Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
so like you saySo what, retard?SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer5:33 p.m. EDT October 20, 2014
WASHINGTON — If you thought last winter was a horror show, with cold blasts from the polar vortex and a lack of California rain, here's some good news: No sequel is expected this year, federal forecasters say.
Mike Halpert of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Thursday that the upcoming winter looks pretty average in general. He doesn't expect a lot of extreme conditions like last year's cold outbreaks when Arctic air dipped south with the polar vortex.
"A repeat of last winter is not particularly likely," said Halpert, acting director of NOAA's Climate Prediction Center in College Park, Maryland.
Feds Don t expect winter to be polar vortex redux
--LOL
November 8, 2014; 2:51 AM ET
Polar Vortex to Blast 200 Million People With Arctic Air
Arctic air associated with the polar vortex will lunge into the North Central United States early next week and will expand southward and eastward to affect about 200 million people as the week progresses.
Polar Vortex to Blast 200 Million People With Arctic Air
NOAA predicts that this winter probably won't feature the same multiple, repeated blasts of Arctic air carried south by a wobbly jet stream that froze the eastern parts of the country last winter (remember - "California had its warmest April-September on record this year with an average temperature of 70.0°F, 3.3°F above average. This bested the previous record set just last year by 0.6°F. Oregon had its second warmest warm season, Washington its third warmest" - NOAA). That doesn't mean that there will be no Arctic air incursions into the USA this winter, just probably not the same repeated pattern.
it is just a guess --LOL--LOL@U loser
so like you saySo what, retard?SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer5:33 p.m. EDT October 20, 2014
WASHINGTON — If you thought last winter was a horror show, with cold blasts from the polar vortex and a lack of California rain, here's some good news: No sequel is expected this year, federal forecasters say.
Mike Halpert of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Thursday that the upcoming winter looks pretty average in general. He doesn't expect a lot of extreme conditions like last year's cold outbreaks when Arctic air dipped south with the polar vortex.
"A repeat of last winter is not particularly likely," said Halpert, acting director of NOAA's Climate Prediction Center in College Park, Maryland.
Feds Don t expect winter to be polar vortex redux
--LOL
November 8, 2014; 2:51 AM ET
Polar Vortex to Blast 200 Million People With Arctic Air
Arctic air associated with the polar vortex will lunge into the North Central United States early next week and will expand southward and eastward to affect about 200 million people as the week progresses.
Polar Vortex to Blast 200 Million People With Arctic Air
NOAA predicts that this winter probably won't feature the same multiple, repeated blasts of Arctic air carried south by a wobbly jet stream that froze the eastern parts of the country last winter (remember - "California had its warmest April-September on record this year with an average temperature of 70.0°F, 3.3°F above average. This bested the previous record set just last year by 0.6°F. Oregon had its second warmest warm season, Washington its third warmest" - NOAA). That doesn't mean that there will be no Arctic air incursions into the USA this winter, just probably not the same repeated pattern.
it is just a guess --LOL--LOL@U loser
Well actually, berserko, normal unretarded people call it a long range weather forcast, but since you're so scientifically ignorant, on top of being an imbecile, I suppose pretty much everything that scientists figure out seems like "a guess" to you
they are really good at guessing incorrectlyso like you saySo what, retard?SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer5:33 p.m. EDT October 20, 2014
WASHINGTON — If you thought last winter was a horror show, with cold blasts from the polar vortex and a lack of California rain, here's some good news: No sequel is expected this year, federal forecasters say.
Mike Halpert of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Thursday that the upcoming winter looks pretty average in general. He doesn't expect a lot of extreme conditions like last year's cold outbreaks when Arctic air dipped south with the polar vortex.
"A repeat of last winter is not particularly likely," said Halpert, acting director of NOAA's Climate Prediction Center in College Park, Maryland.
Feds Don t expect winter to be polar vortex redux
--LOL
November 8, 2014; 2:51 AM ET
Polar Vortex to Blast 200 Million People With Arctic Air
Arctic air associated with the polar vortex will lunge into the North Central United States early next week and will expand southward and eastward to affect about 200 million people as the week progresses.
