offer nothing but screed as a good example.

 

[flacaltenn]

3. The spike in increase was due to Donald Trump's popularity in the run up to the election. They have ceased growing and are merely maintaining a status quo by huge injection of the investors money.

Well Trump's popularity hasn't waned any snowflake, and the massive spike that Brietbart enjoyed has not decreased once ounce. If they were surviving before at a lower level, surely they must be flourishing now at a much higher level.

Which defeats your entire desperate false narrative that they are "only surviving" because of the "deep pockets of owners". Are there any other really stupid lies would you like to attempt?

BS. Their sales are flat and they have dropped 41 points in their worldwide rankings. The onslaught continues with great effect.

Idiots who made that graph in your OP couldn't even get it right side up... And the "data" isn't specified. You're talking about number of advertisers, but the explanation for the data is some kind of nebulous "world ranking"..

Just more proof that math and reason are keeping the left contained all by themselves. WTF is that graph anyways?

The "idiots" who made that graph were the folks at "Alexa" the Internet ranking service who ranks everyone on the Internet including the U.S. Messageboard. If you want specific data you need to subscribe and I won't, as I have enough useless email coming to me daily. Since they run a company that Internet business depends on and since they have been in business ranking since the early days of the Internet, they are a trusted source. You and your opinion without fact are not. I know how righties get their back hair up when they they think that the world isn't knocking down their doors, but facts are facts and you offer nothing but screed as a good example.

So how does that show "number of advertisers"?? Even IF they couldn't get the graph right side up (assuming it WAS # of advertisers) --- If it's RANKINGS -- than it shows a DRAMATIC increase in web traffic.

Let's just say the graphic and the report are questionable sources and need to be further checked out..

 

[flacaltenn]

3. The spike in increase was due to Donald Trump's popularity in the run up to the election. They have ceased growing and are merely maintaining a status quo by huge injection of the investors money.

Well Trump's popularity hasn't waned any snowflake, and the massive spike that Brietbart enjoyed has not decreased once ounce. If they were surviving before at a lower level, surely they must be flourishing now at a much higher level.

Which defeats your entire desperate false narrative that they are "only surviving" because of the "deep pockets of owners". Are there any other really stupid lies would you like to attempt?

BS. Their sales are flat and they have dropped 41 points in their worldwide rankings. The onslaught continues with great effect.

Idiots who made that graph in your OP couldn't even get it right side up... And the "data" isn't specified. You're talking about number of advertisers, but the explanation for the data is some kind of nebulous "world ranking"..

Just more proof that math and reason are keeping the left contained all by themselves. WTF is that graph anyways?

LOL

I love how you're bashing the graph and calling the automatic algorithm that created it "idiots," then ask "wtf is that graph anyway?"

Hilarious. Here's a suggestion, don't run your mouth about stuff you're absolutely clueless about. You'll only embarrass yourself.

That graph "made by idiots" comes from Alexa, dumbass. One of the oldest internet traffic/SEO tools out there. By the way, it didn't "reverse" anything.

Good Evening DUMBASS !!!! That chart appears on Alexis here -- Breitbart.com Traffic, Demographics and Competitors - Alexa

And contrary to the sheer crap you were licking off the floor about what it PROVES --- what it ACTUALLY shows is the BreitBart TRAFFIC is WAY up since election night. WAY beyond where it was during the campaign.. The site ranks 262 or something close in the WORLD....

So sorry ass know nothing bitches like yourself might think it LOOKS pretty and no one with 11th grade math skillls from YOUR side would ever question it -- but you dumbasses constantly prove you don't have a CLUE about defending yourselves on facts, data or math.. So you should be more careful with the ad-homs.

Maybe it wasn't "made by idiots" -- but it was totally MISINTERPRETED by morons.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Bunch of hogwash by the OP....

Breitbart News is now the 29th most trafficked site in the United States, surpassing PornHub and ESPN, according to figures from the latest Alexa rankings.

