Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
actually no, when glass is hit by small objects at high speed the "pitting" occurs at the point of impact it's basically the same a meteor strike.even stranger since the glass was bullet proof.
i dont know if that is the car or not
however it looks as if the hole is cone shaped
with the smallest hole toward the interior and the larger hole to the exterior
if so the bullet traveled from rear to front through the glass
all of what hand job say is a mish mash of crap he read in books which he could only understand the monosyllabic words and even crapper videos.actually no, when glass is hit by small objects at high speed the "pitting" occurs at the point of impact it's basically the same a meteor strike.i dont know if that is the car or not
however it looks as if the hole is cone shaped
with the smallest hole toward the interior and the larger hole to the exterior
if so the bullet traveled from rear to front through the glass
where do you get that idea it is as a bullet travels through glass
the point of impact has the small hole and the larger end of the "cone" is the
exit as it is with any other object a bullet passes through
Oh, the bullet made a U-turn? Obviously? REALLY?? Now we are talking about a REAL magic bullet...
Only if you assume the bullet was fired from the front (such as from the grassy knoll) and then made a U-turn to enter from the rear... which is quite possible if it was done by shape shifting reptilian aliens from the Constellation Draco using boomerang bullets.
The ability to maintain secrecy for a conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of participants in the conspiracy multiplied by time it is maintained secret. ----> Legaleagle's theory of conspiracy dynamics.
How much reading and research have you done on the JFK assassination legaleagle?
What do your dynamics model tell you when the highest levels of government decide 3 days after the assassination of the leader of that government what the official story will be? When the succeeding leader and the head of that government's official investigating bureau have the power to create a blue ribbon panel to head off other branches of government from launching hearings and investigations, creates that this panel does no investigations, instead provides all the evidence and witnesses for that blue ribbon panels final results...WHAT conclusion will this blue ribbon panel come to?
someone farted in here.
someone farted in here.
and now agent rat in the ass who has an obsession with me is here to fart as well.
this is a great thread for seeing who on this site is gullible and prone to believing most anything
thank you
seriously, thank you
shouldn't you be scaring people at the bus stop?Only if you assume the bullet was fired from the front (such as from the grassy knoll) and then made a U-turn to enter from the rear... which is quite possible if it was done by shape shifting reptilian aliens from the Constellation Draco using boomerang bullets.
The ability to maintain secrecy for a conspiracy is inversely proportional to the number of participants in the conspiracy multiplied by time it is maintained secret. ----> Legaleagle's theory of conspiracy dynamics.
How much reading and research have you done on the JFK assassination legaleagle?
What do your dynamics model tell you when the highest levels of government decide 3 days after the assassination of the leader of that government what the official story will be? When the succeeding leader and the head of that government's official investigating bureau have the power to create a blue ribbon panel to head off other branches of government from launching hearings and investigations, creates that this panel does no investigations, instead provides all the evidence and witnesses for that blue ribbon panels final results...WHAT conclusion will this blue ribbon panel come to?
Obviously none at all.Obviously the ONLY research he has done is look at the textbooks from history classes from our corrupt school system.
actually no, when glass is hit by small objects at high speed the "pitting" occurs at the point of impact it's basically the same a meteor strike.i dont know if that is the car or not
however it looks as if the hole is cone shaped
with the smallest hole toward the interior and the larger hole to the exterior
if so the bullet traveled from rear to front through the glass
where do you get that idea it is as a bullet travels through glass
the point of impact has the small hole and the larger end of the "cone" is the
exit as it is with any other object a bullet passes through
actually no, when glass is hit by small objects at high speed the "pitting" occurs at the point of impact it's basically the same a meteor strike.
where do you get that idea it is as a bullet travels through glass
the point of impact has the small hole and the larger end of the "cone" is the
exit as it is with any other object a bullet passes through
Jon your wasting your time with Daws.He is a troll who is just here to waste your time.anytime he is confronted by facts and evidence he cant refute that oswald was innocent and there was a conspiracy,all he can do is make childish posts like this one,post #155 on page 11 knowing he is cornered and cant refute the facts.
