Lest we forget...

[Phoenall]

What was happening at the time was a war. As usual, Team Pallywood tries to paint the Arab Muslims as innocent civilians being massacred by violent and evil Israelis when they were in fact, militants hiding and attacking from amongst a civilian population.

No different than today.

Israel always has to "defend itself" from the people it is attacking.

And only islamonazi morons see Israel defending itself from constant attack as being an attack by Israel. When the arab muslims stop firing illegal weapons into Israel then Israel will stop " attacking" in defence.

 

[Phoenall]

What was happening at the time was a war. As usual, Team Pallywood tries to paint the Arab Muslims as innocent civilians being massacred by violent and evil Israelis when they were in fact, militants hiding and attacking from amongst a civilian population.

No different than today.

Israel always has to "defend itself" from the people it is attacking.

Why not? The honeys with human shields are shooting at them, Clyde.

Except it was Israel that was attacking Palestinians in Palestinian villages. It was Israel that was on the offensive.

Not according to the reports that show the arab muslims were attacking the Jews as israel did not exist at that time, It was the Arab league that invaded Jewish lands in 1947 with the sole intention of wiping out the Jews and destroying any chance of their being a Jewish homeland. The problem has always been and always will be islam and its 7C religion.


Show one instance of Israel attacking that was not as a direct result of arab muslim attacks ?

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, et al,

This is so childlike, that the level of understanding is beyond repair.

What was happening at the time was a war. As usual, Team Pallywood tries to paint the Arab Muslims as innocent civilians being massacred by violent and evil Israelis when they were in fact, militants hiding and attacking from amongst a civilian population.

No different than today.

Israel always has to "defend itself" from the people it is attacking.

Why not? The honeys with human shields are shooting at them, Clyde.

Except it was Israel that was attacking Palestinians in Palestinian villages. It was Israel that was on the offensive.

(COMMENT)

But a simplified response on the kindergarten level is still possible.

Between the opening of the 1948-49 War of Independence, initiated by an attack by the Arab League, and 1988 when the PLO Declared Independence, the State of Israel never engaged any entity called the Palestinians. Hence, no Armistice was ever made between Israel and any nation called the Palestinians.
​

When you make these broad and sweeping statements, you have to give it some specificity.

• WHEN did Israel attack Palestinians?
• WHERE did this allegedly attack happen?
• WHO was acting as the Government of Palestine? WHO initiated (aggressor) contact?
• WHAT forces were involved?
• WHY did the outbreak of hostilities occur?
​

Most Respectfully,
R

• WHEN did Israel attack Palestinians?
Israeli/Zionist proxy army, Britain, around 1917.
• WHERE did this allegedly attack happen?
In the territory that became Palestine in 1924.
• WHO was acting as the Government of Palestine? WHO initiated (aggressor) contact?
Britain, Britain, on behalf of Israel/Zionists.
• WHAT forces were involved?
British military, and Zionist terrorist gangs.
• WHY did the outbreak of hostilities occur?
British/Zionist colonization of Palestine.

LINK as you have failed to produced even one proving this in the last 5 years

LINK as the territory was the mandate of palestine and was granted to the Jews as their NATIONal home

LINK as you have failed to provide one saying this in the last 6 years

LINK as you have failed to provide one saying this in the last 6 years

No colonisation took place other than that by arab muslims, the land was Jewish from 1917 and you are trying once again to deny the Jews support from International law. And denying them their rights that you demand be given to illegal immigrant arab muslims.

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

This is so childlike, that the level of understanding is beyond repair.

Israel always has to "defend itself" from the people it is attacking.

Why not? The honeys with human shields are shooting at them, Clyde.

Except it was Israel that was attacking Palestinians in Palestinian villages. It was Israel that was on the offensive.

(COMMENT)

But a simplified response on the kindergarten level is still possible.

Between the opening of the 1948-49 War of Independence, initiated by an attack by the Arab League, and 1988 when the PLO Declared Independence, the State of Israel never engaged any entity called the Palestinians. Hence, no Armistice was ever made between Israel and any nation called the Palestinians.
​

When you make these broad and sweeping statements, you have to give it some specificity.

• WHEN did Israel attack Palestinians?
• WHERE did this allegedly attack happen?
• WHO was acting as the Government of Palestine? WHO initiated (aggressor) contact?
• WHAT forces were involved?
• WHY did the outbreak of hostilities occur?
​

Most Respectfully,
R

• WHEN did Israel attack Palestinians?
Israeli/Zionist proxy army, Britain, around 1917.
• WHERE did this allegedly attack happen?
In the territory that became Palestine in 1924.
• WHO was acting as the Government of Palestine? WHO initiated (aggressor) contact?
Britain, Britain, on behalf of Israel/Zionists.
• WHAT forces were involved?
British military, and Zionist terrorist gangs.
• WHY did the outbreak of hostilities occur?
British/Zionist colonization of Palestine.

LINK as you have failed to produced even one proving this in the last 5 years

LINK as the territory was the mandate of palestine and was granted to the Jews as their NATIONal home

LINK as you have failed to provide one saying this in the last 6 years

LINK as you have failed to provide one saying this in the last 6 years

No colonisation took place other than that by arab muslims, the land was Jewish from 1917 and you are trying once again to deny the Jews support from International law. And denying them their rights that you demand be given to illegal immigrant arab muslims.

