Lee Harvey Oswald...innocent

[candycorn]

Well at least we've determined that your problem is not a lack of 'skin in the game', it is a lack of cognitive ability. You are scientifically obtuse.

YES...Angles and reaction times...they are called scientific measurements. It is what I've been talking about from the start of the conversation.

Wounds, locations and victim reaction time...remember?

Your Warren Commission conclusion that Oswald was the lone assassin has 2 MAJOR scientific flaws...

Angles
In the case of a missile fired from rifle, we're talking about Newton's first law of motion:
Newton's First Law of Motion is a restatement of Galileo's Principle of Inertia: matter tends to move at a constant velocity, unless an outside force acts upon it. In other words, an object that is moving will keep on moving at a constant speed in a straight line unless some outside force causes it to change its speed or direction.

So, a bullet fired from a 6th floor window of the TSBD building, which is approx. 60 feet above Elm Street, will approach the Presidential limousine at a downward trajectory. The angle of that downward trajectory has been determined to be approx. 21 degrees.

According to Newton's First Law of Motion, the missile will continue on that downward 21 degree trajectory, unless an outside force acts upon it.

1) When that missile hits the President in the back, at the level of the third thoracic vertebra, it will continue to move at that 21 degree angle through his torso. If it does not hit any bone or skeletal structure and still has energy, it would exits the front of the President's chest.

2) If that missile did hit bone or skeletal structure and still has energy, it could be deflected, slowed or stopped.

3) If that missile exits from a 4-6 inch anatomically higher wound in the President's throat, above his shirt collar, slightly nicking the knot in his tie:
a) the missile WAS deflected
b) and the missile would NOW have a new UPWARD trajectory (approx. 11 degrees).

4) Conclusion: the missile would no longer hit John Connally. It would no longer retain a downward trajectory. And, it would possibly exit the vehicle over the driver's head.

Reaction times
Because the event was recorded by Abraham Zapruder from the area of the grassy knoll on his 8–mm Bell & Howell Zoomatic Director Series Model 414 PD camera, we are able to see and measure the initial and subsequent reactions of the President and the Governor to their wounds.

1) The Warren Commission determined from the Zapruder film that the time span between the President's reaction to his first non-fatal wound and the Governor's reaction to his non-fatal wounds was a maximum of 1.7 seconds.

2) The Warren Commission determined from test firings of the bolt action rifle that the fastest time interval between shots the weapon could be fired is 2.3+ seconds.

3) The Warren Commission determined that unless the President and the Governor were hit by the same missile, there had to be a second gunman.

Conclusion: the single bullet theory is false.

You are welcome to explain what planet YOU studied science and physics. I will stick with the planet Earth...

I apologize for a cut and paste but you're simply no longer worth the effort:

Palm Print on Murder Weapon--Oswald's.
Fatal Shots fired from whose place of business--Oswald's.
Man's face in picture posing with murder weapon--Oswald's.
Guilty of murdering a Dallass Police Officer minutes after he killed Kennedy--Oswald

Translation...you quit...AGAIN...

Clearly you are not an intelligent person. You are unable to think for yourself or use critical thinking. Come back when you grow up sonny boy...

When "I" grow up...sure fool...whatever.

You seem to think there were two gunmen but somehow you can't produce a shred of evidence of the 2nd gunman. Apparently the same diabolical genius that facilitated the most perfect escape ever for one of the assailants, left the other guy having a shootout with police in broad daylight.

But, in the end, we all know that you're just a flake of dandruff on the shoulder of humanity and your silly little plots are just that; silly and ignorant.

Before you go, I would like to ask you how did the palm print of Lee Harvey Oswald make it onto the murder weapon. Just for kicks, please lay out the whole conspiracy. I'm sure it will be entertaining; God knows that what you've posted up to now sure has been.

"Not enough to convict"---puh leeze.

 

[Bfgrn]

I apologize for a cut and paste but you're simply no longer worth the effort:

Palm Print on Murder Weapon--Oswald's.
Fatal Shots fired from whose place of business--Oswald's.
Man's face in picture posing with murder weapon--Oswald's.
Guilty of murdering a Dallass Police Officer minutes after he killed Kennedy--Oswald

Translation...you quit...AGAIN...

Clearly you are not an intelligent person. You are unable to think for yourself or use critical thinking. Come back when you grow up sonny boy...