Polar Vortex to Blast 200 Million People With Arctic Air
NOAA predicts that this winter probably won't feature the same multiple, repeated blasts of Arctic air carried south by a wobbly jet stream that froze the eastern parts of the country last winter (remember - "California had its warmest April-September on record this year with an average temperature of 70.0°F, 3.3°F above average. This bested the previous record set just last year by 0.6°F. Oregon had its second warmest warm season, Washington its third warmest" - NOAA). That doesn't mean that there will be no Arctic air incursions into the USA this winter, just probably not the same repeated pattern.
it is just a guess --LOL--LOL@U loser
Well actually, berserko, normal unretarded people call it a long range weather forcast, but since you're so scientifically ignorant, on top of being an imbecile, I suppose pretty much everything that scientists figure out seems like "a guess" to you
they are really good at guessing incorrectlyso like you saySo what, retard?SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer5:33 p.m. EDT October 20, 2014
WASHINGTON — If you thought last winter was a horror show, with cold blasts from the polar vortex and a lack of California rain, here's some good news: No sequel is expected this year, federal forecasters say.
Mike Halpert of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Thursday that the upcoming winter looks pretty average in general. He doesn't expect a lot of extreme conditions like last year's cold outbreaks when Arctic air dipped south with the polar vortex.
"A repeat of last winter is not particularly likely," said Halpert, acting director of NOAA's Climate Prediction Center in College Park, Maryland.
Feds Don t expect winter to be polar vortex redux
--LOL
November 8, 2014; 2:51 AM ET
Polar Vortex to Blast 200 Million People With Arctic Air
Arctic air associated with the polar vortex will lunge into the North Central United States early next week and will expand southward and eastward to affect about 200 million people as the week progresses.
Polar Vortex to Blast 200 Million People With Arctic Air
NOAA predicts that this winter probably won't feature the same multiple, repeated blasts of Arctic air carried south by a wobbly jet stream that froze the eastern parts of the country last winter (remember - "California had its warmest April-September on record this year with an average temperature of 70.0°F, 3.3°F above average. This bested the previous record set just last year by 0.6°F. Oregon had its second warmest warm season, Washington its third warmest" - NOAA). That doesn't mean that there will be no Arctic air incursions into the USA this winter, just probably not the same repeated pattern.
it is just a guess --LOL--LOL@U loser
Well actually, berserko, normal unretarded people call it a long range weather forcast, but since you're so scientifically ignorant, on top of being an imbecile, I suppose pretty much everything that scientists figure out seems like "a guess" to you
You are really good at posting idiotic nonsense.
Yes, it is.it is not nonsensethey are really good at guessing incorrectlyso like you saySo what, retard?
NOAA predicts that this winter probably won't feature the same multiple, repeated blasts of Arctic air carried south by a wobbly jet stream that froze the eastern parts of the country last winter (remember - "California had its warmest April-September on record this year with an average temperature of 70.0°F, 3.3°F above average. This bested the previous record set just last year by 0.6°F. Oregon had its second warmest warm season, Washington its third warmest" - NOAA). That doesn't mean that there will be no Arctic air incursions into the USA this winter, just probably not the same repeated pattern.
it is just a guess --LOL--LOL@U loser
Well actually, berserko, normal unretarded people call it a long range weather forcast, but since you're so scientifically ignorant, on top of being an imbecile, I suppose pretty much everything that scientists figure out seems like "a guess" to you
You are really good at posting idiotic nonsense.
they got it wrong
as usual
Yes, it is.it is not nonsensethey are really good at guessing incorrectlyso like you say
it is just a guess --LOL--LOL@U loser
Well actually, berserko, normal unretarded people call it a long range weather forcast, but since you're so scientifically ignorant, on top of being an imbecile, I suppose pretty much everything that scientists figure out seems like "a guess" to you
You are really good at posting idiotic nonsense.
they got it wrong
as usual
No, they didn't.
Bogus denier cult myth.
In the real world....
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
The Guardian
27 March 2013
Climate Models & Accuracy
Professor Scott A. Mandia
Figure 6.1: Global temperature trend over the past century modeled quite well
Figure 6.2 (ibid) belows shows how climate model temperature predictions compare to reconstructed temperatures. Thick lines represent model predictions with human and natural forcing (All) and thin lines represent model predictions with just natural forcing (Nat). Models do a good job of simulating past climate using just natural forcing but they can only reproduce the modern temperature record by including human emissions of greenhouse gases. The thick and thin lines begin to diverge around 1850 around the time that the Industrial Revolution ramped up. Futhermore, the models predict that the modern climate should be COOLING due to natural forcing which means that the human forcing dominates climate in the recent record.
