Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If it matters, why do you handwave away all the labwork we show you?
When you stop pissing on the labwork, we'll stop calling you a pathological liar.
You are such a stupid troll!Where's the AGWCult Lab Work?
We need to ask the AGWCult for their lab work as part of the response to their every single Chicken Little post
LinkYou are such a stupid troll!Where's the AGWCult Lab Work?
We need to ask the AGWCult for their lab work as part of the response to their every single Chicken Little post
CO2 absorption of infrared (IR), theory:
*Kouzov, A. P., & Chrysos, M. (2009). Collision-induced absorption by CO 2 in the far infrared: Analysis of leading-order moments and interpretation of the experiment. Physical Review A, 80(4), 042703.
*Chrysos, M., Kouzov, A. P., Egorova, N. I., & Rachet, F. (2008 ). Exact Low-Order Classical Moments in Collision-Induced Bands by Linear Rotors: CO 2-CO 2. Physical review letters, 100(13), 133007.
*Buldyreva, J., & Chrysos, M. (2001). Semiclassical modeling of infrared pressure-broadened linewidths: A comparative analysis in CO2–Ar at various temperatures. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 115(16), 7436-7441.
*Kratz, D. P., Gao, B. C., & Kiehl, J. T. (1991). A study of the radiative effects of the 9.4‐and 10.4‐micron bands of carbon dioxide. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 96(D5), 9021-9026.
*Stull, V. R., Wyatt, P. J., & Plass, G. N. (1964). The infrared transmittance of carbon dioxide. Applied Optics, 3(2), 243-254.
CO2 absorption of IR, laboratory measurements:
*R.A. Toth, et al., Spectroscopic database of CO2 line parameters: 4300–7000 cm−1, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 109:6, April 2008, 906-921.
*Predoi-Cross, A., Unni, A. V., Liu, W., Schofield, I., Holladay, C., McKellar, A. R. W., & Hurtmans, D. (2007). Line shape parameters measurement and computations for self-broadened carbon dioxide transitions in the 30012← 00001 and 30013← 00001 bands, line mixing, and speed dependence. Journal of molecular spectroscopy, 245(1), 34-51.
*Miller, C. E., & Brown, L. R. (2004). Near infrared spectroscopy of carbon dioxide I.[sup] 16[/sup] O[sup] 12[/sup] C[sup] 16[/sup] O line positions. Journal of molecular spectroscopy, 228(2), 329-354.
*Niro, F., Boulet, C., & Hartmann, J. M. (2004). Spectra calculations in central and wing regions of CO[sub] 2[/sub] IR bands between 10 and 20μm. I: model and laboratory measurements. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 88(4), 483-498.
*Benec'h, S., Rachet, F., Chrysos, M., Buldyreva, J., & Bonamy, L. (2002). On far‐wing Raman profiles by CO2. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 33(11‐12), 934-940.
Earth's upward emission of IR:
*Murphy, D. M., Solomon, S., Portmann, R. W., Rosenlof, K. H., Forster, P. M., & Wong, T. (2009). An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 114(D17).
*Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., & Kiehl, J. (2009). Earth's global energy budget. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90(3).
*Wong, T., Wielicki, B. A., Lee III, R. B., Smith, G. L., Bush, K. A., & Willis, J. K. (2006). Reexamination of the observed decadal variability of the earth radiation budget using altitude-corrected ERBE/ERBS nonscanner WFOV data. Journal of Climate, 19(16).
*Harries, J. E. (2000). Physics of the Earth's radiative energy balance. Contemporary Physics, 41(5), 309-322.
*Kyle, H. L., Arking, A., Hickey, J. R., Ardanuy, P. E., Jacobowitz, H., Stowe, L. L., ... & Smith, G. L. (1993). The Nimbus Earth radiation budget (ERB) experiment: 1975 to 1992. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 74(5), 815-830.