When "I" grow up...sure fool...whatever.

You seem to think there were two gunmen but somehow you can't produce a shred of evidence of the 2nd gunman. Apparently the same diabolical genius that facilitated the most perfect escape ever for one of the assailants, left the other guy having a shootout with police in broad daylight.

But, in the end, we all know that you're just a flake of dandruff on the shoulder of humanity and your silly little plots are just that; silly and ignorant.

Before you go, I would like to ask you how did the palm print of Lee Harvey Oswald make it onto the murder weapon. Just for kicks, please lay out the whole conspiracy. I'm sure it will be entertaining; God knows that what you've posted up to now sure has been.

"Not enough to convict"---puh leeze.

I just produced evidence in this thread there HAD to be a second gunman. If the single bullet theory doesn't hold up, the LONE assassin theory fails. You are clearly not intelligent enough to understand it.

Why would be difficult for a second gunman to escape? NO ONE was even looking for a second suspect. The Dallas Police put out ONE APB for ONE individual...

puh leeze??? In order to 'convict' any individual of murdering the President of the United States, or convicting any individual of murdering any person with a rifle, you must be able to prove THAT individual pulled the trigger.

Here's a FACT for you to face...you CAN'T...

As a matter of FACT, Oswald failed a paraffin test on his face and cheeks. The testimony of FBI agent John Gallagher told the Warren Commission that Oswald's cheek casts tested negative by Neutron Activation Analysis, suggesting Oswald had not shot a rifle.

Again, your argument is to just have 'faith' in evidence from government agencies that would be impacted negatively by exposing their failed security for the President of the United States.

AND again, you ask me to ignore OBVIOUS discrepancies, anomalies and deceptions in 'reported' evidence. Plus, you want me to dismiss CRITICAL evidence withheld by those same government agencies, like the fact less than 24 hours after the assassination, the FBI Director made the President (LBJ) aware there was an impostor a few months earlier who showed up at the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City using Oswald's name.

At 10 AM on the morning following the Kennedy assassination, President Lyndon Johnson and FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover discussed the state of the case over the telephone. In response to LBJ's question about "the visit to the Soviet Embassy in September," Hoover replied:

"No, that’s one angle that’s very confusing, for this reason—we have up here the tape and the photograph of the man who was at the Soviet embassy, using Oswald’s name. That picture and the tape do not correspond to this man’s voice, nor to his appearance. In other words, it appears that there is a second person who was at the Soviet embassy down there."
The Mexico City Tapes


Clearly you're an individual who is only capable of parroting what the government TELLS you. So, please make the argument that equals intelligence?

 

[slackjawed]

"People will believe forever, no matter the reliability of the evidence," said Charles Stewart, a Purdue University communications professor who studies and teaches how conspiracy theorists make their conspiracies believable. "We love conspiracies in this country. Even back to the colonists, Americans always have been suspicious about their government and have rallied around conspiracies."


great quote from;
Academic says `cult of secrecy' feeds conspiracies on Kennedy - Baltimore Sun

 

[Bfgrn]

"People will believe forever, no matter the reliability of the evidence," said Charles Stewart, a Purdue University communications professor who studies and teaches how conspiracy theorists make their conspiracies believable. "We love conspiracies in this country. Even back to the colonists, Americans always have been suspicious about their government and have rallied around conspiracies."


great quote from;
Academic says `cult of secrecy' feeds conspiracies on Kennedy - Baltimore Sun

Why don't you tell us what you believe?

 

[candycorn]

"People will believe forever, no matter the reliability of the evidence," said Charles Stewart, a Purdue University communications professor who studies and teaches how conspiracy theorists make their conspiracies believable. "We love conspiracies in this country. Even back to the colonists, Americans always have been suspicious about their government and have rallied around conspiracies."


great quote from;
Academic says `cult of secrecy' feeds conspiracies on Kennedy - Baltimore Sun

He's really going to be pissed off in a few months when this comes out:

"Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy" (2011)

 

[candycorn]

Translation...you quit...AGAIN...

Clearly you are not an intelligent person. You are unable to think for yourself or use critical thinking. Come back when you grow up sonny boy...

When "I" grow up...sure fool...whatever.

