Lawyer for the Forgotten Wife in the Fani Willis Scandal Speaks

[Seymour Flops]

FYI, when this attorney talks about "the case," she means the Nathan and Jocelyn Wade divorce case, not the Trump prosecution, nor the motions to remove Fani Willis for cause. She refers to those activities as "the circumstances surrounding the case."




Some takeaways:

1) Nathan Wade and his wife Jocelynn Wade are married. They have been going through the legal processes that typically lead to divorce, but have gone about it very, very slowly. They are just now agreeing on financial arrangements. The marriage is not "basically over," it is ongoing and the wife retains the right to ask for time to reconcile. Being a District Attorney does not grant one the equivalent of jus primae noctis. A marriage is sacred or it isn't.

I suppose the stalling about providing financial support during a separation is the hazard of giving up your own work to take care of the home and children while your husband becomes an experienced and financially successful lawyer well-versed in gaming the system.

2) Nathan Wade hid the fact that he had landed such a lucrative role as the Special Prosecutor gig has turned out to be. His wife's attorney only verified it by subpoena. Nathan did not volunteer this information to his lawfully wedded wife.

When asked about his sources of income, he only provided his law firm, not mentioning his hiring as SC in the Trump case.

3) The lawyer noticed that Wade had little income, bad news for the spouse seeking support. But he seemed to have plenty of money to spend. That's what tipped her off to look into other forms of employment that Mr. Wade might have had.

4) Fani Willis responded to the subpoena with a threat to prosecute Mrs Wade for obstructing a criminal investigation.

Prosecuted for seeking a subpoena?

This only makes sense in light of the bizarre logic Willis used to get the indictments of Trump in the first place. The actions that she "accuses" Trump and others of taking consist mainly of filing legal challenges and planning to file legal challenges.

A person's motion or pleading could be rejected when filing a legal challenge, the person perhaps warned if the filing were found frivolous, and even sanctioned if a case gets to court and the juge rules it abuse of process.

But criminal? To ask for a day in court? Only in the Trump-derange universe could that be logical.

Anyway, that's only the first five minutes or so. I invite you to watch the entire video and see what other outrages this lawyer exposes.

Mrs. Wade should sue the state of Georgia for abettign this divorce fraud, and condoning Fani Willis interference in her marriage.

 

[JoeB131]

FYI, when this attorney talks about "the case," she means the Nathan and Jocelyn Wade divorce case, not the Trump prosecution, nor the motions to remove Fani Willis for cause. She refers to those activities as "the circumstances surrounding the case."

From what I understand, she was the one who cheated on the marriage, and they haven't been together since 2015. That she is fighting the divorce to get better terms is kind of reprehensible

 

[Kilroy2]

Is future earning an issue that one of the partners can claim a right too?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Is future earning an issue that one of the partners can claim a right too?

I would think so. She was his wife during the time that he built up his practice, and possibly while he was in Law School, but I'm only speculating due to the length of time they were married.

Regardless, she did not marry a man who was already pulling down hundreds of thousands of dollars for a single case. He became that caliber of lawyer while she was at home keeping the house and raising the kids. A classic case for a share in future earnings.

Even if Wade were to claim that it was only his relationship with Willis that allowed him to pull such fees, he developed that relationship during the marriage, so his wife is entitled to a share of the financial fruits of that relationship.

 

[ActionJackson]

FYI, when this attorney talks about "the case," she means the Nathan and Jocelyn Wade divorce case, not the Trump prosecution, nor the motions to remove Fani Willis for cause. She refers to those activities as "the circumstances surrounding the case."




Some takeaways:

1) Nathan Wade and his wife Jocelynn Wade are married. They have been going through the legal processes that typically lead to divorce, but have gone about it very, very slowly. They are just now agreeing on financial arrangements. The marriage is not "basically over," it is ongoing and the wife retains the right to ask for time to reconcile. Being a District Attorney does not grant one the equivalent of jus primae noctis. A marriage is sacred or it isn't.

I suppose the stalling about providing financial support during a separation is the hazard of giving up your own work to take care of the home and children while your husband becomes an experienced and financially successful lawyer well-versed in gaming the system.

2) Nathan Wade hid the fact that he had landed such a lucrative role as the Special Prosecutor gig has turned out to be. His wife's attorney only verified it by subpoena. Nathan did not volunteer this information to his lawfully wedded wife.

When asked about his sources of income, he only provided his law firm, not mentioning his hiring as SC in the Trump case.

3) The lawyer noticed that Wade had little income, bad news for the spouse seeking support. But he seemed to have plenty of money to spend. That's what tipped her off to look into other forms of employment that Mr. Wade might have had.

4) Fani Willis responded to the subpoena with a threat to prosecute Mrs Wade for obstructing a criminal investigation.

Prosecuted for seeking a subpoena?

This only makes sense in light of the bizarre logic Willis used to get the indictments of Trump in the first place. The actions that she "accuses" Trump and others of taking consist mainly of filing legal challenges and planning to file legal challenges.

A person's motion or pleading could be rejected when filing a legal challenge, the person perhaps warned if the filing were found frivolous, and even sanctioned if a case gets to court and the juge rules it abuse of process.

But criminal? To ask for a day in court? Only in the Trump-derange universe could that be logical.

Anyway, that's only the first five minutes or so. I invite you to watch the entire video and see what other outrages this lawyer exposes.

Mrs. Wade should sue the state of Georgia for abettign this divorce fraud, and condoning Fani Willis interference in her marriage.

Big Fani should see prison time