Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don’t like

[Jarlaxle]

With any luck, the Georgia authorities will realize what a mental case you are and remove your children.

PS--My grandfather (6th Armored) was one of the first Americans into Buchenwald. Fuck you.

LOL at the ^ communist getting mad at someone using free speech...you are the perfect example of the worlds true liberal...you hate anyone who speaks their mind unless you approve of what they say. Lol.No "authorities" are gonna remove anyone...wouldn't want unneeded blood shed now would we...Oh and I never said prison camps didn't exist.

I'm not sure if you are projecting or just hallucinating. I'm about as far from a "communist" as possible.

 

[Preacher]

With any luck, the Georgia authorities will realize what a mental case you are and remove your children.

PS--My grandfather (6th Armored) was one of the first Americans into Buchenwald. Fuck you.

LOL at the ^ communist getting mad at someone using free speech...you are the perfect example of the worlds true liberal...you hate anyone who speaks their mind unless you approve of what they say. Lol.No "authorities" are gonna remove anyone...wouldn't want unneeded blood shed now would we...Oh and I never said prison camps didn't exist.

I'm not sure if you are projecting or just hallucinating. I'm about as far from a "communist" as possible.

Stop acting like one then. Anti free speech is something a communist loves...

 

[Jarlaxle]

Have you ever NOT been the stupidest person in the room?

 

[Two Thumbs]

leftist, gleefully harming children since Wilson

 

[HUGGY]

Are you guys under the impression that teachers are routinely showing their students porn?

It only takes one teacher backed by administrators to expose most of the kids.

Fine! Name the teacher and the school.

At Gilford HIgh in New Hampshire.

New Hampshire school defends sexually graphic novel Fox News

"She could feel his erection, hot against her stomach.”

It’s not exactly Nancy Drew but that’s the kind of sexually graphic content freshmen boys and girls are being exposed to at New Hampshire’s Gilford High School – without their parent’s knowledge.

"’Yeah,’ he groaned, and he pushed her thighs apart. And then suddenly Matt was inside her, pumping her so hard that she scooted backward on the carpet, burning the backs of her legs.”

Sexually GRAPHIC !!!! ????? Oh My!!! ??? In a high school? I'm shocked !!! SHOCKED I tell you ...

 

[HUGGY]

Are you guys under the impression that teachers are routinely showing their students porn?

It only takes one teacher backed by administrators to expose most of the kids.

Fine! Name the teacher and the school.

At Gilford HIgh in New Hampshire.

New Hampshire school defends sexually graphic novel Fox News

"She could feel his erection, hot against her stomach.”

It’s not exactly Nancy Drew but that’s the kind of sexually graphic content freshmen boys and girls are being exposed to at New Hampshire’s Gilford High School – without their parent’s knowledge.

"’Yeah,’ he groaned, and he pushed her thighs apart. And then suddenly Matt was inside her, pumping her so hard that she scooted backward on the carpet, burning the backs of her legs.”

That passage is a quote from a book written by Bill O'Rilley. I believe THAT book IS relevant to high school students in that it exposes the ugly truth of how depraved many Christian so-called conservatives are in real life.

 

[rdean]

I think we should just give Republicans a tax credit for teaching their children at home. It would free up school space for kids who really want to learn and give us a generation of homeless who will work for food. The cheapest labor possible.

Home schooled kids have a history of excellent test scores. Now how about the inner city youths under progtard's education? How do they compare?

Study Reveals Homeschool Students Score 37 Points Higher on Standardized Achievement Tests
A newly released study from the Home School Legal Defense Association shows that not only do homeschoolers incur expenses only 5 percent of what public schools spend on each student; they score nearly 40 points higher on standardized achievement tests.

“These results validate the dedication of thousands of homeschool parents who are giving their children the best education possible,” said Michael Smith, president of the advocacy organization.

The HSLDA said homeschooling in the United States already includes about 4 percent of the school-aged population and is growing at about 7 percent a year, now involving some two million children.