You seem to think there were two gunmen but somehow you can't produce a shred of evidence of the 2nd gunman. Apparently the same diabolical genius that facilitated the most perfect escape ever for one of the assailants, left the other guy having a shootout with police in broad daylight.

But, in the end, we all know that you're just a flake of dandruff on the shoulder of humanity and your silly little plots are just that; silly and ignorant.

Before you go, I would like to ask you how did the palm print of Lee Harvey Oswald make it onto the murder weapon. Just for kicks, please lay out the whole conspiracy. I'm sure it will be entertaining; God knows that what you've posted up to now sure has been.

"Not enough to convict"---puh leeze.

I just produced evidence in this thread there HAD to be a second gunman. If the single bullet theory doesn't hold up, the LONE assassin theory fails. You are clearly not intelligent enough to understand it.

Why would be difficult for a second gunman to escape? NO ONE was even looking for a second suspect. The Dallas Police put out ONE APB for ONE individual...

puh leeze??? In order to 'convict' any individual of murdering the President of the United States, or convicting any individual of murdering any person with a rifle, you must be able to prove THAT individual pulled the trigger.

Here's a FACT for you to face...you CAN'T...

As a matter of FACT, Oswald failed a paraffin test on his face and cheeks. The testimony of FBI agent John Gallagher told the Warren Commission that Oswald's cheek casts tested negative by Neutron Activation Analysis, suggesting Oswald had not shot a rifle.

Again, your argument is to just have 'faith' in evidence from government agencies that would be impacted negatively by exposing their failed security for the President of the United States.

AND again, you ask me to ignore OBVIOUS discrepancies, anomalies and deceptions in 'reported' evidence. Plus, you want me to dismiss CRITICAL evidence withheld by those same government agencies, like the fact less than 24 hours after the assassination, the FBI Director made the President (LBJ) aware there was an impostor a few months earlier who showed up at the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City using Oswald's name.

At 10 AM on the morning following the Kennedy assassination, President Lyndon Johnson and FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover discussed the state of the case over the telephone. In response to LBJ's question about "the visit to the Soviet Embassy in September," Hoover replied:

"No, that’s one angle that’s very confusing, for this reason—we have up here the tape and the photograph of the man who was at the Soviet embassy, using Oswald’s name. That picture and the tape do not correspond to this man’s voice, nor to his appearance. In other words, it appears that there is a second person who was at the Soviet embassy down there."
The Mexico City Tapes


Clearly you're an individual who is only capable of parroting what the government TELLS you. So, please make the argument that equals intelligence?

Now you have a fake Oswald in your "theory". Thanks for proving my point over and over.

 

[slackjawed]

"People will believe forever, no matter the reliability of the evidence," said Charles Stewart, a Purdue University communications professor who studies and teaches how conspiracy theorists make their conspiracies believable. "We love conspiracies in this country. Even back to the colonists, Americans always have been suspicious about their government and have rallied around conspiracies."


great quote from;
Academic says `cult of secrecy' feeds conspiracies on Kennedy - Baltimore Sun

Why don't you tell us what you believe?

I believe that oswald acted alone.
I have not seen anything but fairy tales and wishful thinking that says otherwise.


Now, in true conspiracy theorist fashion, go ahead and issue your personal attacks.......

 

[slackjawed]

here is the support for what I believe;

" 1. The shots which killed President Kennedy and wounded Governor Connally were fired from the sixth floor window at the southeast corner of the Texas School Book Depository. This determination is based upon the following:
* (a) Witnesses at the scene of the assassination saw a rifle being fired from the sixth floor window of the Depository Building, and some witnesses saw a rifle in the window immediately after the shots were fired.
* (b) The nearly whole bullet found on Governor Connally's stretcher at Parkland Memorial Hospital and the two bullet fragments found in the front seat of the Presidential limousine were fired from the 6.5- millimeter Mannlicher-Carcano rifle found on the sixth floor of the Depository Building to the exclusion of all other weapons.
* (c) The three used cartridge cases found near the window on the sixth floor at the southeast corner of the building were fired from the same rifle which fired the above-described bullet and fragments, to the exclusion of all other weapons.
* (d) The windshield in the Presidential limousine was struck by a bullet fragment on the inside surface of the glass, but was not penetrated.
* (e) The nature of the bullet wounds suffered by President Kennedy and Governor Connally and the location of the car at the time of the shots establish that the bullets were fired from above and behind the Presidential limousine, striking the President and the Governor as follows:

