Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I remember the day of Israel's first press conference on the shooting, he said the shooter had "countless magazines" (I think he actually said "clips"). They must have been somewhere--Cruz wasn't wearing them around in Walmart afterward. I'm guessing he had a belt and dropped it prior to leaving the school.17 were shot , thats one 20 round magazine thats already loaded in the rifle . And with a spare in the back pocket thats 40 rounds . So say he had 4 - 20 rounders . Thats 2 in a pair of cargo pants pockets , one in a back pocket and one in the Rifle for 80 rounds at the ready . ------------------------ BAN Cargo pants , but before you do that realize that it wouldn't be a big load in a pair of blue jeans or loose fitting 'hip hopper' type pants . ------------------------------ i hope that 'diane feinstein' doesn't see this post .
Simply slide them in your belt.......it isn't as if he is running an obstacle course....
-------------------------------------------------------- i think that 'israel' has been saying lots of things hasn't he ?? He may have said the word COUNTLESS because that word is more dramatic than him saying that the murderer had 3 loaded magazines in his pockets and one in the gun for a total of 80 rounds . Course i don't know but all the murderer needed was 17 rounds OldLady .I remember the day of Israel's first press conference on the shooting, he said the shooter had "countless magazines" (I think he actually said "clips"). They must have been somewhere--Cruz wasn't wearing them around in Walmart afterward. I'm guessing he had a belt and dropped it prior to leaving the school.17 were shot , thats one 20 round magazine thats already loaded in the rifle . And with a spare in the back pocket thats 40 rounds . So say he had 4 - 20 rounders . Thats 2 in a pair of cargo pants pockets , one in a back pocket and one in the Rifle for 80 rounds at the ready . ------------------------ BAN Cargo pants , but before you do that realize that it wouldn't be a big load in a pair of blue jeans or loose fitting 'hip hopper' type pants . ------------------------------ i hope that 'diane feinstein' doesn't see this post .
Simply slide them in your belt.......it isn't as if he is running an obstacle course....
During Infantry AIT and OCS, I was trained in firing every weapon in the Army inventory from a 5.56 mm M16 to a 106 mm Recoilless Rifle, so i am dismayed by the hysterical responses and faux expertise posted in this CDZ thread. As far as automatic weapons are concerned, their principal advantage is not their rate of fire, but their ammunition capacity. That is why the M16(AR15) came with an expanded 20 round magazine. This was designed as an offensive military weapons, not for self defense. (The M1911 Colt .50 caliber pistol was designed for the latter.)
Being a gun aficionado, I have also fired Uzi, Schmeisser, Ithaca and Thompson submachine guns at firing ranges, but their private ownership is strictly regulated by the AFT. SUMMARY OF STATE AND FEDERAL MACHINE GUN LAWS From what I have observed, the desire to own military-derived weapons stems more from their macho image than from legitimate hunting or self defense purposes. If it takes you 20 shots to bring down a deer, you shouldn't be hunting. (My bolt-action 30.06 worked just fine.)
Do any of you favor any restrictions on the private ownership of these weapons? Please be civil in your responses.
The coach took eight bullets. The victims (dead and alive) that I've heard details about had all taken three bullets or more. Try reality.-------------------------------------------------------- i think that 'israel' has been saying lots of things hasn't he ?? He may have said the word COUNTLESS because that word is more dramatic than him saying that the murderer had 3 loaded magazines in his pockets and one in the gun for a total of 80 rounds . Course i don't know but all the murderer needed was 17 rounds OldLady .I remember the day of Israel's first press conference on the shooting, he said the shooter had "countless magazines" (I think he actually said "clips"). They must have been somewhere--Cruz wasn't wearing them around in Walmart afterward. I'm guessing he had a belt and dropped it prior to leaving the school.17 were shot , thats one 20 round magazine thats already loaded in the rifle . And with a spare in the back pocket thats 40 rounds . So say he had 4 - 20 rounders . Thats 2 in a pair of cargo pants pockets , one in a back pocket and one in the Rifle for 80 rounds at the ready . ------------------------ BAN Cargo pants , but before you do that realize that it wouldn't be a big load in a pair of blue jeans or loose fitting 'hip hopper' type pants . ------------------------------ i hope that 'diane feinstein' doesn't see this post .
Simply slide them in your belt.......it isn't as if he is running an obstacle course....
------------------------------------------------------ well go ahead , worry about how many magazines the murderer had , thats ok but it is unimportant to me OldLadyThe coach took eight bullets. The victims (dead and alive) that I've heard details about had all taken three bullets or more. Try reality.-------------------------------------------------------- i think that 'israel' has been saying lots of things hasn't he ?? He may have said the word COUNTLESS because that word is more dramatic than him saying that the murderer had 3 loaded magazines in his pockets and one in the gun for a total of 80 rounds . Course i don't know but all the murderer needed was 17 rounds OldLady .I remember the day of Israel's first press conference on the shooting, he said the shooter had "countless magazines" (I think he actually said "clips"). They must have been somewhere--Cruz wasn't wearing them around in Walmart afterward. I'm guessing he had a belt and dropped it prior to leaving the school.17 were shot , thats one 20 round magazine thats already loaded in the rifle . And with a spare in the back pocket thats 40 rounds . So say he had 4 - 20 rounders . Thats 2 in a pair of cargo pants pockets , one in a back pocket and one in the Rifle for 80 rounds at the ready . ------------------------ BAN Cargo pants , but before you do that realize that it wouldn't be a big load in a pair of blue jeans or loose fitting 'hip hopper' type pants . ------------------------------ i hope that 'diane feinstein' doesn't see this post .