Homeschool Programs for Home Education Program Study Reveals Homeschool Students Score 37 Points Higher on Standardized Achievement Tests

Home School Legal Defense Association - good, I'm sure they are completely unbiased. Send your kids there.

home schooled children fall behind - Google Search

Hilarious seeing home schooled children described as "barely literate". No surprise there. Look who is teaching them.

 

[Esmeralda]

What is it with the right-wing hatred of teachers and education?

Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don t like - Salon.com

Kansas - it's like Nazi Germany. Seriously.

It depends on what is considered pornography. I k now places that don't allow books like Mice and Men because there is a lot of swearing in the book and the ranch hands go to whore houses on the weekend. It is a book that has been taught in our high schools for decades, now some people are saying it's porn. Ridiculous.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Jail time for going off the approved curriculum? That's nuts. There is no pornography being given to students by teachers.

Do you believe these quotes are not porn?

"She could feel his erection, hot against her stomach.”

"’Yeah,’ he groaned, and he pushed her thighs apart. And then suddenly Matt was inside her, pumping her so hard that she scooted backward on the carpet, burning the backs of her legs.”

“Semen, sticky and hot, pooled on the carpet beneath her.”

New Hampshire school defends sexually graphic novel Fox News

Some fun you are, where's the foreplay? You have to build to these things not just jump to the money-shot.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Are you guys under the impression that teachers are routinely showing their students porn?

It only takes one teacher backed by administrators to expose most of the kids.

Fine! Name the teacher and the school.

At Gilford HIgh in New Hampshire.

New Hampshire school defends sexually graphic novel Fox News

"She could feel his erection, hot against her stomach.”

It’s not exactly Nancy Drew but that’s the kind of sexually graphic content freshmen boys and girls are being exposed to at New Hampshire’s Gilford High School – without their parent’s knowledge.

"’Yeah,’ he groaned, and he pushed her thighs apart. And then suddenly Matt was inside her, pumping her so hard that she scooted backward on the carpet, burning the backs of her legs.”

Sexually GRAPHIC !!!! ????? Oh My!!! ??? In a high school? I'm shocked !!! SHOCKED I tell you ...

You realize that dialogue would not be allowed on any tv or cable program including Spice and Playboy channel. Sicko.

That is hardcore pornography.

I doubt very much if it is allowed on this forum, but the mods would have to make an exception, since it was given children at school. smh

 

[IlarMeilyr]

What is it with the right-wing hatred of teachers and education?

Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don t like - Salon.com

Kansas - it's like Nazi Germany. Seriously.

dude.

First of all, it's Salon you are quoting.

Secondly, the measure has passed only one house.

Thirdly, even if it does pass, I see no evidence that it will be prosecutors (alone) who determine which books are prosecutable.

Fourthly, even if a prosecutor is the one who makes such a call, the law itself would certainly be challenged on Constitutional grounds if anybody ever does get prosecuted under its provisions.

Fifth: would it be "okay dokey" in your closed-minded asinine little universe if a grade school teacher did assign a book of undisputed pornography to his or her grade school students?

Alarm-ism is a hallmark of your laughable lolberal "thinking."

 

[Dana7360]

This thread is proof that liberals have a serious morality deficit. They see nothing wrong with teachers showing children porn under the guise of "education". What's next, teachers exposing themselves? They would probably approve of that too.

If you had read the article you would see what caused this bill to be created.

If you think a poster that asks a question and then talks about the subject as part of their abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

I know all conservatives are the most laziest people in our nation so I'll do your work for you and the rest of the lazy conservatives on this thread.

Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don’t like - Salon.com

After introducing the bill earlier this month, Pilcher-Cook told the Topeka Capital-Journal that she did so in response to a poster displayed at a Shawnee Mission middle school in 2013. The poster posed the question, “How do people express their sexual feelings?” and listed such examples as oral sex, kissing, intercourse, and talking. Media outlets pounced on the controversy after some parents complained, and though the poster was part of a broader sex education curriculum that emphasized abstinence, the school suspended use of the material.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

This thread is proof that liberals have a serious morality deficit. They see nothing wrong with teachers showing children porn under the guise of "education". What's next, teachers exposing themselves? They would probably approve of that too.