Page 19

1. President Kennedy was first struck by a bullet which entered at the back of his neck and exited through the lower front portion of his neck, causing a wound which would not necessarily have been lethal. The President was struck a second time by a bullet which entered the right-rear portion of his head, causing a massive and fatal wound.
2. Governor Connally was struck by a bullet which entered on the right side of his back and traveled downward through the right side of his chest, exiting below his right nipple. This bullet then passed through his right wrist and entered his left thigh where it caused a superficial wound.
* (f)There is no credible evidence that the shots were fired from the Triple Underpass, ahead of the motorcade, or from any other location.
2. The weight of the evidence indicates that there were three shots fired.
3. Although it is not necessary to any essential findings of the Commission to determine just which shot hit Governor Connally, there is very persuasive evidence from the experts to indicate that the same bullet which pierced the President's throat also caused Governor Connally's wounds. However, Governor Connally's testimony and certain other factors have given rise to some difference of opinion as to this probability but there is no question in the mind of any member of the Commission that all the shots which caused the President's and Governor Connally's wounds were fired from the sixth floor window of the Texas School Book Depository.
4. The shots which killed President Kennedy and wounded Governor Connally were fired by Lee Harvey Oswald. This conclusion is based upon the following:
* (a)The Mannlicher-Carcano 6.5-millimeter Italian rifle from which the shots were fired was owned by and in the possession of Oswald.
* (b)Oswald carried this rifle into the Depository Building on the morning of November 22, 1963.
* (c)Oswald, at the time of the assassination, was present at the window from which the shots were fired.
* (d)Shortly after the assassination, the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle belonging to Oswald was found partially hidden between some cartons on the sixth floor and the improvised paper bag in which Oswald brought the rifle to the Depository was found dose by the window from which the shots were fired.
* (e)Based on testimony of the experts and their analysis of films of the assassination, the Commission has concluded that a rifleman of Lee Harvey Oswald's capabilities could have fired the shots from the rifle used in the assassination within the elapsed time of the shooting. The Commission has concluded further that Oswald possessed the capability with a rifle which enabled him to commit the assassination.



Page 20

* (f)Oswald lied to the police after his arrest concerning important substantive matters.
* (g)Oswald had attempted to kill Maj. Gen. Edwin A. Walker (Retired, U.S. Army) on April 10, 1963, thereby demonstrating his disposition to take human life.
5. Oswald killed Dallas Police Patrolman J. D. Tippit approximately 45 minutes after the assassination. This conclusion upholds the finding that Oswald fired the shots which killed President Kennedy and wounded Governor Connally and is supported by the following:
* (a) Two eyewitnesses saw the Tippit shooting and seven eyewitnesses heard the shots and saw the gunman leave the scene with revolver in hand. These nine eyewitnesses positively identified Lee Harvey Oswald as the man they saw.
* (b) The cartridge cases found at the scene of the shooting were fired from the revolver in the possession of Oswald at the time of his arrest to the exclusion of all other weapons.
* (c) The revolver in Oswald's possession at the time of his arrest was purchased by and belonged to Oswald.
* (d) Oswald's jacket was found along the path of flight taken by the gunman as he fled from the scene of the killing.
6. Within 80 minutes of the assassination and 35 minutes of the Tippit killing Oswald resisted arrest at the theatre by attempting to shoot another Dallas police officer.
7. The Commission has reached the following conclusions concerning Oswald's interrogation and detention by the Dallas police:
* (a) Except for the force required to effect his arrest, Oswald was not subjected to any physical coercion by any law enforcement officials. He was advised that he could not be compelled to give any information and that any statements made by him might be used against him in court. He was advised of his right to counsel. He was given the opportunity to obtain counsel of his own choice and was offered legal assistance by the Dallas Bar Association, which he rejected at that time.
* (b) Newspaper, radio, and television reporters were allowed uninhibited access to the area through which Oswald had to pass when he was moved from his cell to the interrogation room and other sections of the building, thereby subjecting Oswald to harassment and creating chaotic conditions which were not conducive to orderly interrogation or the protection of the rights of the prisoner.
* (c) The numerous statements, sometimes erroneous, made to the press by various local law enforcement officials, during this period of confusion and disorder in the police station, would have presented serious obstacles to the obtaining of a fair trial for Oswald. To the extent that the information was erroneous or misleading, it helped to create doubts, speculations, and fears in the mind of the public which might otherwise not have arisen."


from;
Chapter 1

 

[Bfgrn]

When "I" grow up...sure fool...whatever.