Nope, wrong again, as usual. They are talking about PREDICTIVE models, moron, that have been verified by both hindcasting and direct observation of what happened after the prediction.nice try hindsight models--LOLYes, it is.it is not nonsensethey are really good at guessing incorrectlyWell actually, berserko, normal unretarded people call it a long range weather forcast, but since you're so scientifically ignorant, on top of being an imbecile, I suppose pretty much everything that scientists figure out seems like "a guess" to you
You are really good at posting idiotic nonsense.
they got it wrong
as usual
No, they didn't.
Bogus denier cult myth.
In the real world....
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
The Guardian
27 March 2013
Climate Models & Accuracy
Professor Scott A. Mandia
Figure 6.1: Global temperature trend over the past century modeled quite well
Figure 6.2 (ibid) belows shows how climate model temperature predictions compare to reconstructed temperatures. Thick lines represent model predictions with human and natural forcing (All) and thin lines represent model predictions with just natural forcing (Nat). Models do a good job of simulating past climate using just natural forcing but they can only reproduce the modern temperature record by including human emissions of greenhouse gases. The thick and thin lines begin to diverge around 1850 around the time that the Industrial Revolution ramped up. Futhermore, the models predict that the modern climate should be COOLING due to natural forcing which means that the human forcing dominates climate in the recent record.
Nope, wrong again, as usual. They are talking about PREDICTIVE models, moron, that have been verified by both hindcasting and direct observation of what happened after the prediction.nice try hindsight models--LOLYes, it is.it is not nonsensethey are really good at guessing incorrectly
You are really good at posting idiotic nonsense.
they got it wrong
as usual
No, they didn't.
Bogus denier cult myth.
In the real world....
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
The Guardian
27 March 2013
Climate Models & Accuracy
Professor Scott A. Mandia
Figure 6.1: Global temperature trend over the past century modeled quite well
Figure 6.2 (ibid) belows shows how climate model temperature predictions compare to reconstructed temperatures. Thick lines represent model predictions with human and natural forcing (All) and thin lines represent model predictions with just natural forcing (Nat). Models do a good job of simulating past climate using just natural forcing but they can only reproduce the modern temperature record by including human emissions of greenhouse gases. The thick and thin lines begin to diverge around 1850 around the time that the Industrial Revolution ramped up. Futhermore, the models predict that the modern climate should be COOLING due to natural forcing which means that the human forcing dominates climate in the recent record.
Try actually reading the cited material this time.
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
Nope, wrong again, as usual. They are talking about PREDICTIVE models, moron, that have been verified by both hindcasting and direct observation of what happened after the prediction.nice try hindsight models--LOLYes, it is.it is not nonsensethey are really good at guessing incorrectly
You are really good at posting idiotic nonsense.
they got it wrong
as usual
No, they didn't.
Bogus denier cult myth.
In the real world....
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
The Guardian
27 March 2013
Climate Models & Accuracy
Professor Scott A. Mandia
Figure 6.1: Global temperature trend over the past century modeled quite well
Figure 6.2 (ibid) belows shows how climate model temperature predictions compare to reconstructed temperatures. Thick lines represent model predictions with human and natural forcing (All) and thin lines represent model predictions with just natural forcing (Nat). Models do a good job of simulating past climate using just natural forcing but they can only reproduce the modern temperature record by including human emissions of greenhouse gases. The thick and thin lines begin to diverge around 1850 around the time that the Industrial Revolution ramped up. Futhermore, the models predict that the modern climate should be COOLING due to natural forcing which means that the human forcing dominates climate in the recent record.
Try actually reading the cited material this time.
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
No problem, nutjob. You're too stupid and brainwashed to comprehend what you read anyway.i really have quit bothering to read man made global warming materialNope, wrong again, as usual. They are talking about PREDICTIVE models, moron, that have been verified by both hindcasting and direct observation of what happened after the prediction.nice try hindsight models--LOLYes, it is.it is not nonsenseYou are really good at posting idiotic nonsense.
they got it wrong
as usual
No, they didn't.