*Barkstrom, B. R. (1984). The earth radiation budget experiment (ERBE). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 65(11), 1170-1185.
Changes in Earth's upward IR emission as a result of increased CO2 in the atmosphere:
*Gastineau, G., Soden, B. J., Jackson, D. L., & O'Dell, C. W. (2014). Satellite-Based Reconstruction of the Tropical Oceanic Clear-Sky Outgoing Longwave Radiation and Comparison with Climate Models. Journal of Climate, 27(2).
*Chapman, D., Nguyen, P., & Halem, M. (2013, May). A decade of measured greenhouse forcings from AIRS. In SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing (pp. 874313-874313). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
*Chen, C., Harries, J., Brindley, H., & Ringer, M. (2007). Spectral signatures of climate change in the Earth's infrared spectrum between 1970 and 2006. Retrieved October, 13, 2009.
*Griggs, J. A., & Harries, J. E. (2007). Comparison of Spectrally Resolved Outgoing Longwave Radiation over the Tropical Pacific between 1970 and 2003 Using IRIS, IMG, and AIRS. Journal of climate, 20(15).
*Griggs, J. A., & Harries, J. E. (2004, November). Comparison of spectrally resolved outgoing longwave data between 1970 and present. In Optical Science and Technology, the SPIE 49th Annual Meeting (pp. 164-174). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Changes in downwelling infrared from the atmosphere as a result of increased CO2:
*Wang, K., & Liang, S. (2009). Global atmospheric downward longwave radiation over land surface under all‐sky conditions from 1973 to 2008. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 114(D19).
*Wild, M., Grieser, J., & Schär, C. (2008 ). Combined surface solar brightening and increasing greenhouse effect support recent intensification of the global land‐based hydrological cycle. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(17).
*Prata, F. (2008 ). The climatological record of clear‐sky longwave radiation at the Earth's surface: evidence for water vapour feedback?. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(17-18 ), 5247-5263.
*Allan, R. P. (2006). Variability in clear‐sky longwave radiative cooling of the atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 111(D22).
*Philipona, R., Dürr, B., Marty, C., Ohmura, A., & Wild, M. (2004). Radiative forcing‐measured at Earth's surface‐corroborate the increasing greenhouse effect. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(3).
Formal determination of CO2-temperature causality:
* Attanasio, A., Pasini, A., & Triacca, U. (2013). Granger Causality Analyses for Climatic Attribution. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 3, 515.
* Attanasio, A. (2012). Testing for linear Granger causality from natural/anthropogenic forcings to global temperature anomalies. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 110(1-2), 281-289.
* Attanasio, A., Pasini, A., & Triacca, U. (2012). A contribution to attribution of recent global warming by out‐of‐sample Granger causality analysis. Atmospheric Science Letters, 13(1), 67-72.
* Kodra, E., Chatterjee, S., & Ganguly, A. R. (2011). Exploring Granger causality between global average observed time series of carbon dioxide and temperature. Theoretical and applied climatology, 104(3-4), 325-335.
* Verdes, P. F. (2005). Assessing causality from multivariate time series. PHYSICAL REVIEW-SERIES E-, 72(2), 026222.
You are such a stupid troll!Where's the AGWCult Lab Work?
We need to ask the AGWCult for their lab work as part of the response to their every single Chicken Little post
CO2 absorption of infrared (IR), theory:
*Kouzov, A. P., & Chrysos, M. (2009). Collision-induced absorption by CO 2 in the far infrared: Analysis of leading-order moments and interpretation of the experiment. Physical Review A, 80(4), 042703.
*Chrysos, M., Kouzov, A. P., Egorova, N. I., & Rachet, F. (2008 ). Exact Low-Order Classical Moments in Collision-Induced Bands by Linear Rotors: CO 2-CO 2. Physical review letters, 100(13), 133007.
*Buldyreva, J., & Chrysos, M. (2001). Semiclassical modeling of infrared pressure-broadened linewidths: A comparative analysis in CO2–Ar at various temperatures. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 115(16), 7436-7441.
