Latest FBI Doc Release Shows They Knew Dossier Paid for By Hillary

[easyt65]

The FBI's own written assessment States they KNEW foreign spy, Fusion GPS employee, AND FBI EMPLOYEE hated Donald Trump.

They also knew, the latest document they released shows, The Dossier they received was Russian-authored OPPOSITION RESEARCH PAID FOR BY HILLARY CLINTON!

(The Dossier was not even the 21st 'dossier' on / against Trump - the FBI reported the 1st was SO unbelievable they rejected it immediately.)

Steele said he did not know if any of it was true and it was never verified.

Evidence (US IG, Oher testimony, documents...) shows the FBI, DOJ, CIA, and FBI alluded the Dossier illegally, building the entire KNOWN FALSE accusation of 'illegal Russian Collusion' and the entire KNOWN FALSE case in order to deceive the FISA COURT to illegally get warrants to spy on the Trump team, to deceive Congress to get an investigation opened up, and to get co-conspirator Mueller appointed as Special Political Assassin.

(Oher testified he and Steele were already working with Mueller on the dossier before Mueller was appointed Special I am Counsel.)


This latest doc shows Comey knew the 'Dirt' on Trump Comey warned Candidate Trump about was opposition research from a foreign spy on the FBI's payroll working with Russians and that the opposition research this whole treasonous with hunt / coup has been based on was paid for by Hillary Clinton ... And Comey withheld that information!

FBI Releases Key Steele Dossier Document

"The summary shows that the FBI claimed Steele was working for “private clients,” when he was actually working for the DNC and Clinton campaign. It also noted that Steele relied on “identified and unidentified subsources” to fill out the dossier"

 

[easyt65]

"Steele was ultimately working for the Clinton campaign and DNC, not a private client. And Steele’s use of some “unidentified” sources could raise questions about his collection methods."

Steele was a busy little foreign spy - he worked with the Russians, worked with Fusion GPS, worked with the DOJ, worked for the FBI, worked for the DNC, and worked for Hillary Clinton....

 

[Marion Morrison]

This will get underplayed in the media.

 

[eagle1462010]

They have always known this. They don't care.

 

[Lakhota]

The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.

 

[eagle1462010]

The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.

Paying Russian agents for dirt. Oh that only matters if it's Trump. LOL

 

[Oddball]

The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.

Using it as a false pretext to get an already constitutionally abominable FISA spying warrant isn't, hackasaurus rex.

 

[Lakhota]

This was all reported to the FISA judges when applying for the warrants. Widely reported and nothing new.

 

[Oddball]

This was all reported to the FISA judges when applying for the warrants. Widely reported and nothing new.

Liar.

 

[easyt65]

The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.

Russian-authored Opposition research bought from a foreign spy working with the DOJ and for the FBI, used illegally by the DOJ, NIA, CIA, AND FBI to start up a political assassination, get a traitor/criminal appointed to lead it, and to acquire illegal warrants to conduct their own Watergate, though, is NOT legal.

 

[easyt65]

This was all reported to the FISA judges when applying for the warrants. Widely reported and nothing new.

Actually, as reported by several sources to include the US IG ... and now the FBI itself ... The fact that it was Russian-authored Opposition research bought from a foreign spy working with the DOJ and for the FBI -- PAID FOR BY HILLARY CLINTON - and NOT actually LEGITIMATE INTEL, as they briefed the FISA Court it was, was NEVER revealed to the FISA Court.

 

[Lakhota]

The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.

Russian-authored Opposition research bought from a foreign spy working with the DOJ and for the FBI, used illegally by the DOJ, NIA, CIA, AND FBI to start up a political assassination, get a traitor/criminal appointed to lead it, and to acquire illegal warrants to conduct their own Watergate, though, is NOT legal.

OLD NEWS!! Even the NaziCon Teanderthal Republicans in Congress have gone over all this with a fine-tooth comb. NOTHING! If there was anything to this - Nunes and Howdy Doody Gowdy would have had Hillary in prison by now.

 

[easyt65]

The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.

Russian-authored Opposition research bought from a foreign spy working with the DOJ and for the FBI, used illegally by the DOJ, NIA, CIA, AND FBI to start up a political assassination, get a traitor/criminal appointed to lead it, and to acquire illegal warrants to conduct their own Watergate, though, is NOT legal.

OLD NEWS!! Even the NaziCon Teanderthal Republicans in Congress have gone over all this with a fine-tooth comb. NOTHING! If there was anything to this - Nunes and Howdy Doody Gowdy would have had Hillary in prison by now.

HOW COULD THIS BE 'OLD NEWS' WHEN THE FBI JUST RELEASED THIS DOCUMENT / INFORMATION FOR THE 1ST TIME EVER, SNOWFLAKE?