Bogus denier cult myth.
In the real world....
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
The Guardian
27 March 2013
Climate Models & Accuracy
Professor Scott A. Mandia
Figure 6.1: Global temperature trend over the past century modeled quite well
Figure 6.2 (ibid) belows shows how climate model temperature predictions compare to reconstructed temperatures. Thick lines represent model predictions with human and natural forcing (All) and thin lines represent model predictions with just natural forcing (Nat). Models do a good job of simulating past climate using just natural forcing but they can only reproduce the modern temperature record by including human emissions of greenhouse gases. The thick and thin lines begin to diverge around 1850 around the time that the Industrial Revolution ramped up. Futhermore, the models predict that the modern climate should be COOLING due to natural forcing which means that the human forcing dominates climate in the recent record.
Try actually reading the cited material this time.
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
More braindead denier cult myths with no connection to reality.t has been proven false so many times over the years as well as falsified in so many instances
No problem, nutjob. You're too stupid and brainwashed to comprehend what you read anyway.i really have quit bothering to read man made global warming materialNope, wrong again, as usual. They are talking about PREDICTIVE models, moron, that have been verified by both hindcasting and direct observation of what happened after the prediction.nice try hindsight models--LOLYes, it is.it is not nonsense
they got it wrong
as usual
No, they didn't.
Bogus denier cult myth.
In the real world....
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
The Guardian
27 March 2013
Climate Models & Accuracy
Professor Scott A. Mandia
Figure 6.1: Global temperature trend over the past century modeled quite well
Figure 6.2 (ibid) belows shows how climate model temperature predictions compare to reconstructed temperatures. Thick lines represent model predictions with human and natural forcing (All) and thin lines represent model predictions with just natural forcing (Nat). Models do a good job of simulating past climate using just natural forcing but they can only reproduce the modern temperature record by including human emissions of greenhouse gases. The thick and thin lines begin to diverge around 1850 around the time that the Industrial Revolution ramped up. Futhermore, the models predict that the modern climate should be COOLING due to natural forcing which means that the human forcing dominates climate in the recent record.
Try actually reading the cited material this time.
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
iMore braindead denier cult myths with no connection to reality.t has been proven false so many times over the years as well as falsified in so many instances
You still refuse to actually read this....like the good little denier cult dupe that you are...
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
your the nut job palNo problem, nutjob. You're too stupid and brainwashed to comprehend what you read anyway.i really have quit bothering to read man made global warming materialNope, wrong again, as usual. They are talking about PREDICTIVE models, moron, that have been verified by both hindcasting and direct observation of what happened after the prediction.nice try hindsight models--LOLYes, it is.
No, they didn't.
Bogus denier cult myth.
In the real world....
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
The Guardian
27 March 2013
Climate Models & Accuracy
Professor Scott A. Mandia
Figure 6.1: Global temperature trend over the past century modeled quite well
Figure 6.2 (ibid) belows shows how climate model temperature predictions compare to reconstructed temperatures. Thick lines represent model predictions with human and natural forcing (All) and thin lines represent model predictions with just natural forcing (Nat). Models do a good job of simulating past climate using just natural forcing but they can only reproduce the modern temperature record by including human emissions of greenhouse gases. The thick and thin lines begin to diverge around 1850 around the time that the Industrial Revolution ramped up. Futhermore, the models predict that the modern climate should be COOLING due to natural forcing which means that the human forcing dominates climate in the recent record.
Try actually reading the cited material this time.
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
More braindead denier cult myths with no connection to reality.t has been proven false so many times over the years as well as falsified in so many instances
You still refuse to actually read this....like the good little denier cult dupe that you are...
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
I found it very entertaining.they are really good at guessing incorrectlyso like you saySo what, retard?SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer5:33 p.m. EDT October 20, 2014
WASHINGTON — If you thought last winter was a horror show, with cold blasts from the polar vortex and a lack of California rain, here's some good news: No sequel is expected this year, federal forecasters say.
Mike Halpert of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Thursday that the upcoming winter looks pretty average in general. He doesn't expect a lot of extreme conditions like last year's cold outbreaks when Arctic air dipped south with the polar vortex.
"A repeat of last winter is not particularly likely," said Halpert, acting director of NOAA's Climate Prediction Center in College Park, Maryland.