*Kratz, D. P., Gao, B. C., & Kiehl, J. T. (1991). A study of the radiative effects of the 9.4‐and 10.4‐micron bands of carbon dioxide. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 96(D5), 9021-9026.
*Stull, V. R., Wyatt, P. J., & Plass, G. N. (1964). The infrared transmittance of carbon dioxide. Applied Optics, 3(2), 243-254.
CO2 absorption of IR, laboratory measurements:
*R.A. Toth, et al., Spectroscopic database of CO2 line parameters: 4300–7000 cm−1, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 109:6, April 2008, 906-921.
*Predoi-Cross, A., Unni, A. V., Liu, W., Schofield, I., Holladay, C., McKellar, A. R. W., & Hurtmans, D. (2007). Line shape parameters measurement and computations for self-broadened carbon dioxide transitions in the 30012← 00001 and 30013← 00001 bands, line mixing, and speed dependence. Journal of molecular spectroscopy, 245(1), 34-51.
*Miller, C. E., & Brown, L. R. (2004). Near infrared spectroscopy of carbon dioxide I.[sup] 16[/sup] O[sup] 12[/sup] C[sup] 16[/sup] O line positions. Journal of molecular spectroscopy, 228(2), 329-354.
*Niro, F., Boulet, C., & Hartmann, J. M. (2004). Spectra calculations in central and wing regions of CO[sub] 2[/sub] IR bands between 10 and 20μm. I: model and laboratory measurements. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 88(4), 483-498.
*Benec'h, S., Rachet, F., Chrysos, M., Buldyreva, J., & Bonamy, L. (2002). On far‐wing Raman profiles by CO2. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 33(11‐12), 934-940.
Earth's upward emission of IR:
*Murphy, D. M., Solomon, S., Portmann, R. W., Rosenlof, K. H., Forster, P. M., & Wong, T. (2009). An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 114(D17).
*Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., & Kiehl, J. (2009). Earth's global energy budget. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90(3).
*Wong, T., Wielicki, B. A., Lee III, R. B., Smith, G. L., Bush, K. A., & Willis, J. K. (2006). Reexamination of the observed decadal variability of the earth radiation budget using altitude-corrected ERBE/ERBS nonscanner WFOV data. Journal of Climate, 19(16).
*Harries, J. E. (2000). Physics of the Earth's radiative energy balance. Contemporary Physics, 41(5), 309-322.
*Kyle, H. L., Arking, A., Hickey, J. R., Ardanuy, P. E., Jacobowitz, H., Stowe, L. L., ... & Smith, G. L. (1993). The Nimbus Earth radiation budget (ERB) experiment: 1975 to 1992. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 74(5), 815-830.
*Barkstrom, B. R. (1984). The earth radiation budget experiment (ERBE). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 65(11), 1170-1185.
Changes in Earth's upward IR emission as a result of increased CO2 in the atmosphere:
*Gastineau, G., Soden, B. J., Jackson, D. L., & O'Dell, C. W. (2014). Satellite-Based Reconstruction of the Tropical Oceanic Clear-Sky Outgoing Longwave Radiation and Comparison with Climate Models. Journal of Climate, 27(2).
*Chapman, D., Nguyen, P., & Halem, M. (2013, May). A decade of measured greenhouse forcings from AIRS. In SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing (pp. 874313-874313). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
*Chen, C., Harries, J., Brindley, H., & Ringer, M. (2007). Spectral signatures of climate change in the Earth's infrared spectrum between 1970 and 2006. Retrieved October, 13, 2009.
*Griggs, J. A., & Harries, J. E. (2007). Comparison of Spectrally Resolved Outgoing Longwave Radiation over the Tropical Pacific between 1970 and 2003 Using IRIS, IMG, and AIRS. Journal of climate, 20(15).