If you had read the article you would see what caused this bill to be created.

If you think a poster that asks a question and then talks about the subject as part of their abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

I know all conservatives are the most laziest people in our nation so I'll do your work for you and the rest of the lazy conservatives on this thread.

Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don’t like - Salon.com

After introducing the bill earlier this month, Pilcher-Cook told the Topeka Capital-Journal that she did so in response to a poster displayed at a Shawnee Mission middle school in 2013. The poster posed the question, “How do people express their sexual feelings?” and listed such examples as oral sex, kissing, intercourse, and talking. Media outlets pounced on the controversy after some parents complained, and though the poster was part of a broader sex education curriculum that emphasized abstinence, the school suspended use of the material.

And assholes like you cannot grasp that maybe it is not the province of grade school teachers to be imparting "education" to our children about oral sex as a form of expressing sexual feelings.

I realize that you liberoids are far too brain damaged to get it, but the fact is: your asshole notions do not control for all parents.

 

[S.J.]

This thread is proof that liberals have a serious morality deficit. They see nothing wrong with teachers showing children porn under the guise of "education". What's next, teachers exposing themselves? They would probably approve of that too.

If you had read the article you would see what caused this bill to be created.

If you think a poster that asks a question and then talks about the subject as part of their abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

I know all conservatives are the most laziest people in our nation so I'll do your work for you and the rest of the lazy conservatives on this thread.

Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don’t like - Salon.com

After introducing the bill earlier this month, Pilcher-Cook told the Topeka Capital-Journal that she did so in response to a poster displayed at a Shawnee Mission middle school in 2013. The poster posed the question, “How do people express their sexual feelings?” and listed such examples as oral sex, kissing, intercourse, and talking. Media outlets pounced on the controversy after some parents complained, and though the poster was part of a broader sex education curriculum that emphasized abstinence, the school suspended use of the material.

Be careful, you'll hurt your back reaching to defend your liberal sickness.

 

[Dana7360]

This thread is proof that liberals have a serious morality deficit. They see nothing wrong with teachers showing children porn under the guise of "education". What's next, teachers exposing themselves? They would probably approve of that too.

If you had read the article you would see what caused this bill to be created.

If you think a poster that asks a question and then talks about the subject as part of their abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

I know all conservatives are the most laziest people in our nation so I'll do your work for you and the rest of the lazy conservatives on this thread.

Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don’t like - Salon.com

After introducing the bill earlier this month, Pilcher-Cook told the Topeka Capital-Journal that she did so in response to a poster displayed at a Shawnee Mission middle school in 2013. The poster posed the question, “How do people express their sexual feelings?” and listed such examples as oral sex, kissing, intercourse, and talking. Media outlets pounced on the controversy after some parents complained, and though the poster was part of a broader sex education curriculum that emphasized abstinence, the school suspended use of the material.

Be careful, you'll hurt your back reaching to defend your liberal sickness.

If you think a poster as part of abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

You can say I'm defending liberal sickness but that's a very ridiculous thing to say.

I'm defending free speech and thought. You want to ban free speech and thought. If someone was showing a porno movie I would object. If someone was giving kids the web addresses to porno sites I would object. If someone was handing out copies of playboy or other porno magazines I would object.

What I don't object to is a mature discussion in regard to sex education. A poster with words on it as part of an abstinence only course isn't pornography.

I'm not surprised you don't know the difference.

 

[S.J.]

This thread is proof that liberals have a serious morality deficit. They see nothing wrong with teachers showing children porn under the guise of "education". What's next, teachers exposing themselves? They would probably approve of that too.

If you had read the article you would see what caused this bill to be created.