Feds Don t expect winter to be polar vortex redux
--LOL
November 8, 2014; 2:51 AM ET
Polar Vortex to Blast 200 Million People With Arctic Air
Arctic air associated with the polar vortex will lunge into the North Central United States early next week and will expand southward and eastward to affect about 200 million people as the week progresses.
Polar Vortex to Blast 200 Million People With Arctic Air
NOAA predicts that this winter probably won't feature the same multiple, repeated blasts of Arctic air carried south by a wobbly jet stream that froze the eastern parts of the country last winter (remember - "California had its warmest April-September on record this year with an average temperature of 70.0°F, 3.3°F above average. This bested the previous record set just last year by 0.6°F. Oregon had its second warmest warm season, Washington its third warmest" - NOAA). That doesn't mean that there will be no Arctic air incursions into the USA this winter, just probably not the same repeated pattern.
it is just a guess --LOL--LOL@U loser
Well actually, berserko, normal unretarded people call it a long range weather forcast, but since you're so scientifically ignorant, on top of being an imbecile, I suppose pretty much everything that scientists figure out seems like "a guess" to you
You are really good at posting idiotic nonsense.
And, as usual, JustCrazy, totally beyond your very very limited comprehension.I found it very entertaining.they are really good at guessing incorrectlyso like you saySo what, retard?
NOAA predicts that this winter probably won't feature the same multiple, repeated blasts of Arctic air carried south by a wobbly jet stream that froze the eastern parts of the country last winter (remember - "California had its warmest April-September on record this year with an average temperature of 70.0°F, 3.3°F above average. This bested the previous record set just last year by 0.6°F. Oregon had its second warmest warm season, Washington its third warmest" - NOAA). That doesn't mean that there will be no Arctic air incursions into the USA this winter, just probably not the same repeated pattern.
it is just a guess --LOL--LOL@U loser
Well actually, berserko, normal unretarded people call it a long range weather forcast, but since you're so scientifically ignorant, on top of being an imbecile, I suppose pretty much everything that scientists figure out seems like "a guess" to you
You are really good at posting idiotic nonsense.
You're fun to watch on here. You have no idea about reality. You play with dolls.And, as usual, JustCrazy, totally beyond your very very limited comprehension.I found it very entertaining.they are really good at guessing incorrectlyso like you say
it is just a guess --LOL--LOL@U loser
Well actually, berserko, normal unretarded people call it a long range weather forcast, but since you're so scientifically ignorant, on top of being an imbecile, I suppose pretty much everything that scientists figure out seems like "a guess" to you
You are really good at posting idiotic nonsense.
And yet more braindead drivel from the denier cult troll JustCrazy.You're fun to watch on here. You have no idea about reality. You play with dolls.And, as usual, JustCrazy, totally beyond your very very limited comprehension.I found it very entertaining.they are really good at guessing incorrectlyWell actually, berserko, normal unretarded people call it a long range weather forcast, but since you're so scientifically ignorant, on top of being an imbecile, I suppose pretty much everything that scientists figure out seems like "a guess" to you
You are really good at posting idiotic nonsense.
your the nut job palNo problem, nutjob. You're too stupid and brainwashed to comprehend what you read anyway.i really have quit bothering to read man made global warming materialNope, wrong again, as usual. They are talking about PREDICTIVE models, moron, that have been verified by both hindcasting and direct observation of what happened after the prediction.nice try hindsight models--LOL
Try actually reading the cited material this time.
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
More braindead denier cult myths with no connection to reality.t has been proven false so many times over the years as well as falsified in so many instances
You still refuse to actually read this....like the good little denier cult dupe that you are...
Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures
Uh-huh, riiiiight, the guy who accepts the overwhelming scientific consensus on the reality and dangers of AGW/CC, and the obvious real-world evidence all around us that supports the conclusions of the scientists, he's the "nut job"......while you, who rejects science and the enormous amount of supporting evidence for AGW, and instead falls for the anti-science bullshit propaganda being pushed by the fossil fuel industry, and who can't even spell "you're" correctly, you actually imagine that you are not a flaming nutjob severely afflicted by the Dunning-Kruger Effect......LOLOLOLOL.....so you're as delusional as ever, eh berserko?