*Griggs, J. A., & Harries, J. E. (2004, November). Comparison of spectrally resolved outgoing longwave data between 1970 and present. In Optical Science and Technology, the SPIE 49th Annual Meeting (pp. 164-174). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Changes in downwelling infrared from the atmosphere as a result of increased CO2:
*Wang, K., & Liang, S. (2009). Global atmospheric downward longwave radiation over land surface under all‐sky conditions from 1973 to 2008. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 114(D19).
*Wild, M., Grieser, J., & Schär, C. (2008 ). Combined surface solar brightening and increasing greenhouse effect support recent intensification of the global land‐based hydrological cycle. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(17).
*Prata, F. (2008 ). The climatological record of clear‐sky longwave radiation at the Earth's surface: evidence for water vapour feedback?. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(17-18 ), 5247-5263.
*Allan, R. P. (2006). Variability in clear‐sky longwave radiative cooling of the atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 111(D22).
*Philipona, R., Dürr, B., Marty, C., Ohmura, A., & Wild, M. (2004). Radiative forcing‐measured at Earth's surface‐corroborate the increasing greenhouse effect. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(3).
Formal determination of CO2-temperature causality:
* Attanasio, A., Pasini, A., & Triacca, U. (2013). Granger Causality Analyses for Climatic Attribution. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 3, 515.
* Attanasio, A. (2012). Testing for linear Granger causality from natural/anthropogenic forcings to global temperature anomalies. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 110(1-2), 281-289.
* Attanasio, A., Pasini, A., & Triacca, U. (2012). A contribution to attribution of recent global warming by out‐of‐sample Granger causality analysis. Atmospheric Science Letters, 13(1), 67-72.
* Kodra, E., Chatterjee, S., & Ganguly, A. R. (2011). Exploring Granger causality between global average observed time series of carbon dioxide and temperature. Theoretical and applied climatology, 104(3-4), 325-335.
* Verdes, P. F. (2005). Assessing causality from multivariate time series. PHYSICAL REVIEW-SERIES E-, 72(2), 026222.
You are such a stupid troll!Where's the AGWCult Lab Work?
We need to ask the AGWCult for their lab work as part of the response to their every single Chicken Little post
CO2 absorption of infrared (IR), theory:
*Kouzov, A. P., & Chrysos, M. (2009). Collision-induced absorption by CO 2 in the far infrared: Analysis of leading-order moments and interpretation of the experiment. Physical Review A, 80(4), 042703.
*Chrysos, M., Kouzov, A. P., Egorova, N. I., & Rachet, F. (2008 ). Exact Low-Order Classical Moments in Collision-Induced Bands by Linear Rotors: CO 2-CO 2. Physical review letters, 100(13), 133007.
*Buldyreva, J., & Chrysos, M. (2001). Semiclassical modeling of infrared pressure-broadened linewidths: A comparative analysis in CO2–Ar at various temperatures. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 115(16), 7436-7441.
*Kratz, D. P., Gao, B. C., & Kiehl, J. T. (1991). A study of the radiative effects of the 9.4‐and 10.4‐micron bands of carbon dioxide. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 96(D5), 9021-9026.
*Stull, V. R., Wyatt, P. J., & Plass, G. N. (1964). The infrared transmittance of carbon dioxide. Applied Optics, 3(2), 243-254.
CO2 absorption of IR, laboratory measurements:
*R.A. Toth, et al., Spectroscopic database of CO2 line parameters: 4300–7000 cm−1, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 109:6, April 2008, 906-921.
*Predoi-Cross, A., Unni, A. V., Liu, W., Schofield, I., Holladay, C., McKellar, A. R. W., & Hurtmans, D. (2007). Line shape parameters measurement and computations for self-broadened carbon dioxide transitions in the 30012← 00001 and 30013← 00001 bands, line mixing, and speed dependence. Journal of molecular spectroscopy, 245(1), 34-51.