LINK as the territory was the mandate of palestine and was granted to the Jews as their NATIONal home​

It is you who has never proven this to be true.

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, et al,

This is so childlike, that the level of understanding is beyond repair.

Why not? The honeys with human shields are shooting at them, Clyde.

Except it was Israel that was attacking Palestinians in Palestinian villages. It was Israel that was on the offensive.

(COMMENT)

But a simplified response on the kindergarten level is still possible.

Between the opening of the 1948-49 War of Independence, initiated by an attack by the Arab League, and 1988 when the PLO Declared Independence, the State of Israel never engaged any entity called the Palestinians. Hence, no Armistice was ever made between Israel and any nation called the Palestinians.
​

When you make these broad and sweeping statements, you have to give it some specificity.

• WHEN did Israel attack Palestinians?
• WHERE did this allegedly attack happen?
• WHO was acting as the Government of Palestine? WHO initiated (aggressor) contact?
• WHAT forces were involved?
• WHY did the outbreak of hostilities occur?
​

Most Respectfully,
R

• WHEN did Israel attack Palestinians?
Israeli/Zionist proxy army, Britain, around 1917.
• WHERE did this allegedly attack happen?
In the territory that became Palestine in 1924.
• WHO was acting as the Government of Palestine? WHO initiated (aggressor) contact?
Britain, Britain, on behalf of Israel/Zionists.
• WHAT forces were involved?
British military, and Zionist terrorist gangs.
• WHY did the outbreak of hostilities occur?
British/Zionist colonization of Palestine.

LINK as you have failed to produced even one proving this in the last 5 years

LINK as the territory was the mandate of palestine and was granted to the Jews as their NATIONal home

LINK as you have failed to provide one saying this in the last 6 years

LINK as you have failed to provide one saying this in the last 6 years

No colonisation took place other than that by arab muslims, the land was Jewish from 1917 and you are trying once again to deny the Jews support from International law. And denying them their rights that you demand be given to illegal immigrant arab muslims.

LINK as the territory was the mandate of palestine and was granted to the Jews as their NATIONal home​

It is you who has never proven this to be true.

Only because you deny that INTERNATIONALO LAWS should ever work in the favour of the Jews.

Are you denying the Treaty of Sevres, the treaty of Lausanne, the LoN mandate of palestine, the granting of land to arab muslims to create Syria, Iraq, Iran, Jordan, Egypt and Saudi by the LoN under the mandate system.


I HAVE POSTED THE MANDATE OF PALESTINE OVER 1000 TIMES AND HIGHLIGHTED THE SECTIONS THAT SAY THE LAND WAS FOR THE CREATION OF THE NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS AND STILL YOU DENY THAT IT EXISTS PROVING THAT YOU WANT TO DENY THE RIGHTS OF THE JEWS TO FREE DETERMINATION, A HOMELAND AND THE PROTECTION OF INTERNATIONAL LAWS. IT IS YOU THAT REFUSES TO PRODUCE A LINK TO A SITE OF IMPECCABLE CREDENTIALS THAT SHOWS THE LON NEVER GRANTED THE LAND TO THE JEWS

 

[P F Tinmore]

What was happening at the time was a war. As usual, Team Pallywood tries to paint the Arab Muslims as innocent civilians being massacred by violent and evil Israelis when they were in fact, militants hiding and attacking from amongst a civilian population.

No different than today.

Israel always has to "defend itself" from the people it is attacking.

Why not? The honeys with human shields are shooting at them, Clyde.

Except it was Israel that was attacking Palestinians in Palestinian villages. It was Israel that was on the offensive.

Not according to the reports that show the arab muslims were attacking the Jews as israel did not exist at that time, It was the Arab league that invaded Jewish lands in 1947 with the sole intention of wiping out the Jews and destroying any chance of their being a Jewish homeland. The problem has always been and always will be islam and its 7C religion.


Show one instance of Israel attacking that was not as a direct result of arab muslim attacks ?

Show one instance of an attack that was not related to colonialism.

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

This is so childlike, that the level of understanding is beyond repair.

Except it was Israel that was attacking Palestinians in Palestinian villages. It was Israel that was on the offensive.

(COMMENT)

But a simplified response on the kindergarten level is still possible.

Between the opening of the 1948-49 War of Independence, initiated by an attack by the Arab League, and 1988 when the PLO Declared Independence, the State of Israel never engaged any entity called the Palestinians. Hence, no Armistice was ever made between Israel and any nation called the Palestinians.
​

When you make these broad and sweeping statements, you have to give it some specificity.

• WHEN did Israel attack Palestinians?
• WHERE did this allegedly attack happen?
• WHO was acting as the Government of Palestine? WHO initiated (aggressor) contact?
• WHAT forces were involved?
• WHY did the outbreak of hostilities occur?
​

Most Respectfully,
R

• WHEN did Israel attack Palestinians?
Israeli/Zionist proxy army, Britain, around 1917.
• WHERE did this allegedly attack happen?
In the territory that became Palestine in 1924.
• WHO was acting as the Government of Palestine? WHO initiated (aggressor) contact?
Britain, Britain, on behalf of Israel/Zionists.
• WHAT forces were involved?
British military, and Zionist terrorist gangs.
• WHY did the outbreak of hostilities occur?
British/Zionist colonization of Palestine.

