Lynch was placed, bought, and paid for by the Clintons. No surprise here.
In January she'll have nice position with fat check in Clinton Foundation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lynch was placed, bought, and paid for by the Clintons. No surprise here.
EXCLUSIVE: State Department Won’t Release Clinton Foundation Emails for 27 Months
Bill knew Lynch's plane was about to land. He instructed his staff to WAIT until Lynch's plane had landed. Bill then boarded Lynch's plane and the two of them had a 'private' conversation' lasting for thirty minutes.
Lynch claims they only talked about their families FOR THIRTY MINUTES!!!!!!!!!!
Ya fucking RIGHT!
Why does Lynch have a "plane" in the first place?
It's the 21st century, Caveman.
This never has really been about legalities, because Hillary has never been in real danger of indictment. She's too well insulated and knows where too many skeletons are buried. Politics, however, doesn't operate on legalities any more. It operates on perception. The perception is that this meeting was a really clumsy political move and just plain looks bad. That's all it takes. Why do you think Trump gets so much traction with the "Hillary is a liar" line? She is, but that's not the point. The point is that Trump lies as well, but he's successfully amplified the existing reality that she lies a lot, and that's what's sticking. This meeting will have the same effect, and Hillary sycophants (you know who you are) can flail all they want about legalities. It doesn't matter.Regarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.
The global warming hoax is just a tax drain that applies to private taxpayers only.EXCLUSIVE: State Department Won’t Release Clinton Foundation Emails for 27 Months
Bill knew Lynch's plane was about to land. He instructed his staff to WAIT until Lynch's plane had landed. Bill then boarded Lynch's plane and the two of them had a 'private' conversation' lasting for thirty minutes.
Lynch claims they only talked about their families FOR THIRTY MINUTES!!!!!!!!!!
Ya fucking RIGHT!
Why does Lynch have a "plane" in the first place?
It's the 21st century, Caveman.
I thought we were worried about Global Warming. No commercial flight to Washington?
The ridiculous right and their ridiculous lies
This admin makes the Nixon, Haldeman, Ehrlichman bunch look like choir boys.
It doesn't come close to the Iran Contra pardons.
Nor the pardon of Marc Rich.
You're saying that pardon was worse than the pardoning of Richard Nixon? lol
This never has really been about legalities, because Hillary has never been in real danger of indictment. She's too well insulated and knows where too many skeletons are buried. Politics, however, doesn't operate on legalities any more. It operates on perception. The perception is that this meeting was a really clumsy political move and just plain looks bad. That's all it takes. Why do you think Trump gets so much traction with the "Hillary is a liar" line? She is, but that's not the point. The point is that Trump lies as well, but he's successfully amplified the existing reality that she lies a lot, and that's what's sticking. This meeting will have the same effect, and Hillary sycophants (you know who you are) can flail all they want about legalities. It doesn't matter.Regarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.
This admin makes the Nixon, Haldeman, Ehrlichman bunch look like choir boys.
It doesn't come close to the Iran Contra pardons.
Nor the pardon of Marc Rich.
You're saying that pardon was worse than the pardoning of Richard Nixon? lol
Nixon was pardoned for any crimes he might have committed. Rich was pardoned for crimes he did commit.
"In 1983 Rich and partner Pincus Green were indicted on 65 criminal counts, including income tax evasion, wire fraud, racketeering, and trading with Iran during the oil embargo (at a time when Iranian revolutionaries were still holding American citizens hostage). The charges would have led to a sentence of more than 300 years in prison had Rich been convicted on all counts. The indictment was filed by then-U.S. Federal Prosecutor (and future mayor of New York City) Rudolph Giuliani. At the time it was the biggest tax evasion case in U.S. history."
Regarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.
Regarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.
Wait....wut?
Let me get the score card out.
1. The Clintons did nothing wrong in real estate deals in Arkansas. Check.
2. The Clintons did nothing wrong in allegedly sexually assaulting multiple women over the years or having sex with interns and then perjuring themselves in a court of law over it by lying about it. Check.
3. Clintons did not wrong when they stole furniture from the White house when they left office because they cut a check for the goods. Check.
4. Clintons did nothing wrong by lying about Benghazi affair, nor did they do anything wrong by not sending troops in time to save them. Check.
5. Clintons did nothing wrong by sending unsecure e-mails against standing orders and then deleting them. Check.
6. Bill did nothing wrong by meeting with Loretta Lynch in private right before deciding the fate of his wife. Check.
The Democrats always trot out liar A or B for this or that. This "law professor" is a big fan of Madeleine Allbright....
This admin makes the Nixon, Haldeman, Ehrlichman bunch look like choir boys.
It doesn't come close to the Iran Contra pardons.
Nor the pardon of Marc Rich.
You're saying that pardon was worse than the pardoning of Richard Nixon? lol
Nixon was pardoned for any crimes he might have committed. Rich was pardoned for crimes he did commit.
"In 1983 Rich and partner Pincus Green were indicted on 65 criminal counts, including income tax evasion, wire fraud, racketeering, and trading with Iran during the oil embargo (at a time when Iranian revolutionaries were still holding American citizens hostage). The charges would have led to a sentence of more than 300 years in prison had Rich been convicted on all counts. The indictment was filed by then-U.S. Federal Prosecutor (and future mayor of New York City) Rudolph Giuliani. At the time it was the biggest tax evasion case in U.S. history."
The Bush administration used the Government server. Powell and Rice DID NOT have their own PRIVATE SERVER you fucking moron! They had private Email accounts.CNN.com - Scalia won't recuse himself from Cheney case - Mar 18, 2004
Enough said... This was worse by a long way...
Lynch was never going against the FBI recommendation, I don't know what anyone is thinking.. Clinton's defense in the email case would be so quick and simple that it will never be prosecuted..
'I did what the previous number of Secretary of States did and unlike them I kept the emails and passed them to the government. I would ask under FOI that I can see Colin's Powell's Emails, I would also like to see the 5 million emails that the Bush Administration had on there private server.
I would like to ask how much money was in spent on the other far more serious infractions compare to my oversight'
Considering this administration didn't go after Bush Administration staff for lying and getting US into a War killing hundreds of thousands dead and trillions wasted and then burying the emails about it, I don't think Clinton has much to worry about...
Hillary must actually love Bill, hard as it is to believe, but she's had other people rubbed out for lesser offenses. (-:Regarding a recent airport meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch does not need to recuse herself from Hillary Clinton's email investigation, a law professor said:
From the standpoint of legal ethics, Lynch did nothing wrong, said New York University law school professor Stephen Gillers. Gillers said he didn't think the attorney general needed to recuse herself from overseeing the email probe. But Gillers took a sterner tone with Bill Clinton.
Bipartisan Disapproval Follows Bill Clinton's Meeting With Loretta Lynch
This represents a major blow to fake-scandal peddling right wing nuts and the minority of butt-hurt Bernie supporters who lost the primaries.