The analysis, which is based on a variety of factors, found that the average Breitbart reader spends 5 minutes 18 seconds on the site, whilst having an average of 2.64 pageviews.

It also found that 8.7% of Breitbart’s traffic came from search engines and that 41,686 sites link in every week to Breitbart stories.

At 29th place, Breitbart is the third most trafficked pure news website in America, behind only to CNN and The New York Times. Its traffic has now overtaken that of outlets such as FOX News, The Huffington Post, and The Washington Post.

Breitbart News 29th Most Trafficked Site in America, Overtakes PornHub and ESPN - Breitbart

 

[SYTFE]

3. The spike in increase was due to Donald Trump's popularity in the run up to the election. They have ceased growing and are merely maintaining a status quo by huge injection of the investors money.

Well Trump's popularity hasn't waned any snowflake, and the massive spike that Brietbart enjoyed has not decreased once ounce. If they were surviving before at a lower level, surely they must be flourishing now at a much higher level.

Which defeats your entire desperate false narrative that they are "only surviving" because of the "deep pockets of owners". Are there any other really stupid lies would you like to attempt?

BS. Their sales are flat and they have dropped 41 points in their worldwide rankings. The onslaught continues with great effect.

Idiots who made that graph in your OP couldn't even get it right side up... And the "data" isn't specified. You're talking about number of advertisers, but the explanation for the data is some kind of nebulous "world ranking"..

Just more proof that math and reason are keeping the left contained all by themselves. WTF is that graph anyways?

LOL

I love how you're bashing the graph and calling the automatic algorithm that created it "idiots," then ask "wtf is that graph anyway?"

Hilarious. Here's a suggestion, don't run your mouth about stuff you're absolutely clueless about. You'll only embarrass yourself.

That graph "made by idiots" comes from Alexa, dumbass. One of the oldest internet traffic/SEO tools out there. By the way, it didn't "reverse" anything.

Good Evening DUMBASS !!!! That chart appears on Alexis here -- Breitbart.com Traffic, Demographics and Competitors - Alexa

And contrary to the sheer crap you were licking off the floor about what it PROVES --- what it ACTUALLY shows is the BreitBart TRAFFIC is WAY up since election night. WAY beyond where it was during the campaign.. The site ranks 262 or something close in the WORLD....

So sorry ass know nothing bitches like yourself might think it LOOKS pretty and no one with 11th grade math skillls from YOUR side would ever question it -- but you dumbasses constantly prove you don't have a CLUE about defending yourselves on facts, data or math.. So you should be more careful with the ad-homs.

Maybe it wasn't "made by idiots" -- but it was totally MISINTERPRETED by morons.

Congratulations! You finally learned how to read the graph! Are they idiots now, dumbshit? LOL

And no shit traffic is up -- fuckwit -- that's why I said nothing was reversed -- because traffic is up for them. Jesus fucking Christ. I never said it wasn't. This whole thing has caused a spike in traffic for them as it's made headlines across the web, but it's likely a temporary spike.

However, they are looking at rebranding since the Milo debacle and the mass exodus of advertisers. Even if they've got a temporary spike in traffic, they're still getting hurt every time advertisers pull their ads.

 

[SYTFE]

Bunch of hogwash by the OP....

Breitbart News is now the 29th most trafficked site in the United States, surpassing PornHub and ESPN, according to figures from the latest Alexa rankings.

The analysis, which is based on a variety of factors, found that the average Breitbart reader spends 5 minutes 18 seconds on the site, whilst having an average of 2.64 pageviews.

It also found that 8.7% of Breitbart’s traffic came from search engines and that 41,686 sites link in every week to Breitbart stories.

At 29th place, Breitbart is the third most trafficked pure news website in America, behind only to CNN and The New York Times. Its traffic has now overtaken that of outlets such as FOX News, The Huffington Post, and The Washington Post.

Breitbart News 29th Most Trafficked Site in America, Overtakes PornHub and ESPN - Breitbart

No, they're not. They're number 32. Learn how to read a graph, cupcake.