If you think a poster that asks a question and then talks about the subject as part of their abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

I know all conservatives are the most laziest people in our nation so I'll do your work for you and the rest of the lazy conservatives on this thread.

Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don’t like - Salon.com

After introducing the bill earlier this month, Pilcher-Cook told the Topeka Capital-Journal that she did so in response to a poster displayed at a Shawnee Mission middle school in 2013. The poster posed the question, “How do people express their sexual feelings?” and listed such examples as oral sex, kissing, intercourse, and talking. Media outlets pounced on the controversy after some parents complained, and though the poster was part of a broader sex education curriculum that emphasized abstinence, the school suspended use of the material.

Be careful, you'll hurt your back reaching to defend your liberal sickness.

If you think a poster as part of abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

You can say I'm defending liberal sickness but that's a very ridiculous thing to say.

I'm defending free speech and thought. You want to ban free speech and thought. If someone was showing a porno movie I would object. If someone was giving kids the web addresses to porno sites I would object. If someone was handing out copies of playboy or other porno magazines I would object.

What I don't object to is a mature discussion in regard to sex education. A poster with words on it as part of an abstinence only course isn't pornography.

I'm not surprised you don't know the difference.

I'm not surprised you would see nothing wrong with indoctrinating children into discussions of oral and anal sex without the consent of their parents.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

This thread is proof that liberals have a serious morality deficit. They see nothing wrong with teachers showing children porn under the guise of "education". What's next, teachers exposing themselves? They would probably approve of that too.

If you had read the article you would see what caused this bill to be created.

If you think a poster that asks a question and then talks about the subject as part of their abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

I know all conservatives are the most laziest people in our nation so I'll do your work for you and the rest of the lazy conservatives on this thread.

Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don’t like - Salon.com

After introducing the bill earlier this month, Pilcher-Cook told the Topeka Capital-Journal that she did so in response to a poster displayed at a Shawnee Mission middle school in 2013. The poster posed the question, “How do people express their sexual feelings?” and listed such examples as oral sex, kissing, intercourse, and talking. Media outlets pounced on the controversy after some parents complained, and though the poster was part of a broader sex education curriculum that emphasized abstinence, the school suspended use of the material.

Be careful, you'll hurt your back reaching to defend your liberal sickness.

If you think a poster as part of abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

You can say I'm defending liberal sickness but that's a very ridiculous thing to say.

I'm defending free speech and thought. You want to ban free speech and thought. If someone was showing a porno movie I would object. If someone was giving kids the web addresses to porno sites I would object. If someone was handing out copies of playboy or other porno magazines I would object.

What I don't object to is a mature discussion in regard to sex education. A poster with words on it as part of an abstinence only course isn't pornography.

I'm not surprised you don't know the difference.

I'm not surprised you would see nothing wrong with indoctrinating children into discussions of oral and anal sex without the consent of their parents.

Well since they don't ask mommy or daddy for permission before doing that I've heard worse ideas eh? Kids have sex lives, they aren't carrots or angels, now you know.

 

[S.J.]

This thread is proof that liberals have a serious morality deficit. They see nothing wrong with teachers showing children porn under the guise of "education". What's next, teachers exposing themselves? They would probably approve of that too.

If you had read the article you would see what caused this bill to be created.

If you think a poster that asks a question and then talks about the subject as part of their abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

I know all conservatives are the most laziest people in our nation so I'll do your work for you and the rest of the lazy conservatives on this thread.

Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don’t like - Salon.com

After introducing the bill earlier this month, Pilcher-Cook told the Topeka Capital-Journal that she did so in response to a poster displayed at a Shawnee Mission middle school in 2013. The poster posed the question, “How do people express their sexual feelings?” and listed such examples as oral sex, kissing, intercourse, and talking. Media outlets pounced on the controversy after some parents complained, and though the poster was part of a broader sex education curriculum that emphasized abstinence, the school suspended use of the material.

Be careful, you'll hurt your back reaching to defend your liberal sickness.