LINK as you have failed to produced even one proving this in the last 5 years

LINK as the territory was the mandate of palestine and was granted to the Jews as their NATIONal home

LINK as you have failed to provide one saying this in the last 6 years

LINK as you have failed to provide one saying this in the last 6 years

No colonisation took place other than that by arab muslims, the land was Jewish from 1917 and you are trying once again to deny the Jews support from International law. And denying them their rights that you demand be given to illegal immigrant arab muslims.

LINK as the territory was the mandate of palestine and was granted to the Jews as their NATIONal home​

It is you who has never proven this to be true.

Only because you deny that INTERNATIONALO LAWS should ever work in the favour of the Jews.

Are you denying the Treaty of Sevres, the treaty of Lausanne, the LoN mandate of palestine, the granting of land to arab muslims to create Syria, Iraq, Iran, Jordan, Egypt and Saudi by the LoN under the mandate system.


I HAVE POSTED THE MANDATE OF PALESTINE OVER 1000 TIMES AND HIGHLIGHTED THE SECTIONS THAT SAY THE LAND WAS FOR THE CREATION OF THE NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS AND STILL YOU DENY THAT IT EXISTS PROVING THAT YOU WANT TO DENY THE RIGHTS OF THE JEWS TO FREE DETERMINATION, A HOMELAND AND THE PROTECTION OF INTERNATIONAL LAWS. IT IS YOU THAT REFUSES TO PRODUCE A LINK TO A SITE OF IMPECCABLE CREDENTIALS THAT SHOWS THE LON NEVER GRANTED THE LAND TO THE JEWS

And you have been shown 1000 times that the Jewish National Home was not a land transfer, it was Palestinian citizenship.

 

[Roudy]

What was happening at the time was a war. As usual, Team Pallywood tries to paint the Arab Muslims as innocent civilians being massacred by violent and evil Israelis when they were in fact, militants hiding and attacking from amongst a civilian population.

No different than today.

Israel always has to "defend itself" from the people it is attacking.

Why not? The honeys with human shields are shooting at them, Clyde.

Except it was Israel that was attacking Palestinians in Palestinian villages. It was Israel that was on the offensive.

Not according to the reports that show the arab muslims were attacking the Jews as israel did not exist at that time, It was the Arab league that invaded Jewish lands in 1947 with the sole intention of wiping out the Jews and destroying any chance of their being a Jewish homeland. The problem has always been and always will be islam and its 7C religion.


Show one instance of Israel attacking that was not as a direct result of arab muslim attacks ?

Show one instance of an attack that was not related to colonialism.

You terrorist lovers always get it backwards. The land is ancient Jewish religious and ancestral land. And despite the many invasions, the Jews always maintained a presence and kept coming back over the mellenia. The Arabs are the real invaders and colonialists. The Middle East is littered with countries they invaded, looted, and destroyed.

 

[Roudy]

Israel always has to "defend itself" from the people it is attacking.

Why not? The honeys with human shields are shooting at them, Clyde.

Except it was Israel that was attacking Palestinians in Palestinian villages. It was Israel that was on the offensive.

Not according to the reports that show the arab muslims were attacking the Jews as israel did not exist at that time, It was the Arab league that invaded Jewish lands in 1947 with the sole intention of wiping out the Jews and destroying any chance of their being a Jewish homeland. The problem has always been and always will be islam and its 7C religion.


Show one instance of Israel attacking that was not as a direct result of arab muslim attacks ?

Show one instance of an attack that was not related to colonialism.

You terrorist lovers always get it backwards. The land is ancient Jewish religious and ancestral land. And despite the many invasions, the Jews always maintained a presence and kept coming back over the mellenia. The Arabs are the real invaders and colonialists. The Middle East is littered with countries they invaded, looted, and destroyed.

Battle of Hebron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 1834 Hebron massacre occurred in early August 1834,[1] when the forces of Ibrahim Pasha launched an assault against Hebron to crush the last pocket of significant resistance.

Mass killings and rapes by the Egyptian troops took place in Hebron after they captured the city from the rebels. The Jews of Hebron had not participated in the rebellion, but Egyptian soldiers who entered the city ignored this.[13] For three hours, troops committed atrocities against the people of Hebron.[16] The Jews were not subject to Pasha's conscription policy but suffered the "most cruel outrages"[17] and were targeted for "special violence".[18] While many Muslims managed to escape the impending danger, the Jews remained, confident they would not be harmed by the Egyptians. Apparently, the Jews of Jerusalem had received an assurance from Ibrahim that Hebron's Jews would be protected.[19] In the end, seven Jewish men[16][20][21] and five girls[1][16] were killed. Isaac Farhi also described violent attacks on the Jews of Hebron committed by Egyptian soldiers.[22] He writes that the attack in Hebron was even worse than the plunder in Safed. Synagogues were desecrated,[23] houses were ransacked, and valuable items were stolen[24] leaving the Jewish community of Hebron destitute.[25]

 

[P F Tinmore]

Why not? The honeys with human shields are shooting at them, Clyde.

Except it was Israel that was attacking Palestinians in Palestinian villages. It was Israel that was on the offensive.

Not according to the reports that show the arab muslims were attacking the Jews as israel did not exist at that time, It was the Arab league that invaded Jewish lands in 1947 with the sole intention of wiping out the Jews and destroying any chance of their being a Jewish homeland. The problem has always been and always will be islam and its 7C religion.


