Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
7. And, back to the point.....are these studies indicating that at the heart if Liberal governance is the view that producing lazy, unemployed folks is good????
If studies show that workers sit back and accept benefits until they run out, rather than accept work......
....do we really want to produce citizens who live at their leisure at the expense of their neighbors??????
Well....
a. At least 106 million Americans receive benefits from one or more of these programs. Sara Murray, “Nearly Half of U.S. Lives in Household Receiving Government Benefit,”
Wall Street Journal, October 5, 2011, http://blogs.
wsj.com/economics/2011/10/05/nearly-half-ofhouseholds-receive-some-government-benefit/.
b. 'None of this, of course, includes middleclass entitlements such as Medicare and
Social Security, which, while not designed specifically as anti-poverty programs, nevertheless represent transfer payments from the government.' Scribd
No, you're angry because you're unattractive.The Reagan numbers aren't impressive at all, considering that he (1) relied heavily upon federal deficit spending to achieve them, (2) economies emerging from deep cyclical recessions always improve relative to recessionary years, and (3) the prime interest rate is (supposedly) not dependent upon specific legislative actions.
Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.
Bet you wish Barack Hussein Obama had those numbers.
I honestly don't see much difference between presidents Obama and Reagan, except that Reagan empowered private ownership of news and information. Their rhetoric was different, of course, but their actual actions are similar.
That's because you're a moron.
You are lucky to be born beautiful, unlike me - who was born to be a big liar!
I suppose you did not, B. Many folks, though, seem to believe that R's disdain "big government." I don't think that's true; it's simply differing views of how government spends its money. Nearly everybody seems to want big government, but they want THEIR big government.This is quite possibly true, but it applies across political continuums.Big Government only helps itself and its Cronies...at the expense of people who are self-reliant and just want to be left alone.
Where did I mention politics, bub?
No, you're angry because you're unattractive.Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.
Bet you wish Barack Hussein Obama had those numbers.
I honestly don't see much difference between presidents Obama and Reagan, except that Reagan empowered private ownership of news and information. Their rhetoric was different, of course, but their actual actions are similar.
That's because you're a moron.
You are lucky to be born beautiful, unlike me - who was born to be a big liar!
I'm quite surprised you admitted this.
7. And, back to the point.....are these studies indicating that at the heart if Liberal governance is the view that producing lazy, unemployed folks is good????
If studies show that workers sit back and accept benefits until they run out, rather than accept work......
....do we really want to produce citizens who live at their leisure at the expense of their neighbors??????
Well....
a. At least 106 million Americans receive benefits from one or more of these programs. Sara Murray, “Nearly Half of U.S. Lives in Household Receiving Government Benefit,”
Wall Street Journal, October 5, 2011, http://blogs.
wsj.com/economics/2011/10/05/nearly-half-ofhouseholds-receive-some-government-benefit/.
b. 'None of this, of course, includes middleclass entitlements such as Medicare and
Social Security, which, while not designed specifically as anti-poverty programs, nevertheless represent transfer payments from the government.' Scribd
So, shut off all entitlement/transfer payments. I don't care, and welfare was never my idea to begin with. I have always believed these things only represent bribes to the impoverished population to prevent mass riots and, ultimately, overthrow of the prevailing systems.
So basically one can sum up PC's thoughts thusly:7. And, back to the point.....are these studies indicating that at the heart if Liberal governance is the view that producing lazy, unemployed folks is good????
If studies show that workers sit back and accept benefits until they run out, rather than accept work......
....do we really want to produce citizens who live at their leisure at the expense of their neighbors??????
Well....
a. At least 106 million Americans receive benefits from one or more of these programs. Sara Murray, “Nearly Half of U.S. Lives in Household Receiving Government Benefit,”
Wall Street Journal, October 5, 2011, http://blogs.
wsj.com/economics/2011/10/05/nearly-half-ofhouseholds-receive-some-government-benefit/.
b. 'None of this, of course, includes middleclass entitlements such as Medicare and
Social Security, which, while not designed specifically as anti-poverty programs, nevertheless represent transfer payments from the government.' Scribd
So, shut off all entitlement/transfer payments. I don't care, and welfare was never my idea to begin with. I have always believed these things only represent bribes to the impoverished population to prevent mass riots and, ultimately, overthrow of the prevailing systems.