You seem to think there were two gunmen but somehow you can't produce a shred of evidence of the 2nd gunman. Apparently the same diabolical genius that facilitated the most perfect escape ever for one of the assailants, left the other guy having a shootout with police in broad daylight.

But, in the end, we all know that you're just a flake of dandruff on the shoulder of humanity and your silly little plots are just that; silly and ignorant.

Before you go, I would like to ask you how did the palm print of Lee Harvey Oswald make it onto the murder weapon. Just for kicks, please lay out the whole conspiracy. I'm sure it will be entertaining; God knows that what you've posted up to now sure has been.

"Not enough to convict"---puh leeze.

I just produced evidence in this thread there HAD to be a second gunman. If the single bullet theory doesn't hold up, the LONE assassin theory fails. You are clearly not intelligent enough to understand it.

Why would be difficult for a second gunman to escape? NO ONE was even looking for a second suspect. The Dallas Police put out ONE APB for ONE individual...

puh leeze??? In order to 'convict' any individual of murdering the President of the United States, or convicting any individual of murdering any person with a rifle, you must be able to prove THAT individual pulled the trigger.

Here's a FACT for you to face...you CAN'T...

As a matter of FACT, Oswald failed a paraffin test on his face and cheeks. The testimony of FBI agent John Gallagher told the Warren Commission that Oswald's cheek casts tested negative by Neutron Activation Analysis, suggesting Oswald had not shot a rifle.

Again, your argument is to just have 'faith' in evidence from government agencies that would be impacted negatively by exposing their failed security for the President of the United States.

AND again, you ask me to ignore OBVIOUS discrepancies, anomalies and deceptions in 'reported' evidence. Plus, you want me to dismiss CRITICAL evidence withheld by those same government agencies, like the fact less than 24 hours after the assassination, the FBI Director made the President (LBJ) aware there was an impostor a few months earlier who showed up at the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City using Oswald's name.

At 10 AM on the morning following the Kennedy assassination, President Lyndon Johnson and FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover discussed the state of the case over the telephone. In response to LBJ's question about "the visit to the Soviet Embassy in September," Hoover replied:

"No, that’s one angle that’s very confusing, for this reason—we have up here the tape and the photograph of the man who was at the Soviet embassy, using Oswald’s name. That picture and the tape do not correspond to this man’s voice, nor to his appearance. In other words, it appears that there is a second person who was at the Soviet embassy down there."
The Mexico City Tapes


Clearly you're an individual who is only capable of parroting what the government TELLS you. So, please make the argument that equals intelligence?

Now you have a fake Oswald in your "theory". Thanks for proving my point over and over.

WOW...a 'theory'??? What the hell is wrong with you? ... It is public record. The quotation I posted is FBI Director J Edgar Hoover.

History Matters Archive - LBJ Phone Calls - November 23 1963

I posted a recording you can listen to of the 11/29/63 LBJ-Hoover's phone conversation earlier where the subject of an Oswald impostor in Mexico City is talked about again...you REFUSED to listen to it...

To call someone else out, when YOU refuse to listen or see anything that would call your beliefs into question IS ignorance...

 

[Bfgrn]

here is the support for what I believe;

" 1. The shots which killed President Kennedy and wounded Governor Connally were fired from the sixth floor window at the southeast corner of the Texas School Book Depository. This determination is based upon the following:
* (a) Witnesses at the scene of the assassination saw a rifle being fired from the sixth floor window of the Depository Building, and some witnesses saw a rifle in the window immediately after the shots were fired.
* (b) The nearly whole bullet found on Governor Connally's stretcher at Parkland Memorial Hospital and the two bullet fragments found in the front seat of the Presidential limousine were fired from the 6.5- millimeter Mannlicher-Carcano rifle found on the sixth floor of the Depository Building to the exclusion of all other weapons.
* (c) The three used cartridge cases found near the window on the sixth floor at the southeast corner of the building were fired from the same rifle which fired the above-described bullet and fragments, to the exclusion of all other weapons.
* (d) The windshield in the Presidential limousine was struck by a bullet fragment on the inside surface of the glass, but was not penetrated.
* (e) The nature of the bullet wounds suffered by President Kennedy and Governor Connally and the location of the car at the time of the shots establish that the bullets were fired from above and behind the Presidential limousine, striking the President and the Governor as follows:

Page 19

1. President Kennedy was first struck by a bullet which entered at the back of his neck and exited through the lower front portion of his neck, causing a wound which would not necessarily have been lethal. The President was struck a second time by a bullet which entered the right-rear portion of his head, causing a massive and fatal wound.
2. Governor Connally was struck by a bullet which entered on the right side of his back and traveled downward through the right side of his chest, exiting below his right nipple. This bullet then passed through his right wrist and entered his left thigh where it caused a superficial wound.
* (f)There is no credible evidence that the shots were fired from the Triple Underpass, ahead of the motorcade, or from any other location.
2. The weight of the evidence indicates that there were three shots fired.
3. Although it is not necessary to any essential findings of the Commission to determine just which shot hit Governor Connally, there is very persuasive evidence from the experts to indicate that the same bullet which pierced the President's throat also caused Governor Connally's wounds. However, Governor Connally's testimony and certain other factors have given rise to some difference of opinion as to this probability but there is no question in the mind of any member of the Commission that all the shots which caused the President's and Governor Connally's wounds were fired from the sixth floor window of the Texas School Book Depository.
4. The shots which killed President Kennedy and wounded Governor Connally were fired by Lee Harvey Oswald. This conclusion is based upon the following:
* (a)The Mannlicher-Carcano 6.5-millimeter Italian rifle from which the shots were fired was owned by and in the possession of Oswald.
* (b)Oswald carried this rifle into the Depository Building on the morning of November 22, 1963.
* (c)Oswald, at the time of the assassination, was present at the window from which the shots were fired.
* (d)Shortly after the assassination, the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle belonging to Oswald was found partially hidden between some cartons on the sixth floor and the improvised paper bag in which Oswald brought the rifle to the Depository was found dose by the window from which the shots were fired.
* (e)Based on testimony of the experts and their analysis of films of the assassination, the Commission has concluded that a rifleman of Lee Harvey Oswald's capabilities could have fired the shots from the rifle used in the assassination within the elapsed time of the shooting. The Commission has concluded further that Oswald possessed the capability with a rifle which enabled him to commit the assassination.



Page 20

* (f)Oswald lied to the police after his arrest concerning important substantive matters.
* (g)Oswald had attempted to kill Maj. Gen. Edwin A. Walker (Retired, U.S. Army) on April 10, 1963, thereby demonstrating his disposition to take human life.
5. Oswald killed Dallas Police Patrolman J. D. Tippit approximately 45 minutes after the assassination. This conclusion upholds the finding that Oswald fired the shots which killed President Kennedy and wounded Governor Connally and is supported by the following:
* (a) Two eyewitnesses saw the Tippit shooting and seven eyewitnesses heard the shots and saw the gunman leave the scene with revolver in hand. These nine eyewitnesses positively identified Lee Harvey Oswald as the man they saw.
* (b) The cartridge cases found at the scene of the shooting were fired from the revolver in the possession of Oswald at the time of his arrest to the exclusion of all other weapons.
* (c) The revolver in Oswald's possession at the time of his arrest was purchased by and belonged to Oswald.
* (d) Oswald's jacket was found along the path of flight taken by the gunman as he fled from the scene of the killing.
6. Within 80 minutes of the assassination and 35 minutes of the Tippit killing Oswald resisted arrest at the theatre by attempting to shoot another Dallas police officer.
7. The Commission has reached the following conclusions concerning Oswald's interrogation and detention by the Dallas police:
* (a) Except for the force required to effect his arrest, Oswald was not subjected to any physical coercion by any law enforcement officials. He was advised that he could not be compelled to give any information and that any statements made by him might be used against him in court. He was advised of his right to counsel. He was given the opportunity to obtain counsel of his own choice and was offered legal assistance by the Dallas Bar Association, which he rejected at that time.
* (b) Newspaper, radio, and television reporters were allowed uninhibited access to the area through which Oswald had to pass when he was moved from his cell to the interrogation room and other sections of the building, thereby subjecting Oswald to harassment and creating chaotic conditions which were not conducive to orderly interrogation or the protection of the rights of the prisoner.
* (c) The numerous statements, sometimes erroneous, made to the press by various local law enforcement officials, during this period of confusion and disorder in the police station, would have presented serious obstacles to the obtaining of a fair trial for Oswald. To the extent that the information was erroneous or misleading, it helped to create doubts, speculations, and fears in the mind of the public which might otherwise not have arisen."


from;
Chapter 1

I just proved the bullet did not enter at the back of his neck ...