*Miller, C. E., & Brown, L. R. (2004). Near infrared spectroscopy of carbon dioxide I.[sup] 16[/sup] O[sup] 12[/sup] C[sup] 16[/sup] O line positions. Journal of molecular spectroscopy, 228(2), 329-354.
*Niro, F., Boulet, C., & Hartmann, J. M. (2004). Spectra calculations in central and wing regions of CO[sub] 2[/sub] IR bands between 10 and 20μm. I: model and laboratory measurements. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 88(4), 483-498.
*Benec'h, S., Rachet, F., Chrysos, M., Buldyreva, J., & Bonamy, L. (2002). On far‐wing Raman profiles by CO2. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 33(11‐12), 934-940.
Earth's upward emission of IR:
*Murphy, D. M., Solomon, S., Portmann, R. W., Rosenlof, K. H., Forster, P. M., & Wong, T. (2009). An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 114(D17).
*Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., & Kiehl, J. (2009). Earth's global energy budget. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90(3).
*Wong, T., Wielicki, B. A., Lee III, R. B., Smith, G. L., Bush, K. A., & Willis, J. K. (2006). Reexamination of the observed decadal variability of the earth radiation budget using altitude-corrected ERBE/ERBS nonscanner WFOV data. Journal of Climate, 19(16).
*Harries, J. E. (2000). Physics of the Earth's radiative energy balance. Contemporary Physics, 41(5), 309-322.
*Kyle, H. L., Arking, A., Hickey, J. R., Ardanuy, P. E., Jacobowitz, H., Stowe, L. L., ... & Smith, G. L. (1993). The Nimbus Earth radiation budget (ERB) experiment: 1975 to 1992. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 74(5), 815-830.
*Barkstrom, B. R. (1984). The earth radiation budget experiment (ERBE). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 65(11), 1170-1185.
Changes in Earth's upward IR emission as a result of increased CO2 in the atmosphere:
*Gastineau, G., Soden, B. J., Jackson, D. L., & O'Dell, C. W. (2014). Satellite-Based Reconstruction of the Tropical Oceanic Clear-Sky Outgoing Longwave Radiation and Comparison with Climate Models. Journal of Climate, 27(2).
*Chapman, D., Nguyen, P., & Halem, M. (2013, May). A decade of measured greenhouse forcings from AIRS. In SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing (pp. 874313-874313). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
*Chen, C., Harries, J., Brindley, H., & Ringer, M. (2007). Spectral signatures of climate change in the Earth's infrared spectrum between 1970 and 2006. Retrieved October, 13, 2009.
*Griggs, J. A., & Harries, J. E. (2007). Comparison of Spectrally Resolved Outgoing Longwave Radiation over the Tropical Pacific between 1970 and 2003 Using IRIS, IMG, and AIRS. Journal of climate, 20(15).
*Griggs, J. A., & Harries, J. E. (2004, November). Comparison of spectrally resolved outgoing longwave data between 1970 and present. In Optical Science and Technology, the SPIE 49th Annual Meeting (pp. 164-174). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Changes in downwelling infrared from the atmosphere as a result of increased CO2:
*Wang, K., & Liang, S. (2009). Global atmospheric downward longwave radiation over land surface under all‐sky conditions from 1973 to 2008. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 114(D19).
*Wild, M., Grieser, J., & Schär, C. (2008 ). Combined surface solar brightening and increasing greenhouse effect support recent intensification of the global land‐based hydrological cycle. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(17).
*Prata, F. (2008 ). The climatological record of clear‐sky longwave radiation at the Earth's surface: evidence for water vapour feedback?. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(17-18 ), 5247-5263.
*Allan, R. P. (2006). Variability in clear‐sky longwave radiative cooling of the atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 111(D22).
*Philipona, R., Dürr, B., Marty, C., Ohmura, A., & Wild, M. (2004). Radiative forcing‐measured at Earth's surface‐corroborate the increasing greenhouse effect. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(3).