If you vote Democrat, it indicates that your post is just one more lie.
So basically one can sum up PC's thoughts thusly:7. And, back to the point.....are these studies indicating that at the heart if Liberal governance is the view that producing lazy, unemployed folks is good????
If studies show that workers sit back and accept benefits until they run out, rather than accept work......
....do we really want to produce citizens who live at their leisure at the expense of their neighbors??????
Well....
a. At least 106 million Americans receive benefits from one or more of these programs. Sara Murray, “Nearly Half of U.S. Lives in Household Receiving Government Benefit,”
Wall Street Journal, October 5, 2011, http://blogs.
wsj.com/economics/2011/10/05/nearly-half-ofhouseholds-receive-some-government-benefit/.
b. 'None of this, of course, includes middleclass entitlements such as Medicare and
Social Security, which, while not designed specifically as anti-poverty programs, nevertheless represent transfer payments from the government.' Scribd
So, shut off all entitlement/transfer payments. I don't care, and welfare was never my idea to begin with. I have always believed these things only represent bribes to the impoverished population to prevent mass riots and, ultimately, overthrow of the prevailing systems.
If you vote Democrat, it indicates that your post is just one more lie.
Republican = GOOD
Democrat = BAD
You are the problem, PC.
Who in the hell said THAT? He's a personification of the Wall Street party--as is every U.S. president. Fools like you think that there is some kind of actual debate going on in the halls of Congress . . . that's absurd. Washington is simply full of well-paid professional politicians that work hard at reelection.So basically one can sum up PC's thoughts thusly:7. And, back to the point.....are these studies indicating that at the heart if Liberal governance is the view that producing lazy, unemployed folks is good????
If studies show that workers sit back and accept benefits until they run out, rather than accept work......
....do we really want to produce citizens who live at their leisure at the expense of their neighbors??????
Well....
a. At least 106 million Americans receive benefits from one or more of these programs. Sara Murray, “Nearly Half of U.S. Lives in Household Receiving Government Benefit,”
Wall Street Journal, October 5, 2011, http://blogs.
wsj.com/economics/2011/10/05/nearly-half-ofhouseholds-receive-some-government-benefit/.
b. 'None of this, of course, includes middleclass entitlements such as Medicare and
Social Security, which, while not designed specifically as anti-poverty programs, nevertheless represent transfer payments from the government.' Scribd
So, shut off all entitlement/transfer payments. I don't care, and welfare was never my idea to begin with. I have always believed these things only represent bribes to the impoverished population to prevent mass riots and, ultimately, overthrow of the prevailing systems.
If you vote Democrat, it indicates that your post is just one more lie.
Republican = GOOD
Democrat = BAD
You are the problem, PC.
Wait....is Obama the personification of the Democrat Party?
Yes?
Well, then....
Republican = GOOD
Democrat = BAD
...is correct.
Who in the hell said THAT? He's a personification of the Wall Street party--as is every U.S. president. Fools like you think that there is some kind of actual debate going on in the halls of Congress . . . that's absurd. Washington is simply full of well-paid professional politicians that work hard at reelection.So basically one can sum up PC's thoughts thusly:7. And, back to the point.....are these studies indicating that at the heart if Liberal governance is the view that producing lazy, unemployed folks is good????
If studies show that workers sit back and accept benefits until they run out, rather than accept work......
....do we really want to produce citizens who live at their leisure at the expense of their neighbors??????
Well....
a. At least 106 million Americans receive benefits from one or more of these programs. Sara Murray, “Nearly Half of U.S. Lives in Household Receiving Government Benefit,”
Wall Street Journal, October 5, 2011, http://blogs.
wsj.com/economics/2011/10/05/nearly-half-ofhouseholds-receive-some-government-benefit/.
b. 'None of this, of course, includes middleclass entitlements such as Medicare and
Social Security, which, while not designed specifically as anti-poverty programs, nevertheless represent transfer payments from the government.' Scribd
So, shut off all entitlement/transfer payments. I don't care, and welfare was never my idea to begin with. I have always believed these things only represent bribes to the impoverished population to prevent mass riots and, ultimately, overthrow of the prevailing systems.