Pay attention...

As a matter of FACT...Commission member and future president Gerald R. Ford had the final wording of the report changed.

The initial draft of the report stated:
"A bullet had entered his back at a point slightly above the shoulder to the right of the spine."

Ford wanted it to read:
"A bullet had entered the back of his neck slightly to the right of the spine."

The final report said:
"A bullet had entered the base of the back of his neck slightly to the right of his spine."

You people need to take a course in anatomy/physiology...

 

[slackjawed]

You need to take a course in what proof is.
Just because you believe something with faith close to a religious faith, doesn't make it "proof".

 

[Bfgrn]

You need to take a course in what proof is.
Just because you believe something with faith close to a religious faith, doesn't make it "proof".

Page 19

1. President Kennedy was first struck by a bullet which entered at the back of his neck and exited through the lower front portion of his neck...


SHOW me the 'NECK' wound...

The signed autopsy sheet, including the placement and description of the back wound, was verified by Admiral George Gregory Burkley, personal physician to the president who directed the autopsy at Bathesda. Burkley filled out and signed John F. Kennedy's official death certificate on November 23rd, 1963. He verified the location of the back wound and signed the Kennedy autopsy sheet at Bethesda on November 24th. That death certificate revealed the back wound to be, in the Admiral's own words, at the president's "third thoracic vertebra."The neck has seven CERVICAL vertebrae, and this observed and verified wound was described as three THORACIC vertebrae lower than the neck itself. A wound in the back, exactly where the official autopsy sheet and the coat and shirt placed it.

 

[slackjawed]

You need to take a course in what proof is.
Just because you believe something with faith close to a religious faith, doesn't make it "proof".

Page 19

1. President Kennedy was first struck by a bullet which entered at the back of his neck and exited through the lower front portion of his neck...


SHOW me the 'NECK' wound...

The signed autopsy sheet, including the placement and description of the back wound, was verified by Admiral George Gregory Burkley, personal physician to the president who directed the autopsy at Bathesda. Burkley filled out and signed John F. Kennedy's official death certificate on November 23rd, 1963. He verified the location of the back wound and signed the Kennedy autopsy sheet at Bethesda on November 24th. That death certificate revealed the back wound to be, in the Admiral's own words, at the president's "third thoracic vertebra."The neck has seven CERVICAL vertebrae, and this observed and verified wound was described as three THORACIC vertebrae lower than the neck itself. A wound in the back, exactly where the official autopsy sheet and the coat and shirt placed it.

yawn, and how exactly does this discredit the official story?

 

[Bfgrn]

You need to take a course in what proof is.
Just because you believe something with faith close to a religious faith, doesn't make it "proof".

Page 19

1. President Kennedy was first struck by a bullet which entered at the back of his neck and exited through the lower front portion of his neck...


SHOW me the 'NECK' wound...

The signed autopsy sheet, including the placement and description of the back wound, was verified by Admiral George Gregory Burkley, personal physician to the president who directed the autopsy at Bathesda. Burkley filled out and signed John F. Kennedy's official death certificate on November 23rd, 1963. He verified the location of the back wound and signed the Kennedy autopsy sheet at Bethesda on November 24th. That death certificate revealed the back wound to be, in the Admiral's own words, at the president's "third thoracic vertebra."The neck has seven CERVICAL vertebrae, and this observed and verified wound was described as three THORACIC vertebrae lower than the neck itself. A wound in the back, exactly where the official autopsy sheet and the coat and shirt placed it.

yawn, and how exactly does this discredit the official story?

Are you serious? Really???

 

[slackjawed]

Page 19

1. President Kennedy was first struck by a bullet which entered at the back of his neck and exited through the lower front portion of his neck...


SHOW me the 'NECK' wound...