Show one instance of Israel attacking that was not as a direct result of arab muslim attacks ?

Show one instance of an attack that was not related to colonialism.

You terrorist lovers always get it backwards. The land is ancient Jewish religious and ancestral land. And despite the many invasions, the Jews always maintained a presence and kept coming back over the mellenia. The Arabs are the real invaders and colonialists. The Middle East is littered with countries they invaded, looted, and destroyed.

Battle of Hebron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 1834 Hebron massacre occurred in early August 1834,[1] when the forces of Ibrahim Pasha launched an assault against Hebron to crush the last pocket of significant resistance.

Mass killings and rapes by the Egyptian troops took place in Hebron after they captured the city from the rebels. The Jews of Hebron had not participated in the rebellion, but Egyptian soldiers who entered the city ignored this.[13] For three hours, troops committed atrocities against the people of Hebron.[16] The Jews were not subject to Pasha's conscription policy but suffered the "most cruel outrages"[17] and were targeted for "special violence".[18] While many Muslims managed to escape the impending danger, the Jews remained, confident they would not be harmed by the Egyptians. Apparently, the Jews of Jerusalem had received an assurance from Ibrahim that Hebron's Jews would be protected.[19] In the end, seven Jewish men[16][20][21] and five girls[1][16] were killed. Isaac Farhi also described violent attacks on the Jews of Hebron committed by Egyptian soldiers.[22] He writes that the attack in Hebron was even worse than the plunder in Safed. Synagogues were desecrated,[23] houses were ransacked, and valuable items were stolen[24] leaving the Jewish community of Hebron destitute.[25]

A hundred year old attack by Egypt is the best you can do?

 

[Shusha]

Show one instance of an attack that was not related to colonialism.

Not one single attack was related to colonialism. Because there is not and never has been a "colony" of Jewish people in Israel. Israel is the homeland of the Jewish people (historically undeniably true).

The problem was and is the perception held by the Arabs (ironically the invading and colonizing culture) that the Jewish people have no rights to sovereignty in land the Arabs perceive as "theirs".

 

[Phoenall]

What was happening at the time was a war. As usual, Team Pallywood tries to paint the Arab Muslims as innocent civilians being massacred by violent and evil Israelis when they were in fact, militants hiding and attacking from amongst a civilian population.

No different than today.

Israel always has to "defend itself" from the people it is attacking.

Why not? The honeys with human shields are shooting at them, Clyde.

Except it was Israel that was attacking Palestinians in Palestinian villages. It was Israel that was on the offensive.

Not according to the reports that show the arab muslims were attacking the Jews as israel did not exist at that time, It was the Arab league that invaded Jewish lands in 1947 with the sole intention of wiping out the Jews and destroying any chance of their being a Jewish homeland. The problem has always been and always will be islam and its 7C religion.


Show one instance of Israel attacking that was not as a direct result of arab muslim attacks ?

Show one instance of an attack that was not related to colonialism.

Every single one of them, as they were done for the arab muslim religion that says the land has to be fought for one taken. Just look at the TRUE reasons given before the attacks for the reasons behind the attacks, not the post defeat reasons that are just lame escuses for the failure of the muslims

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, et al,

This is so childlike, that the level of understanding is beyond repair.

(COMMENT)

But a simplified response on the kindergarten level is still possible.

Between the opening of the 1948-49 War of Independence, initiated by an attack by the Arab League, and 1988 when the PLO Declared Independence, the State of Israel never engaged any entity called the Palestinians. Hence, no Armistice was ever made between Israel and any nation called the Palestinians.
​

When you make these broad and sweeping statements, you have to give it some specificity.

• WHEN did Israel attack Palestinians?
• WHERE did this allegedly attack happen?
• WHO was acting as the Government of Palestine? WHO initiated (aggressor) contact?
• WHAT forces were involved?
• WHY did the outbreak of hostilities occur?
​

Most Respectfully,
R

• WHEN did Israel attack Palestinians?
Israeli/Zionist proxy army, Britain, around 1917.
• WHERE did this allegedly attack happen?
In the territory that became Palestine in 1924.
• WHO was acting as the Government of Palestine? WHO initiated (aggressor) contact?
Britain, Britain, on behalf of Israel/Zionists.
• WHAT forces were involved?
British military, and Zionist terrorist gangs.
• WHY did the outbreak of hostilities occur?
British/Zionist colonization of Palestine.

LINK as you have failed to produced even one proving this in the last 5 years

LINK as the territory was the mandate of palestine and was granted to the Jews as their NATIONal home

LINK as you have failed to provide one saying this in the last 6 years

LINK as you have failed to provide one saying this in the last 6 years

No colonisation took place other than that by arab muslims, the land was Jewish from 1917 and you are trying once again to deny the Jews support from International law. And denying them their rights that you demand be given to illegal immigrant arab muslims.

LINK as the territory was the mandate of palestine and was granted to the Jews as their NATIONal home​

It is you who has never proven this to be true.

Only because you deny that INTERNATIONALO LAWS should ever work in the favour of the Jews.

Are you denying the Treaty of Sevres, the treaty of Lausanne, the LoN mandate of palestine, the granting of land to arab muslims to create Syria, Iraq, Iran, Jordan, Egypt and Saudi by the LoN under the mandate system.