Formal determination of CO2-temperature causality:
* Attanasio, A., Pasini, A., & Triacca, U. (2013). Granger Causality Analyses for Climatic Attribution. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 3, 515.
* Attanasio, A. (2012). Testing for linear Granger causality from natural/anthropogenic forcings to global temperature anomalies. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 110(1-2), 281-289.
* Attanasio, A., Pasini, A., & Triacca, U. (2012). A contribution to attribution of recent global warming by out‐of‐sample Granger causality analysis. Atmospheric Science Letters, 13(1), 67-72.
* Kodra, E., Chatterjee, S., & Ganguly, A. R. (2011). Exploring Granger causality between global average observed time series of carbon dioxide and temperature. Theoretical and applied climatology, 104(3-4), 325-335.
* Verdes, P. F. (2005). Assessing causality from multivariate time series. PHYSICAL REVIEW-SERIES E-, 72(2), 026222.
That's not what he asked for silly boy. He asked for a lab experiment that shows a 120ppm rise in the CO2 content of the atmosphere will result in warming. All you presented were a bunch of papers that tell us that CO2 is a GHG. We know that. What we don't know is whether an infinitesimal increase in an infinitesimal trace gas can make a temperature difference.
Linking to articles =/= lab work
That's not what he asked for silly boy. He asked for a lab experiment that shows a 120ppm rise in the CO2 content of the atmosphere will result in warming. All you presented were a bunch of papers that tell us that CO2 is a GHG. We know that. What we don't know is whether an infinitesimal increase in an infinitesimal trace gas can make a temperature difference.Linking to articles =/= lab work
I really can't help it if you two are too stupid and brainwashed to be able to understand the evidence you were shown, including these section headings.
CO2 absorption of IR, laboratory measurements
Changes in Earth's upward IR emission as a result of increased CO2 in the atmosphere:
Changes in downwelling infrared from the atmosphere as a result of increased CO2:
Formal determination of CO2-temperature causality:
BTW, walleyed, an increase in a greenhouse gas, BY DEFINITION, causes a temperature increase. You are soooo clueless. Nor is a 43% increase in atmospheric levels of CO2 "infintesimal", you poor deluded nutjob.
That's not what he asked for silly boy. He asked for a lab experiment that shows a 120ppm rise in the CO2 content of the atmosphere will result in warming. All you presented were a bunch of papers that tell us that CO2 is a GHG. We know that. What we don't know is whether an infinitesimal increase in an infinitesimal trace gas can make a temperature difference.Linking to articles =/= lab work
I really can't help it if you two are too stupid and brainwashed to be able to understand the evidence you were shown, including these section headings.
CO2 absorption of IR, laboratory measurements
Changes in Earth's upward IR emission as a result of increased CO2 in the atmosphere:
Changes in downwelling infrared from the atmosphere as a result of increased CO2:
Formal determination of CO2-temperature causality:
BTW, walleyed, an increase in a greenhouse gas, BY DEFINITION, causes a temperature increase. You are soooo clueless. Nor is a 43% increase in atmospheric levels of CO2 "infintesimal", you poor deluded nutjob.
More of BoobyBobNutJob's usual insane drivel. Denier cult retards deny the very evidence they are supposedly demanding.That's not what he asked for silly boy. He asked for a lab experiment that shows a 120ppm rise in the CO2 content of the atmosphere will result in warming. All you presented were a bunch of papers that tell us that CO2 is a GHG. We know that. What we don't know is whether an infinitesimal increase in an infinitesimal trace gas can make a temperature difference.Linking to articles =/= lab work
I really can't help it if you two are too stupid and brainwashed to be able to understand the evidence you were shown, including these section headings.
