Manonthestreet
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2014
- 35,722
- 24,267
- 1,945
Omg they're Russian stooges .....ummmmm..........ummmm.m
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here is the vote
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml
Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings
Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren
The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.
Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml
So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.
Here is the vote
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml
Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings
Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren
The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.
Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml
So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.
The only personal gain President Trump had was in seeing the country that he loves and is the leader of , fight corruption.
I also gain by that.
You probably don't.
Here is the vote
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml
Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings
Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren
The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.
Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml
So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.
The only personal gain President Trump had was in seeing the country that he loves and is the leader of , fight corruption.
I also gain by that.
You probably don't.
How did Trump fight corruption? How is that investigation by Ukraine into the Biden's going now that they got their money? The bullshit you people believe in.
Here is the vote
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml
Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings
Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren
The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.
Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml
So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.
The only personal gain President Trump had was in seeing the country that he loves and is the leader of , fight corruption.
I also gain by that.
You probably don't.
How did Trump fight corruption? How is that investigation by Ukraine into the Biden's going now that they got their money? The bullshit you people believe in.
People like you are so uninformed.
Republican Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy
Same ole saw
What the dem accuse others of they are engaging in
Ya, like we're gong to believe you're smarter than Joni Ernst.Republican Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy
Same ole saw
What the dem accuse others of they are engaging in
Just fake news - without the full context.
Fake like you idiot libs.Republican Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy
Same ole saw
What the dem accuse others of they are engaging in
Just fake news - without the full context.
Here is the vote
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml
Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings
Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren
The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.
Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml
So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.
Here is the vote
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml
Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings
Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren
The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.
Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml
So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.
That's the FY 2019 bill, which was signed in 2018. Not the most recent one they voted against.
National Defense Authorization Act - Wikipedia
Ya, like we're gong to believe you're smarter than Joni Ernst.Republican Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy
Same ole saw
What the dem accuse others of they are engaging in
Just fake news - without the full context.
LOL
Here is the vote
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml
Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings
Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren
The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.
Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml
So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.
That's the FY 2019 bill, which was signed in 2018. Not the most recent one they voted against.
National Defense Authorization Act - Wikipedia
Guy, check the votes.
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll473.xml
You're welcome.
It has everything to do with it.Ya, like we're gong to believe you're smarter than Joni Ernst.Republican Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy
Same ole saw
What the dem accuse others of they are engaging in
Just fake news - without the full context.
LOL
Funny. I'm smart enough to know that is just a diversion - which has nothing to do with the Senate impeachment trial.
It has everything to do with it.Ya, like we're gong to believe you're smarter than Joni Ernst.Republican Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy
Same ole saw
What the dem accuse others of they are engaging in
Just fake news - without the full context.
LOL
Funny. I'm smart enough to know that is just a diversion - which has nothing to do with the Senate impeachment trial.
Here is the vote
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml
Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings
Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren
The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.
Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml
So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.
That's the FY 2019 bill, which was signed in 2018. Not the most recent one they voted against.
National Defense Authorization Act - Wikipedia
Guy, check the votes.
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll473.xml
You're welcome.
That's for the FY 2020. For the FY 2019 of the NNDA, Nadler, Lofgrun, and Jeffries all voted "No."
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll230.xml
Nadler, Jeffries, and Lofgren apparently voted "No" in the FY 2017 NNDA as well:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2016/roll216.xml
How about FY 2016?
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll239.xml
You're welcome.
Republican Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy
Same ole saw
What the dem accuse others of they are engaging in
Just fake news - without the full context.
Here is the vote
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml
Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings
Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren
The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.
Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml
So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.
That's the FY 2019 bill, which was signed in 2018. Not the most recent one they voted against.
National Defense Authorization Act - Wikipedia
Guy, check the votes.
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll473.xml
You're welcome.
That's for the FY 2020. For the FY 2019 of the NNDA, Nadler, Lofgrun, and Jeffries all voted "No."
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll230.xml
Nadler, Jeffries, and Lofgren apparently voted "No" in the FY 2017 NNDA as well:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2016/roll216.xml
How about FY 2016?
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll239.xml
You're welcome.
Dude, they voted for the initial funding. The NDAA is about a lot more than Ukraine. Ernst is playing dirty tricks here by somehow implying they are hypocrites, she and you should know better.
In the end this has nothing to do with Trump not using the money as it was intended until he got caught trying to hold it over Ukraine's head for personal gain.