I HAVE POSTED THE MANDATE OF PALESTINE OVER 1000 TIMES AND HIGHLIGHTED THE SECTIONS THAT SAY THE LAND WAS FOR THE CREATION OF THE NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS AND STILL YOU DENY THAT IT EXISTS PROVING THAT YOU WANT TO DENY THE RIGHTS OF THE JEWS TO FREE DETERMINATION, A HOMELAND AND THE PROTECTION OF INTERNATIONAL LAWS. IT IS YOU THAT REFUSES TO PRODUCE A LINK TO A SITE OF IMPECCABLE CREDENTIALS THAT SHOWS THE LON NEVER GRANTED THE LAND TO THE JEWS

And you have been shown 1000 times that the Jewish National Home was not a land transfer, it was Palestinian citizenship.

No you have just stated that as your POV without onced showing that this is what the words mean. the actuak words arwe

The Avalon Project : The Palestine Mandate



The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country; and

Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country; and

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have selected His Britannic Majesty as the Mandatory for Palestine; and

Whereas the mandate in respect of Palestine has been formulated in the following terms and submitted to the Council of the League for approval; and

Whereas His Britannic Majesty has accepted the mandate in respect of Palestine and undertaken to exercise it on behalf of the League of Nations in conformity with the following provisions; and

Whereas by the afore-mentioned Article 22 (paragraph 8), it is provided that the degree of authority, control or administration to be exercised by the Mandatory, not having been previously agreed upon by the Members of the League, shall be explicitly defined by the Council of the League Of Nations;

confirming the said Mandate, defines its terms as follows:

ARTICLE 1.
The Mandatory shall have full powers of legislation and of administration, save as they may be limited by the terms of this mandate.

ART. 2.
The Mandatory shall be responsible for placing the country under such political, administrative and economic conditions as will secure the establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid down in the preamble, and the development of self-governing institutions, and also for safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion.

ART. 3.
The Mandatory shall, so far as circumstances permit, encourage local autonomy.

ART. 4.
An appropriate Jewish agency shall be recognised as a public body for the purpose of advising and co-operating with the Administration of Palestine in such economic, social and other matters as may affect the establishment of the Jewish national home and the interests of the Jewish population in Palestine, and, subject always to the control of the Administration to assist and take part in the development of the country.

The Zionist organization, so long as its organization and constitution are in the opinion of the Mandatory appropriate, shall be recognised as such agency. It shall take steps in consultation with His Britannic Majesty's Government to secure the co-operation of all Jews who are willing to assist in the establishment of the Jewish national home.

ART. 5.
The Mandatory shall be responsible for seeing that no Palestine territory shall be ceded or leased to, or in any way placed under the control of the Government of any foreign Power.

ART. 6.
The Administration of Palestine, while ensuring that the rights and position of other sections of the population are not prejudiced, shall facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall encourage, in co-operation with the Jewish agency referred to in Article 4, close settlement by Jews on the land, including State lands and waste lands not required for public purposes.

ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

ART. 8.
The privileges and immunities of foreigners, including the benefits of consular jurisdiction and protection as formerly enjoyed by Capitulation or usage in the Ottoman Empire, shall not be applicable in Palestine.

Unless the Powers whose nationals enjoyed the afore-mentioned privileges and immunities on August 1st, 1914, shall have previously renounced the right to their re-establishment, or shall have agreed to their non-application for a specified period, these privileges and immunities shall, at the expiration of the mandate, be immediately reestablished in their entirety or with such modifications as may have been agreed upon between the Powers concerned.

ART. 9.
The Mandatory shall be responsible for seeing that the judicial system established in Palestine shall assure to foreigners, as well as to natives, a complete guarantee of their rights.

Respect for the personal status of the various peoples and communities and for their religious interests shall be fully guaranteed. In particular, the control and administration of Wakfs shall be exercised in accordance with religious law and the dispositions of the founders.

ART. 10.
Pending the making of special extradition agreements relating to Palestine, the extradition treaties in force between the Mandatory and other foreign Powers shall apply to Palestine.

ART. 11.
The Administration of Palestine shall take all necessary measures to safeguard the interests of the community in connection with the development of the country, and, subject to any international obligations accepted by the Mandatory, shall have full power to provide for public ownership or control of any of the natural resources of the country or of the public works, services and utilities established or to be established therein. It shall introduce a land system appropriate to the needs of the country, having regard, among other things, to the desirability of promoting the close settlement and intensive cultivation of the land.

The Administration may arrange with the Jewish agency mentioned in Article 4 to construct or operate, upon fair and equitable terms, any public works, services and utilities, and to develop any of the natural resources of the country, in so far as these matters are not directly undertaken by the Administration. Any such arrangements shall provide that no profits distributed by such agency, directly or indirectly, shall exceed a reasonable rate of interest on the capital, and any further profits shall be utilised by it for the benefit of the country in a manner approved by the Administration.

ART. 12.
The Mandatory shall be entrusted with the control of the foreign relations of Palestine and the right to issue exequaturs to consuls appointed by foreign Powers. He shall also be entitled to afford diplomatic and consular protection to citizens of Palestine when outside its territorial limits.

