Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ferret face Krugman is an incurable kook and you're a day late.
Ferret face Krugman is an incurable kook and you're a day late.
Thanks for the video, though.
Yeah...We might need to push gramma out onto the ice floe.Well, that "wacko" is an international renowned economist and Nobel winner.
But that's beside the point: He didn't say anything about what "the libs" want, he only talked about what he thinks we might need.
LOOK AT HIS EYES!!!
Well, that "wacko" is an international renowned economist and Nobel winner.
But that's beside the point: He didn't say anything about what "the libs" want, he only talked about what he thinks we might need.
Well, that "wacko" is an international renowned economist and Nobel winner.
But that's beside the point: He didn't say anything about what "the libs" want, he only talked about what he thinks we might need.
He's a nobel winner? Since obama was also given one for doing nothing at all, having be given one really has lost all meaning.
Well, that "wacko" is an international renowned economist and Nobel winner.
But that's beside the point: He didn't say anything about what "the libs" want, he only talked about what he thinks we might need.
He's a nobel winner? Since obama was also given one for doing nothing at all, having be given one really has lost all meaning.
I'm serious here, gang.....
If it makes you feel better to fantasize about me, feel free to.Yeah...We might need to push gramma out onto the ice floe.Well, that "wacko" is an international renowned economist and Nobel winner.
But that's beside the point: He didn't say anything about what "the libs" want, he only talked about what he thinks we might need.
Good thing you progressive authoritarian central planners are sooooo caring and compassionate and understanding.
Wrong, yet again.
What in the world is it that makes you believe that people would be "dying in the streets", without big bloated gubmint bureaucracies like Medicare/Medicaid?
There are currently two strategies, the second of which is being covered up.
1. Death Panels: Keep Medicare, but get rid of costly, ineffective end-of-life procedures. Also, give the patient more control over end-of-life care, e.g., get patients to decide if they want to be kept alive in a vegetative state indefinitely or not. [FYI: These kinds of end-of-life policy suggestions were first made by a Republican]
2) Death: Get rid of Medicare completely. This would result in millions of early deaths because so many elderly people depend on medicare.
The GOP's ultimate goal is to get rid of Medicare. This program, with Social Security, represents the most important Middle Class program of the Liberal New Deal era.
The GOP is scaring old people by telling them that their end-of-life Medicare services will be scaled back. The GOP actually drove old people to town hall meetings to protest ObamaCare.
Here is what seniors don't understand: the GOP is not merely going to cut some of their end-of-life procedures, they are getting rid of Medicare and Social Security altogether.
The GOP is literally leading these blind sheep to slaughter. People have no idea what the next phase of the Republican Revolution involves. This country is going to be a much different place in ten years.
The term "rationing" presumes that some will be treated while others are denied...Even though those being denied could pay their own way.Wrong, yet again.
What in the world is it that makes you believe that people would be "dying in the streets", without big bloated gubmint bureaucracies like Medicare/Medicaid?
Perhaps the same thing that makes you believe that rationing Medicare would be "sending Gramma out on the ice floe". You can't have it both ways.
The term "rationing" presumes that some will be treated while others are denied...Even though those being denied could pay their own way.Wrong, yet again.
What in the world is it that makes you believe that people would be "dying in the streets", without big bloated gubmint bureaucracies like Medicare/Medicaid?
Perhaps the same thing that makes you believe that rationing Medicare would be "sending Gramma out on the ice floe". You can't have it both ways.
Have you any grasp of the English language?
There are currently two strategies, the second of which is being covered up.
1. Death Panels: Keep Medicare, but get rid of costly, ineffective end-of-life procedures. Also, give the patient more control over end-of-life care, e.g., get patients to decide if they want to be kept alive in a vegetative state indefinitely or not. [FYI: These kinds of end-of-life policy suggestions were first made by a Republican]
2) Death: Get rid of Medicare completely. This would result in millions of early deaths because so many elderly people depend on medicare.
The GOP's ultimate goal is to get rid of Medicare. This program, with Social Security, represents the most important Middle Class program of the Liberal New Deal era.
The GOP is scaring old people by telling them that their end-of-life Medicare services will be scaled back. The GOP actually drove old people to town hall meetings to protest ObamaCare.
Here is what seniors don't understand: the GOP is not merely going to cut some of their end-of-life procedures, they are getting rid of Medicare and Social Security altogether.
The GOP is literally leading these blind sheep to slaughter. People have no idea what the next phase of the Republican Revolution involves. This country is going to be a much different place in ten years.
Just the GOP? Why is alwayes just the Republicans who alwayes want to get rid of medicare? When in facts obama wants it done.