DESPERATE, IN DENIAL, AND STUPID ... WHAT A BAD COMBINATION.

 

[Lakhota]

This was all reported to the FISA judges when applying for the warrants. Widely reported and nothing new.

Actually, as reported by several sources to include the US IG ... and now the FBI itself ... The fact that it was Russian-authored Opposition research bought from a foreign spy working with the DOJ and for the FBI -- PAID FOR BY HILLARY CLINTON - and NOT actually LEGITIMATE INTEL, as they briefed the FISA Court it was, was NEVER revealed to the FISA Court.

A Republican started the request for the dossier on behalf of his preferred candidate, but after his candidate lost out to Trump, the Republican initiator stop paying for it. Then, the DNC picked up where he left off and paid for the completion of the dossier. It was revealed to the FISA judges that the dossier was being funded by an opposing political party.

Your thread is dead.

 

[easyt65]

This was all reported to the FISA judges when applying for the warrants. Widely reported and nothing new.

Actually, as reported by several sources to include the US IG ... and now the FBI itself ... The fact that it was Russian-authored Opposition research bought from a foreign spy working with the DOJ and for the FBI -- PAID FOR BY HILLARY CLINTON - and NOT actually LEGITIMATE INTEL, as they briefed the FISA Court it was, was NEVER revealed to the FISA Court.

A Republican started the request for the dossier on behalf of his preferred candidate, but after his candidate lost out to Trump, the Republican initiator stop paying for it. Then, the DNC picked up where he left off and paid for the completion of the dossier. It was revealed to the FISA judges that the dossier was being funded by an opposing political party.

Your thread is dead.

A Republican dropped it, did not / would not work with a Trump-hating foreign spy working WITH Russians, WITH the DOJ, and FOR the FBI, did not PAY them for a Russian-authored document, did not use that propaganda illegally....

 

[airplanemechanic]

This was all reported to the FISA judges when applying for the warrants. Widely reported and nothing new.

Proof? All they disclosed was that it was "politically motivated." They did NOT say it was paid for by Clinton.

CNN linky:

Schiff: Steele dossier's political motivation disclosed in FISA application - CNNPolitics

A Democratic memo written to rebut the allegations in Nunes' document said the FBI did, in fact, tell the court that the information in the Steele dossier was politically motivated, even if the bureau didn't mention that research that went into the dossier was paid for by Democrats

 

[easyt65]

This was all reported to the FISA judges when applying for the warrants. Widely reported and nothing new.

Actually, as reported by several sources to include the US IG ... and now the FBI itself ... The fact that it was Russian-authored Opposition research bought from a foreign spy working with the DOJ and for the FBI -- PAID FOR BY HILLARY CLINTON - and NOT actually LEGITIMATE INTEL, as they briefed the FISA Court it was, was NEVER revealed to the FISA Court.

A Republican started the request for the dossier on behalf of his preferred candidate, but after his candidate lost out to Trump, the Republican initiator stop paying for it. Then, the DNC picked up where he left off and paid for the completion of the dossier. It was revealed to the FISA judges that the dossier was being funded by an opposing political party.

Your thread is dead.

The FBI knew it was Hillary, did NOT reveal that, did NOT reveal the ICA, ICR, request for warrants, and request for an investigation were base in foreign spy/Russian-authored LIES bought and procoded to the FBI by Hillary Clinton. The US IG and Oher confirmed they lied and told the FISA COURT and CONGRESS they were based on 'LEGITIMATE INTEL', which it was NOT...

AND THEY NEVER SAID IT - NEVER TOLD THE TRUTH...

The FBI just released this document for the 1st time, & they STILL couldn't come right out and state the truth. - it was STEELE, it was HILLARY ....

THAT is what all the evidence shows - you are a desperate liar!

Evidence shows all if this started based on lies and Russian propaganda from a Trump-hating foreign spy working for the FBI and from the RussIan's ...1 of 2 dossiers provided by Hillary and her supporters.

The DOJ, NIA, CIA, & FBI then, AS EVIDENCE SHOWS, then used those documents illegally to lie to the FISA Court and CONGRESS...

 

[Shrimpbox]

The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.

Not if the trump team is looking for it. I can’t believe you are so stupid you just blew up the whole trump tower talking point. Thanks.

 

[Marion Morrison]

They just hate Trump because he's like all real Americans.

 

[Marion Morrison]

A Republican started the request for the dossier on behalf of his preferred candidate, but after his candidate lost out to Trump, the Republican initiator stop paying for it. Then, the DNC picked up where he left off and paid for the completion of the dossier. It was revealed to the FISA judges that the dossier was being funded by an opposing political party.

Your thread is dead.

No, you're barking up the wrong tree, Chihuahua.