Last defense bill included aid for Ukraine, which the dems voted against

[Manonthestreet]

Omg they're Russian stooges .....ummmmm..........ummmm.m

 

[HappyJoy]

Here is the vote

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml

Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings

Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren

The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.

Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml

So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.

 

[Billiejeens]

Here is the vote

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml

Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings

Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren

The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.

Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml

So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.

The only personal gain President Trump had was in seeing the country that he loves and is the leader of , fight corruption.

I also gain by that.
You probably don't.

 

[Rambunctious]

Democrats don't care about the Ukraine or us or anything but winning...and even when they do win they don't do anything for us or the nation...all they do is try daily to undermine their political enemies at the peoples expense....like children...petty little children.....

 

[HappyJoy]

Here is the vote

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml

Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings

Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren

The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.

Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml

So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.

The only personal gain President Trump had was in seeing the country that he loves and is the leader of , fight corruption.

I also gain by that.
You probably don't.

How did Trump fight corruption? How is that investigation by Ukraine into the Biden's going now that they got their money? The bullshit you people believe in.

 

[Billiejeens]

Here is the vote

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml

Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings

Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren

The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.

Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml

So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.

The only personal gain President Trump had was in seeing the country that he loves and is the leader of , fight corruption.

I also gain by that.
You probably don't.

How did Trump fight corruption? How is that investigation by Ukraine into the Biden's going now that they got their money? The bullshit you people believe in.

People like you are so uninformed.

 

[HappyJoy]

Here is the vote

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml

Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings

Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren

The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.

Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml

So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.

The only personal gain President Trump had was in seeing the country that he loves and is the leader of , fight corruption.

I also gain by that.
You probably don't.

How did Trump fight corruption? How is that investigation by Ukraine into the Biden's going now that they got their money? The bullshit you people believe in.

People like you are so uninformed.

Then inform me, how has Trump fought corruption in Ukraine?

Not to get side tracked, just want to point out again that the OP is a lie.

 

[Lakhota]

Republican Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy

Same ole saw
What the dem accuse others of they are engaging in

Just fake news - without the full context.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Republican Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy

Same ole saw
What the dem accuse others of they are engaging in

Just fake news - without the full context.

Ya, like we're gong to believe you're smarter than Joni Ernst.
LOL

 

[ColonelAngus]

Schiff is such a fraud, it’s just unreal.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Republican Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy

Same ole saw
What the dem accuse others of they are engaging in

Just fake news - without the full context.

Fake like you idiot libs.

 

[JGalt]

Here is the vote

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml

Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings

Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren

The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.

Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml

So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.

That's the FY 2019 bill, which was signed in 2018. Not the most recent one they voted against.

National Defense Authorization Act - Wikipedia

 

[HappyJoy]

Here is the vote

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml

Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings

Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren

The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.

Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml

So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.

That's the FY 2019 bill, which was signed in 2018. Not the most recent one they voted against.

National Defense Authorization Act - Wikipedia

Guy, check the votes.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll473.xml

You're welcome.

 

[Lakhota]

Republican Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy

Same ole saw
What the dem accuse others of they are engaging in

Just fake news - without the full context.

Ya, like we're gong to believe you're smarter than Joni Ernst.
LOL

Funny. I'm smart enough to know that is just a diversion - which has nothing to do with the Senate impeachment trial.

 

[JGalt]

Here is the vote

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml

Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings

Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren

The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.

Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml

So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.

That's the FY 2019 bill, which was signed in 2018. Not the most recent one they voted against.

National Defense Authorization Act - Wikipedia

Guy, check the votes.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll473.xml

You're welcome.

That's for the FY 2020. For the FY 2019 of the NNDA, Nadler, Lofgrun, and Jeffries all voted "No."

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll230.xml

Nadler, Jeffries, and Lofgren apparently voted "No" in the FY 2017 NNDA as well:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2016/roll216.xml

How about FY 2016?

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll239.xml

You're welcome.

 

[depotoo]

Republican Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy

Same ole saw
What the dem accuse others of they are engaging in

Just fake news - without the full context.

Ya, like we're gong to believe you're smarter than Joni Ernst.
LOL

Funny. I'm smart enough to know that is just a diversion - which has nothing to do with the Senate impeachment trial.

It has everything to do with it.

 

[Lakhota]

Republican Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy

Same ole saw
What the dem accuse others of they are engaging in

Just fake news - without the full context.

Ya, like we're gong to believe you're smarter than Joni Ernst.
LOL

Funny. I'm smart enough to know that is just a diversion - which has nothing to do with the Senate impeachment trial.

It has everything to do with it.

Please tell us how.

 

[HappyJoy]

Here is the vote

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml

Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings

Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren

The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.

Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml

So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.

That's the FY 2019 bill, which was signed in 2018. Not the most recent one they voted against.

National Defense Authorization Act - Wikipedia

Guy, check the votes.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll473.xml

You're welcome.

That's for the FY 2020. For the FY 2019 of the NNDA, Nadler, Lofgrun, and Jeffries all voted "No."

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll230.xml

Nadler, Jeffries, and Lofgren apparently voted "No" in the FY 2017 NNDA as well:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2016/roll216.xml

How about FY 2016?

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll239.xml

You're welcome.

Dude, they voted for the initial funding. The NDAA is about a lot more than Ukraine. Ernst is playing dirty tricks here by somehow implying they are hypocrites, she and you should know better.

In the end this has nothing to do with Trump not using the money as it was intended until he got caught trying to hold it over Ukraine's head for personal gain.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Republican Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy

Same ole saw
What the dem accuse others of they are engaging in

Just fake news - without the full context.

Agreed. This is cherry picking grandstanding. Aid to the Ukraine was PART of the defense bill that they voted against. I'm pretty sure that the aid to the Ukraine wasn't the main reason they voted against it. And, instead of accusing them, why not ask them why they voted against the defense bill? I'm pretty sure aid isn't the main reason. They probably voted against it because it diverted funds from the military to the border wall.

 

[JGalt]

Here is the vote

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll313.xml

Yeas:
Schiff
Jeffries
Demings

Nays:
Nadler
Lofgren

The bill was ultimately passed by both Democrats and Republicans. As to why Nadler and Lofgren didn't vote for the bill most likely had little to do with Ukraine since that was a small portion of the Appropriations bill.

Actually after the bill went into conference with the senate they all voted for the bill. That vote can be found here:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll405.xml

So, in the end they all voted for for the Ukraine funding. However that has no bearing here. At hand is Trump holding back funding that Congress had approved for his own personal benefit. It makes no difference how the individual House members voted even though it looks like Ernst is being purposefully dishonest and she relies on the numbnuts like the guy who started this thread not to look into what she says any further.

That's the FY 2019 bill, which was signed in 2018. Not the most recent one they voted against.

National Defense Authorization Act - Wikipedia

Guy, check the votes.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll473.xml

You're welcome.

That's for the FY 2020. For the FY 2019 of the NNDA, Nadler, Lofgrun, and Jeffries all voted "No."

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll230.xml

Nadler, Jeffries, and Lofgren apparently voted "No" in the FY 2017 NNDA as well:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2016/roll216.xml

How about FY 2016?

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll239.xml

You're welcome.

Dude, they voted for the initial funding. The NDAA is about a lot more than Ukraine. Ernst is playing dirty tricks here by somehow implying they are hypocrites, she and you should know better.

In the end this has nothing to do with Trump not using the money as it was intended until he got caught trying to hold it over Ukraine's head for personal gain.

You mean like Joe Biden did, right? At least Biden was honest enough to admit it, eh?