If you think a poster as part of abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

You can say I'm defending liberal sickness but that's a very ridiculous thing to say.

I'm defending free speech and thought. You want to ban free speech and thought. If someone was showing a porno movie I would object. If someone was giving kids the web addresses to porno sites I would object. If someone was handing out copies of playboy or other porno magazines I would object.

What I don't object to is a mature discussion in regard to sex education. A poster with words on it as part of an abstinence only course isn't pornography.

I'm not surprised you don't know the difference.

I'm not surprised you would see nothing wrong with indoctrinating children into discussions of oral and anal sex without the consent of their parents.

Well since they don't ask mommy or daddy for permission before doing that I've heard worse ideas eh? Kids have sex lives, they aren't carrots or angels, now you know.

It's not your place to educate (indoctrinate) them. Keep your perverted notions about sex to yourself.

 

[Jarlaxle]

What is it with the right-wing hatred of teachers and education?

Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don t like - Salon.com

Kansas - it's like Nazi Germany. Seriously.

dude.

First of all, it's Salon you are quoting.

Secondly, the measure has passed only one house.

I believe Kansas has a unicameral legislature...there is only one house

Edit: never mind, that is Nebraska.

 

[HUGGY]

This thread is proof that liberals have a serious morality deficit. They see nothing wrong with teachers showing children porn under the guise of "education". What's next, teachers exposing themselves? They would probably approve of that too.

If you had read the article you would see what caused this bill to be created.

If you think a poster that asks a question and then talks about the subject as part of their abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

I know all conservatives are the most laziest people in our nation so I'll do your work for you and the rest of the lazy conservatives on this thread.

Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don’t like - Salon.com

After introducing the bill earlier this month, Pilcher-Cook told the Topeka Capital-Journal that she did so in response to a poster displayed at a Shawnee Mission middle school in 2013. The poster posed the question, “How do people express their sexual feelings?” and listed such examples as oral sex, kissing, intercourse, and talking. Media outlets pounced on the controversy after some parents complained, and though the poster was part of a broader sex education curriculum that emphasized abstinence, the school suspended use of the material.

Be careful, you'll hurt your back reaching to defend your liberal sickness.

If you think a poster as part of abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

You can say I'm defending liberal sickness but that's a very ridiculous thing to say.

I'm defending free speech and thought. You want to ban free speech and thought. If someone was showing a porno movie I would object. If someone was giving kids the web addresses to porno sites I would object. If someone was handing out copies of playboy or other porno magazines I would object.

What I don't object to is a mature discussion in regard to sex education. A poster with words on it as part of an abstinence only course isn't pornography.

I'm not surprised you don't know the difference.

I'm not surprised you would see nothing wrong with indoctrinating children into discussions of oral and anal sex without the consent of their parents.

I'm sure the Christian Fascists would find a discussion of oral and anal sex with their children fascinating. I haven't been pre puberty for a very very long time but do clearly recall two neighbor girls, a local farm girl and a fully mature mother of one of my brothers friends propositioning me before I was thirteen. This was way before they even allowed married couples to be seen sleeping in the same bed on the TV.

Why do these so called conservatives need so desperately to be involved in other peoples, teens and younger's sexual development? Why are so many christians perverts? Is that what the elected christians believe? Do they really think they got elected to decide what other people are allowed to read?

Do you want to know what it looks like from a distance? It looks like many christians are way too interested in the sexual ideas that teens have. What is VERY strange is that these so called morality police don't think what they are doing is perverted. It is perverted. Teens are going to think about sex. You asshats can't change that. Not everyone cares to get involved in teenage sexual fantasies like Pat O'Reilly. Most well adjusted adult people find this quest YOU people are on to be disgusting and perverted.

I don't care if little Bobby or little Samatha think about oral or anal sex. It is REALLY none of mine nor YOUR business. When you make it your business you are going WAY over the line.

You people are creepy on a 1-10 scale around a 20.