ART. 13.
All responsibility in connection with the Holy Places and religious buildings or sites in Palestine, including that of preserving existing rights and of securing free access to the Holy Places, religious buildings and sites and the free exercise of worship, while ensuring the requirements of public order and decorum, is assumed by the Mandatory, who shall be responsible solely to the League of Nations in all matters connected herewith, provided that nothing in this article shall prevent the Mandatory from entering into such arrangements as he may deem reasonable with the Administration for the purpose of carrying the provisions of this article into effect; and provided also that nothing in this mandate shall be construed as conferring upon the Mandatory authority to interfere with the fabric or the management of purely Moslem sacred shrines, the immunities of which are guaranteed.

ART. 14.
A special commission shall be appointed by the Mandatory to study, define and determine the rights and claims in connection with the Holy Places and the rights and claims relating to the different religious communities in Palestine. The method of nomination, the composition and the functions of this Commission shall be submitted to the Council of the League for its approval, and the Commission shall not be appointed or enter upon its functions without the approval of the Council.

ART. 15.
The Mandatory shall see that complete freedom of conscience and the free exercise of all forms of worship, subject only to the maintenance of public order and morals, are ensured to all. No discrimination of any kind shall be made between the inhabitants of Palestine on the ground of race, religion or language. No person shall be excluded from Palestine on the sole ground of his religious belief.

The right of each community to maintain its own schools for the education of its own members in its own language, while conforming to such educational requirements of a general nature as the Administration may impose, shall not be denied or impaired.

ART. 16.
The Mandatory shall be responsible for exercising such supervision over religious or eleemosynary bodies of all faiths in Palestine as may be required for the maintenance of public order and good government. Subject to such supervision, no measures shall be taken in Palestine to obstruct or interfere with the enterprise of such bodies or to discriminate against any representative or member of them on the ground of his religion or nationality.

ART. 17.
The Administration of Palestine may organist on a voluntary basis the forces necessary for the preservation of peace and order, and also for the defence of the country, subject, however, to the supervision of the Mandatory, but shall not use them for purposes other than those above specified save with the consent of the Mandatory. Except for such purposes, no military, naval or air forces shall be raised or maintained by the Administration of Palestine.

Nothing in this article shall preclude the Administration of Palestine from contributing to the cost of the maintenance of the forces of the Mandatory in Palestine.

The Mandatory shall be entitled at all times to use the roads, railways and ports of Palestine for the movement of armed forces and the carriage of fuel and supplies.

ART. 18.
The Mandatory shall see that there is no discrimination in Palestine against the nationals of any State Member of the League of Nations (including companies incorporated under its laws) as compared with those of the Mandatory or of any foreign State in matters concerning taxation, commerce or navigation, the exercise of industries or professions, or in the treatment of merchant vessels or civil aircraft. Similarly, there shall be no discrimination in Palestine against goods originating in or destined for any of the said States, and there shall be freedom of transit under equitable conditions across the mandated area.

Subject as aforesaid and to the other provisions of this mandate, the Administration of Palestine may, on the advice of the Mandatory, impose such taxes and customs duties as it may consider necessary, and take such steps as it may think best to promote the development of the natural resources of the country and to safeguard the interests of the population. It may also, on the advice of the Mandatory, conclude a special customs agreement with any State the territory of which in 1914 was wholly included in Asiatic Turkey or Arabia.

ART. 19.
The Mandatory shall adhere on behalf of the Administration of Palestine to any general international conventions already existing, or which may be concluded hereafter with the approval of the League of Nations, respecting the slave traffic, the traffic in arms and ammunition, or the traffic in drugs, or relating to commercial equality, freedom of transit and navigation, aerial navigation and postal, telegraphic and wireless communication or literary, artistic or industrial property.

ART. 20.
The Mandatory shall co-operate on behalf of the Administration of Palestine, so far as religious, social and other conditions may permit, in the execution of any common policy adopted by the League of Nations for preventing and combating disease, including diseases of plants and animals.

ART. 21.
The Mandatory shall secure the enactment within twelve months from this date, and shall ensure the execution of a Law of Antiquities based on the following rules. This law shall ensure equality of treatment in the matter of excavations and archaeological research to the nationals of all States Members of the League of Nations.

(1) "Antiquity" means any construction or any product of human activity earlier than the year 1700 A. D.

(2) The law for the protection of antiquities shall proceed by encouragement rather than by threat.

Any person who, having discovered an antiquity without being furnished with the authorization referred to in paragraph 5, reports the same to an official of the competent Department, shall be rewarded according to the value of the discovery.

(3) No antiquity may be disposed of except to the competent Department, unless this Department renounces the acquisition of any such antiquity.

No antiquity may leave the country without an export licence from the said Department.

(4) Any person who maliciously or negligently destroys or damages an antiquity shall be liable to a penalty to be fixed.

(5) No clearing of ground or digging with the object of finding antiquities shall be permitted, under penalty of fine, except to persons authorised by the competent Department.

(6) Equitable terms shall be fixed for expropriation, temporary or permanent, of lands which might be of historical or archaeological interest.

(7) Authorization to excavate shall only be granted to persons who show sufficient guarantees of archaeological experience. The Administration of Palestine shall not, in granting these authorizations, act in such a way as to exclude scholars of any nation without good grounds.

(8) The proceeds of excavations may be divided between the excavator and the competent Department in a proportion fixed by that Department. If division seems impossible for scientific reasons, the excavator shall receive a fair indemnity in lieu of a part of the find.

