- Thread starter
- #101
You are actually doing what Rabid is accusing everyone else of doing even though they are not.CON$ think that because they can't read or do simple arithmetic then nobody can either because CON$ are the smartest most informed people on Earth because they can copy & paste from Heritage.
Now I highlighted and colored the answer that was given before Rabid even asked it, and you can be sure he will still play too dumb to have seen it. So I'll even explain that a change with a - (minus sign) is a LOSS of non farm jobs for that month.
I'll even add up the minuses for him because CON$ are confused by ADDING MINUS signs, with GOP fuzzy math you can only subtract if there is a minus sign.
Now if you total the jobs lost for not just 2001 but for 2002 and 2003 combined, as marked in red above you get a loss of about -2.6 million jobs.
And if you add up the job loss for 2008 ALONE you get a loss of about -3.6 million jobs. Which to CON$ proves that Bush had more job losses in 2001 alone then in all of the Bush Depression because to CON$ 2.6 is infinitely larger than 3.6
Explain this and stop being so paranoid
calling people names and acting a fool is not going to change what Obama is doing
2001...... 131,826 110,708 23,873 606 6,826 16,441
2002...... 130,341 108,828 22,557 583 6,716 15,259
2003...... 129,999 108,416 21,816 572 6,735 14,510
2004...... 131,435 109,814 21,882 591 6,976 14,315
2005...... 133,703 111,899 22,190 628 7,336 14,226
2006...... 136,086 114,113 22,531 684 7,691 14,155
2007...... 137,598 115,380 22,233 724 7,630 13,879
2008...... 136,790 114,281 21,334 767 7,162 13,406
Please note that 2008 we had 5 million jobs more than we did in 2001
6 million more than 2003
stop spinning your information
/ftp.bls.gov/pub/suppl/empsit.ceseeb1.txt
Jobs lost Vs. total people in the work force are 2 different things
ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/suppl/empsit.ceseeb1.txt
Those are TOTAL employment numbers, not the JOB LOSS numbers Rabid demands. But nice attempt to divert to save your fellow traveler.
Originally Posted by The Rabbi
I am not talking about TOTAL unemployment. I was talking about JOB LOSS, which is NOT THE SAME FUCKING THING. People hire even in a recession. There is always job creation somewhere. But under Bush in 2001 JOB LOSS was higher than in the recent recession. But total unemployment was not nearly as high because under Bush there was much greater JOB CREATION.
divert?
look dude its just information
It is nothing more
It is nothing less