The signed autopsy sheet, including the placement and description of the back wound, was verified by Admiral George Gregory Burkley, personal physician to the president who directed the autopsy at Bathesda. Burkley filled out and signed John F. Kennedy's official death certificate on November 23rd, 1963. He verified the location of the back wound and signed the Kennedy autopsy sheet at Bethesda on November 24th. That death certificate revealed the back wound to be, in the Admiral's own words, at the president's "third thoracic vertebra."The neck has seven CERVICAL vertebrae, and this observed and verified wound was described as three THORACIC vertebrae lower than the neck itself. A wound in the back, exactly where the official autopsy sheet and the coat and shirt placed it.

yawn, and how exactly does this discredit the official story?

Are you serious? Really???

looks close enough to cause damage to the neck to me. somebody made an error, thats about it.

 

[Bfgrn]

yawn, and how exactly does this discredit the official story?

Are you serious? Really???

looks close enough to cause damage to the neck to me. somebody made an error, thats about it.

Close enough? A bullet entering the BACK on a DOWNward trajectory? HOW does it exit the front of the neck ABOVE the collar? HOW does it hit Governor Connally?

Even the FBI's own photo shows the bullet would exit the President's chest, NOT his neck

 

[slackjawed]

It's close to his neck, I highlighted the part of the report that stated that early on, mistkes were made and reports were erroneous.

I just don't see where there is anything to make me think it was all a conspiracy.


The arguments your making have gone on and on and on for years.
Your starting too sound like charlie brown's teacher, sorry, but it's all been said before.

If there was any credence, something besides a few posts on a message board would have happened.

 

[Bfgrn]

It's close to his neck, I highlighted the part of the report that stated that early on, mistkes were made and reports were erroneous.

I just don't see where there is anything to make me think it was all a conspiracy.


The arguments your making have gone on and on and on for years.
Your starting too sound like charlie brown's teacher, sorry, but it's all been said before.

If there was any credence, something besides a few posts on a message board would have happened.

Close to his neck doesn't work... there was a HOLE in JFK's back and a hole in JFK's neck, not in his back and a hole his chest.

You really need to understand the laws of physics...

As a matter of FACT...HERE is how the Warren Report got around this problem...they LIED.

Warren Commission Exhibits CE385 and CE386

It's not about a conspiracy, it is about the truth. If the evidence supported Oswald as the lone assassin, I wouldn't have a problem with it. But it doesn't.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

It's close to his neck, I highlighted the part of the report that stated that early on, mistkes were made and reports were erroneous.

I just don't see where there is anything to make me think it was all a conspiracy.


The arguments your making have gone on and on and on for years.
Your starting too sound like charlie brown's teacher, sorry, but it's all been said before.

If there was any credence, something besides a few posts on a message board would have happened.

Close to his neck doesn't work... there was a HOLE in JFK's back and a hole in JFK's neck, not in his back and a hole his chest.

You really need to understand the laws of physics...

As a matter of FACT...HERE is how the Warren Report got around this problem...they LIED.

Warren Commission Exhibits CE385 and CE386

It's not about a conspiracy, it is about the truth. If the evidence supported Oswald as the lone assassin, I wouldn't have a problem with it. But it doesn't.

Thats why its a complete waste of time trying to have a discussion with CandyCorn,Divecon or Slackjaw is because they clearly dont understand the laws of physics and how they work.

 

[DiveCon]

It's close to his neck, I highlighted the part of the report that stated that early on, mistkes were made and reports were erroneous.

I just don't see where there is anything to make me think it was all a conspiracy.


The arguments your making have gone on and on and on for years.
Your starting too sound like charlie brown's teacher, sorry, but it's all been said before.

If there was any credence, something besides a few posts on a message board would have happened.

Close to his neck doesn't work... there was a HOLE in JFK's back and a hole in JFK's neck, not in his back and a hole his chest.

You really need to understand the laws of physics...

As a matter of FACT...HERE is how the Warren Report got around this problem...they LIED.

Warren Commission Exhibits CE385 and CE386

It's not about a conspiracy, it is about the truth. If the evidence supported Oswald as the lone assassin, I wouldn't have a problem with it. But it doesn't.

Thats why its a complete waste of time trying to have a discussion with CandyCorn,Divecon or Slackjaw is because they clearly dont understand the laws of physics and how they work.

^^^^more TPP
i see you have found a new ass to lick, rimjob