If you vote Democrat, it indicates that your post is just one more lie.
Republican = GOOD
Democrat = BAD
You are the problem, PC.
Wait....is Obama the personification of the Democrat Party?
Yes?
Well, then....
Republican = GOOD
Democrat = BAD
...is correct.
 | Barack Obama (born 1961) [136][137][138] | January 20, 2009 | Incumbent | Democratic | 56 (2008) | U.S. Senator from Illinois (2005–2008) |
Rep. Gerry Connolly says Reagan raised taxes during five years of presidency PolitiFact Virginiagiven that rightwingnut voodoo economics has failed each and every time, i'm amused and bemused, PC. lol
I'm happy that you enjoyed the post..e.g., laughing out loud.
But I'd be even happier if you were correct in your post, e.g., "rightwingnut voodoo economics has failed each and every time."
In other words, you couldn't be more wrong.
You could try to be....but you would be unsuccessful.
For example....the unmitigated success of President Reagan....
b. and c. Kiva - Kiva Lending Team Team Ron Paul Hulk Hogan Jesus of Nazareth Chuck Norris Ronald Reagan John Wayne Thomas Jefferson Alex Jones Peyton Manning The Tuskegee Airmen Schiff REAL Americans and George W. Bush
- The economy grew at a 3.4% average rate…compared with 2.9% for the previous eight years, and 2.7% for the next eight.(Table B-4)
- Inflation rate dropped from 12.5% to 4.4%. (Table B-63)
- Unemployment fell to 5.5% from 7.1% (Table B-35)
- Prime interest rate fell by one-third.(Table B-73)
- The S & P 500 jumped 124% (Table B-95) FDsys - Browse ERP
- Charitable contributions rose 57% faster than inflation. Dinesh D’Souza, “Ronald Reagan: How an Ordinary May Became an Extraordinary Leader,” p. 116
Bet you feel stupid now, huh?
Rep. Gerry Connolly says Reagan raised taxes during five years of presidency PolitiFact Virginiagiven that rightwingnut voodoo economics has failed each and every time, i'm amused and bemused, PC. lol
I'm happy that you enjoyed the post..e.g., laughing out loud.
But I'd be even happier if you were correct in your post, e.g., "rightwingnut voodoo economics has failed each and every time."
In other words, you couldn't be more wrong.
You could try to be....but you would be unsuccessful.
For example....the unmitigated success of President Reagan....
b. and c. Kiva - Kiva Lending Team Team Ron Paul Hulk Hogan Jesus of Nazareth Chuck Norris Ronald Reagan John Wayne Thomas Jefferson Alex Jones Peyton Manning The Tuskegee Airmen Schiff REAL Americans and George W. Bush
- The economy grew at a 3.4% average rate…compared with 2.9% for the previous eight years, and 2.7% for the next eight.(Table B-4)
- Inflation rate dropped from 12.5% to 4.4%. (Table B-63)
- Unemployment fell to 5.5% from 7.1% (Table B-35)
- Prime interest rate fell by one-third.(Table B-73)
- The S & P 500 jumped 124% (Table B-95) FDsys - Browse ERP
- Charitable contributions rose 57% faster than inflation. Dinesh D’Souza, “Ronald Reagan: How an Ordinary May Became an Extraordinary Leader,” p. 116
Bet you feel stupid now, huh?
Yes, he raised taxes in 1982, 1984, 1985, 1986 and 1987."
Reagan’s efforts to cut top income tax rates at the same time he was increasing defense spending created strain, and the federal debt rose from $994 billion at the start of his first term to almost $2.9 trillion at the end.
-------------------------------------------------
He raised taxes and still created trillions in deficit. Republican politics. They have sucked and caused disaster for decades. But this current crop of Republicans is pure poison.
. But this current crop of Republicans is pure poison.
- Extending jobless benefits allows people to put off difficult choices, such as moving to another state to find work, switching industries, getting retrained or accepting lower salaries, said Chris Edwards, an economist with the Cato Institute, which advocates for a limited government role.Unemployment benefits extension reviewed for 9th time - Dec. 13 2011