He cant ever admit when he has been proven wrong and if you watch,he wont even watch the videos you show him and comment on the facts in the videos listed either.Just look at his posts throughout this whole thread.Take my advise,ignore the troll and dont read his posts.
to plan,prepare,and implement such an attack common sense says he did not act alone !!.............I suggest reading a book entitled Double Cross !!Just curious so I thought I'd throw out a historical opinion question. Anyone here think Oswald shot Kennedy, or did other "forces" take him out.
Double cross: the explosive, inside story of the mobster who controlled America - Sam Giancana, Chuck Giancana - Google Books
you really need to get over this childish obsession you have with me rat in the ass.
to plan,prepare,and implement such an attack common sense says he did not act alone !!.............I suggest reading a book entitled Double Cross !!Just curious so I thought I'd throw out a historical opinion question. Anyone here think Oswald shot Kennedy, or did other "forces" take him out.
Double cross: the explosive, inside story of the mobster who controlled America - Sam Giancana, Chuck Giancana - Google Books
funny that you mentioned this book because I just finished reading it a couple of weeks ago.yeah thats one of many really great JFK assassination books out there that everybody should read.
ah.. hand job. he's talking to you not me...ignorant and illiterate.actually no, when glass is hit by small objects at high speed the "pitting" occurs at the point of impact it's basically the same a meteor strike.
where do you get that idea it is as a bullet travels through glass
the point of impact has the small hole and the larger end of the "cone" is the
exit as it is with any other object a bullet passes through
Jon your wasting your time with Daws.He is a troll who is just here to waste your time.anytime he is confronted by facts and evidence he cant refute that oswald was innocent and there was a conspiracy,all he can do is make childish posts like this one,post #155 on page 11 knowing he is cornered and cant refute the facts.
He cant ever admit when he has been proven wrong and if you watch,he wont even watch the videos you show him and comment on the facts in the videos listed either.Just look at his posts throughout this whole thread.Take my advise,ignore the troll and dont read his posts.
in sixty three the tree didn't obscure the shot.Okay, you need to kill someone, they are driving down the road straight at you and you have a clear line of sight but you wait until they turn the corner and drive away from you and are obscured by a tree before you take the shot, why?
in sixty three the tree didn't obscure the shot.Okay, you need to kill someone, they are driving down the road straight at you and you have a clear line of sight but you wait until they turn the corner and drive away from you and are obscured by a tree before you take the shot, why?
have you ever been to the book depository museum?
[ame=http://youtu.be/a5IWK9sRYTs]Full Metal Jacket - Charles Whitman - Lee Harvey Oswald - YouTube[/ame]
never said the tree was not there:"in sixty three the tree didn't obscure the shot."in sixty three the tree didn't obscure the shot.Okay, you need to kill someone, they are driving down the road straight at you and you have a clear line of sight but you wait until they turn the corner and drive away from you and are obscured by a tree before you take the shot, why?
have you ever been to the book depository museum?
[ame=http://youtu.be/a5IWK9sRYTs]Full Metal Jacket - Charles Whitman - Lee Harvey Oswald - YouTube[/ame]
The tree was still there in 63, I've seen pictures. No I haven't been to the museum. Even if the tree didn't exist, which it did, why would you wait until he was driving away from you, and so far away before taking the shot? Why wouldn't you have taken the shot when he was driving towards you on the other side of the room? Straight at the school book depository. Straight at the room Oswald was supposedly in.
BTW, there was a cop who claimed to have rushed into the school book depository immediately after the shooting and found Oswald in the basement break room where he had been, according to witnesses all morning, waiting for a phone call. There were people on the stairs who didn't see him pass them and the elevator took too long, according to the cop, there was no way Oswald could have shot the president and gotten down to the basement where the cop saw him less than a minute after the shooting. This was revealed in the series "The Men Who Shot Kennedy" broadcast on the History channel.