ART. 22.
English, Arabic and Hebrew shall be the official languages of Palestine. Any statement or inscription in Arabic on stamps or money in Palestine shall be repeated in Hebrew and any statement or inscription in Hebrew shall be repeated in Arabic.

ART. 23.
The Administration of Palestine shall recognise the holy days of the respective communities in Palestine as legal days of rest for the members of such communities.

ART. 24.
The Mandatory shall make to the Council of the League of Nations an annual report to the satisfaction of the Council as to the measures taken during the year to carry out the provisions of the mandate. Copies of all laws and regulations promulgated or issued during the year shall be communicated with the report.

ART. 25.
In the territories lying between the Jordan and the eastern boundary of Palestine as ultimately determined, the Mandatory shall be entitled, with the consent of the Council of the League of Nations, to postpone or withhold application of such provisions of this mandate as he may consider inapplicable to the existing local conditions, and to make such provision for the administration of the territories as he may consider suitable to those conditions, provided that no action shall be taken which is inconsistent with the provisions of Articles 15, 16 and 18.

ART. 26.
The Mandatory agrees that, if any dispute whatever should arise between the Mandatory and another member of the League of Nations relating to the interpretation or the application of the provisions of the mandate, such dispute, if it cannot be settled by negotiation, shall be submitted to the Permanent Court of International Justice provided for by Article 14 of the Covenant of the League of Nations.

ART. 27.
The consent of the Council of the League of Nations is required for any modification of the terms of this mandate.

ART. 28.
In the event of the termination of the mandate hereby conferred upon the Mandatory, the Council of the League of Nations shall make such arrangements as may be deemed necessary for safeguarding in perpetuity, under guarantee of the League, the rights secured by Articles 13 and 14, and shall use its influence for securing, under the guarantee of the League, that the Government of Palestine will fully honour the financial obligations legitimately incurred by the Administration of Palestine during the period of the mandate, including the rights of public servants to pensions or gratuities.

The present instrument shall be deposited in original in the archives of the League of Nations and certified copies shall be forwarded by the Secretary-General of the League of Nations to all members of the League.

Done at London the twenty-fourth day of July, one thousand nine hundred and twenty-two.






So where does it even hint that the only reason for the mandate is to make immigrant Jews palestinians and subject to islamonazi government ?

 

[Phoenall]

Except it was Israel that was attacking Palestinians in Palestinian villages. It was Israel that was on the offensive.

Not according to the reports that show the arab muslims were attacking the Jews as israel did not exist at that time, It was the Arab league that invaded Jewish lands in 1947 with the sole intention of wiping out the Jews and destroying any chance of their being a Jewish homeland. The problem has always been and always will be islam and its 7C religion.


Show one instance of Israel attacking that was not as a direct result of arab muslim attacks ?

Show one instance of an attack that was not related to colonialism.

You terrorist lovers always get it backwards. The land is ancient Jewish religious and ancestral land. And despite the many invasions, the Jews always maintained a presence and kept coming back over the mellenia. The Arabs are the real invaders and colonialists. The Middle East is littered with countries they invaded, looted, and destroyed.

Battle of Hebron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 1834 Hebron massacre occurred in early August 1834,[1] when the forces of Ibrahim Pasha launched an assault against Hebron to crush the last pocket of significant resistance.

Mass killings and rapes by the Egyptian troops took place in Hebron after they captured the city from the rebels. The Jews of Hebron had not participated in the rebellion, but Egyptian soldiers who entered the city ignored this.[13] For three hours, troops committed atrocities against the people of Hebron.[16] The Jews were not subject to Pasha's conscription policy but suffered the "most cruel outrages"[17] and were targeted for "special violence".[18] While many Muslims managed to escape the impending danger, the Jews remained, confident they would not be harmed by the Egyptians. Apparently, the Jews of Jerusalem had received an assurance from Ibrahim that Hebron's Jews would be protected.[19] In the end, seven Jewish men[16][20][21] and five girls[1][16] were killed. Isaac Farhi also described violent attacks on the Jews of Hebron committed by Egyptian soldiers.[22] He writes that the attack in Hebron was even worse than the plunder in Safed. Synagogues were desecrated,[23] houses were ransacked, and valuable items were stolen[24] leaving the Jewish community of Hebron destitute.[25]

A hundred year old attack by Egypt is the best you can do?

Then how about the 1929 massacre of the Jews on the mufti's orders, or the attacks on the Jews during the civil war of 1920 and 1931. And lastly the invasion by arab league troops in 1947 to wipe out the Jews and stop the creation of Israel. The proclamations of the arab leaders spell out why they were invading, and it was only after they put troops in place that they changed their words because the UN warned them it was a breach of the UN charter which they had signed.

 

[Phoenall]

Show one instance of an attack that was not related to colonialism.

Not one single attack was related to colonialism. Because there is not and never has been a "colony" of Jewish people in Israel. Israel is the homeland of the Jewish people (historically undeniably true).

The problem was and is the perception held by the Arabs (ironically the invading and colonizing culture) that the Jewish people have no rights to sovereignty in land the Arabs perceive as "theirs".

It is the concept of dar-al-islam and dar-al-harb as contained in the koran

Divisions of the world in Islam - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Dar al-Islam (Arabic: دار الإسلام‎‎ literally house/abode of Islam;



Dar al-Harb (Arabic: دار الحرب‎‎ "house of war"

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Well, you have it patricianly correct. It was not a "land transfer." Land Transfers are real estate matters. Sovereignty and Independence are are something all together different. (A lesson which has been explained many times in this discussion group.)

