5stringJeff
Senior Member
- Thread starter
- #21
freeandfun1 said:I see "j" is at it again...
I think a little analysis of the article needs to take place.
It says that Vincent contacted Kemp, not that Kemp contacted Vincent. Now, is one automatically guilty because somebody "contacted" them? It does not say that Kemp did anything. Hell, it doesn't even IMPLY that he did. How do we know that Kemp didn't tell Vincent to go fuck himself? We don't.
I certainly didn't try to imply any guilt on the part of Kemp. I just thought it was interesting that he was involved in the first place.