Simply slide them in your belt.......it isn't as if he is running an obstacle course....
Of course it's unimportant to you, after making numerous silly ignorant posts about the number he needed.------------------------------------------------------ well go ahead , worry about how many magazines the murderer had , thats ok but it is unimportant to me OldLadyThe coach took eight bullets. The victims (dead and alive) that I've heard details about had all taken three bullets or more. Try reality.-------------------------------------------------------- i think that 'israel' has been saying lots of things hasn't he ?? He may have said the word COUNTLESS because that word is more dramatic than him saying that the murderer had 3 loaded magazines in his pockets and one in the gun for a total of 80 rounds . Course i don't know but all the murderer needed was 17 rounds OldLady .I remember the day of Israel's first press conference on the shooting, he said the shooter had "countless magazines" (I think he actually said "clips"). They must have been somewhere--Cruz wasn't wearing them around in Walmart afterward. I'm guessing he had a belt and dropped it prior to leaving the school.17 were shot , thats one 20 round magazine thats already loaded in the rifle . And with a spare in the back pocket thats 40 rounds . So say he had 4 - 20 rounders . Thats 2 in a pair of cargo pants pockets , one in a back pocket and one in the Rifle for 80 rounds at the ready . ------------------------ BAN Cargo pants , but before you do that realize that it wouldn't be a big load in a pair of blue jeans or loose fitting 'hip hopper' type pants . ------------------------------ i hope that 'diane feinstein' doesn't see this post .
Simply slide them in your belt.......it isn't as if he is running an obstacle course....
Of course it's unimportant to you, after making numerous silly ignorant posts about the number he needed.------------------------------------------------------ well go ahead , worry about how many magazines the murderer had , thats ok but it is unimportant to me OldLadyThe coach took eight bullets. The victims (dead and alive) that I've heard details about had all taken three bullets or more. Try reality.-------------------------------------------------------- i think that 'israel' has been saying lots of things hasn't he ?? He may have said the word COUNTLESS because that word is more dramatic than him saying that the murderer had 3 loaded magazines in his pockets and one in the gun for a total of 80 rounds . Course i don't know but all the murderer needed was 17 rounds OldLady .I remember the day of Israel's first press conference on the shooting, he said the shooter had "countless magazines" (I think he actually said "clips"). They must have been somewhere--Cruz wasn't wearing them around in Walmart afterward. I'm guessing he had a belt and dropped it prior to leaving the school.Simply slide them in your belt.......it isn't as if he is running an obstacle course....
I was just curious where a mass shooter keeps all those magazines.
This thread is a perfect example of how the media is definitely succeeding in doing its job. How is it even possible to be half ass on the second amendment? you want us to have guns but only up to a certain type and then after that only the government, who clearly only has our best interests at heart at all times; can have the hardcore shit. You people are crazier than any single lone gun nut because there's millions of you and you're going to damage this country worse than any whack job could shooting up a school or a country concert
During Infantry AIT and OCS, I was trained in firing every weapon in the Army inventory from a 5.56 mm M16 to a 106 mm Recoilless Rifle, so i am dismayed by the hysterical responses and faux expertise posted in this CDZ thread. As far as automatic weapons are concerned, their principal advantage is not their rate of fire, but their ammunition capacity. That is why the M16(AR15) came with an expanded 20 round magazine. This was designed as an offensive military weapons, not for self defense. (The M1911 Colt .50 caliber pistol was designed for the latter.)
Being a gun aficionado, I have also fired Uzi, Schmeisser, Ithaca and Thompson submachine guns at firing ranges, but their private ownership is strictly regulated by the AFT. SUMMARY OF STATE AND FEDERAL MACHINE GUN LAWS From what I have observed, the desire to own military-derived weapons stems more from their macho image than from legitimate hunting or self defense purposes. If it takes you 20 shots to bring down a deer, you shouldn't be hunting. (My bolt-action 30.06 worked just fine.)
Do any of you favor any restrictions on the private ownership of these weapons? Please be civil in your responses.
During Infantry AIT and OCS, I was trained in firing every weapon in the Army inventory from a 5.56 mm M16 to a 106 mm Recoilless Rifle, so i am dismayed by the hysterical responses and faux expertise posted in this CDZ thread. As far as automatic weapons are concerned, their principal advantage is not their rate of fire, but their ammunition capacity. That is why the M16(AR15) came with an expanded 20 round magazine. This was designed as an offensive military weapons, not for self defense. (The M1911 Colt .50 caliber pistol was designed for the latter.)
Being a gun aficionado, I have also fired Uzi, Schmeisser, Ithaca and Thompson submachine guns at firing ranges, but their private ownership is strictly regulated by the AFT. SUMMARY OF STATE AND FEDERAL MACHINE GUN LAWS From what I have observed, the desire to own military-derived weapons stems more from their macho image than from legitimate hunting or self defense purposes. If it takes you 20 shots to bring down a deer, you shouldn't be hunting. (My bolt-action 30.06 worked just fine.)
Do any of you favor any restrictions on the private ownership of these weapons? Please be civil in your responses.
Because it is more effective than a five or a ten round magazine.
----------------------------------------- fullilling the proper role of the Second Amendment JWoody .Because it is more effective than a five or a ten round magazine.
More effective at doing what?
The Right to Bear Arms (i.e. the 2nd Amendment) was seen by our Founding Fathers as the last check against tyranny. They knew that the best line of defense against a standing army was an armed populace.
"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair."
- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28
"If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist."
- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28
why do you think it doesnt protect the right to own machine guns?