CO2 absorption of IR, laboratory measurements
Changes in Earth's upward IR emission as a result of increased CO2 in the atmosphere:
Changes in downwelling infrared from the atmosphere as a result of increased CO2:
Formal determination of CO2-temperature causality:
BTW, walleyed, an increase in a greenhouse gas, BY DEFINITION, causes a temperature increase. You are soooo clueless. Nor is a 43% increase in atmospheric levels of CO2 "infintesimal", you poor deluded nutjob.
Too funny...
The Moron thinks that an experiment in the lab will have the same results in the atmosphere..Empirical evidence says NOPE!
Last time I checked the Null Hypothesis has clearly laid those experiments waste showing that there is no causal relationship.. Observed empirical evidence trumps all theory's..
Poor little retard has nothing to counter the facts with so he responds with personal attacks..More of BoobyBobNutJob's usual insane drivel. Denier cult retards deny the very evidence they are supposedly demanding.That's not what he asked for silly boy. He asked for a lab experiment that shows a 120ppm rise in the CO2 content of the atmosphere will result in warming. All you presented were a bunch of papers that tell us that CO2 is a GHG. We know that. What we don't know is whether an infinitesimal increase in an infinitesimal trace gas can make a temperature difference.Linking to articles =/= lab work
I really can't help it if you two are too stupid and brainwashed to be able to understand the evidence you were shown, including these section headings.
CO2 absorption of IR, laboratory measurements
Changes in Earth's upward IR emission as a result of increased CO2 in the atmosphere:
Changes in downwelling infrared from the atmosphere as a result of increased CO2:
Formal determination of CO2-temperature causality:
BTW, walleyed, an increase in a greenhouse gas, BY DEFINITION, causes a temperature increase. You are soooo clueless. Nor is a 43% increase in atmospheric levels of CO2 "infintesimal", you poor deluded nutjob.
Too funny...
The Moron thinks that an experiment in the lab will have the same results in the atmosphere..Empirical evidence says NOPE!
Last time I checked the Null Hypothesis has clearly laid those experiments waste showing that there is no causal relationship.. Observed empirical evidence trumps all theory's..
That's not what he asked for silly boy. He asked for a lab experiment that shows a 120ppm rise in the CO2 content of the atmosphere will result in warming. All you presented were a bunch of papers that tell us that CO2 is a GHG. We know that. What we don't know is whether an infinitesimal increase in an infinitesimal trace gas can make a temperature difference.Linking to articles =/= lab work
I really can't help it if you two are too stupid and brainwashed to be able to understand the evidence you were shown, including these section headings.
CO2 absorption of IR, laboratory measurements
Changes in Earth's upward IR emission as a result of increased CO2 in the atmosphere:
Changes in downwelling infrared from the atmosphere as a result of increased CO2:
Formal determination of CO2-temperature causality:
BTW, walleyed, an increase in a greenhouse gas, BY DEFINITION, causes a temperature increase. You are soooo clueless. Nor is a 43% increase in atmospheric levels of CO2 "infintesimal", you poor deluded nutjob.
Too funny...
The Moron thinks that an experiment in the lab will have the same results in the atmosphere..Empirical evidence says NOPE!
Last time I checked the Null Hypothesis has clearly laid those experiments waste showing that there is no causal relationship.. Observed empirical evidence trumps all theory's..
That's not what he asked for silly boy. He asked for a lab experiment that shows a 120ppm rise in the CO2 content of the atmosphere will result in warming. All you presented were a bunch of papers that tell us that CO2 is a GHG. We know that. What we don't know is whether an infinitesimal increase in an infinitesimal trace gas can make a temperature difference.Linking to articles =/= lab work
I really can't help it if you two are too stupid and brainwashed to be able to understand the evidence you were shown, including these section headings.
CO2 absorption of IR, laboratory measurements
Changes in Earth's upward IR emission as a result of increased CO2 in the atmosphere:
Changes in downwelling infrared from the atmosphere as a result of increased CO2:
Formal determination of CO2-temperature causality:
BTW, walleyed, an increase in a greenhouse gas, BY DEFINITION, causes a temperature increase. You are soooo clueless. Nor is a 43% increase in atmospheric levels of CO2 "infintesimal", you poor deluded nutjob.