[And you have been shown 1000 times that the Jewish National Home was not a land transfer, it was Palestinian citizenship.

(COMMENT)

The establishment of a Jewish National Home was the stated intention of the Allied Powers, as passed via the San Remo Convention and the Mandate.

It has nothing to do with "Citizenship."

The issue of nationality and citizenship where processed through the Mandate for action, but the technical aspects with dictated by the Palestine Order in Council and Citizenship Order (as amended over time).

The initial sovereignty transfer has been explained several times. The establishment of the State of Israel had several components to it. Most of which you do not understand. The umbrella methodology is was under the "Declarative Concept;" as recommended by the UN Special Committee for Palestine and adopted under the General Assembly as an acceptable means and pathway to Independence and Statehood (Step Preparatory to Independence).

And don't cite that lame Article 30 of the Treaty of Lausanne. The intention of Article was to fulfill the intent of the Allied Powers to create "Stateless People" (a person who is not considered as a national by any State under the operation of its law). Until 1988 the Government of Palestine (GOP) was a territory under the Mandate and determined by the High Commissioner. Citizens of the (GOP) were citizens under the Administration set-up by the Mandate.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Shusha]

And you have been shown 1000 times that the Jewish National Home was not a land transfer, it was Palestinian citizenship

You have such a strange understanding of the meanings of words:

the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people

recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country

secure the establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid down in the preamble, and the development of self-governing institutions,

the establishment of the Jewish national home and the interests of the Jewish population in Palestine

The Administration of Palestine ... shall facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall encourage ... close settlement by Jews on the land ...

The Administration may arrange with the Jewish agency mentioned in Article 4 to construct or operate, upon fair and equitable terms, any public works, services and utilities, and to develop any of the natural resources of the country, in so far as these matters are not directly undertaken by the Administration.


Why do you think the these terms were used, with respect to the Jewish people?

reconstitution
national home
self-governing


Why do you think the Jewish agency was given these powers?

construction and operation of public works, services and utilities
development of natural resources


It seems to me the plain language of the Mandate demonstrates an expectation of Jewish sovereignty as a national entity (you know, a nation). Arguing against the plain meaning of the text seems well, just silly.

 

[Roudy]

Except it was Israel that was attacking Palestinians in Palestinian villages. It was Israel that was on the offensive.

Not according to the reports that show the arab muslims were attacking the Jews as israel did not exist at that time, It was the Arab league that invaded Jewish lands in 1947 with the sole intention of wiping out the Jews and destroying any chance of their being a Jewish homeland. The problem has always been and always will be islam and its 7C religion.


Show one instance of Israel attacking that was not as a direct result of arab muslim attacks ?

Show one instance of an attack that was not related to colonialism.

You terrorist lovers always get it backwards. The land is ancient Jewish religious and ancestral land. And despite the many invasions, the Jews always maintained a presence and kept coming back over the mellenia. The Arabs are the real invaders and colonialists. The Middle East is littered with countries they invaded, looted, and destroyed.

Battle of Hebron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 1834 Hebron massacre occurred in early August 1834,[1] when the forces of Ibrahim Pasha launched an assault against Hebron to crush the last pocket of significant resistance.

Mass killings and rapes by the Egyptian troops took place in Hebron after they captured the city from the rebels. The Jews of Hebron had not participated in the rebellion, but Egyptian soldiers who entered the city ignored this.[13] For three hours, troops committed atrocities against the people of Hebron.[16] The Jews were not subject to Pasha's conscription policy but suffered the "most cruel outrages"[17] and were targeted for "special violence".[18] While many Muslims managed to escape the impending danger, the Jews remained, confident they would not be harmed by the Egyptians. Apparently, the Jews of Jerusalem had received an assurance from Ibrahim that Hebron's Jews would be protected.[19] In the end, seven Jewish men[16][20][21] and five girls[1][16] were killed. Isaac Farhi also described violent attacks on the Jews of Hebron committed by Egyptian soldiers.[22] He writes that the attack in Hebron was even worse than the plunder in Safed. Synagogues were desecrated,[23] houses were ransacked, and valuable items were stolen[24] leaving the Jewish community of Hebron destitute.[25]

A hundred year old attack by Egypt is the best you can do?

Didn't Poor Fucking Tinmore ask for an Arab attack that didn't have to do with "European" colonial invasion? And here we have one showing Arab Muslim invasion and Arab Muslim colonialism. There are many more such examples.

 

[Challenger]

What was happening at the time was a war. As usual, Team Pallywood tries to paint the Arab Muslims as innocent civilians being massacred by violent and evil Israelis when they were in fact, militants hiding and attacking from amongst a civilian population.

No different than today.

They were innocent civillians and they were massacred by the IDF as part of a deliberate policy of ethnic cleansing. As usual zionists try to paint them as "evil terrorists" bent on the extermination of "the Jewish people" in order to deflect attention from the magnitude of their crimes against defenceless old people, women and children.

 

[Shusha]

They were innocent civillians and they were massacred by the IDF as part of a deliberate policy of ethnic cleansing.

So, you are putting forth the argument that the events in Lydda in 1948 happened outside the context of war and that there was no military value to the town and that not a single military action was taken by any of the residents of the town.

Really? That's what you are going with?