- Thread starter
- #21
If she isn't bipolar, that is a different story. Very confusing.So he's trying to avoid paying child support.
hmmmm....I think 25% seems fair if she is bi-polar and cannot work. Shouldn't he have thought this through before he had kids with her?
Does he have evidence that she is spending the money on something other than the children? If so, maybe he could ask the judge to change it so the money goes to her parents with strict instructions that it can only be spent on the children.
Or if she really is bi-polar and cannot function, he should try to get full time custody.
I don't think she's diagnosed bi-polar, and she def. has a job.
I don't see where 25% is fair at all. It's not logical or fair. 0% would be what's fair.
How much per month does he pay vs. what she pays?
Why would both be paying? That makes no sense. Only he pays Child Support.
He pays 25% of his Gross pay, weekly. He owns 50% custody and has to buy 100% of their necessities while they're in his posession. It makes no lick of sense for him to pay any support, at all, especially since she has a job and lives with her parents.
This is what I call Gender discrimination, under the Law. This is NYS, btw.