Actually a number of those studies do just that. Actually you're just too retarded to comprehend what they are saying even if you read them, which you didn't.That's not what he asked for silly boy. He asked for a lab experiment that shows a 120ppm rise in the CO2 content of the atmosphere will result in warming. All you presented were a bunch of papers that tell us that CO2 is a GHG. We know that. What we don't know is whether an infinitesimal increase in an infinitesimal trace gas can make a temperature difference.Linking to articles =/= lab work
I really can't help it if you two are too stupid and brainwashed to be able to understand the evidence you were shown, including these section headings.
CO2 absorption of IR, laboratory measurements
Changes in Earth's upward IR emission as a result of increased CO2 in the atmosphere:
Changes in downwelling infrared from the atmosphere as a result of increased CO2:
Formal determination of CO2-temperature causality:
BTW, walleyed, an increase in a greenhouse gas, BY DEFINITION, causes a temperature increase. You are soooo clueless. Nor is a 43% increase in atmospheric levels of CO2 "infintesimal", you poor deluded nutjob.
None of those experiments link CO2 to temperature, none of them test your stupid "120PPM of additional CO2 will melt the ice caps and turn the oceans so gastric juice" theory.
Not one
Show the experimentActually a number of those studies do just that. Actually you're just too retarded to comprehend what they are saying even if you read them, which you didn't.That's not what he asked for silly boy. He asked for a lab experiment that shows a 120ppm rise in the CO2 content of the atmosphere will result in warming. All you presented were a bunch of papers that tell us that CO2 is a GHG. We know that. What we don't know is whether an infinitesimal increase in an infinitesimal trace gas can make a temperature difference.Linking to articles =/= lab work
I really can't help it if you two are too stupid and brainwashed to be able to understand the evidence you were shown, including these section headings.
CO2 absorption of IR, laboratory measurements
Changes in Earth's upward IR emission as a result of increased CO2 in the atmosphere:
Changes in downwelling infrared from the atmosphere as a result of increased CO2:
Formal determination of CO2-temperature causality:
BTW, walleyed, an increase in a greenhouse gas, BY DEFINITION, causes a temperature increase. You are soooo clueless. Nor is a 43% increase in atmospheric levels of CO2 "infintesimal", you poor deluded nutjob.
None of those experiments link CO2 to temperature, none of them test your stupid "120PPM of additional CO2 will melt the ice caps and turn the oceans so gastric juice" theory.
Not one
Ben there, done that. You're just too brainwashed to accept the evidence even when it is shown to you.Show the experimentActually a number of those studies do just that. Actually you're just too retarded to comprehend what they are saying even if you read them, which you didn't.That's not what he asked for silly boy. He asked for a lab experiment that shows a 120ppm rise in the CO2 content of the atmosphere will result in warming. All you presented were a bunch of papers that tell us that CO2 is a GHG. We know that. What we don't know is whether an infinitesimal increase in an infinitesimal trace gas can make a temperature difference.Linking to articles =/= lab work
I really can't help it if you two are too stupid and brainwashed to be able to understand the evidence you were shown, including these section headings.
CO2 absorption of IR, laboratory measurements
Changes in Earth's upward IR emission as a result of increased CO2 in the atmosphere:
Changes in downwelling infrared from the atmosphere as a result of increased CO2:
Formal determination of CO2-temperature causality:
BTW, walleyed, an increase in a greenhouse gas, BY DEFINITION, causes a temperature increase. You are soooo clueless. Nor is a 43% increase in atmospheric levels of CO2 "infintesimal", you poor deluded nutjob.
None of those experiments link CO2 to temperature, none of them test your stupid "120PPM of additional CO2 will melt the ice caps and turn the oceans so gastric juice" theory.
Not one
Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk
